scholarly journals Successes and Failures of Family Business in Slovakia

2020 ◽  
Vol 83 ◽  
pp. 01068
Author(s):  
Alena Tóthová ◽  
Miroslav Tóth

Family businesses are part of the world's economies, with an estimated 70-90% share of total performance. The history of family business in Slovakia is not continuous, so we can examine its level from the last 30 years of experience at most. The paper is focused on research of financial results of Slovak family enterprises, their confrontation with other types of enterprises, searching for trends in the level of their financial indicators and finally on the dependence between results and environment. In the research were used several methods, from which we can name mainly analysis, synthesis, comparison, mathematical-statistical methods. The obtained outputs are intended to identify strengths and weaknesses of family business in Slovakia.

2016 ◽  
Vol 37 (1) ◽  
pp. 3-10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Braun ◽  
Scott Latham ◽  
Emily Porschitz

Purpose – This paper aims to introduce a supplementary strategic mapping tool designed specifically for family businesses. The authors extend the popular tool of strategy maps into the family business arena to address potential misalignments arising from the family imprint on a business. The resulting family enterprise strategy map (FESM) aims, both literally and figuratively, to get internal stakeholders on the same page in their pursuit of family business objectives. Using the FESM, family managers can enhance strategy design and implementation, thereby increasing the viability and longevity of their enterprises for future generations. Design/methodology/approach – The framework draws from previous work on strategic maps, from scholarly research on family businesses and from the authors’ experiences consulting with family enterprises. The framework addresses four distinct but interrelated perspectives requiring managerial attention: family business objectives, family alignment, family systems and family business foundation. The case of Mondavi Winery is used to illustrate the prescriptive value of the FESM. Findings – The FESM is meant to be used cooperatively among internal stakeholders to tease out potential challenges that can hinder the effective design and implementation of a family business strategy. The FESM makes explicit the primary objectives of the family business, prompts stakeholders to voice professional and personal ambitions in the business and brings individual risk propensities to the dialogue. Systems and activities necessary for successful strategy implementation are also underlined in the FESM. Lastly, the framework helps to identify the strategic foundation that can be leveraged to achieve the family enterprise’s objective. Originality/value – The value of the FESM is threefold. First, having family members and non-family managers engage in this activity can make known individual, family and non-family functions, desires and goals. In doing so, the FESM also effectively highlights misalignments among and between various internal stakeholders that may otherwise go unnoticed. Second, the FESM draws management’s attention to specific family-related resources and capabilities within the company and, just as importantly, those that need to be cultivated to achieve strategic objectives. Third, the FESM can serve as a valuable reminder during those times when family systems begin to malfunction or to diverge from intended objectives.


Author(s):  
Derya Çevik Taşdemir ◽  
Filiz Çayırağası ◽  
Gülsüm Günbala Güven

An important part of the businesses in the world and in Turkey is a family business. In this context, the economy is largely dominated by family businesses. Literature studies showed that nepotic approaches are more common in family businesses than in other businesses. Nepotism, the problems that the family business has caused; non-institutionalization, increase in labor turnover rate, decrease in organizational commitment, decrease in productivity. It is directly related to the solution of nepotism problems in the family business, the increase of the market share, and the extension of the life span. This article is about nepotism and family businesses; success in family business, failure, strategy, etc. aims at conceptual evaluation of the effect in a holistic approach from the angles and within the frame of institutionalization.


2003 ◽  
Vol 16 (3) ◽  
pp. 221-223 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul I. Karofsky

Dr. William O’Hara, the executive director of Bryant College’s Institute for Family Enterprise (IFE), answers questions dealing with many aspects of his life. By founding the IFE and continually adapting it to the condition of the marketplace, O’Hara maintains a commitment to expanding the knowledge of the family business community. O’Hara’s new research into the history of family businesses hints at an underlying framework that is still applicable today. He spoke with Paul I. Karofsky, executive director of Northeastern University’s Center for Family Business.


