Lessons Learned: Trapeziectomy and Suture Suspension Arthroplasty for Thumb Carpometacarpal Osteoarthritis

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ashley L. Pistorio ◽  
John B. Moore
Keyword(s):  
Surgical Technique ◽  
Grip Strength ◽  
Preoperative Assessment ◽  
Lessons Learned ◽  
Pain Scores ◽  
Proximal Migration ◽  
Surgeon Experience ◽  
Thumb Carpometacarpal ◽  
Carpometacarpal Osteoarthritis ◽  
Suture Suspension

AbstractIn this study, we describe refinements of an accepted technique made by a single surgeon for trapeziectomy and suture suspension arthroplasty for thumb carpometacarpal (CMC) osteoarthritis after 220 cases over 4 years. Results are derived from 77 patients who underwent treatment using this technique comparing postoperative results with preoperative assessment and had sufficient data for inclusion. The surgical technique is described, including tips and modifications to avoid known possible complications. All patients in this study had advanced Eaton stage III or IV osteoarthritis. Grip strength and key pinch showed statistically significant improvement, and the improvement in palmar pinch approached significance. Pain scores were significantly decreased with over 50% of the patients rating their pain at 0 postoperatively. The overall complication rate was very low, and improvements in technique were made to mitigate future occurrence. This surgical technique for the treatment of thumb CMC arthritis achieved pain relief and recreated ligamentous support of the base of the first metacarpal to resist proximal migration after trapeziectomy, providing an increase in grip strength and key pinch with return of range of motion early in the postoperative period. Refinements on this technique through a large volume single surgeon experience provide technical tips for optimizing outcomes.

scholarly journals Ulnar Digits Contribution to Grip Strength in Patients with Thumb Carpometacarpal Osteoarthritis is Less than in Normal Controls

Hand ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 191-196 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jorge H. Villafañe ◽  
Kristin Valdes ◽  
Santiago Angulo-Diaz-Parreño ◽  
Paolo Pillastrini ◽  
Stefano Negrini
Keyword(s):  
Grip Strength ◽  
Thumb Carpometacarpal ◽  
Carpometacarpal Osteoarthritis ◽  
Normal Controls

scholarly journals Comparison of arthrodesis and arthroplasty of Chinese thumb carpometacarpal osteoarthritis

2019 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jianfeng Li ◽  
Dacun Li ◽  
Guanglei Tian ◽  
Wentong Zhang
Keyword(s):  
Grip Strength ◽  
Ligament Reconstruction ◽  
Subjective Evaluation ◽  
Chinese Patients ◽  
Pinch Strength ◽  
Dash Score ◽  
Advantages And Disadvantages ◽  
Thumb Carpometacarpal ◽  
Tendon Interposition ◽  
Carpometacarpal Osteoarthritis

Abstract Background The thumb carpometacarpal (CMC) osteoarthritis is very common. Multiple methods are used to treat progressive thumb CMC osteoarthritis, among which trapeziometacarpal arthrodesis and trapezial excision with ligament reconstruction and tendon interposition (LRTI) are the most common. These two surgical treatment methods have received mixed reviews in previous studies in the west patients. This retrospective study studied the effects, advantages, and disadvantages of arthrodesis and arthroplasty for treating thumb carpometacarpal osteoarthritis in Chinese patients. Methods Between February 2012 and September 2017, 39 Chinese patients with stage II or III thumb carpometacarpal osteoarthritis underwent surgery (trapeziometacarpal arthrodesis in 22, trapezial excision with ligament reconstruction and tendon interposition in 17). Postoperative objective and subjective evaluations were performed. The objective evaluation involved grip strength, pinch strength, thumb abduction degree (palmar and radial), and Kapandji opposition scores. The subjective evaluation involved visual analog scale (VAS) and Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) scores. Results Intergroup differences in pinch strength, thumb abduction degrees (palmar and radial), and Kapandji opposition scores were obvious, whereas those in grip strength, VAS score, and DASH score were not. Conclusion In Chinese patients, both techniques relieved pain and improve grip strength. Arthrodesis displayed better pinch strength, while arthroplasty displayed better motor function. Patients were satisfied with the effects of both techniques.

scholarly journals Effect of hyaluronate and splinting alone versus combined treatment (splinting and hyaluronate) on thumb carpometacarpal osteoarthritis

2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 35-40
Author(s):  
Salvatore Denaro ◽  
Salvatore Boccaccio ◽  
Antonino Zocco
Keyword(s):  
Grip Strength ◽  
Rating Scale ◽  
Combined Treatment ◽  
Numeric Rating Scale ◽  
Group Iii ◽  
Pain Disability ◽  
Group I ◽  
Group Ii ◽  
Thumb Carpometacarpal ◽  
Carpometacarpal Osteoarthritis

