Factor V Leiden (G1691A) and Prothrombin Gene G20210A Mutations as Potential Risk Factors for Venous Thromboembolism after Total Hip or Total Knee Replacement Surgery

2002 ◽  
Vol 87 (04) ◽  
pp. 580-585 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. Larson ◽  
T. L. Lindahl ◽  
C. Andersson ◽  
L. Frison ◽  
D. Gustafsson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Venous Thromboembolism ◽  
Factor V Leiden ◽  
Composite Endpoint ◽  
Factor V ◽  
Factor V Leiden Mutation ◽  
G20210a Mutation ◽  
Symptomatic Pulmonary Embolism ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Prothrombin Gene

SummaryPatients (n = 1600) from 12 European countries, scheduled for elective orthopaedic hip or knee surgery, were screened for Factor V Leiden and prothrombin gene G20210A mutations, found in 5.5% and 2.9% of the populations, respectively. All patients underwent prophylactic treatment with one of four doses of melagatran and ximelagatran or dalteparin, starting pre-operatively. Bilateral ascending venography was performed on study day 8-11. The patients were subsequently treated according to local routines and followed for 4-6 weeks postoperatively. The composite endpoint of screened deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and symptomatic pulmonary embolism (PE) during prophylaxis did not differ significantly between patients with or without these mutations. Symptomatic venous thromboembolism (VTE) during prophylaxis and follow-up (1.9%) was significantly over-represented among patients with the prothrombin gene G20210A mutation (p = 0.0002). A tendency towards increased risk of VTE was found with the Factor V Leiden mutation (p = 0.09). PE were few, but significantly over-represented in both the Factor V Leiden and prothrombin gene G20210A mutated patients (p = 0.03 and p = 0.05, respectively). However, since 90% of the patients with these genetic risk factors will not suffer a VTE event, a general pre-operative genotyping is, in our opinion, of questionable value.

THROMBOPHILIC RISK FACTORS IN PATIENTS WITH CRANIAL AND SPINAL DURAL ARTERIOVENOUS FISTULAE

Neurosurgery ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 63 (4) ◽  
pp. 693-699 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rüediger Gerlach ◽  
Martina Boehm-Weigert ◽  
Joachim Berkefeld ◽  
Judith Duis ◽  
Andreas Raabe ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Protein C ◽  
Factor V Leiden ◽  
Factor V ◽  
Arteriovenous Fistulae ◽  
Factor V Leiden Mutation ◽  
Exact Test ◽  
G20210a Mutation ◽  
Cardiolipin Antibodies ◽  
Prothrombin Gene

ABSTRACT OBJECTIVE Numerous studies have reported the technical aspects and results of surgical and/or endovascular treatment of cranial dural arteriovenous fistulae (cDAVF) and spinal dural arteriovenous fistulae (sDAVF). Only a few of them have addressed the question of thrombophilic conditions, which may be relevant as pathogenetic factors or can increase the risk for venous thromboembolic events. Therefore, the objective of this study is to compare thrombophilic risk factors in patients with cDAVF and sDAVF with no history of trauma. METHODS A total of 43 patients (25 with cDAVF and 18 with sDAVF) were included in this study. Blood samples were analyzed for G20210A mutation of the prothrombin gene and factor V Leiden mutation. In all patients, prothrombin time, international normalized ratio, fibrinogen, antithrombin, protein C and S activity, von Willebrand factor antigen, ristocetin cofactor activity, D-dimer, coagulation factor VIII activity, and tissue factor pathway inhibitor were determined. Screening was performed for the occurrence of lupus antiphospholipid and cardiolipin antibodies. RESULTS The prevalence of G20210A mutation of the prothrombin gene was significantly higher in patients with cDAVF (n = 6) compared with patients with sDAVF (n = 0; P < 0.05, Fisher's exact test). A factor V Leiden mutation was found in 3 patients with sDAVF and in 1 patient with cDAVF (P = 0.29, Fisher's exact test). No significant difference was found for other parameters, except for fibrinogen, but decreased protein C activity was more frequent in patients with cDAVF compared with patients with sDAVF (4 versus 1). Decreased protein S activity was encountered in 3 patients (2 with sDAVF and 1 with cDAVF). Cardiolipin antibodies were found in 2 patients with cDAVF but in none with sDAVF, whereas only 1 patient with sDAVF had lupus antiphospholipid antibodies. CONCLUSION In both groups of patients with dural arteriovenous fistulae, genetic thrombophilic abnormalities occurred in a higher percentage than in the general population. The differences of the genetic abnormalities may be involved in different pathophysiological mechanism(s) in the development of these distinct neurovascular entities.