Author(s):  
John L. Ward ◽  
Susan R. Schwendener ◽  
Scott T. Whitaker

Steven Rogers had always thought that someday he would like to own a business with one or both of his daughters. As his eldest daughter, Akilah, finished her final semester at Harvard Business School, she told Rogers that she would like to create with him a Chicago-based real estate venture that included buying, rehabbing and renting homes in the Englewood and South Shore neighborhoods of Chicago. Rogers quickly realized that his biggest challenge was how to equitably structure the ownership of the business. He gathered advice from family business experts and slowly began to build a plan that would benefit each member of his family. Meanwhile, Akilah assumed responsibilities associated with the business as she finished her final semester at HBS. The case ends with Rogers Family Enterprises owning its first three houses.1. Students learn how to construct an equitable business ownership plan for a family business. 2. Students learn the agreements that family businesses should have in place. 3. Students learn why successful entrepreneurs tend to be those who control the growth of their company while envisioning an empire.


2021 ◽  
Vol 71 (4) ◽  
pp. 140-150
Author(s):  
Yu. Solonenko

One of the traditional methods of the investigation of family business, as the most common and sustainable form of management in the world, is its comparison with the activities of non-family businesses. This approach makes it possible` to introduce into the analysis a fairly large list of indicators, which in turn increases the understanding of the functioning of both family and non-family companies. In this paper the investigation of family enterprises is carried out on the basis of developments of leading foreign scientists and the table is formed. Thus, the invesstigation demonstrates significant differences between family and non-family business, which are reflected in the general indicators, structural organization, forms of ownership, management, theoretical justification of doing business, business goals, available resources of the firm. Differences in both interior and exterior of the operation of these business facilities are defined. In general, the family business is socially oriented, aimed at stable moderate growth, resilient in times of crisis, adaptive, risk-averse, aimed at the long-term perspective of existence in order to pass it on to the next family generation. Analyzing the social systems of economically successful countries, such as the United States, Japan, the European Union, the Persian Gulf and East Asia, we find that the main form of ownership belongs to the family business. More detailed analysis of the economic systems of these countries reveals the formation of the balance between the ownership structure and the power structure. The ownership structure is characterized by large percentage of independent private owners, where the family form of ownership is widely represented in the leading sectors of the economy, and the family business itself is the dominant form of entrepreneurship. It is the family business that configures the property system within a single country, forming powerful social stratum of independent owners who control the main resources of the state. The presence of this layer results in the evolution of power democracy, where state institutions do not have declarative powers, but operate in real formal democracy. The level of real democracy (democracy) in the country is determined not by freedom-loving articles of the Constitution, but by the number of independent owners in the state. Family businesses and independent family owners are closely linked to local communities, are an integral part of them, providing jobs and employment in the regions, which is the basis for economic prosperity of local communities and the country as a whole.


2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (14) ◽  
pp. 5540
Author(s):  
Marie Mikušová ◽  
Václav Friedrich ◽  
Petra Horváthová

The aim of this research was to find out whether family businesses create better opportunities for their economic sustainability in comparison with non-family businesses. That is, whether family businesses are more responsible in preparing for crises than non-family businesses. Having a sustainable business means being prepared for potential threats of all kinds. Research was carried out in 2019 on a sample of 2300 family and non-family enterprises. On the basis of statistically processed results, a minimum of significant differences in preparation for the crisis was identified. Even the basic hypothesis about a more responsible approach by family businesses to prepare for the crisis could not be accepted. It could not be noted that family businesses are building better conditions for their economic sustainability. The implication for praxis is to encourage owners to involve the family more in the preparation for crises, including development of formalised tools. Predetermined tools will help in solving crises that threaten the source of livelihoods of the whole family. The comparison of family and non-family businesses in this area, as yet unexplored, has the potential to contribute to the deepening of research in both crisis management and family business, which is the main contribution to the theoretical field.


