Endoscopic Full-Thickness Resection of Polyps Involving the Appendiceal Orifice: A Multicenter International Experience

Endoscopy ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yervant Ichkhanian ◽  
Mohammed Barawi ◽  
Shyam J Thakkar ◽  
Talal Seoud ◽  
Truptesh H Kothari ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Success ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
En Bloc Resection ◽  
Prior History ◽  
R0 Resection ◽  
Full Thickness ◽  
Technical Success ◽  
En Bloc ◽  
Surgical Interventions ◽  
Neoplastic Lesions

Background and Aims: Endoscopic resection of lesions involving the appendiceal orifice (AO) remains a challenge. We aim to report the outcomes of full-thickness resection device (FTRD) for the resection of appendiceal lesions and identify factors associated with the occurrence of appendicitis. Methods: This is a retrospective study at 18 tertiary-care centers (12 U.S., Canada 1, 5 Europe) between 11/2016 and 8/2020. Consecutive patients who underwent resection of AO lesions using the FTRD were included. The primary outcome was the rate of R0 margin resection in neoplastic lesions, defined as negative lateral and deep margins on post-resection histologic evaluation. Secondary outcomes included the rates of; technical success (en bloc resection), clinical success (technical success without need for further surgical interventions), post-resection appendicitis, and polyp recurrence. Results: A total of 66 patients (mean age 64 yr., 29 F) underwent resection of colonic lesions (mean size 14.5 (6.2) mm) involving the AO, with 40 (61%) deep extending into the appendiceal lumen. Technical success was achieved in 59/66 (89%) cases, out of which, 56 were found to be neoplastic lesions on post-resection pathology. Clinical success was achieved in 53/66 (80%). R0 resection was achieved in 52/56 (93%) cases. Out of the 58 patients of whom EFTR was completed and had no prior history of appendectomy, appendicitis was reported in 10 (17%) cases, with 6 (60%) requiring surgical appendectomies. Follow-up colonoscopy was completed in 41 cases with evidence of recurrence in 5 (12.2%). Conclusions: FTRD is a promising non-surgical alternative for resecting appendiceal lesions but appendicitis occurs in 1 out of 6 cases.

scholarly journals Endoscopic full-thickness resection (eFTR) of colorectal lesions: results from the Dutch colorectal eFTR registry

Endoscopy ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 52 (11) ◽  
pp. 1014-1023 ◽  
Author(s):  
Liselotte W. Zwager ◽  
Barbara A. J. Bastiaansen ◽  
Maxime E. S. Bronzwaer ◽  
Bas W. van der Spek ◽  
G. Dimitri N. Heine ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
En Bloc Resection ◽  
Bloc Resection ◽  
Adverse Event Rate ◽  
Resection Margins ◽  
R0 Resection ◽  
Incomplete Resection ◽  
Full Thickness ◽  
Technical Success ◽  
En Bloc ◽  
Endoscopic Full Thickness Resection

Abstract Background Endoscopic full-thickness resection (eFTR) is a minimally invasive resection technique that allows definite diagnosis and treatment for complex colorectal lesions ≤ 30 mm unsuitable for conventional endoscopic resection. This study reports clinical outcomes from the Dutch colorectal eFTR registry. Methods Consecutive patients undergoing eFTR in 20 hospitals were prospectively included. The primary outcome was technical success, defined as macroscopic complete en bloc resection. Secondary outcomes were: clinical success, defined as tumor-free resection margins (R0 resection); full-thickness resection rate; and adverse events. Results Between July 2015 and October 2018, 367 procedures were included. Indications were difficult polyps (non-lifting sign and/or difficult location; n = 133), primary resection of suspected T1 colorectal cancer (CRC; n = 71), re-resection after incomplete resection of T1 CRC (n = 150), and subepithelial tumors (n = 13). Technical success was achieved in 308 procedures (83.9 %). In 21 procedures (5.7 %), eFTR was not performed because the lesion could not be reached or retracted into the cap. In the remaining 346 procedures, R0 resection was achieved in 285 (82.4 %) and full-thickness resection in 288 (83.2 %). The median diameter of resected specimens was 23 mm. Overall adverse event rate was 9.3 % (n = 34/367): 10 patients (2.7 %) required emergency surgery for five delayed and two immediate perforations and three cases of appendicitis. Conclusion eFTR is an effective and relatively safe en bloc resection technique for complex colorectal lesions with the potential to avoid surgery. Further studies assessing the role of eFTR in early CRC treatment with long-term outcomes are needed.

scholarly journals Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Visible Dysplasia Treatment in Ulcerative Colitis Patients: Cases Series and Systematic Review of Literature