Risk Factors in Venous Thromboembolism

2001 ◽  
Vol 86 (07) ◽  
pp. 395-403 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ida Martinelli
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Venous Thromboembolism ◽  
Factor V Leiden ◽  
Protein S ◽  
Prothrombin G20210a ◽  
Factor V ◽  
Nucleotide Substitutions ◽  
Inherited Thrombophilia ◽  
G20210a Mutation ◽  
Increased Risk

SummaryVenous thromboembolism is a serious disorder because of its potential complications, such as pulmonary embolism and the post-thrombotic syndrome. Inherited determinants of venous thromboembolism are only in part known, but in the past decades considerable progress has been made in the understanding of risk factors for the disease and their clinical impact. In particular, the development of molecular biology techniques and the increasing interest in their application, allowed an identification of two causes of inherited thrombophilia, i.e., factor V Leiden and the prothrombin G20210A mutation. Their recent discovery provided a new approach for improving the knowledge of inherited thrombophilia. In contrast to deficiencies of the naturally occurring anticoagulant proteins antithrombin, protein C and protein S, these two mutations cannot be considered true genetic defects, since they are nucleotide substitutions resulting in a more efficient coagulation process. Since they are rather common in the general populations of Caucasian descent and are associated with a moderate increased risk of venous thromboembolism, the effect of the interaction between inherited and environmental risk factors for venous thromboembolism has become an even greater field of interest. Prevention of first events and recurrences of venous thromboembolism can be optimized only through a knowledge of the main risk factors, their effect, and their interaction with environmental factors.

Third Generation Oral Contraceptives and Heritable Thrombophilia as Risk Factors of Non-fatal Venous Thromboembolism

1998 ◽  
Vol 79 (01) ◽  
pp. 28-31 ◽  
Author(s):  
Birthe Søgaard Andersen ◽  
Jørn Olsen ◽  
Gunnar Lauge Nielsen ◽  
Flemming Hald Steffensen ◽  
Henrik Toft Sørensen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Venous Thromboembolism ◽  
Oral Contraceptives ◽  
Factor V Leiden ◽  
Factor V ◽  
Third Generation ◽  
Confounding By Indication ◽  
Antithrombin Deficiency ◽  
Factor V Leiden Mutation ◽  
Increased Risk

SummaryThird generation oral contraceptives (OCs) are apparently stronger risk factors for venous thromboembolism (VTE) than other OCs, however, the increased risk may be due to confounding by indication related to differences in prescription behaviour.We estimated the risk of VTE associated with use of OCs with and without the presence of Factor V Leiden mutation, protein C-, protein S- or antithrombin deficiency.Sixty-seven cases with VTE were compared with 134 controls. The risk of VTE in the presence of thrombophilia was of the same magnitude for third generation OC users as for users of other OCs; OR: 52.5 (95% CI: 3.7-738.1) and OR: 63.3 (95% CI: 6.2-648.4), respectively.It is unlikely that confounding by indication entirely explains the risk of VTE associated with third generation OCs since the combined effect exceeds what could be explained if this source of error was the only determinant of the association.

scholarly journals Type and Location of Venous Thromboembolism in Carriers of Factor V Leiden or Prothrombin G20210A Mutation Versus Patients With No Mutation

