scholarly journals Endoscopic full-thickness resection (eFTR) of colorectal lesions: results from the Dutch colorectal eFTR registry

Endoscopy ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 52 (11) ◽  
pp. 1014-1023 ◽  
Author(s):  
Liselotte W. Zwager ◽  
Barbara A. J. Bastiaansen ◽  
Maxime E. S. Bronzwaer ◽  
Bas W. van der Spek ◽  
G. Dimitri N. Heine ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
En Bloc Resection ◽  
Bloc Resection ◽  
Adverse Event Rate ◽  
Resection Margins ◽  
R0 Resection ◽  
Incomplete Resection ◽  
Full Thickness ◽  
Technical Success ◽  
En Bloc ◽  
Endoscopic Full Thickness Resection

Abstract Background Endoscopic full-thickness resection (eFTR) is a minimally invasive resection technique that allows definite diagnosis and treatment for complex colorectal lesions ≤ 30 mm unsuitable for conventional endoscopic resection. This study reports clinical outcomes from the Dutch colorectal eFTR registry. Methods Consecutive patients undergoing eFTR in 20 hospitals were prospectively included. The primary outcome was technical success, defined as macroscopic complete en bloc resection. Secondary outcomes were: clinical success, defined as tumor-free resection margins (R0 resection); full-thickness resection rate; and adverse events. Results Between July 2015 and October 2018, 367 procedures were included. Indications were difficult polyps (non-lifting sign and/or difficult location; n = 133), primary resection of suspected T1 colorectal cancer (CRC; n = 71), re-resection after incomplete resection of T1 CRC (n = 150), and subepithelial tumors (n = 13). Technical success was achieved in 308 procedures (83.9 %). In 21 procedures (5.7 %), eFTR was not performed because the lesion could not be reached or retracted into the cap. In the remaining 346 procedures, R0 resection was achieved in 285 (82.4 %) and full-thickness resection in 288 (83.2 %). The median diameter of resected specimens was 23 mm. Overall adverse event rate was 9.3 % (n = 34/367): 10 patients (2.7 %) required emergency surgery for five delayed and two immediate perforations and three cases of appendicitis. Conclusion eFTR is an effective and relatively safe en bloc resection technique for complex colorectal lesions with the potential to avoid surgery. Further studies assessing the role of eFTR in early CRC treatment with long-term outcomes are needed.

scholarly journals Endoscopic full-thickness resection of polyps involving the appendiceal orifice: a prospective observational case study

2018 ◽  
Vol 06 (09) ◽  
pp. E1112-E1119 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maxime E.S. Bronzwaer ◽  
Barbara A.J. Bastiaansen ◽  
Lianne Koens ◽  
Evelien Dekker ◽  
Paul Fockens
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Polyps ◽  
Exclusion Criterion ◽  
R0 Resection ◽  
Full Thickness ◽  
Technical Success ◽  
En Bloc ◽  
Invasive Approach ◽  
Tertiary Referral Center ◽  
Endoscopic Full Thickness Resection

Abstract Background and study aims Colorectal polyps involving the appendiceal orifice (AO) are difficult to resect with conventional polypectomy techniques and therefore often require surgical intervention. These appendiceal polyps could potentially be removed with endoscopic full-thickness resection (eFTR) performed with a full-thickness resection device (FTRD). The aim of this prospective observational case study was to evaluate feasibility, technical success and safety of eFTR procedures involving the AO. Patients and methods This study was performed between November 2016 and December 2017 in a tertiary referral center by two experienced endoscopists. All patients referred for eFTR with a polyp involving the AO that could not be resected by EMR due to more than 50 % circumferential involvement of the AO or deep extension into the AO were included. The only exclusion criterion was lesion diameter > 20 mm. Results Seven patients underwent eFTR for a polyp involving the AO. All target lesions could be reached with the FTRD and retracted into the device. Technical success with an endoscopic radical en-bloc and full-thickness resection was achieved in all cases. Histopathological R0 resection was achieved in 85.7 % of patients (6/7). One patient who previously underwent an appendectomy developed a small abscess adjacent to the resection site, which was treated conservatively. Another patient developed secondary appendicitis followed by a laparoscopic appendectomy. Conclusion This small exploratory study suggests that eFTR of appendiceal polyps is feasible and can offer a minimally invasive approach for radical resection of these lesions. However, more safety and long-term follow-up data are needed to evaluate this evolving technique.