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Raffaele Manta ◽  
Angelo Zullo ◽  
Donato Alessandro Telesca ◽  
Danilo Castellani ◽  
Ugo Germani ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Ulcerative Colitis ◽  
En Bloc Resection ◽  
Bloc Resection ◽  
R0 Resection ◽  
Resection Rate ◽  
En Bloc ◽  
Pooled Data ◽  
Non Invasive ◽  
Neoplastic Lesions

Abstract Background and Aims Ulcerative colitis [UC] patients are at an increased risk of developing colorectal cancer due to chronic inflammation. Endoscopic submucosal dissection [ESD] allows removal of non-invasive neoplastic lesions in the colon, but few data are available on its efficacy in UC patients. Methods Data from consecutive UC patients diagnosed with visible dysplastic lesions in the colon who underwent ESD were evaluated. The en bloc removal, R0 resection and complication rates were calculated. Local recurrence and metachronous lesions during follow-up were identified. A systematic review of the literature with pooled data analysis was performed. Results A total of 53 UC patients [age: 65 years; range 30–74; M/F: 31/22] underwent ESD. The en bloc resection rate was 100%, and the R0 resection rate was 96.2%. Bleeding occurred in seven [13.2%] patients, and perforation in three [5.6%] cases, all treated at endoscopy. No recurrence was observed, but two metachronous lesions were detected. Data from six other studies [three Asian and three European] were available. By pooling data, en bloc resection was successful in 88.4% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 83.5–92) of 216 lesions and in 91.8% [95% CI = 87.3–94.8] of 208 patients. R0 resection was achieved in 169 ESDs, equivalent to a 78.2% [95% CI = 72.3–83.2] rate for lesions and 81.3% [95% CI = 75.4–86] rate for patients. No difference between European and Asian series was noted. Conclusions This pooled data analysis indicated that ESD is a suitable tool for safely and properly removing non-invasive neoplastic lesions on colonic mucosa of selected UC patients.

scholarly journals Endoscopic full-thickness resection of polyps involving the appendiceal orifice: a prospective observational case study

2018 ◽  
Vol 06 (09) ◽  
pp. E1112-E1119 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maxime E.S. Bronzwaer ◽  
Barbara A.J. Bastiaansen ◽  
Lianne Koens ◽  
Evelien Dekker ◽  
Paul Fockens
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Polyps ◽  
Exclusion Criterion ◽  
R0 Resection ◽  
Full Thickness ◽  
Technical Success ◽  
En Bloc ◽  
Invasive Approach ◽  
Tertiary Referral Center ◽  
Endoscopic Full Thickness Resection

Abstract Background and study aims Colorectal polyps involving the appendiceal orifice (AO) are difficult to resect with conventional polypectomy techniques and therefore often require surgical intervention. These appendiceal polyps could potentially be removed with endoscopic full-thickness resection (eFTR) performed with a full-thickness resection device (FTRD). The aim of this prospective observational case study was to evaluate feasibility, technical success and safety of eFTR procedures involving the AO. Patients and methods This study was performed between November 2016 and December 2017 in a tertiary referral center by two experienced endoscopists. All patients referred for eFTR with a polyp involving the AO that could not be resected by EMR due to more than 50 % circumferential involvement of the AO or deep extension into the AO were included. The only exclusion criterion was lesion diameter > 20 mm. Results Seven patients underwent eFTR for a polyp involving the AO. All target lesions could be reached with the FTRD and retracted into the device. Technical success with an endoscopic radical en-bloc and full-thickness resection was achieved in all cases. Histopathological R0 resection was achieved in 85.7 % of patients (6/7). One patient who previously underwent an appendectomy developed a small abscess adjacent to the resection site, which was treated conservatively. Another patient developed secondary appendicitis followed by a laparoscopic appendectomy. Conclusion This small exploratory study suggests that eFTR of appendiceal polyps is feasible and can offer a minimally invasive approach for radical resection of these lesions. However, more safety and long-term follow-up data are needed to evaluate this evolving technique.

scholarly journals Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection of Gastric Neoplastic Lesions: An Italian, Multicenter Study

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 737
Author(s):  
Raffaele Manta ◽  
Giuseppe Galloro ◽  
Francesco Pugliese ◽  
Stefano Angeletti ◽  
Angelo Caruso ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection ◽  
En Bloc Resection ◽  
Bloc Resection ◽  
R0 Resection ◽  
Gastric Lesions ◽  
En Bloc ◽  
Submucosal Dissection ◽  
Neoplastic Lesions ◽  
One Year

