scholarly journals Shared Oocyte Donation: Ideas and Expectations in a Bioethical Context Based on a Qualitative Survey of Brazilian Women

Author(s):  
Drauzio Oppenheimer ◽  
Agatha Oppenheimer ◽  
Sthefano Vilhena ◽  
Augusto Von Atzingen

Objective Assisted reproduction combines innovative technologies and new forms of procreation through gamete donation; however, it also leads to moral and ethical issues and to the wide application of referential bioethics. The objective of the present study was to understand the bioethical context of shared oocyte donation. Methods The present qualitative study used the Collective Subject Discourse methodology to interview donors and recipients in Brazil. Results Donors suffer from infertility, and in vitro fertilization opens the possibility of having a child; however, the cost is high, and helping the recipient is more important than the financial cost. The recipients regret delaying motherhood; adopting a child is their last option, and they desire to feel the physical stages of pregnancy. The recipients find the rules unfair regarding the lack of an oocyte bank and the fact that the treatment must be performed in shared cycles; however, oocyte donation makes it possible to realize the common dream of motherhood. Conclusion The obtained data showed that the patients are suffering and frustrated due to infertility, and they realize that in vitro fertilization may be the treatment they need. These women believe that children are essential in the constitution of the family, and scientific advances bring about innovative technologies and new forms of family constitution, with repercussions in the social, economic, political, and family contexts that lead to bioethical questions in Postmodernity.

Author(s):  
Elizabeth Heitman

In vitro fertilization (IVF) stands out as one of the contemporary period's most extraordinary technologies, and its social and ethical consequences among the most far reaching. Despite its uncertain effectiveness and medical consequences, IVF has contributed significantly to the medicalization of infertility and the increasingly imperative character of reproductive technology. New developments in IVF, particularly oocyte donation, have created new definitions of treatable infertility and new social needs for IVF; when the technology does not result in pregnancy or healthy babies, these developments have created profound new disappointments. IVF and the commodification of the extracorporeal embryo have also confused the social meaning and legal definition of parenthood. Ultimately the relationship between prospective parents, infertility specialists, and the embryos that they create is a highly ambiguous one. This ambiguity is likely to be a long-term characteristic of efforts to develop, use, and assess assisted reproductive technologies.


1995 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 320-323 ◽  
Author(s):  
Steven R. Lindheim ◽  
Richard S. Legro ◽  
Randy S. Morris ◽  
May A. Vijod ◽  
Rogerio A. Lobo ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 112 (3) ◽  
pp. e156-e157
Author(s):  
Audrey J. Gaskins ◽  
Zsolt Peter Nagy ◽  
Sarah M. Capelouto ◽  
Daniel B. Shapiro ◽  
Jessica B. Spencer ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 112 (6) ◽  
pp. 1112-1117
Author(s):  
Yelena Dondik ◽  
Kelly Pagidas ◽  
Elizabeth Eklund ◽  
Christina Ngo ◽  
Glenn E. Palomaki ◽  
...  

1995 ◽  
Vol 63 (1) ◽  
pp. 71-76 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuval Yaron ◽  
Ami Amit ◽  
Steven M. Brenner ◽  
M. Reuben Peyser ◽  
Menachem P. David ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document