scholarly journals Effects of 1450-ppm Fluoride-containing Toothpastes Associated with Boosters on the Enamel Remineralization and Surface Roughness after Cariogenic Challenge

2020 ◽  
Vol 14 (01) ◽  
pp. 161-170
Author(s):  
Pedro Luiz Santos Tomaz ◽  
Letícia Almeida de Sousa ◽  
Kayanne Freire de Aguiar ◽  
Thales de Sá Oliveira ◽  
Marcelo Henrick Maia Matochek ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Surface Roughness ◽  
Surface Hardness ◽  
In Vitro Study ◽  
Longitudinal Section ◽  
Enamel Surface ◽  
Physical Parameters ◽  
Specific Chemical ◽  
Caries Lesion ◽  
Ph Cycling

Abstract Objectives This in vitro study investigated the remineralization potential of 1450 ppm, fluoride-containing toothpastes containing different active remineralization agents after cariogenic challenge with pH cycling. The enamel surface roughness after brushing and the chemical and physical characteristics of the toothpastes tested were also analyzed. Materials and Methods Fifty-six bovine enamel blocks were obtained (4 × 4 × 6 mm) and divided into three thirds: intact (untreated), demineralized (artificial caries lesion), and treated (caries lesion, pH cycling, and brushing with dentifrices). Seven commercially available fluoride toothpastes (1450 ppm F): three with anti-erosion claims (Candida Professional [CPP], Colgate Total 12 Daily Repair [CDR], Regenerate Enamel Science [RES]); three with desensitizing claims (Bianco Pro Clinical [BPP], Elmex Sensitive [ESS], and Regenerador Diário DentalClean [RDC]); and one standard regular-fluoride toothpaste Colgate Total 12 (CTT) were selected. During pH cycling (demineralization 6 h/remineralization 18 h) for 7 days, the treated third was brushed with the different dentifrices for 10 minutes in a brushing machine before immersion in a remineralizing solution. The Knoop hardness (25 g, 10 second of the surface, and longitudinal section were then evaluated at eight depths (10 to 330 μm). Mean and percentage of surface hardness recovery (% SHR) were calculated. Surface enamel roughness (Ra) was also evaluated. The pH, %weight of particles, zeta potential, and polydispersity index of toothpaste slurries were also evaluated. Statistical Analysis Data were statistically analyzed (ANOVA/Tukey, 5%). Results The %SHR of CPP was significantly lower than the others (p < 0.05). The enamel subsurface was more effectively remineralized when treated with BPP, ESS, and RDC. The surface roughness was higher when the demineralized third was treated with CTT, RDC, and RES and after the cariogenic challenge (p < 0.05). For some of the products tested, there was no relationship between surface remineralization and subsurface remineralization. Although toothpastes CPP and RDC present the lowest %SHR means, both products effectively remineralize within the subsurface carious lesion. Regression analysis demonstrated no strong correlations of the enamel surface roughness with the chemical and physical parameters. Conclusions Most but not all the fluoride toothpastes were able to remineralize the enamel surface. No specific chemical or physical parameter alone correlated with the surface roughness.

scholarly journals Effects of Toothbrushing with Fluoride Abrasive and Whitening Dentifrices on Both Unbleached and Bleached Human Enamel Surface in Terms of Roughness and Hardness: An in vitro Study

2012 ◽  
Vol 13 (5) ◽  
pp. 584-589 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sukran Bolay ◽  
Filiz Yalcin Cakir ◽  
Sevil Gurgan
Keyword(s):  
Surface Roughness ◽  
In Vitro Study ◽  
Vitro Study ◽  
Enamel Surface ◽  
Carbamide Peroxide ◽  
Hardness Tester ◽  
Human Enamel ◽  
Machine Surface Roughness ◽  
Hardness Values

ABSTRACT Aim The aim of this in vitro study was to evaluate the surface roughness and hardness of both unbleached and bleached (opalescence; 10% carbamide peroxide) human enamel brushed with water (without dentifrice), fluoride abrasive dentifrice (Colgate Total) and whitening dentifrice (Natural White). Materials and methods Human enamel samples were obtained from third molars and randomly divided into five groups (n = 8): G1—Control (brushed with water without dentifrice), G2—Colgate Total (fluoride abrasive dentifrice), G3—Natural White (whitening dentifrice), G4—Opalescence (10% carbamide peroxide) and then brushed with Colgate Total, G5— Opalescence (10% carbamide peroxide) and then brushed with Natural White. Bleaching regimen was applied according to manufacturers’ instructions. The brushing process was performed with a modified Nyffenegger's brushing machine. Surface roughness was analyzed with a profilometer. Microhardness testing was performed with a Brinell hardness tester. Results Results were statistically analyzed by Kruskal-Wallis, one-way ANOVA analysis and Mann-Whitney U, Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed-ranks tests. There were significant differences in surface roughness values for all groups, which showed an increase in roughness (p < 0.05). When the bleaching treatment combined with brushing with whitening dentifrice was performed (G5), there was a significant decrease in hardness values (p < 0.05). The other groups (G1, G2, G3, G4) showed no significant hardness differences (p > 0.05). Conclusion It was concluded that toothbrushing procedures increased the enamel surface roughness, and that bleaching regimen performed with cleaning treatment, through brushing with whitening dentifrice decreased hardness values. Clinical significance When applied together, bleaching and cleaning treatments may alter the enamel surface roughness and hardness values. How to cite this article Bolay S, Cakir FY, Gurgan S. Effects of Toothbrushing with Fluoride Abrasive and Whitening Dentifrices on Both Unbleached and Bleached Human Enamel Surface in Terms of Roughness and Hardness: An in vitro Study. J Contemp Dent Pract 2012;13(5):584-589.