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) allows removing neoplastic lesions on gastric mucosa, including early gastric cancer (EGC) and dysplasia. Data on ESD from Western countries are still scanty. We report results of ESD procedures performed in Italy. Data of consecutive patients who underwent ESD for gastric neoplastic removal were analyzed. The en bloc resection rate and the R0 resection rates for all neoplastic lesions were calculated, as well as the curative rate (i.e., no need for surgical treatment) for EGC. The incidence of complications, the one-month mortality, and the recurrence rate at one-year follow-up were computed. A total of 296 patients with 299 gastric lesions (80 EGC) were treated. The en bloc resection was successful for 292 (97.6%) and the R0 was achieved in 266 (89%) out of all lesions. In the EGC group, the ESD was eventually curative in 72.5% (58/80) following procedure. A complication occurred in 30 (10.1%) patients. Endoscopic treatment was successful in all 3 perforations, whereas it failed in 2 out of 27 bleeding patients who were treated with radiological embolization (1 case) or surgery (1 case). No procedure-related deaths at one-month follow-up were observed. Lesion recurrence occurred in 16 (6.2%) patients (6 EGC and 10 dysplasia). In conclusion, the rate of both en bloc and R0 gastric lesions removal was very high in Italy. However, the curative rate for EGC needs to be improved. Complications were acceptably low and amenable at endoscopy.

scholarly journals Endoscopic full-thickness resection versus endoscopic submucosal dissection in the treatment of colonic neoplastic lesions ≤ 30 mm—a single-center experience

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Přemysl Falt ◽  
Jana Zapletalová ◽  
Ondřej Urban
Keyword(s):  
Success Rate ◽  
Curative Resection ◽  
R0 Resection ◽  
Full Thickness ◽  
Procedure Time ◽  
Technical Success ◽  
Resection Rate ◽  
Technical Success Rate ◽  
Neoplastic Lesions ◽  
Endoscopic Full Thickness Resection

AbstractEndoscopic full-thickness resection (FTR) is a novel technique of endoscopic treatment of colorectal neoplastic lesions not suitable for endoscopic polypectomy or mucosal resection. FTR appears to be a reasonable alternative to technically demanding endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for lesions ≤ 30 mm. However, comparison between FTR and ESD has not been published yet and their mutual positioning in the treatment algorithm is still unclear. The purpose of the analysis was to evaluate efficacy and safety of FTR in the treatment of colorectal lesions ≤ 30 mm by comparing prospectively followed FTR cohort to retrospective ESD cohort in the setting of single tertiary endoscopy center. Primary outcomes were technical success rate, R0 resection and curative resection rate, and complication rate. A total of 52 patients in FTR and 50 patients in ESD group were treated between 2015 and 2018. Technical success rate was significantly higher in FTR group (92 vs. 74%, P = 0.01) as well as R0 resection rate (85 vs. 62%, P = 0.01) and curative resection rate (75 vs. 56%, P = 0.01). Complications occurred more frequently in ESD group (40 vs. 13%, P = 0.002), mainly due to high incidence of electrocoagulation syndrome (24 vs. 0%). Total procedure time was substantially shorter in FTR group (26.4 ± 11.0 min vs. estimated 90–240 min). Local residual neoplastic lesions were detected numerically more often in FTR group (12 vs. 5%, P = 0.12). No patient died during follow-up. Compared to ESD, FTR proved significantly higher technical success rate, higher R0 and curative resection rate, and shorter procedure time. In the FTR group, there were significantly less complications but higher incidence of local residual neoplasia. Further research including randomized trials is needed to compare both resection techniques.

scholarly journals Acceptability of endoscopic submucosal dissection for sessile serrated lesions: comparison with non-sessile serrated lesions

2020 ◽  
Vol 08 (12) ◽  
pp. E1832-E1839
Author(s):  
Yuichiro Kuroki ◽  
Toshiyuki Endo ◽  
Kenta Iwahashi ◽  
Naoki Miyao ◽  
Reika Suzuki ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection ◽  
Postoperative Bleeding ◽  
En Bloc Resection ◽  
Tumor Location ◽  
Proximal Colon ◽  
R0 Resection ◽  
Resection Rate ◽  
En Bloc ◽  
Submucosal Dissection ◽  
Serrated Lesions