scholarly journals ESD with double clips and rubber band traction of neoplastic lesions developed in the appendiceal orifice is effective and safe

2020 ◽  
Vol 08 (03) ◽  
pp. E388-E395 ◽  
Author(s):  
Borathchakra Oung ◽  
Jérôme Rivory ◽  
Edouard Chabrun ◽  
Romain Legros ◽  
Julien Faller ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rubber Band ◽  
En Bloc Resection ◽  
Lesion Size ◽  
Bloc Resection ◽  
R0 Resection ◽  
Incomplete Resection ◽  
En Bloc ◽  
Close Proximity ◽  
Traction System ◽  
Type 3

Abstract Background and study aims Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) of superficial colorectal lesions in close proximity to the appendiceal orifice (L-PAO) was shown to be feasible except in case of deep invasion into the appendix (type 3 of Toyonaga’s classification). This study aimed to determine the outcomes of ESD with double clip and rubber band traction (DCT-ESD) of L-PAO including a majority of type 3. Patients and methods We reviewed retrospectively all consecutive DCT-ESD of L-PAO performed in 3 French centers. Each lesion was described according to Toyonaga’s classification and type 0 lesions were excluded. The primary outcome was en bloc and R0 resection rates for L-PAO. Morbidity and salvage surgery were recorded. Results A total of 32 patients underwent DCT-ESD; 22 lesions (68.8 %) were type 3, including 11 with previous appendectomy (34.4 %). Median lesion size was 35 mm range (10–110 mm) and median duration of resection was 47 min range (10–230 min). We achieved 100 % of En bloc resection exclusively with DCT-ESD and 90.6 % of histological R0 resection rate. Per-procedure, 11 perforations occurred and were all immediately closed with clips. Overall, 3 patients (10.7 %) underwent surgery without stoma (2 complications related and 1 incomplete resection). No death occurred. Conclusion ESD of lesions deeply invading appendiceal orifice is feasible with the help of a traction system. Technical success by endoscopy avoiding surgery was achieved in 90.6 % of cases.

Endoscopic full-thickness resection of T1 colorectal cancers: a retrospective analysis from a multicenter Dutch eFTR registry

Endoscopy ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Liselotte W. Zwager ◽  
Barbara Bastiaansen ◽  
Bas van der Spek ◽  
Dimitri Heine ◽  
Ramon Michel Schreuder ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Curative Resection ◽  
Histological Evaluation ◽  
R0 Resection ◽  
Incomplete Resection ◽  
Full Thickness ◽  
Technical Success ◽  
Short Term ◽  
Residual Cancer ◽  
Oncologic Surgery ◽  
Endoscopic Full Thickness Resection

Background and study aims: Complete endoscopic resection and accurate histological evaluation for T1 colorectal cancer (CRC) is critical to determine subsequent treatment. Endoscopic Full-Thickness Resection (eFTR) is a new treatment option for T1 CRC <2cm. We aim to report clinical outcomes and short-term results. Patients and methods: Consecutive eFTR procedures for T1 CRC, prospectively recorded in our national registry between November 2015 and April 2020, were retrospectively analysed. Primary outcomes were technical success and R0 resection. Secondary outcomes were histological risk-assessment, curative resections, adverse events and short-term outcomes. Results: We included 330 procedures: 132 primary resections and 198 secondary scar resections after incomplete T1 CRC resection. Overall technical success, R0 resection and curative resection rates were 87.0% (95% CI [82.7 – 90.3%]), 85.6% (95% CI [81.2 – 89.2%]) and 60.3% (95% CI [54.7 – 65.7%]). Curative resection rate for primary resected T1 CRC was 23.7% (95% CI [15.9 – 33.6%]) and 60.8% (95% CI [50.4 – 70.4%]) after excluding deep submucosal invasion as risk-factor. Risk-stratification was possible in 99.3%. Severe adverse event rates was 2.2%. Additional oncologic surgery was performed in 49/320 (15.3%), with residual cancer in 11/49 (22.4%). Endoscopic follow-up was available in 200/242 (82.6%), with a median of 4 months and residual cancer in 1 (0.5%) following an incomplete resection. Conclusions: eFTR is a relatively safe and effective method to resect small T1 CRC, both as primary and secondary treatment. eFTR can expand endoscopic treatment options for T1 CRC and could help to reduce surgical overtreatment. Future studies should focus on long-term outcomes.

