scholarly journals Paving the Path to Value: The Role of Registry Studies in Interventional Radiology

2018 ◽  
Vol 02 (02) ◽  
pp. 128-132
Author(s):  
Melinda Wang ◽  
Maureen Kohi

AbstractThe growth rate of interventional radiology (IR) procedures and practitioners has exceeded the pace of evidence development to support evidence-based practice. In the innovative and highly adaptive field of IR, there exists a tremendous need for interventional radiologists to practice evidence-based medicine as a way to maintain and improve quality of health care. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are considered to be the gold standard of research, providing level I evidence, but in procedural subspecialties, they remain difficult to design and implement due to challenges in randomization, blinding, and inadequate sample size. To build the foundation of evidence in IR, registry studies can play a complementary role to RCTs. Clinical data registries may offer a more practical approach to gathering outcomes data, important in this era with the advent of the Medicare Access and CHIP Reauthorization Act (MACRA), in comparison with RCTs. Properly designed registries can store an abundance of data with which high-quality observational studies can be performed. Although considered level II evidence, these registry studies will allow the evaluation of both performance and value of IR procedures, particularly in circumstances in which an RCT would not be feasible. This manuscript aims to serve as a guide for developing and participating in IR registry studies.

2011 ◽  
Vol 21 (6) ◽  
pp. 644-653 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael P. Kelly ◽  
Tessa A. Moore

This article outlines a set of methodological, theoretical, and other issues relating to the conduct of good outcome studies. The article begins by considering the contribution of evidence-based medicine to the methodology of outcome research. The lessons which can be applied in outcome studies in nonmedical settings are described. The article then examines the role of causal pathways between interventions and outcomes and especially the importance of delineating them in advance of undertaking investigations. The development of designs based on randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with fully articulated causal pathways is described. Ways of supplementing RCTs with methods to highlight elements in the causal pathway in outcome studies are indicated. The importance of adhering to best practice in reporting and analysis is also noted.


2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 52
Author(s):  
Muhammad Sobri Maulana

Background: Geriatric care is an important part in healthcare and are sometimes neglected.  Family caregivers figures assume a key role in postponing and potentially forestalling standardization of chronically ill elderly patients. The role of family function in depression has been demonstrated from earlier studies, however, the part of family function in quality of life the elderly has not concentrated widely. Objective: To evaluate the connection between family function and quality of life. Methods: Literature searching was conducted through PubMed, Science Direct and Embase. Critical appraisal using appraisal sheet for prognosis from Oxford Center for Evidence Based Medicine in 2011. Results: One article was found with good validity showed that direct relationship between family function and quality of life is not associated. However, if depression is present it plays as a strong mediator between family function and quality of life. Conclusion: Family function mediated with depression plays an important role in quality of life in elderly patients.


2021 ◽  
Vol 26 (3S) ◽  
pp. 4636
Author(s):  
T. V. Pavlova

The introduction of evidence-based medicine into practical healthcare provides physicians with the opportunity to use treatment approaches, which have been proven to be effective in randomized controlled trials. In this case, it is necessary to consider using the medication in a particular patient in accordance with the design of clinical trials and strictly follow the instructions. Drugs should be critically selected with focus on quality of available efficacy and safety data obtained in the population closest to a patient. In addition, clinicians should regularly review the available data with particular regard to its quality. The advantages, disadvantages, limitations and methodological problems of observational studies should be carefully considered during the interpretation of results. At the same time, the compliance of the results of real-world evidence studies with registration trial data indicates a high reproducibility of medication effects.


Surgeries ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 216-230
Author(s):  
Andrew A. Gumbs ◽  
Manana Gogol ◽  
Gaya Spolverato ◽  
Hebatallah Taher ◽  
Elie K. Chouillard