Abstract Background and study aims Sessile serrated lesions (SSL) are major precursor lesions of serrated pathway cancers, and appropriate treatment may prevent interval colorectal cancer. Studies have reported the outcomes of endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) for SSL; however, there are insufficient reports on endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). We examined the characteristics and outcomes of SSL and compared them to those of non-SSL in ESD. Patients and methods We reviewed 370 consecutive cases in 322 patients who underwent colorectal ESD between January 2016 and March 2020 at our hospital. There were 267 0-IIa lesions that were stratified into 41 SSL and 226 non-SSL (intramucosal cancer, adenoma) cases. We used propensity matching to adjust for the variances in the factors affecting treatment between the SSL and non-SSL groups. Results In the baseline cases, young women and proximal colon tumor location were significantly more common in the SSL group. There were no statistically significant differences between the SSL and non-SSL groups in terms of en bloc resection rate (97.6 % vs. 99.6 %; P = 0.28), R0 resection rate (92.7 % vs. 93.4 %; P = 0.74), perforation (0 % vs. 0.9 %; P > 0.99), and postoperative bleeding (2.4 % vs. 1.8 %; P = 0.56). Thirty-eight pairs were matched using propensity score, and the median dissection speed (12 vs. 7.7 cm2/h; P = 0.0095) was significantly faster in the SSL than in the non-SSL group. Conclusions ESD for SSL was safely performed, and SSL was smoother to remove than non-SSL. ESD might be an acceptable endoscopic treatment option for SSL.

scholarly journals Endoscopic management of ampullary tumors: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline

Endoscopy ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Geoffroy Vanbiervliet ◽  
Marin Strijker ◽  
Marianna Arvanitakis ◽  
Arthur Aelvoet ◽  
Urban Arnelo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Success ◽  
Endoscopic Management ◽  
R0 Resection ◽  
En Bloc ◽  
Strong Recommendation ◽  
Moderate Quality ◽  
Endoscopic Papillectomy ◽  
Pancreatic Duct Stenting ◽  
Ampullary Tumors ◽  
Quality Evidence

Main Recommendations 1 ESGE recommends against diagnostic/therapeutic papillectomy when adenoma is not proven.Strong recommendation, low quality evidence. 2 ESGE recommends endoscopic ultrasound and abdominal magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) for staging of ampullary tumors.Strong recommendation, low quality evidence. 3 ESGE recommends endoscopic papillectomy in patients with ampullary adenoma without intraductal extension, because of good results regarding outcome (technical and clinical success, morbidity, and recurrence).Strong recommendation, moderate quality evidence. 4 ESGE recommends en bloc resection of ampullary adenomas up to 20–30 mm in diameter to achieve R0 resection, for optimizing the complete resection rate, providing optimal histopathology, and reduction of the recurrence rate after endoscopic papillectomy.Strong recommendation, low quality evidence. 5 ESGE suggests considering surgical treatment of ampullary adenomas when endoscopic resection is not feasible for technical reasons (e. g. diverticulum, size > 4 cm), and in the case of intraductal involvement (of > 20 mm). Surveillance thereafter is still mandatory.Weak recommendation, low quality evidence. 6 ESGE recommends direct snare resection without submucosal injection for endoscopic papillectomy.Strong recommendation, moderate quality evidence. 7 ESGE recommends prophylactic pancreatic duct stenting to reduce the risk of pancreatitis after endoscopic papillectomy.Strong recommendation, moderate quality evidence. 8 ESGE recommends long-term monitoring of patients after endoscopic papillectomy or surgical ampullectomy, based on duodenoscopy with biopsies of the scar and of any abnormal area, within the first 3 months, at 6 and 12 months, and thereafter yearly for at least 5 years.Strong recommendation, low quality evidence.

scholarly journals Colorectal Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection in a Western Center: Analysis of Outcomes and Safety Profile

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-9
Author(s):  
João Santos-Antunes ◽  
Margarida Marques ◽  
Rui Morais ◽  
Fátima Carneiro ◽  
Guilherme Macedo
Keyword(s):  
Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection ◽  
Safety Profile ◽  
En Bloc Resection ◽  
R0 Resection ◽  
Hybrid Technique ◽  
Resection Rate ◽  
En Bloc ◽  
Delayed Bleeding ◽  
Submucosal Dissection ◽  
Gastrointestinal Lesions

<b><i>Introduction:</i></b> Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is a well-established endoscopic technique for the treatment of gastrointestinal lesions. Colorectal ESD outcomes are less reported in the Western literature, and Portuguese data are still very scarce. Our aim was to describe our experience on colorectal ESD regarding its outcomes and safety profile. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> We conducted a retrospective evaluation of recorded data on ESDs performed between 2015 and 2020. Only ESDs performed on epithelial neoplastic lesions were selected for further analysis. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Of a total of 167 colorectal ESDs, 153 were included. Technical success was achieved in 147 procedures (96%). The lesions were located in the colon (<i>n</i> = 24) and rectum (<i>n</i> = 123). The en bloc resection rate was 92% and 97%, the R0 resection rate was 83% and 82%, and the curative resection rate was 79% and 78% for the colon and the rectum, respectively. The need for a hybrid technique was the only risk factor for piecemeal or R1 resection. We report a perforation rate of 3.4% and a 4.1% rate of delayed bleeding; all the adverse events were manageable endoscopically, without the need of blood transfusions or surgery. Most of the lesions were laterally spreading tumours of the granular mixed type (70%), and 20% of the lesions were malignant (12% submucosal and 8% intramucosal cancer). <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> Our series on colorectal ESD reports a very good efficacy and safety profile. This technique can be applied by endoscopists experienced in ESD.

