scholarly journals Effectiveness and adverse events of endoscopic clipping versus band ligation for colonic diverticular hemorrhage: A large-scale multicenter cohort study

Endoscopy ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katsumasa Kobayashi ◽  
Naoyoshi Nagata ◽  
Yohei Furumoto ◽  
Atsushi Yamauchi ◽  
Atsuo Yamada ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cohort Study ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Multicenter Cohort Study ◽  
Band Ligation ◽  
Prolonged Length ◽  
Diverticular Hemorrhage ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Colonic Diverticular Hemorrhage ◽  
Endoscopic Clipping

Background and study aims: Prior studies have shown the effectiveness of endoscopic band ligation (EBL) and clipping for colonic diverticular hemorrhage (CDH) but have been small and conducted at single centers. Thus, we investigated which was the more effective and safe treatment in a multicenter long-term cohort study. Patients and methods: We reviewed data for 1,679 patients with CDH who were treated with EBL (n=638) or clipping (n=1,041) between January 2010 and December 2019 at 49 hospitals across Japan (CODE BLUE-J Study). Logistic regression analysis was used to compare outcomes between the two treatments. Results: In multivariate analysis, EBL compared with clipping was independently associated with reduced risk of early rebleeding (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 0.46; p<0.001) and late rebleeding (AOR 0.62; p<0.001). These significantly lower rebleeding rates with EBL were evident regardless of active bleeding or early colonoscopy. No significant difference was found between the treatments in the rate of initial hemostasis or mortality. EBL compared with clipping independently reduced the risk of need for interventional radiology (IVR) (AOR 0.37; p=0.006) and prolonged length of hospital stay (LOS) (AOR 0.35; p<0.001), but not need for surgery. Diverticulitis developed in 1 patient (0.16%) following EBL and 2 patients (0.19%) following clipping. Perforation occurred in 2 patients (0.31%) following EBL and none following clipping. Conclusions: Analysis of our large endoscopy dataset suggests that EBL is an effective and safe endoscopic therapy for CDH offering the advantages of lower early and late rebleeding rates, reduced need for IVR, and shorter LOS.

scholarly journals Influence of Weekday of Admission and Level of Distress on Length of Hospital Stay in Patients With Low Back Pain: A Retrospective Cohort Study

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emanuel Brunner ◽  
André Meichtry ◽  
Davy Vancampfort ◽  
Reinhard Imoberdorf ◽  
David Gisi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Cohort Study ◽  
Back Pain ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Linear Model ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Complex Problem ◽  
Interdisciplinary Management ◽  
Prolonged Length ◽  
The Impact

Abstract BackgroundLow back pain (LBP) is often a complex problem requiring interdisciplinary management to address patients’ multidimensional needs. The inpatient care for patients with LBP in primary care hospitals is a challenge. In this setting, interdisciplinary LBP management is often unavailable during the weekend. Delays in therapeutic procedures may result in prolonged length of hospital stay (LoS). The impact of delays on LoS might be strongest in patients reporting high levels of psychological distress. Therefore, this study investigates which influence the weekday of admission and distress have on LoS of inpatients with LBP.MethodsRetrospective cohort study conducted between 1 February 2019 and 31 January 2020. ANOVA was used to test the hypothesized difference in mean effects of the weekday of admission on LoS. Further, a linear model was fitted for LoS with distress, categorical weekday of admission (Friday/Saturday vs. Sunday-Thursday), and their interactions.ResultsWe identified 173 patients with LBP. Mean LoS was 7.8 days (SD=5.59). Patients admitted on Friday (mean LoS=10.3) and Saturday (LoS=10.6) had longer stays but not those admitted on Sunday (LoS=7.1). Analysis of the weekday effect (Friday/Saturday vs. Sunday-Thursday) showed that admission on Friday or Saturday was associated with significant increase in LoS compared to admission on other weekdays (t=3.43, p=<0.001). 101 patients (58%) returned questionnaires, and complete data on distress was available from 86 patients (49%). According to a linear model for LoS, the effect of distress on LoS was significantly modified (t=2.51, p=0.014) by dichotomic weekdays of admission (Friday/Saturday vs. Sunday-Thursday).ConclusionsPatients with LBP are hospitalized significantly longer if they have to wait more than two days for interdisciplinary LBP management. This particularly affects patients reporting high distress. Our study provides a platform to further explore whether interdisciplinary LBP management addressing patients’ multidimensional needs reduces LoS in primary care hospitals.

scholarly journals Hospitalized Children with Critical SARS-CoV-2 Infection Cared for in a Limited Resource Setting: Multicenter Cohort Study

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emmerson C.F. de Fariasa ◽  
Jefferson P. Piva ◽  
Manoel J.C. Pavão Junior ◽  
Susan C.D. Sales ◽  
Luciana M.P. Nascimento ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cohort Study ◽  
Children And Adolescents ◽  
Invasive Mechanical Ventilation ◽  
Laboratory Data ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Limited Resource ◽  
Hospitalized Children ◽  
Multicenter Cohort Study ◽  
Multicenter Cohort ◽  
Resource Setting

