Kaiserschnittraten im europäischen Vergleich

Die Hebamme ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 34 (06) ◽  
pp. 14-14

Die Sectioraten in den einzelnen europäischen Ländern variieren erheblich. Eine Möglichkeit, die Perinatalmedizin regional und national zu monitorisieren und vergleichbar zu machen, bietet das von der WHO propagierte Ten-Group Classification System (TGCS) nach Robson. Wie gut dies anhand der verfügbaren nationalen Daten gelingt, untersuchte nun ein europäisches Forscherteam.

2021 ◽  
Vol 37 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Rashida Parveen ◽  
Mehnaz Khakwani ◽  
Anum Naz ◽  
Rabia Bhatti

Objective: To analyze trends of CSs and evaluating them according to Robson’s Ten Groups Classification System (TGCS) at a leading government tertiary care hospital of South Punjab, Pakistan. Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted at Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Nishtar Medical University Hospital, Multan Pakistan, from October 2019 to March 2020.The study population included a total of 167 women who underwent CS in the hospital during the specified study period. For each case, we collected data regarding maternal characteristics and pregnancy-related information. The dependent variable was Robson classification group. Results: Overall, mean age was 26.53+5.1 years. Majority of the women, 116 (69.5%) belonged to urban areas of residence, 74 (44.3%) gestational aged between 37-42 years while 108 (64.7%) had history of cesarean section. Most of the patients, 85 (50.9%) turned out to be from TGCS Group-10. Group-5 and Group-1 were the 2nd and 3rd most common group, accounted for 24 (14.4%) and 19 (11.4%) cases respectively. Previous cesarean section (20.4%) and fetal distress (19.8%) were found to be most common indications leading to cesarean section. Conclusion: As per Robson’s Ten-Group Classification, Group-10 and Group-5 were found to be the most contributing among deliveries done. Previous cesarean section and fetal distress were the most common indications of cesarean section. doi: https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.37.2.3823 How to cite this:Parveen R, Khakwani M, Naz A, Bhatti R. Analysis of Cesarean Sections using Robson’s Ten Group Classification System. Pak J Med Sci. 2021;37(2):---------. doi: https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.37.2.3823 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


2019 ◽  
Vol 65 (1) ◽  
pp. 10-21 ◽  
Author(s):  
Denise Colter Smith ◽  
Julia C. Phillippi ◽  
Nancy K Lowe ◽  
Rachel Blankstein Breman ◽  
Nicole S. Carlson ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 60 (6) ◽  
pp. 858-864
Author(s):  
Bobby D. O’Leary ◽  
Daniel T. Kane ◽  
Nicholas Kruseman Aretz ◽  
Michael P. Geary ◽  
Fergal D. Malone ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Varija T. ◽  
Veerendra Kumar C. M. ◽  
Chandrasekhar Tarihalli

Background: The caesarean section (CS) delivery rate is steadily increasing worldwide, including India. Identifying the proportion of women in various categories as per Robson's ten group classification system and CS rate among them is important to bring down the increasing CS rate.Methods: This case series study was conducted at Vijayanagar Institute of Medical Sciences (VIMS), a tertiary care teaching hospital in Ballari, Karnataka, India. All pregnant women who have been admitted for delivery were enrolled and the data was collected for the women delivered by CS during January 2016 to December 2016 and proportions in various groups as per Robson’s ten-group classification system were calculated.Results: Among a total of 6980 women delivered during study period, 2992 (42.8%) delivered by CS. The CS rates among various groups varied from 100% among women with abnormal lies and group 6-95% (all nulliparous breeches) group 5-94% (Previous CS, single cephalic, >37 weeks) to 10 to 15% among multiparous women with spontaneous labour having single cephalic pregnancy (group 3). Among women with previous section, CS rate was very high (89.6%). Women with previous CS (group 5) contributed maximum (40.24%) to the total number of CS.Conclusions: In the present study, all women with breech presentation and abnormal lies delivered by CS and repeat CS was the highest contributor to all CS deliveries.


Blood ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 112 (11) ◽  
pp. 735-735
Author(s):  
Alex Klimowicz ◽  
Paola Neri ◽  
Adnan Mansoor ◽  
Anthony Magliocco ◽  
Douglas A. Stewart ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) has dramatically improved the survival of myeloma patients; however, this approach has significant toxicities and nearly 25% of MM patients progress within one year from their transplant. While gene expression profiling-based (GEP) molecular classification has permitted the identification of unresponsive high-risk patients, these approaches have proven too costly and complex to translate into clinical practice. Less expensive and more readily available methods are needed clinically to identify, at the time of diagnosis, MM patients who may benefit from more aggressive or experimental therapies. While protein-based tissue arrays offer such alternative, biases introduced by the “observer-dependent” scoring methods have limited their wide applicability. Methods: We have designed a simplified, fully automated and quantitative protein expression based-classification system that will allow us to accurately predict survival post ASCT in a cost effective and “observer-independent” manner. We constructed tissue microarrays using diagnostic bone marrow biopsies of 82 newly diagnosed MM patients uniformly treated with a dexamethasone based induction regimen and frontline ASCT. Using the HistoRx PM-2000 quantitative immunohistochemistry platform, coupled with the AQUA analysis software, we have examined the expression of the following proteins: FGFR3 which is associated with t(4;14), cyclin B2 and Ki-67 which are associated with cellular proliferation, TACI which is associated with maf deregulation, and phospho-Y705 STAT3 and p65NF-κB, which are associated with myeloma cell growth and survival. For FGFR3, patients were divided into FGFR3 positive and negative groups based on hierarchical clustering of their AQUA score. For all other proteins examined, based on AQUA scores, the top quartiles or quintiles of patients were classified as high expression groups. Based on the univariate analysis, patients were further classified as “High Risk” MM if they had been identified as high expressers of either TACI, p65NF-κB or FGFR3. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate time to progression and overall survival. Multivariate analysis was performed using the Cox regression method. Results: 82 patients were included in this study. In univariate analysis, FGFR3 and p65NF-κB expression were associated with significantly shorter TTP (p=0.018 and p=0.009) but not OS (p=0.365 and p=0.104). TACI expression levels predicted for worse OS (p=0.039) but not TTP (p=0.384). High expression of Ki67 or phospho-Y705 STAT3 did not affect survival. Of the 82 cases, 67 were included in the multivariate analysis since they had AQUA scores available for all markers: 26 (38.8%) were considered as High Risk by their AQUA scores and had significantly shorter TTP (p=0.014) and OS (p=0.006) compared to the Low Risk group. The median TTP for the Low and High Risk groups was 2.9 years and 1.9 years, respectively. The 5-years estimates for OS were 60.6% for the High Risk group versus 83.5% for the Low Risk group. Multivariate analysis was performed using del13q and our risk group classification as variables. Both our risk group classification and del13q were independent predictors for TTP, having 2.4 and 2.3 greater risk of relapse, respectively. Our risk group classification was the only independent predictor of OS with the High Risk group having a 5.9 fold greater risk of death. Conclusions: We have found that the expression of FGFR3, TACI, and p65NF-κB, in an automated and fully quantitative tissue-based array, is a powerful predictor of survival post-ASCT in MM and eliminates the “observer-dependent” bias of scoring TMAs. A validation of this “High Risk” TMA based signature is currently underway in larger and independent cohorts. Figure Figure


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document