Thrombophilia and risk of VTE recurrence according to the age at the time of first VTE manifestation

VASA ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 44 (4) ◽  
pp. 313-323 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lea Weingarz ◽  
Marc Schindewolf ◽  
Jan Schwonberg ◽  
Carola Hecking ◽  
Zsuzsanna Wolf ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Factor V Leiden ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards ◽  
First Episode ◽  
Factor V ◽  
Factor V Leiden Mutation ◽  
Younger Patients ◽  
Risk Of Recurrence ◽  
G20210a Mutation ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
The Impact

Abstract. Background: Whether screening for thrombophilia is useful for patients after a first episode of venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a controversial issue. However, the impact of thrombophilia on the risk of recurrence may vary depending on the patient’s age at the time of the first VTE. Patients and methods: Of 1221 VTE patients (42 % males) registered in the MAISTHRO (MAin-ISar-THROmbosis) registry, 261 experienced VTE recurrence during a 5-year follow-up after the discontinuation of anticoagulant therapy. Results: Thrombophilia was more common among patients with VTE recurrence than those without (58.6 % vs. 50.3 %; p = 0.017). Stratifying patients by the age at the time of their initial VTE, Cox proportional hazards analyses adjusted for age, sex and the presence or absence of established risk factors revealed a heterozygous prothrombin (PT) G20210A mutation (hazard ratio (HR) 2.65; 95 %-confidence interval (CI) 1.71 - 4.12; p < 0.001), homozygosity/double heterozygosity for the factor V Leiden and/or PT mutation (HR 2.35; 95 %-CI 1.09 - 5.07, p = 0.030), and an antithrombin deficiency (HR 2.12; 95 %-CI 1.12 - 4.10; p = 0.021) to predict recurrent VTE in patients aged 40 years or older, whereas lupus anticoagulants (HR 3.05; 95%-CI 1.40 - 6.66; p = 0.005) increased the risk of recurrence in younger patients. Subgroup analyses revealed an increased risk of recurrence for a heterozygous factor V Leiden mutation only in young females without hormonal treatment whereas the predictive value of a heterozygous PT mutation was restricted to males over the age of 40 years. Conclusions: Our data do not support a preference of younger patients for thrombophilia testing after a first venous thromboembolic event.

Factor V Leiden (G1691A) and Prothrombin Gene G20210A Mutations as Potential Risk Factors for Venous Thromboembolism after Total Hip or Total Knee Replacement Surgery

2002 ◽  
Vol 87 (04) ◽  
pp. 580-585 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. Larson ◽  
T. L. Lindahl ◽  
C. Andersson ◽  
L. Frison ◽  
D. Gustafsson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Venous Thromboembolism ◽  
Factor V Leiden ◽  
Composite Endpoint ◽  
Factor V ◽  
Factor V Leiden Mutation ◽  
G20210a Mutation ◽  
Symptomatic Pulmonary Embolism ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Prothrombin Gene

SummaryPatients (n = 1600) from 12 European countries, scheduled for elective orthopaedic hip or knee surgery, were screened for Factor V Leiden and prothrombin gene G20210A mutations, found in 5.5% and 2.9% of the populations, respectively. All patients underwent prophylactic treatment with one of four doses of melagatran and ximelagatran or dalteparin, starting pre-operatively. Bilateral ascending venography was performed on study day 8-11. The patients were subsequently treated according to local routines and followed for 4-6 weeks postoperatively. The composite endpoint of screened deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and symptomatic pulmonary embolism (PE) during prophylaxis did not differ significantly between patients with or without these mutations. Symptomatic venous thromboembolism (VTE) during prophylaxis and follow-up (1.9%) was significantly over-represented among patients with the prothrombin gene G20210A mutation (p = 0.0002). A tendency towards increased risk of VTE was found with the Factor V Leiden mutation (p = 0.09). PE were few, but significantly over-represented in both the Factor V Leiden and prothrombin gene G20210A mutated patients (p = 0.03 and p = 0.05, respectively). However, since 90% of the patients with these genetic risk factors will not suffer a VTE event, a general pre-operative genotyping is, in our opinion, of questionable value.