scholarly journals Endoscopic Full-Thickness Resection of a Colonic Lateral Spreading Tumor

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (3) ◽  
pp. 252-256 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ana-Maria Bucalau ◽  
Arnaud Lemmers ◽  
Marianna Arvanitakis ◽  
Daniel Blero ◽  
Horst Neuhaus
Keyword(s):  
En Bloc Resection ◽  
Lateral Spreading ◽  
Bloc Resection ◽  
Full Thickness ◽  
En Bloc ◽  
Gastrointestinal Lesions ◽  
Histopathological Evaluation ◽  
Wall Specimen ◽  
Lateral Spreading Tumor ◽  
Endoscopic Full Thickness Resection

The Full-Thickness Resection Device (FTRD; Ovesco Endoscopy, Tübingen, Germany) combines endoscopic full-thickness resection (EFTR) of gastrointestinal lesions with closure and cutting of the tissue in one integrated procedure. It provides en-bloc resection with an integral wall specimen for histopathological evaluation. This resection technique is partially filling of the gaps between the current procedures of choice in endoscopy (endoscopic mucosal resection and endoscopic submucosal dissection) and surgery. We present the case of an EFTR procedure performed for a periappendicular lateral spreading tumor.

Endoscopic Full-Thickness Resection of Polyps Involving the Appendiceal Orifice: A Multicenter International Experience

Endoscopy ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yervant Ichkhanian ◽  
Mohammed Barawi ◽  
Shyam J Thakkar ◽  
Talal Seoud ◽  
Truptesh H Kothari ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Success ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
En Bloc Resection ◽  
Prior History ◽  
R0 Resection ◽  
Full Thickness ◽  
Technical Success ◽  
En Bloc ◽  
Surgical Interventions ◽  
Neoplastic Lesions

Background and Aims: Endoscopic resection of lesions involving the appendiceal orifice (AO) remains a challenge. We aim to report the outcomes of full-thickness resection device (FTRD) for the resection of appendiceal lesions and identify factors associated with the occurrence of appendicitis. Methods: This is a retrospective study at 18 tertiary-care centers (12 U.S., Canada 1, 5 Europe) between 11/2016 and 8/2020. Consecutive patients who underwent resection of AO lesions using the FTRD were included. The primary outcome was the rate of R0 margin resection in neoplastic lesions, defined as negative lateral and deep margins on post-resection histologic evaluation. Secondary outcomes included the rates of; technical success (en bloc resection), clinical success (technical success without need for further surgical interventions), post-resection appendicitis, and polyp recurrence. Results: A total of 66 patients (mean age 64 yr., 29 F) underwent resection of colonic lesions (mean size 14.5 (6.2) mm) involving the AO, with 40 (61%) deep extending into the appendiceal lumen. Technical success was achieved in 59/66 (89%) cases, out of which, 56 were found to be neoplastic lesions on post-resection pathology. Clinical success was achieved in 53/66 (80%). R0 resection was achieved in 52/56 (93%) cases. Out of the 58 patients of whom EFTR was completed and had no prior history of appendectomy, appendicitis was reported in 10 (17%) cases, with 6 (60%) requiring surgical appendectomies. Follow-up colonoscopy was completed in 41 cases with evidence of recurrence in 5 (12.2%). Conclusions: FTRD is a promising non-surgical alternative for resecting appendiceal lesions but appendicitis occurs in 1 out of 6 cases.

scholarly journals Endoscopic submucosal dissection of 301 large colorectal neoplasias: outcome and learning curve from a specialized center in Europe

2018 ◽  
Vol 06 (11) ◽  
pp. E1340-E1348 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carl-Fredrik Rönnow ◽  
Noriya Uedo ◽  
Ervin Toth ◽  
Henrik Thorlacius
Keyword(s):  
Learning Curve ◽  
Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection ◽  
Colorectal Neoplasia ◽  
En Bloc Resection ◽  
Bloc Resection ◽  
High Rate ◽  
R0 Resection ◽  
En Bloc ◽  
Submucosal Dissection ◽  
Immediate Bleeding