2008 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 66-70 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mirjana Kovac ◽  
Gorana Mitic ◽  
Zeljko Mikovic ◽  
Nebojsa Antonijevic ◽  
Valentina Djordjevic ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Risk Factor ◽  
Venous Thromboembolism ◽  
Clinical Manifestations ◽  
Factor V Leiden ◽  
Transverse Sinus ◽  
Prothrombin G20210a ◽  
Factor V ◽  
G20210a Mutation ◽  
Increased Risk

Factor V Leiden (FVLeiden) and prothrombin G20210A are the most common genetic causes of thrombophilia and established risk factors for different clinical manifestations of venous thromboembolism (VTE). This study investigated whether the clinical manifestation of VTE, the extension of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and the presence of transient risk factors at the time of the first VTE, differed among patients with mutations (97 with FVLeiden; 33 with prothrombin G20210A) and in 109 patients without thrombophilia. Isolated pulmonary embolism (PE) was less prevalent in patients with FVLeiden (6%) and no thrombophilia (6%) than in those with prothrombin G20210A (15%). No difference was found in the incidence of distal DVT. Regarding the extension of proximal DVT, the lowest incidence for isolated popliteal vein and the highest for iliofemoral vein were observed in patients with prothrombin G20210A. No difference was observed between groups of patients with or without thrombophilia by unprovoked VTE. The pregnancy/puerperium was the most prevalent risk factor in carriers of prothrombin G20210A. Among FVLeiden carriers, the most prevalent risk factor was surgery, and in patients without thrombophilia, it was trauma ( P < .05). Thrombosis of the upper limb was more frequent in a group without thrombophilia than in patients with mutations ( P < .01). Transverse sinus venous thrombosis was present only in patients with prothrombin G20210A. Carriers of prothrombin G20210A have an increased risk of developing isolated PE and more severe clinical manifestations than those with FVLeiden or without thrombophilia.

Bewertung des Rezidivthrombose-risikos venöser Thromboembolien

2011 ◽  
Vol 31 (01) ◽  
pp. 07-12 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. Lindhoff-Last
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Venous Thromboembolism ◽  
Venous Thrombosis ◽  
Factor V Leiden ◽  
Recurrence Risk ◽  
Factor V ◽  
Recurrence Rates ◽  
Factor V Leiden Mutation ◽  
Symptomatic Pulmonary Embolism ◽  
Recurrent Venous Thromboembolism

SummaryRecurrent venous thromboembolism is associated with increased mortality in 5–9% of the patients. On the other hand prolonged anticoagulation can increase the bleeding risk which can also be responsible for an increased mortality. Therefore, it is necessary to validate the recurrence risk of venous thromboembolism on an individual basis.In this review the most relevant risk factors for recurrent venous thromboembolism are analyzed. Spontaneous thrombosis is associated with significantly increased recurrence rates in comparison to risk associated venous thrombosis. In addition, a positive D-dimer result after stop of anticoagulation, an increased amount of residual thrombus in proximal veins analyzed by compression sonography, a proximal localization of thrombosis, symptomatic pulmonary embolism and male sex are clinically relevant risk factors for increased recurrence rates. While mild thrombophilic defects like heterozygous factor V Leiden mutation are not associated with a clinically relevant recurrence risk, inherited inhibitor deficiencies and the anti-phospholipid-syndrome are known to be responsible for an increased recurrence rate of venous thromboembolism. A new recurrence risk-score (RR-Score) for individual judgement of patients with a first spontaneous venous thrombosis is introduced.