Factor V Leiden Mutation Increases the Risk of Venous Thromboembolism in Cancer Patients – Results From the Vienna Cancer and Thrombosis Study (CATS).

Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (21) ◽  
pp. 2253-2253
Author(s):  
Ingrid Pabinger ◽  
Cihan Ay ◽  
Daniela Dunkler ◽  
Johannes Thaler ◽  
Eva-Maria Reitter ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Venous Thromboembolism ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Factor V Leiden ◽  
Treatment Modalities ◽  
Individual Risk ◽  
Factor V ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Factor V Leiden Mutation ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Abstract 2253 Background: Patients with cancer are at an increased risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE). The risk varies markedly in different patient populations and improvement of the prediction of VTE would be of advantage for tailoring thrombosis prophylaxis. Factor V Leiden is the most common genetic risk factor for VTE and the impact of factor V Leiden on cancer-associated thrombosis is not yet fully elucidated. Objective: To study the impact of factor V Leiden on the risk of VTE in cancer patients. Patients and Methods: Nine-hundred-eighty-two patients with newly diagnosed cancer (n=745) or progression of disease after complete or partial remission (n=237) were included in the cancer and thrombosis study (CATS), a prospective observational single centre cohort study at the Medical University Vienna. Patients were followed for a maximum period of 2 years. Blood samples were collected at inclusion and factor V Leiden was determined by genotyping. The main outcome measure was symptomatic or lethal objectively confirmed VTE. All VTE events were adjudicated independently. Results: Of the 982 patients (median age 62 years, interquartile range (IQR) 52–68, 537 men, 445 women) factor V-Leiden was found in 72 (7.3%), 70 had a heterozygous and two a homozygous genotype. Ten of 72 (14%) patients with factor V-Leiden developed VTE, whereas this was the case in 69 of 910 (7.6%) patients without factor V-Leiden. Interestingly, both patients with homozygous factor V Leiden developed VTE. In multivariable analysis that included age, sex, different tumour types, newly diagnosed versus recurrence of disease and the treatment modalities (chemotherapy, radiotherapy and surgery) the hazard ratio (HR) for factor V Leiden was 2.04 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.04–3.97)). In patients with newly diagnosed tumours the HR for factor V Leiden was 3.7 (95% CI 1.2–12.2) after 30 days. In Kaplan Meier analysis the probability for development of VTE after 6 months was 5.7% in those without and 13% in those with factor V Leiden, after one year the corresponding rates were 7.3% and 15%. Conclusions: Factor V Leiden is a genetically determined and thus disease-independent parameter, which is associated with VTE in cancer patients, especially shortly after cancer diagnosis, and could therefore be used for individual risk assignment. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Combined Factor V Leiden (R506Q) and prothrombin G20210A genotyping in young patients presenting with deep venous thrombosis

2006 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
pp. 24-27 ◽  
Author(s):  
A Mansilha ◽  
F Araújo ◽  
M Severo ◽  
S M Sampaio ◽  
T Toledo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factor ◽  
Young People ◽  
Venous Thrombosis ◽  
Deep Venous Thrombosis ◽  
Young Patients ◽  
Factor V Leiden ◽  
First Episode ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Factor V ◽  
Factor V Leiden Mutation

Objective: To evaluate the association between the Factor V Leiden (FV R506Q) and prothrombin gene (FII G20210A) mutations and deep venous thrombosis (DVT) in young people. Methods: Blood samples were drawn from 199 subjects: 100 healthy controls and 99 unselected patients, with an objectively documented first episode of DVT under 40 years old. DNA analysis was performed using the polymerase chain reaction. Results: The mean age in the patient cohort was 27 years (range 16–40) and 68 (68.7%) were women. Patient prevalences were 20.6% and 10.1% for FV R506Q and FII G20210A, respectively. In the control group, carrier frequencies were 2% and 5%, respectively. We found an increased overall relative risk of DVT with statistical significance for FV R506Q carriers (OR: 12.8; 95% CI: 2.9–56.7; P < 0.001), but not for FII G20210A mutation (OR: 2.1; 95% CI: 0.7–6.5; P = 0.19). Conclusions: Our results suggest a possible increase in DVT risk for the young G20210A allele carriers, which can be more expressed in the presence of a circumstantial risk factor. There is extremely strong evidence that the Factor V Leiden mutation is an important risk factor in the development of a first episode of DVT in young people.