Abstract Background and study aims Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) allows en bloc resection of large colorectal lesions but ESD experience is limited outside Asia. This study evaluated implementation of ESD in the treatment of colorectal neoplasia in a Western center. Patients and methods Three hundred and one cases of colorectal ESD (173 rectal and 128 colonic lesions) were retrospectively evaluated in terms of outcome, learning curve and complications. Results Median size was 4 cm (range 1 – 12.5). En bloc resection was achieved in 241 cases amounting to an en bloc resection rate of 80 %. R0 resection was accomplished in 207 cases (69 %), RX and R1 were attained in 83 (27 %) and 11 (4 %) cases, respectively. Median time was 98 min (range 10 – 588) and median proficiency was 7.2 cm2/h. Complications occurred in 24 patients (8 %) divided into 12 immediate perforations, five delayed perforations, one immediate bleeding and six delayed bleedings. Six patients (2 %), all with proximal lesions, had emergency surgery. Two hundred and four patients were followed up endoscopically and median follow-up time was 13 months (range 3 – 53) revealing seven recurrences (3 %). En bloc rate improved gradually from 60 % during the first period to 98 % during the last period. ESD proficiency significantly improved between the first study period (3.6 cm2/h) and the last study period (10.8 cm2/h). Conclusions This study represents the largest material on colorectal ESD in the west and shows that colorectal ESD can be implemented in clinical routine in western countries after appropriate training and achieve a high rate of en bloc and R0 resection with a concomitant low incidence of complications. ESD of proximal colonic lesions should be attempted with caution during the learning curve because of higher risk of complications.

scholarly journals Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Visible Dysplasia Treatment in Ulcerative Colitis Patients: Cases Series and Systematic Review of Literature

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Raffaele Manta ◽  
Angelo Zullo ◽  
Donato Alessandro Telesca ◽  
Danilo Castellani ◽  
Ugo Germani ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Ulcerative Colitis ◽  
En Bloc Resection ◽  
Bloc Resection ◽  
R0 Resection ◽  
Resection Rate ◽  
En Bloc ◽  
Pooled Data ◽  
Non Invasive ◽  
Neoplastic Lesions

Abstract Background and Aims Ulcerative colitis [UC] patients are at an increased risk of developing colorectal cancer due to chronic inflammation. Endoscopic submucosal dissection [ESD] allows removal of non-invasive neoplastic lesions in the colon, but few data are available on its efficacy in UC patients. Methods Data from consecutive UC patients diagnosed with visible dysplastic lesions in the colon who underwent ESD were evaluated. The en bloc removal, R0 resection and complication rates were calculated. Local recurrence and metachronous lesions during follow-up were identified. A systematic review of the literature with pooled data analysis was performed. Results A total of 53 UC patients [age: 65 years; range 30–74; M/F: 31/22] underwent ESD. The en bloc resection rate was 100%, and the R0 resection rate was 96.2%. Bleeding occurred in seven [13.2%] patients, and perforation in three [5.6%] cases, all treated at endoscopy. No recurrence was observed, but two metachronous lesions were detected. Data from six other studies [three Asian and three European] were available. By pooling data, en bloc resection was successful in 88.4% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 83.5–92) of 216 lesions and in 91.8% [95% CI = 87.3–94.8] of 208 patients. R0 resection was achieved in 169 ESDs, equivalent to a 78.2% [95% CI = 72.3–83.2] rate for lesions and 81.3% [95% CI = 75.4–86] rate for patients. No difference between European and Asian series was noted. Conclusions This pooled data analysis indicated that ESD is a suitable tool for safely and properly removing non-invasive neoplastic lesions on colonic mucosa of selected UC patients.

scholarly journals A Giant retroperitoneal liposarcoma encasing entirely the right kidney: A case report and a review of nephrectomy indications