Abstract Background: Some children can develop severe forms of SARS-CoV-2 infection either acutely or later, as represented by multisystemic inflammatory syndrome in children (MIS- C). To identify the risk factors for worse outcomes in hospitalized children and adolescents with severe acute SARS-CoV-2 infection and MIS-C. Methods: This multicenter cohort study included all children and adolescents with confirmed or suspected critical SARS-CoV-2 infection admitted to the PICU between April 2020 and September 2021. The exclusion criteria were incomplete vaccinal status, immunocompromised status, and end-of-life decision. The main variables analyzed were epidemiological, clinical, and laboratory data, and ventilator settings at admission and after 72 h. The patients were divided into three groups (G): confirmed coronavirus disease (COVID-19) with MIS-C criteria (G1), confirmed COVID-19 without MIS-C criteria (G2), and MIS-C criteria without confirmed COVID-19. Results: The median age of the patients was 28 months in G1, with comorbidities in 40 patients (72.7%) (p < 0.0001). The duration of exposure (median 23 days; p = 0.004) and fever were longer in G1 (12 days; p = 0.001). Moreover, invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) was required in 44 patients (80%, p < 0.0001), and cardiogenic shock occurred in 26 patients (54.2%, p < 0.0001) in G1. Subnutrition was most frequent in G1 in 55 cases (57.3%; p = 0.01). Under nutrition (< 2 SD for weight), longer exposure time (odds ratio [OR]: 2.11; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.37–3.25; p = 0.001), IMV time (OR: 2.6; 95% CI: 1.15–5.85; p = 0.03), and length of hospital stay (OR: 10.94; 95% CI: 1.93–63.1; p = 0.007) were associated with critical MIS-C in G1. Conclusions: In the Brazilian Amazon area, specifically in the Pará state, we identified a cluster of more severe forms of pediatric acute or late SARS-CoV-2 infection.

scholarly journals P461 Intolerance to 5-aminosalicylate is a risk of poor prognosis in ulcerative colitis patients

2020 ◽  
Vol 14 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S409-S410
Author(s):  
T Fujii ◽  
S Hibiya ◽  
C Maeyashiki ◽  
E Saito ◽  
K Takenaka ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ulcerative Colitis ◽  
Cohort Study ◽  
Confidence Interval ◽  
Maintenance Therapy ◽  
Retrospective Review ◽  
Poor Prognosis ◽  
Hazard Ratio ◽  
Multicenter Cohort Study ◽  
Multicenter Cohort ◽  
Significant Difference

Abstract Background 5-Aminosalicylates (5-ASA) are the key drugs in induction and maintenance therapy in ulcerative colitis (UC). Some UC patients are involved in 5-ASA intolerance after induction of oral 5-ASA compounds. There is no evidence of the prognosis including the risk of colectomy in 5-ASA intolerant UC patients. Methods The aim of this study is to establish the prognosis of 5-ASA intolerant UC patients in a multicenter cohort study. A retrospective review of a prospective multicenter database (2014–2018) of 1,574 UC patients was carried out and a total of 1,286 patients treated with oral 5-ASA compounds were enrolled. We compared the risk of colectomy and biologics induction between patients (i) tolerant to first 5-ASA compound (1079), (ii) intolerant to first 5-ASA compound but tolerant to other 5-ASA compound (107) and (iii) intolerant to 5-ASA compound and withdrawal of 5-ASA (100). Results We identified 1,286 patients with UC, of which 40 patients (3.1%) resulted in colectomy and 247 patients (19%) treated with biologics. Colectomy rate in patients (iii) intolerant to 5-ASA and withdrawal of 5-ASA were higher than (i) tolerant to first 5-ASA and (ii) intolerant to first 5-ASA but tolerant to other 5-ASA (9.0%, 2.7%, 1.9%, respectively). (iii) Patients withdrawal of 5-ASA showed higher risk of colectomy compared with (i) tolerant to first 5-ASA (Hazard ratio (HR) 4.71, 95% Confidence interval (CI): 2.04–10.8). The risk of colectomy among (ii) patients intolerant to first 5-ASA but tolerant to other 5-ASA showed no significant difference compared with (i) tolerant to first 5-ASA (HR 0.76, 95% CI: 0.43–1.35). The biologics induction rate in (iii) patients withdrawal of 5-ASA was significantly higher than (i) tolerant to first 5-ASA and (ii) intolerant to first 5-ASA but tolerant to other 5-ASA (37%, 18%, 16%, respectively). Also (iii) patients withdrawal of 5-ASA showed higher risk of induction with biologics compared with (i) tolerant to first 5-ASA (HR 2.35, 95% CI: 1.50–3.68). Those risk among (ii) patients intolerant to first 5-ASA but tolerant to other 5-ASA showed no significant difference compared with (i) tolerant to first 5-ASA (HR 0.76, 95% CI: 0.43–1.35). Conclusion Patients with UC who had 5-ASA intolerance and withdrew from 5-ASA showed poor prognosis. We should consider trying other 5-ASA compounds even if the patients had intolerance to one 5-ASA compound.

586 Long-Term Outcomes of Endoscopic Band Ligation (EBL) for Colonic Diverticular Hemorrhage

2013 ◽  
Vol 77 (5) ◽  
pp. AB162 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kaoru Nakano ◽  
Naoki Ishii ◽  
Yuto Shimamura ◽  
Takashi Ikeya ◽  
Kenji Nakamura ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Long Term Outcomes ◽  
Band Ligation ◽  
Diverticular Hemorrhage ◽  
Endoscopic Band Ligation ◽  
Colonic Diverticular Hemorrhage
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document