Introduction: Integrative medicine (IM) is a relatively new field where non-traditional therapies with peer-reviewed evidence are incorporated or integrated with more traditional approaches. Methods: A systematic review of the literature from the last 10 years was done by searching clinical trials and randomized-controlled trials on Pubmed that discuss nutrition, supplementation, and lifestyle changes associated with “Pancreatic Cancer.” Results: Only 50 articles ultimately met the inclusion criteria for this review. A total of 15 articles discussed the role of obesity and 10 discussed the influence of stress in increasing the risk of pancreatic cancer. Six discussed the potential beneficial role of Vitamins, 5 of cannabinoids, 4 an anti-inflammatory diet, 3 of nut consumption, 2 of green tea consumption, 2 of curcumin supplementation, 1 role of melatonin, and 1 of probiotics. One article each was found on the theoretical benefits of adhering to either a Mediterranean or ketogenic diet. Discussion: As more surgeons become interested in IM, it is hoped that more diseases where the curative treatment is mainly surgical can benefit from the all-encompassing principles of IM in an effort to improve quality of life and survival in patients with pancreatic cancer.


2021 ◽  
Vol 37 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sameh M. Zamzam ◽  
Mosaad Abdel-Aziz ◽  
Ahmed Atef ◽  
Usama Abdel-Naseer ◽  
Mostafa Hamoda ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are prospective comparative studies in which study groups are allocated randomly to intervention or serve as controls. RCT is the mainstay to achieve evidence in the literature in clinical research. A RCT is the main research design to study the effect of an intervention and the only way to confirm the value of a new treatment. Main body RCT also gives the way to generate meta-analyses and systematic reviews giving a stronger evidence for clinical practice. Evidence-based medicine (EBM) is crucial for safe, effective, and standardized patient care. Although there is an agreement on the importance of performing RCT, it can be challenging to do it efficiently including different aspects like study design, funding, randomization, blinding, follow-up, data analysis, statistics, generalization of results, and reporting of quality of the studies. Conclusion In this article, we gave a comprehensive review for RCT in otolaryngology discussing their importance, advantages, and drawbacks, types, steps, challenges, reporting their quality and their prevalence in the literature.


2021 ◽  
pp. bmjebm-2021-111670
Author(s):  
Clara Locher ◽  
David Moher ◽  
Ioana Alina Cristea ◽  
Florian Naudet

During the COVID-19 pandemic, the rush to scientific and political judgements on the merits of hydroxychloroquine was fuelled by dubious papers which may have been published because the authors were not independent from the practices of the journals in which they appeared. This example leads us to consider a new type of illegitimate publishing entity, ‘self-promotion journals’ which could be deployed to serve the instrumentalisation of productivity-based metrics, with a ripple effect on decisions about promotion, tenure and grant funding, but also on the quality of manuscripts that are disseminated to the medical community and form the foundation of evidence-based medicine.


2011 ◽  
Vol 33 (1) ◽  
pp. 3-9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bob Wilffert ◽  
◽  
Jesse Swen ◽  
Hans Mulder ◽  
Daan Touw ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
pp. 34-37
Author(s):  
Olha Puzanovа

The objective: was to study the international experience of evidence based preventive medicine development as well as to estimate its perspectives in Ukraine. Patients and methods. Main principles and methods of scientific knowledge and research have been used including universal ones, methods of systemic approach, quantitative and qualitative information analysis, classification and systematization of theoretical and empirical data, hystorical and logical methods, health statistics as well). In total 529 scientific information sources have been studied, particularly a number of evidence based medicine (EBM) computer databases, special task forces recommendations and Cochrane reviews on prevention, Register of medical and technological documents for health care standards in Ukraine et al. Results. The contribution of foreign scientific schools in the development of EBM has been determined, as well as the crucial role of scientific works carried out in the US and Great Britain in 1930–80s as to the development of evidence based preventive medicine. The international experience of the development and functioning of evidence based practice centers’ and special task forces on prevention has been summarized, as the experience of the development and implementation of recommendations on prevention in primary health care (PHC) in high income countries acceptable for Ukraine. The concept of evidence based prevention has been first proposed. It is revealed, that EBM implementation in Europe has been prioritized in both the field of infectious diseases prevention and PHC, while there are both the development of differentiated evidence based prevention and early evidence based diagnosis in PHC in the US. Conclusion. The results proved importance of taking into consideration of international experience while evidence based PHC is being developed as a priority in Ukraine.


2017 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 47-48 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joshua Z. Goldenberg ◽  
Erica B. Oberg ◽  
Jane Guiltinan ◽  
Rachelle L. McCarty

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document