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Houssem Harbi ◽  
Amira Akrout ◽  
Mohamed Fourati ◽  
Amine Zouari ◽  
Nozha Toumi
Keyword(s):  
Elderly Patient ◽  
Case Report ◽  
En Bloc Resection ◽  
Bloc Resection ◽  
Resection Margins ◽  
En Bloc ◽  
Retroperitoneal Liposarcoma ◽  
R1 Resection ◽  
The Right

A 68-year-old female was operated for a giant dedifferentiated retroperitoneal liposarcoma (RLS) encasing entirely the right kidney. She had an en-bloc resection of the tumor with right nephrectomy. The en-bloc resection should avoid R1 resection margins. Renal conservation is suggested if the kidney is widely displaced and for elderly patient.

scholarly journals High proficiency of colonic endoscopic submucosal dissection in Europe thanks to countertraction strategy using a double clip and rubber band

2019 ◽  
Vol 07 (09) ◽  
pp. E1166-E1174 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jérémie Jacques ◽  
Aurélie Charissoux ◽  
Pierre Bordillon ◽  
Romain Legros ◽  
Jérôme Rivory ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Case Series ◽  
Rubber Band ◽  
En Bloc Resection ◽  
Bloc Resection ◽  
Point Of View ◽  
University Hospital ◽  
Control Group ◽  
R0 Resection ◽  
Resection Rate ◽  
En Bloc

Abstract Background and study aims ESD in the colon is more challenging technically than in other locations. Here, we report the first comparative case series of colon ESD using a systematic countertraction strategy using two clips and a rubber band. Patients and methods Retrospective comparative study of classic versus countertraction colon ESD performed in colon ESD cases collected prospectively at Lyon Edouard Herriot Hospital and Limoges University Hospital from January 2016 until December 2017. Results The study included 192 cases (control = 76, countertraction = 116). Countertraction using the double clip and rubber band technique versus the control group resulted in a significant decrease in the procedure time (94.7 vs. 117 min; P = 0.004) and significant increases in procedure speed (28.2 vs. 16.7 mm2/min; P < 0.0001), en bloc resection rate (95.7 % vs. 76.3 %, P < 0.0001), and R0 resection rate (78.5 % vs. 64.5 %, P = 0.04).At an individual operator point of view, results varied between operators but the double clip countertraction strategy significantly increased the en bloc resection rate, R0 resection rate, and speed of dissection for each of the 4 operators. Conclusion Systematic countertraction using a double clip and rubber band facilitates colon ESD. This strategy should become the standard for colon ESD.

scholarly journals Endoscopic full thickness resection vs. transanal endoscopic microsurgery for local treatment of rectal neuroendocrine tumors - a retrospective analysis

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Markus Brand ◽  
Stanislaus Reimer ◽  
Joachim Reibetanz ◽  
Sven Flemming ◽  
Marko Kornmann ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Neuroendocrine Tumors ◽  
Transanal Endoscopic Microsurgery ◽  
Local Treatment ◽  
University Hospital ◽  
R0 Resection ◽  
Full Thickness ◽  
Resection Rate ◽  
En Bloc ◽  
Endoscopic Full Thickness Resection ◽  
Endoscopic Microsurgery

Abstract Purpose Local treatment of small well-differentiated rectal neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) is recommended by current guidelines. However, although several endoscopic methods have been established, the highest R0 rate is achieved by transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM). Since a recently published study about endoscopic full thickness resection (eFTR) showed a R0 resection rate of 100%, the aim of this study was to evaluate both methods (eFTR vs. TEM). Methods We retrospectively analyzed all patients with rectal NET treated either by TEM (1999–2018) or eFTR (2016–2019) in two tertiary centers (University Hospital Wuerzburg and Ulm). We analyzed clinical, procedural, and histopathological outcomes in both groups. Results Twenty-eight patients with rectal NET received local treatment (TEM: 13; eFTR: 15). Most tumors were at stage T1a and grade G1 or G2 (in the TEM group two G3 NETs were staged T2 after neoadjuvant chemotherapy). In both groups, similar outcomes for en bloc resection rate, R0 resection rate, tumor size, or specimen size were found. No procedural adverse events were noted. Mean procedure time in the TEM group was 48.9 min and 19.2 min in the eFTR group. Conclusion eFTR is a convincing method for local treatment of small rectal NETs combining high safety and efficacy with short interventional time.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document