Interaction Of Plasma Proteins With Artificial Surfaces With Reference To Platelet Adhesion
On occasion, fewer platelets from platelet rich plasma (PRP), adhered to hydrophilic (glass) surfaces exposed to platelet poor plasma (PPP) for 3 min than areas exposed for 3 s. The decrease was dramatic and consistent when platelet suspension (gel-PLS, obtained from PRP by 2B Sepharose gel filtration) was used instead of PRP. To further explore the factors which influence platelet adhesion, we used the following: for surfaces, a) sparkleen-cleaned glass (hydrophilic), b) acid-washed (somewhat hydrophobic), and c) siliconized (hydrophobic); for proteins, a) PPP, b) fibrinogen (96% clottable), c) defi-brinogenated (defib.) plasma, and d) defib. plasma plus fibrinogen; for platelet suspension, a) PRP, b) gel-PLS, and c) platelets in defib. plasma (defib. PLS).From gel-PLS, non-siliconized surfaces exposed to fibrinogen for 3 s attached more platelets (F<0.05) than those exposed to PPP or defib. plasma plus fibrinogen. The latter two attracted more platelets (P<0.01) than defib. plasma. Hydrophilic sparkleen-cleaned glass previously exposed to PPP (or defib. plasma plus fibrinogen) attached a minimum of 10-fold as many platelets from gel-PLS than from PRP. Under similar conditions acid-cleaned surfaces attached 2-fold from gel-PLS, while hydrophobic glass did not show any change. By exposing the surfaces to PPP followed by gel-PLS, the sparkleen-cleaned glass showed the greatest decrease (P<0.001) in the number of platelets attached to areas exposed to PPP for 3 min as compared to 3 s, while siliconized showed no such decrease. If, however, the surfaces were exposed to defib. plasma, they all showed decreases in platelet attraction at 3 min.