2021 ◽  

This volume documents the 7th annual conference of the Notarial Center for Family Enterprises of Bucerius Law School on October 26, 2018, which focused on legal issues of family businesses and the entrepreneur’s family: the entrepreneur’s lasting power of attorney Children’s involvement in family business international matrimonial property and family law EU matrimonial property regulations With contributions by Dr. Malte Ivo, Prof. Dr. Anne Röthel, Prof. Dr. Dr. h.c. mult. Karsten Schmidt, Dr. Johannes Weber, LL.M. (Cambridge) and Prof. Dr. Frauke Wedemann.


2020 ◽  
Vol 27 (6) ◽  
pp. 905-926
Author(s):  
Mengyun Wu ◽  
Martha Coleman ◽  
Abdul Rashid Abdul Rahaman ◽  
Bless Kofi Edziah

PurposeSuccession of family enterprises has been an issue of concern to a number of researchers, and extensive studies have been conducted on this. Transfer of family business from one generation to next has resulted in collapse of most family business in both developed and developing economies. This study looked at succession in family enterprise in Ghana using theory of planned behaviour (Ajzen, 1991) and cognitive dimension of social capital theory to know the intention of founder/incumbent to hand over the family business to an internal successor.Design/methodology/approachOur target population for this study is family businesses run in Ghana, Western region. Ghana is not having statistical database on family businesses; therefore, the study relied on the database of registered SMEs which was gotten from Registrar General's Department, Ghana. This is the government department that is in charge of registering business in Ghana. A sample of 596 was used and received a response rate of 60%. The study used structural equation model to find out how the variables correlate to discover the intention of the founder/successor on internal succession.FindingsIt was discovered that intention of founder/incumbent to hand over to an internal successor is predominantly determined by attitude, subjective norm, perceived behavioural control and cognitive dimension of the social capital. Trust does not influence the intention of founder/incumbent but attitude; this rejects the findings of most researchers.Research limitations/implicationsMost family enterprises were not registered, which made it difficult to reach out to all family businesses. This limited the authors approach to only the registered family enterprises.Practical implicationsFamily firms are the backbone of any economy, which comprise mostly of SMEs. Therefore, the understanding of succession by incumbents/founders as well as policymakers enhances firms' value and continuity.Originality/valueThe study was conducted in Africa, Ghana in particular, owing to the limited studies in this region.


Author(s):  
Máté Repisky ◽  
Éva Málovics ◽  
Gergely Farkas

Family business researchers widely investigated the loss or the threatened loss of socioemotional wealth. Another growing theme within entrepreneurship is the consequences of business failures affecting entrepreneurs. However, these two fields rarely overlapped. The aim of this study was to explore different challenging events’ effects on the family entrepreneurs and to identify the factors that can determine the successfulness of the coping strategies. In this study, we present three case studies about family enterprises, which went through a challenging period and balanced between failure and success. In two cases the main challenges rooted in familiness of the enterprises and in the third case the challenge came from external regulatory change. The two inner challenges were generated by the retirement of the founder and the divorce between the two owners. We could observe both successful and partially successful coping strategies, but the common point was that all of them were strongly rooted in the socio-emotional wealth of family businesses.


Author(s):  
Harold James

The history of Krupp is the history of modern Germany. No company symbolized the best and worst of that history more than the famous steel and arms maker. This book tells the story of the Krupp family and its industrial empire between the early nineteenth century and the present, and analyzes its transition from a family business to one owned by a nonprofit foundation. Krupp founded a small steel mill in 1811, which established the basis for one of the largest and most important companies in the world by the end of the century. Famously loyal to its highly paid workers, it rejected an exclusive focus on profit, but the company also played a central role in the armament of Nazi Germany and the firm's head was convicted as a war criminal at Nuremberg. Yet after the war Krupp managed to rebuild itself and become a symbol of Germany once again—this time open, economically successful, and socially responsible. This book presents a balanced account, showing that the owners felt ambivalent about the company's military connection even while becoming more and more entangled in Germany's aggressive politics during the imperial era and the Third Reich. By placing the story of Krupp and its owners in a wide context, this book also provides new insights into the political, social, and economic history of modern Germany.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document