Thrombophilia and risk of VTE recurrence according to the age at the time of first VTE manifestation

VASA ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 44 (4) ◽  
pp. 313-323 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lea Weingarz ◽  
Marc Schindewolf ◽  
Jan Schwonberg ◽  
Carola Hecking ◽  
Zsuzsanna Wolf ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Factor V Leiden ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards ◽  
First Episode ◽  
Factor V ◽  
Factor V Leiden Mutation ◽  
Younger Patients ◽  
Risk Of Recurrence ◽  
G20210a Mutation ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
The Impact

Abstract. Background: Whether screening for thrombophilia is useful for patients after a first episode of venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a controversial issue. However, the impact of thrombophilia on the risk of recurrence may vary depending on the patient’s age at the time of the first VTE. Patients and methods: Of 1221 VTE patients (42 % males) registered in the MAISTHRO (MAin-ISar-THROmbosis) registry, 261 experienced VTE recurrence during a 5-year follow-up after the discontinuation of anticoagulant therapy. Results: Thrombophilia was more common among patients with VTE recurrence than those without (58.6 % vs. 50.3 %; p = 0.017). Stratifying patients by the age at the time of their initial VTE, Cox proportional hazards analyses adjusted for age, sex and the presence or absence of established risk factors revealed a heterozygous prothrombin (PT) G20210A mutation (hazard ratio (HR) 2.65; 95 %-confidence interval (CI) 1.71 - 4.12; p < 0.001), homozygosity/double heterozygosity for the factor V Leiden and/or PT mutation (HR 2.35; 95 %-CI 1.09 - 5.07, p = 0.030), and an antithrombin deficiency (HR 2.12; 95 %-CI 1.12 - 4.10; p = 0.021) to predict recurrent VTE in patients aged 40 years or older, whereas lupus anticoagulants (HR 3.05; 95%-CI 1.40 - 6.66; p = 0.005) increased the risk of recurrence in younger patients. Subgroup analyses revealed an increased risk of recurrence for a heterozygous factor V Leiden mutation only in young females without hormonal treatment whereas the predictive value of a heterozygous PT mutation was restricted to males over the age of 40 years. Conclusions: Our data do not support a preference of younger patients for thrombophilia testing after a first venous thromboembolic event.

Thrombotic risk during oral contraceptive use and pregnancy in women with factor V Leiden or prothrombin mutation: a rational approach to contraception

Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (8) ◽  
pp. 2055-2061 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elizabeth F. W. van Vlijmen ◽  
Nic J. G. M. Veeger ◽  
Saskia Middeldorp ◽  
Karly Hamulyák ◽  
Martin H. Prins ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Oral Contraceptive ◽  
Factor V Leiden ◽  
Informed Choice ◽  
Rational Approach ◽  
Prothrombin G20210a ◽  
Factor V ◽  
Factor V Leiden Mutation ◽  
Thrombotic Risk ◽  
G20210a Mutation

AbstractCurrent guidelines discourage combined oral contraceptive (COC) use in women with hereditary thrombophilic defects. However, qualifying all hereditary thrombophilic defects as similarly strong risk factors might be questioned. Recent studies indicate the risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) of a factor V Leiden mutation as considerably lower than a deficiency of protein C, protein S, or antithrombin. In a retrospective family cohort, the VTE risk during COC use and pregnancy (including postpartum) was assessed in 798 female relatives with or without a heterozygous, double heterozygous, or homozygous factor V Leiden or prothrombin G20210A mutation. Overall, absolute VTE risk in women with no, single, or combined defects was 0.13 (95% confidence interval 0.08-0.21), 0.35 (0.22-0.53), and 0.94 (0.47-1.67) per 100 person-years, while these were 0.19 (0.07-0.41), 0.49 (0.18-1.07), and 0.86 (0.10-3.11) during COC use, and 0.73 (0.30-1.51), 1.97 (0.94-3.63), and 7.65 (3.08-15.76) during pregnancy. COC use and pregnancy were independent risk factors for VTE, with highest risk during pregnancy postpartum, as demonstrated by adjusted hazard ratios of 16.0 (8.0-32.2) versus 2.2 (1.1-4.0) during COC use. Rather than strictly contraindicating COC use, we advocate that detailed counseling on all contraceptive options, including COCs, addressing the associated risks of both VTE and unintended pregnancy, enabling these women to make an informed choice.