scholarly journals Evaluation of Enamel Surface after Removal of Adhesive Resin: An in Vitro Study

2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 12-16
Author(s):  
Geeta Pyakurel ◽  
Gazi Shamim Hassan ◽  
Mahmood Sajedeen
Keyword(s):  
Surface Roughness ◽  
Stainless Steel ◽  
Tungsten Carbide ◽  
In Vitro Study ◽  
T Test ◽  
Enamel Surface ◽  
Adhesive Resin ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
And Tungsten

Introduction: Preservation of the enamel surface during the removal of orthodontic appliance is an essential aspect for clinicians. However, various therapeutic measures can affect the enamel surface. The objective of the research is to evaluate the roughness of enamel surface after the removal of adhesive resin. Materials & Method: 40 extracted human premolar teeth were randomly divided into two groups and the enamel surfaces were initially subjected to profilometer for the assessment of surface roughness. Following bracket bonding, debonding was done and adhesive resin was removed by stainless steel bur in Group A and tungsten carbide bur in Group B. Again, the surface roughness was measured by profilometer. Independent t-test was performed to compare the enamel surface roughness between two groups and paired t-test to compare the enamel surface roughness within the groups. Result: The mean average surface roughness of stainless steel bur was 27.009 ± 4.8420 μm and tungsten carbide was 31.426 ± 5.0956 μm. The result showed that there was significant difference in enamel surface roughness between two groups. Conclusion: The roughness values were found to be significantly decreased with the use of stainless steel bur (SS) than tungsten carbide bur (TC).

scholarly journals In vitro evaluation of human dental enamel surface roughness bleached with 35% carbamide peroxide and submitted to abrasive dentifrice brushing

2003 ◽  
Vol 17 (4) ◽  
pp. 342-348 ◽  
Author(s):  
Claudia Cia Worschech ◽  
José Augusto Rodrigues ◽  
Luis Roberto Marcondes Martins ◽  
Gláucia Maria Bovi Ambrosano
Keyword(s):  
Surface Roughness ◽  
Artificial Saliva ◽  
Dental Enamel ◽  
In Vitro Study ◽  
Surface Cleaning ◽  
Enamel Surface ◽  
Initial Surface ◽  
Carbamide Peroxide ◽  
Molar Teeth

The aim of this in vitro study was to evaluate the surface roughness of human enamel bleached with 35% carbamide peroxide at different times and submitted to different superficial cleaning treatments: G1 - not brushed; G2 - brushed with fluoride abrasive dentifrice; G3 - brushed with a non-fluoride abrasive dentifrice; G4 - brushed without dentifrice. Sixty fragments of human molar teeth with 4 x 4 mm were obtained using a diamond disc. The specimens were polished with sandpaper and abrasive pastes. A perfilometer was used to measure roughness average (Ra) values of the initial surface roughness and at each 7-day-interval after the beginning of treatment. The bleaching was performed on the surface of the fragments for 1 hour a week, and the surface cleaning treatment for 3 minutes daily. The samples were stored in individual receptacles with artificial saliva. Analysis of variance and the Tukey test revealed significant differences in surface roughness values for G2 and G3, which showed an increase in roughness over time; G1 and G4 showed no significant roughness differences. The bleaching with 35% carbamide peroxide did not alter the enamel surface roughness, but when the bleaching treatment was performed combined with brushing with abrasive dentifrices, there was a significant increase in roughness values.

scholarly journals Impact of Experimental Nano-HAP Pastes on Bovine Enamel and Dentin Submitted to a pH Cycling Model

2013 ◽  
Vol 24 (3) ◽  
pp. 273-278 ◽  
Author(s):  
Livia P. Comar ◽  
Beatriz M. Souza ◽  
Luiz Fernando Gracindo ◽  
Marilia A. R. Buzalaf ◽  
Ana Carolina Magalhaes
Keyword(s):  
Calcium Phosphate ◽  
Repeated Measures ◽  
Surface Hardness ◽  
In Vitro Study ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Mi Paste ◽  
Ph Cycling ◽  
Bovine Enamel

This in vitro study evaluated the preventive potential of experimental pastes containing 10% and 20% hydroxyapatite nanoparticles (Nano-HAP), with or without fluoride, on dental demineralization. Bovine enamel (n=15) and root dentin (n=15) specimens were divided into 9 groups according to their surface hardness: control (without treatment), 20 Nanop paste (20% HAP), 20 Nanop paste plus (20% HAP + 0.2% NaF), 10 Nanop paste (10% HAP), 10 Nanop paste plus (10% HAP + 0.2% NaF), placebo paste (without fluoride and HAP), fluoride paste (0.2% NaF), MI paste (CPP-ACP, casein phosphopeptide-amorphous calcium phosphate), and MI paste plus (CPP-ACP + 0.2% NaF). Both MI pastes were included as commercial control products containing calcium phosphate. The specimens were treated with the pastes twice a day (1 min), before and after demineralization. The specimens were subjected to a pH-cycling model (demineralization–6-8 h/ remineralization-16-18 h a day) for 7 days. The dental subsurface demineralization was analyzed using cross-sectional hardness (kgf/mm 2 , depth 10-220 µm). Data were tested using repeated-measures two-way ANOVA and Bonferroni's test (p<0.05). The only treatment able to reduce the loss of enamel and dentin subsurface hardness was fluoride paste (0.2% NaF), which differed significantly from the control at 30- and 50-µm depth (p<0.0001). The other treatments were not different from each other or compared with the control. The experimental Nanop pastes, regardless of the addition of fluoride, were unable to reduce dental demineralization in vitro.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document