The Association Between Parameters of Erythrocytes Morphology and Thrombophilia-Related Mutations

2021 ◽  
Vol 16 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ozlem Oz ◽  
Ataman Gonel
Keyword(s):  
Factor V Leiden ◽  
Mthfr C677t ◽  
Prothrombin G20210a ◽  
Factor V ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Factor V Leiden Mutation ◽  
Erythrocyte Morphology ◽  
Mthfr A1298c ◽  
G20210a Mutation ◽  
History Of

Background: Alterations in erythrocyte morphology parameters have been identified and associated with hematological disorders and other chronic and cardiovascular diseases. Erythrocytes are abundant in thrombus content. Their hemoglobin density and differences in the ratio of macrocytic and microcytic cells may be associated with hypercoagulopathy in those with a history of thrombosis. Objective: This cross-sectional study aimed to investigate the relationship between hemogram parameters and thrombophilia genetic parameters. Method: A total of 55 patients whose thrombophilia panel was reviewed due to the diagnosis of thrombosis were included in the study. %MIC, %MAC, %HPO, %HPR and all hemogram parameters were measured using Abbott Alinity HQ. Prothrombin G20210A, MTHFR C677T, MTHFR A1298C, Factor V Leiden G169A and PAI-1 4G/5G mutations were studied using Real Time-PCR. Results: The MTHFR C677T mutation was detected in 58.2% of the patients. The Factor V Leiden mutation was detected in 5.5% of the patients. The MTHFR A1298C mutation was detected in 58.2%, The PAI mutation was detected in 74.5%, and the Factor 13 mutation was detected in 29% of the patients. Prothrombin G20210A mutation was not detected in any of the patients. Red blood cell (RBC) and Hct values were higher in Factor 13 mutant group; the Hgb and Htc values were higher in the MTHFR C677T mutant group. Conclusion: The MTHFR C677T and Factor 13 mutations may be associated with high Hct and RBC, Hgb, and Htc values, respectively and coagulation tendency in patients with a history of thrombosis.

Factor V Leiden and the risk of stillbirth in a German population

2003 ◽  
Vol 90 (09) ◽  
pp. 429-433 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rita Grimm ◽  
Daniel Robinson ◽  
Constanze Robinson ◽  
Thomas Kohlmann ◽  
Gudrun Schuster ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Population Sample ◽  
Factor V Leiden ◽  
Population Based ◽  
German Population ◽  
Factor V ◽  
Factor V Leiden Mutation ◽  
Number Of Children ◽  
North East ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Affected Woman

SummaryAn association between the factor V Leiden variant and an increased risk of pregnancy loss has been reported. Most previous studies were performed with clinically recruited patients and controls. This approach may cause selection bias. The present analysis was performed with the aim to investigate the association between the factor V Leiden mutation and the risk of stillbirth in a population-based sample.The Study of Health in Pomerania (SHIP) is a survey that was carried out in North East Germany. A random sample from the population aged 20 to 79 years was taken. The total SHIP population comprised 4,310 participants. The presence of the factor V Leiden variant was determined by PCR and Mnl I digestion. The presence of the factor V Leiden variant was neither associated with the number of pregnancies nor with the number of children per women. Data from 1,768 females who had at least one pregnancy with known outcome was available for the present analysis. Seventy-three women (4.1%) reported at least one stillbirth. Women with and without the factor V Leiden mutation did not differ with respect to the number of women with at least one stillbirth (OR for factor V Leiden variant 1.57; 95%-CI 0.76 – 3.25). Furthermore, the number of women with two or more stillbirths, the number of stillbirths per affected woman and the number of stillbirths per number of pregnancies per woman was similar between both genotype groups.In conclusion, there is no association between the factor V Leiden mutation and the risk of stillbirth in a representative population sample.

