Postoperative Complications Causing Readmission in 30 Days after Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Retrospective Nested Case-Control Study of Risk Factors Based on Propensity Score Matching

2019 ◽  
Vol 33 (11) ◽  
pp. 1100-1108 ◽  
Author(s):  
Haozheng Tang ◽  
Hui Li ◽  
Shutao Zhang ◽  
You Wang ◽  
Xinhua Qu ◽  
...  

AbstractWe performed this study to identify independent risk factors for life-threatening postoperative complications causing 30-day readmissions after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Improved understanding of these risks may improve efficiency and safety of treatment. We performed a retrospective, nested case-control study using an open-access database of 2,622 patients who underwent primary TKA at a tertiary academic medical center in Singapore between January 2013 and June 2014. Patients were grouped according to the incidence of complications. Multivariate logistic analysis was performed to identify predictive factors for TKA complications. The incidence of postoperative complications was 1.72%. Compared with cases performed with an operative time < 70 minutes, increased operative time was associated with a higher risk of complications. Case duration > 90 minutes was associated with an increased risk (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 4.57, p = 0.001; case duration ≥ 111 minutes, aOR = 4.64, p = 0.04; and case duration between 91 and 110 minutes, aOR = 3.20, p = 0.03). The correlation between operative time and complications was nonlinear. Cerebrovascular accident (CVA) or transient ischemic attack (TIA) was an independent risk factor for increased complication rate (aOR = 11.59, p = 0.02). Operative duration has been identified as an independent risk factor for complications after TKA. As it remains a modifiable factor to which doctors are interested in bringing quality improvement, the risk of postoperative complications will be reduced by minimizing the operative duration.

PLoS ONE ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 12 (6) ◽  
pp. e0178571 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sai-Wai Ho ◽  
Chao-Bin Yeh ◽  
Shun-Fa Yang ◽  
Han-Wei Yeh ◽  
Jing-Yang Huang ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Enguang Yang ◽  
Suoshi Jing ◽  
Yuanjie Niu ◽  
Shiyong Qi ◽  
Prabin Kumar Yadav ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: To compare the efficacy and safety of a single-use digital flexible ureteroscope (FURS) and a reusable FURS for the treatment of lower pole stones (LPS) smaller than 20 mm.Methods: A prospective case-control study was conducted using the clinical data from a multicenter, randomized, open-label clinical trial in four hospitals in China. A single-use digital FURS ZebraScope™ was utilized in the trial group during surgery, with a reusable FURS URF-V used in the control group. The efficacy endpoints assessed were the 1-month postsurgical stone-free rate (SFR), operative time, length of postoperative hospital stay, and mean reduction in hemoglobin level. The safety outcomes assessed were the presence of adverse events (AEs), severe AEs (SAEs), and postoperative complications.Results: In total, 49 patients with LPS underwent surgery using FURS. The demographic and preoperative parameters were comparable between the 2 groups. The 1-month SFR was 84.00% for the ZebraScope™ group and 58.33% for the URF-V group (P<0.05). There was no difference between the two groups in the operative time (P=0.665), the length of hospital stay (P=0.308), the presence of postoperative complications (P=0.307), the presence of AEs (P=0.483),and the presence of SAEs (P = 0.141). Conclusions: This study demonstrates that single-use digital FURS is a safe and effective option and can offer higher SFR than the reusable FURS in the treatment of LPS smaller than 20 mm. We recommend single-use digital FURS as an alternative to reusable FURS for the treatment of LPS.Trial registration: The trial was registered in Chinese Clinical Trial Registry. The registration number: ChiCTR1900021615. Date of registration: 1/3/2019. This trial was registered retrospectively.


Author(s):  
Rajesh Malhotra ◽  
Aditya Jain ◽  
Saurabh Gupta ◽  
Deepak Gautam

AbstractPresence of hardware in juxta-articular location poses challenge during total knee arthroplasty (TKA). When present in distal femur, it precludes the use of an intramedullary femoral jig during TKA often necessitating removal of hardware leading to prolonged surgery, higher risk of complications, and inferior results. We conducted a case–control study to assess the outcome of TKA among patients with post-traumatic arthritis using a handheld navigation system to perform bone cuts allowing retention of hardware in situ. In 15 patients with post-traumatic arthritis and hardware around the knee (Group A), none or part(s) of hardware were removed while performing TKA. These patients were matched to 15 patients who underwent TKA with handheld navigation for primary OA knee (Group B). The perioperative outcomes assessed were operative time, intraoperative blood loss, length of hospital stay, complications, and 30 days reoperation rate. Clinical outcomes were assessed by using Knee Society Score (KSS) and radiological outcomes using mechanical axis and coronal and sagittal component angles. Mean age of patients at surgery were 65.67 years (Group A) and 66.73 years (Group B). Mean operative time and blood loss were significantly higher in Group A as compared with Group B. At the mean follow-up of 34 months, KSS significantly improved in both the groups. However, there was no statistically significant difference in the clinical and radiological outcomes between the two groups. One patient in Group A developed wound dehiscence and had to undergo debridement and flap coverage within 30 days. The use of navigation helps surgeons in gaining proper limb alignment and implant positioning without complete removal of hardware.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document