scholarly journals Heritable Thrombophilia in Venous Thromboembolism in Northern Pakistan: A Cross-Sectional Study

2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-5
Author(s):  
Maria Khan ◽  
Chaudhry Altaf ◽  
Hamid Saeed Malik ◽  
Muhammad Abdul Naeem ◽  
Aamna Latif
Keyword(s):  
Venous Thromboembolism ◽  
Protein C ◽  
Gene Mutations ◽  
Factor V Leiden ◽  
Factor V ◽  
Protein C Deficiency ◽  
Factor V Leiden Mutation ◽  
Inherited Thrombophilia ◽  
At Deficiency ◽  
Prothrombin Gene

Background. Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is referred to as formation of clots in a deep vein or lodging of thrombus towards the lungs which could be fatal yet preventable. The risk of developing VTE can be increased by various factors. Where there are innumerable acquired causes, the possibility of inherited thrombophilia cannot be ignored. In view of this, we have evaluated all patients with venous thromboembolism for inherited thrombophilia. Objective. To evaluate the frequencies of antithrombin (AT) deficiency, protein C and S deficiencies, Factor V Leiden, and prothrombin gene mutations in patients harboring venous thromboembolism. Materials and Methods. A study comprising of 880 patients who were presented with manifestations of venous thromboembolism was conducted from July 2016 to June 2017. A blood sample collected from patients was screened for thrombophilia defects encompassing AT, protein C and S deficiencies, Factor V Leiden, and prothrombin gene mutations. All acquired causes of thrombosis were excluded. Results. Of 880 patients who underwent screening for thrombophilia, 182 patients demonstrated VTE history. Their age ranged from 1 to 58 years. Males constituted a predominant group. About 45 (24.7%) patients had evidence of heritable thrombophilia. Of these, 20 (10.9%) had AT deficiency, 9 (4.9%) had Factor V Leiden mutation, 6 (3.2%) had protein C deficiency, whereas protein S deficiency and prothrombin gene mutation both were found in 5 (2.7%) patients. Conclusion. Our study illustrated the highest frequency of antithrombin deficiency among other investigated thrombophilia defects.

scholarly journals Evaluation of Direct Oral Anticoagulants in the Treatment of Venous Thromboembolism for Inherited Thrombophilia Disorders

Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 5007-5007 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ali McBride ◽  
Reem Diri ◽  
Ravitharan Krishnadasan ◽  
Pavani Chalasani ◽  
Ivo Abraham ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Venous Thromboembolism ◽  
Protein C ◽  
Factor V Leiden ◽  
Secondary Prophylaxis ◽  
Factor V ◽  
Inherited Thrombophilia ◽  
Dvt Prophylaxis ◽  
Prothrombin Gene ◽  
Baseline Characteristics