scholarly journals Endoscopic submucosal dissection of 301 large colorectal neoplasias: outcome and learning curve from a specialized center in Europe

2018 ◽  
Vol 06 (11) ◽  
pp. E1340-E1348 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carl-Fredrik Rönnow ◽  
Noriya Uedo ◽  
Ervin Toth ◽  
Henrik Thorlacius
Keyword(s):  
Learning Curve ◽  
Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection ◽  
Colorectal Neoplasia ◽  
En Bloc Resection ◽  
Bloc Resection ◽  
High Rate ◽  
R0 Resection ◽  
En Bloc ◽  
Submucosal Dissection ◽  
Immediate Bleeding

Abstract Background and study aims Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) allows en bloc resection of large colorectal lesions but ESD experience is limited outside Asia. This study evaluated implementation of ESD in the treatment of colorectal neoplasia in a Western center. Patients and methods Three hundred and one cases of colorectal ESD (173 rectal and 128 colonic lesions) were retrospectively evaluated in terms of outcome, learning curve and complications. Results Median size was 4 cm (range 1 – 12.5). En bloc resection was achieved in 241 cases amounting to an en bloc resection rate of 80 %. R0 resection was accomplished in 207 cases (69 %), RX and R1 were attained in 83 (27 %) and 11 (4 %) cases, respectively. Median time was 98 min (range 10 – 588) and median proficiency was 7.2 cm2/h. Complications occurred in 24 patients (8 %) divided into 12 immediate perforations, five delayed perforations, one immediate bleeding and six delayed bleedings. Six patients (2 %), all with proximal lesions, had emergency surgery. Two hundred and four patients were followed up endoscopically and median follow-up time was 13 months (range 3 – 53) revealing seven recurrences (3 %). En bloc rate improved gradually from 60 % during the first period to 98 % during the last period. ESD proficiency significantly improved between the first study period (3.6 cm2/h) and the last study period (10.8 cm2/h). Conclusions This study represents the largest material on colorectal ESD in the west and shows that colorectal ESD can be implemented in clinical routine in western countries after appropriate training and achieve a high rate of en bloc and R0 resection with a concomitant low incidence of complications. ESD of proximal colonic lesions should be attempted with caution during the learning curve because of higher risk of complications.

scholarly journals High proficiency of colonic endoscopic submucosal dissection in Europe thanks to countertraction strategy using a double clip and rubber band

2019 ◽  
Vol 07 (09) ◽  
pp. E1166-E1174 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jérémie Jacques ◽  
Aurélie Charissoux ◽  
Pierre Bordillon ◽  
Romain Legros ◽  
Jérôme Rivory ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Case Series ◽  
Rubber Band ◽  
En Bloc Resection ◽  
Bloc Resection ◽  
Point Of View ◽  
University Hospital ◽  
Control Group ◽  
R0 Resection ◽  
Resection Rate ◽  
En Bloc

Abstract Background and study aims ESD in the colon is more challenging technically than in other locations. Here, we report the first comparative case series of colon ESD using a systematic countertraction strategy using two clips and a rubber band. Patients and methods Retrospective comparative study of classic versus countertraction colon ESD performed in colon ESD cases collected prospectively at Lyon Edouard Herriot Hospital and Limoges University Hospital from January 2016 until December 2017. Results The study included 192 cases (control = 76, countertraction = 116). Countertraction using the double clip and rubber band technique versus the control group resulted in a significant decrease in the procedure time (94.7 vs. 117 min; P = 0.004) and significant increases in procedure speed (28.2 vs. 16.7 mm2/min; P < 0.0001), en bloc resection rate (95.7 % vs. 76.3 %, P < 0.0001), and R0 resection rate (78.5 % vs. 64.5 %, P = 0.04).At an individual operator point of view, results varied between operators but the double clip countertraction strategy significantly increased the en bloc resection rate, R0 resection rate, and speed of dissection for each of the 4 operators. Conclusion Systematic countertraction using a double clip and rubber band facilitates colon ESD. This strategy should become the standard for colon ESD.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document