THROMBOPHILIC RISK FACTORS IN PATIENTS WITH CRANIAL AND SPINAL DURAL ARTERIOVENOUS FISTULAE

Neurosurgery ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 63 (4) ◽  
pp. 693-699 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rüediger Gerlach ◽  
Martina Boehm-Weigert ◽  
Joachim Berkefeld ◽  
Judith Duis ◽  
Andreas Raabe ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Protein C ◽  
Factor V Leiden ◽  
Factor V ◽  
Arteriovenous Fistulae ◽  
Factor V Leiden Mutation ◽  
Exact Test ◽  
G20210a Mutation ◽  
Cardiolipin Antibodies ◽  
Prothrombin Gene

ABSTRACT OBJECTIVE Numerous studies have reported the technical aspects and results of surgical and/or endovascular treatment of cranial dural arteriovenous fistulae (cDAVF) and spinal dural arteriovenous fistulae (sDAVF). Only a few of them have addressed the question of thrombophilic conditions, which may be relevant as pathogenetic factors or can increase the risk for venous thromboembolic events. Therefore, the objective of this study is to compare thrombophilic risk factors in patients with cDAVF and sDAVF with no history of trauma. METHODS A total of 43 patients (25 with cDAVF and 18 with sDAVF) were included in this study. Blood samples were analyzed for G20210A mutation of the prothrombin gene and factor V Leiden mutation. In all patients, prothrombin time, international normalized ratio, fibrinogen, antithrombin, protein C and S activity, von Willebrand factor antigen, ristocetin cofactor activity, D-dimer, coagulation factor VIII activity, and tissue factor pathway inhibitor were determined. Screening was performed for the occurrence of lupus antiphospholipid and cardiolipin antibodies. RESULTS The prevalence of G20210A mutation of the prothrombin gene was significantly higher in patients with cDAVF (n = 6) compared with patients with sDAVF (n = 0; P &lt; 0.05, Fisher's exact test). A factor V Leiden mutation was found in 3 patients with sDAVF and in 1 patient with cDAVF (P = 0.29, Fisher's exact test). No significant difference was found for other parameters, except for fibrinogen, but decreased protein C activity was more frequent in patients with cDAVF compared with patients with sDAVF (4 versus 1). Decreased protein S activity was encountered in 3 patients (2 with sDAVF and 1 with cDAVF). Cardiolipin antibodies were found in 2 patients with cDAVF but in none with sDAVF, whereas only 1 patient with sDAVF had lupus antiphospholipid antibodies. CONCLUSION In both groups of patients with dural arteriovenous fistulae, genetic thrombophilic abnormalities occurred in a higher percentage than in the general population. The differences of the genetic abnormalities may be involved in different pathophysiological mechanism(s) in the development of these distinct neurovascular entities.

The relationship of a Prothrombin G20210A mutation or a factor V Leiden mutation and on-aspirin platelet (re-)activity

2020 ◽  
Vol 19 ◽  
pp. 127-130
Author(s):  
Jeske J.K. van Diemen ◽  
Jeske M. Bij de Weg ◽  
Arda Arduç ◽  
Olivier Veraart ◽  
David Mager ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Factor V Leiden ◽  
Prothrombin G20210a ◽  
Factor V ◽  
Factor V Leiden Mutation ◽  
G20210a Mutation ◽  
Relationship Of ◽  
The Relationship

"ProC Global": A functional screening test that predicts recurrent venous thromboembolism

2005 ◽  
Vol 93 (03) ◽  
pp. 600-604 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shannon Bates ◽  
Marilyn Johnston ◽  
Simon McRae ◽  
Jeffrey Ginsberg ◽  
Anne Grand’Maison
Keyword(s):  
Venous Thromboembolism ◽  
Protein C ◽  
Specific Inhibitor ◽  
Factor V Leiden ◽  
First Episode ◽  
Functional Screening ◽  
Factor V ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Global Result ◽  
Recurrent Vte