Abstract Background Venous thromboembolism can be classified according to the presence of either environmental or genetic risk factors. Risk factors for thrombosis can include activated protein C resistance, and heritable including deficiencies of antithrombin, protein C or protein S. Factor V Leiden deficiency and prothrombin gene mutations are some of the more common thrombophilias, with a slight increased risk for venous thromboembolism (VTE). Current guidelines suggest the use of low-molecular weight heparins for secondary prophylaxis in patients with VTE. However, there is a lack of data on the use of Direct Oral Anticoagulant (DOACs) in patients with inherited thrombophilia. We evaluated our use of rivaroxaban in patients with thrombophilia disorders treated for secondary DVT prophylaxis. Method We performed a retrospective evaluation of patients in our institution with inherited thrombophilia with an active VTE diagnosis who received DOACs for secondary prophylaxis from November 2013 until April 2016. Data collected included patient demographics, inherited thrombophilia mutation, previous history of VTE, prior treatments, and efficacy and safety of anticoagulation with DOACs. Results We had 13 patients with inherited thrombophilia mutation and 4 patients diagnosed with concomitant cancer (non-Hodgkin lymphoma, melanoma, and 2 with breast cancer) (Table 1). Out of 13 patients 3 failed warfarin, and one failed fondaparinux prior to switching to a DOAC. Mutation with heterozygous Factor V Leiden deficiency was reported in 7 patients, while mutations with Protein C and/or S deficiency were found in 4 patients. One patient had both Factor V Leiden and Protein C deficiency mutations. The prothrombin gene mutation was identified in one patient. The median of length of therapy was 2 years with 8/13 still on rivaroxaban in April 2016. The shortest treatment duration was 41 days for a patient who failed rivaroxaban with a second clot and was switched to apixaban without subsequent treatment failure. Two patients experienced 4 non-major episodes of gastrointestinal bleeding, nose bleeding and dark stool. One patient developed rash with noted bruising during their rivaroxaban therapy. Conclusion: This is the first report on outcomes for secondary DVT prophylaxis with DOACs in patients with underlying thrombophilia mutations. Safety and efficacy of DOACs for secondary VTE prophylaxis yielded favorable results; however, future prospective studies in the setting of thrombophilia are warranted. Table 1 Summary of baseline characteristics and outcomes. Table 1. Summary of baseline characteristics and outcomes. Disclosures McBride: Sanofi: Research Funding.

Factor V Leiden Mutation Increases the Risk of Venous Thromboembolism in Cancer Patients – Results From the Vienna Cancer and Thrombosis Study (CATS).

Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (21) ◽  
pp. 2253-2253
Author(s):  
Ingrid Pabinger ◽  
Cihan Ay ◽  
Daniela Dunkler ◽  
Johannes Thaler ◽  
Eva-Maria Reitter ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Venous Thromboembolism ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Factor V Leiden ◽  
Treatment Modalities ◽  
Individual Risk ◽  
Factor V ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Factor V Leiden Mutation ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Abstract 2253 Background: Patients with cancer are at an increased risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE). The risk varies markedly in different patient populations and improvement of the prediction of VTE would be of advantage for tailoring thrombosis prophylaxis. Factor V Leiden is the most common genetic risk factor for VTE and the impact of factor V Leiden on cancer-associated thrombosis is not yet fully elucidated. Objective: To study the impact of factor V Leiden on the risk of VTE in cancer patients. Patients and Methods: Nine-hundred-eighty-two patients with newly diagnosed cancer (n=745) or progression of disease after complete or partial remission (n=237) were included in the cancer and thrombosis study (CATS), a prospective observational single centre cohort study at the Medical University Vienna. Patients were followed for a maximum period of 2 years. Blood samples were collected at inclusion and factor V Leiden was determined by genotyping. The main outcome measure was symptomatic or lethal objectively confirmed VTE. All VTE events were adjudicated independently. Results: Of the 982 patients (median age 62 years, interquartile range (IQR) 52–68, 537 men, 445 women) factor V-Leiden was found in 72 (7.3%), 70 had a heterozygous and two a homozygous genotype. Ten of 72 (14%) patients with factor V-Leiden developed VTE, whereas this was the case in 69 of 910 (7.6%) patients without factor V-Leiden. Interestingly, both patients with homozygous factor V Leiden developed VTE. In multivariable analysis that included age, sex, different tumour types, newly diagnosed versus recurrence of disease and the treatment modalities (chemotherapy, radiotherapy and surgery) the hazard ratio (HR) for factor V Leiden was 2.04 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.04–3.97)). In patients with newly diagnosed tumours the HR for factor V Leiden was 3.7 (95% CI 1.2–12.2) after 30 days. In Kaplan Meier analysis the probability for development of VTE after 6 months was 5.7% in those without and 13% in those with factor V Leiden, after one year the corresponding rates were 7.3% and 15%. Conclusions: Factor V Leiden is a genetically determined and thus disease-independent parameter, which is associated with VTE in cancer patients, especially shortly after cancer diagnosis, and could therefore be used for individual risk assignment. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document