SummaryAbnormalities of the Protein C (PC) pathway are found in the majority of patients with thrombophilia. ProC Global is a coagulation assay that reflects the net effect of the PC pathway by measuring the activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) of patient and control plasma, before and after activation of endogenous PC by Protac, a snake venom. Previous studies have suggested that abnormalities in this test are associated with an increased risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE). A retrospective analysis was performed using frozen plasma samples from 140 patients with confirmed VTE to determine whether an abnormal ProC Global result (in the presence and in the absence of known abnormalities in the PC pathway) is a predictor of initial and recurrent VTE. Patients were tested for the presence of activated protein C resistance, Factor V Leiden, PC and protein S (PS) deficiency, and non-specific inhibitor positivity. Mean ProC Global results were significantly lower in patients with recurrent VTE than in patients without recurrent VTE. The association between abnormal ProC Global result and recurrent VTE showed a strong trend, before (odds ratio, OR 3.6) and after (OR 3.1) exclusion of known thrombophilic abnormalities. Patients with a first episode of idiopathic VTE also expressed significant lower ProC Global results than those with secondary VTE. After exclusion of known PC pathway abnormalities, there was a statistically significant association between abnormal ProC Global and initial idiopathic VTE (p=0.04). These results suggest that ProC Global may serve as a predictor of recurrent VTE and potentially for first episode of idiopathic VTE. ProC Global may help identify patients at increased risk of initial and recurrent VTE.

A Case Illustrating That Cancer Tips the Scale of Thrombosis.

Blood ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 106 (11) ◽  
pp. 4128-4128
Author(s):  
Emma C. Scott ◽  
Jeffrey Cohn ◽  
Stephen Heitner
Keyword(s):  
Tumor Cells ◽  
Ductal Carcinoma ◽  
Metastatic Cancer ◽  
Factor V Leiden ◽  
Cysteine Proteases ◽  
Factor V ◽  
Factor V Leiden Mutation ◽  
Patients With Cancer ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Prothrombin Mutation

Abstract Background: There are many causes of thrombosis in cancer, including cancer itself, the release of TNF, IL-1 &IL-6 causing endothelial damage, the interaction between tumor cells and macrophages activates platelets, factors X11 &X. Cysteine proteases &tissue factor, in the tumor cells have pro-coagulant activity (Bick, R. New Engl J of Med. Volume 349. July 2003). Chemotherapy, hormonal therapy and indwelling central venous catheters also increase the risk of thrombosis. There is a RR of 4.1 for patients with cancer who did not have chemotherapy and 6.5 for patients with cancer who had chemotherapy (Heit et al. Arch Intern Med. 2000; 160: 809–815). Factor V Leiden mutation causes partial resistance to the inactivating effects of activated protein C. 5% of the population carries this mutation and it is present in 20% of patients with a 1st venous thrombotic episode. The risk of venous thrombosis is 3–8 fold. The prothrombin mutation is less common and the relative risk of thrombosis is about 2.0. In a large case control study it was found that carriers of the Factor V Leiden or the prothrombin mutation who also had cancer had an approximately 12–17 times increased risk of thrombosis; compared to an overall 7 times risk in patients with malignancy alone (Blom et al. JAMA. Feb 9, 2005. Vol 293, No 6). Case history: A 54 year old caucasion female was diagnosed with stage 1 infiltrating ductal carcinoma after palpating a lump in her left breast. The tumor was 1.6 cm, ER negative, PR negative and HER-2 negative. Lumpectomy and axillary node dissection revealed no residual carcinoma in the breast and no involvement of eleven lymph nodes. She completed 4 cycles of Cytoxan and Adriamycin successfully and was to start radiation therapy. 1 week after completing chemotherapy she had a focal seizure with tonicclonic movements of her right arm and no loss of consciousness. An MRI showed cortical infarcts, which were originally thought to be metastatic hemorrhages, in the left parietal and frontal areas and right parietal area. A follow up MRI showed considerable improvement of the cortical lesions, with no evidence of any metastatic cancer. Subsequently, she developed bilateral DVTs for which an IVC filter was placed as it was felt that she was not a candidate for anticoagulation given her recent CNS hemorrhage. She was also found to have bilateral pulmonary emboli on CT scan of the chest. Two other underlying disorders predisposing to thrombosis were found- Factor V Leiden mutation and the prothrombin gene mutation. Further imaging confirmed a thrombotic etiology for her CNS event, and coumadin was started. Conclusion: This case demonstrates the magnitude of the effect of cancer on thrombosis. This patient had 2 prothrombotic mutations, was a smoker, who had been on the OCP for 10 years prior to menopause, yet had no thrombotic episodes until she developed cancer. Also of interest is that the thrombotic episodes occurred shortly after completion of chemotherapy- another prothrombotic factor.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document