Thumb carpometacarpal osteoarthritis can lead to global hand dysfunctions and its symptoms are pain and inability. The purpose of this study is to determine the effectiveness of hyaluronate in relieving these symptoms, and to compare it to orthosis and combined treatment (orthosis and hyaluronate). We enrolled 39 patients, evaluated at the baseline by using numeric rating scale (NRS) for pain, Disability of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) and Dreiser Scale for disability degree, and Digital Hydraulic Pinch Gauge for grip strength. Eligible participants were randomly assigned to one of the three treatments: injection of hyaluronate (group I), combined treatment (hyaluronate and orthosis, Group II) and orthosis (hard-resting splint, Group III). Patients of Group I and Group II were injected by low molecular weight Hyaluronate once a week for three consecutive weeks. Injections were performed by means of the so-called blind technique. The data analysis indicated a significant decrease (P<0.01) of pain at week 4, further manifested at week 26 by all groups treated. The same occurred for functional symptoms, and grip strength. This improvement appears more evident in group I that received HA.

scholarly journals Surgeon Preference, Influence, and Treatment of Thumb Carpometacarpal Arthritis

Hand ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 13 (4) ◽  
pp. 403-411 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zachary Deutch ◽  
Steven R. Niedermeier ◽  
Hisham M. Awan
Keyword(s):  
Online Survey ◽  
The United States ◽  
Current Evidence ◽  
Opioid Medications ◽  
American Society ◽  
Thumb Carpometacarpal ◽  
Tendon Interposition ◽  
Carpometacarpal Osteoarthritis ◽  
And Training ◽  
Suture Suspension

Background: The purpose of this study was to evaluate current surgical practice patterns, the factors that influence these patterns, and overall trends in the treatment of thumb carpometacarpal osteoarthritis. Methods: An online survey containing 14 questions was sent to all active members of the American Society for Surgery of the Hand. Information on demographics and treatments was collected. Results were anonymously uploaded to an online spreadsheet. Results: A total of 823 responses were recorded. Trapeziectomy with ligament reconstruction and tendon interposition (LRTI) using whole flexor carpi radialis was the most popular technique at 37.44%. In all, 26.38% of surgeons with fewer than 5 years of experience utilize trapeziectomy with suture suspension (bone anchor based or tendon based); 55.76% choose a particular procedure because of “Personal Clinical Experience” over “Current Evidence” and “Training.” In addition, 24.17% of surgeons who have been practicing for longer than 5 years have changed procedures in the last 5 years. In the United States, 97.2% of hand surgeons prescribe either oxycodone or hydrocodone postoperatively compared with just 23.75% of international hand surgeons. Conclusions: The results show that trapeziectomy with LRTI remains the most popular treatment of choice. The use of trapeziectomy with suture suspension is on the rise, particularly in younger surgeons. International hand surgeons rely more on current evidence, utilize less postoperative therapy and opioid medications, and change procedures more often than US hand surgeons.

scholarly journals Suspension arthroplasty in the treatment of thumb carpometacarpal osteoarthritis

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Gianfilippo Caggiari ◽  
Fabrizio Polese ◽  
Cristiano Rosetti ◽  
Emanuele Ciurlia ◽  
Matteo Brusoni ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Surgical Techniques ◽  
Operation Time ◽  
Flexor Carpi Radialis ◽  
Abductor Pollicis Longus ◽  
Total Operation Time ◽  
Age At Surgery ◽  
Thumb Carpometacarpal ◽  
Carpometacarpal Osteoarthritis ◽  
Suture Suspension

Literature presents several examples of surgical techniques for the treatment of carpometacarpal osteoarthritis. In our study we used a modified Ceruso’s suspended arthroplasty technique. In this study, 53 patients from 2011 to 2017 underwent arthroplasty with trapezius excision and suture suspension between abductor pollicis longus and flexor carpi radialis. The average age at surgery was 69, the participants were 43 women and 10 men. The average total operation time was 59 minutes. The modified CMC suspension arthroplasty technique provides excellent results compared with those in the literature.

Arthroplasty in the hand: what works and what doesn’t?

2021 ◽  
pp. 175319342110177
Author(s):  
Daniel B. Herren ◽  
Hajime Ishikawa ◽  
Marco Rizzo ◽  
Mark Ross ◽  
Michael Solomons
Keyword(s):  
Surgical Technique ◽  
Metacarpophalangeal Joint ◽  
Distal Radioulnar Joint ◽  
Proximal Interphalangeal Joint ◽  
Interphalangeal Joint ◽  
Carpometacarpal Joint ◽  
Thumb Carpometacarpal Joint ◽  
Radioulnar Joint ◽  
What Works ◽  
Thumb Carpometacarpal

This review describes the different possibilities for arthroplasties at the proximal interphalangeal joint, thumb carpometacarpal joint, distal radioulnar joint, metacarpophalangeal joint and the wrist. For each joint, the indication for arthroplasty is explained, the surgical technique with the suitable implant is described and a brief summary of the outcomes reported in the literature is given.

scholarly journals FRI0635-HPR PATIENTS’ MOTIVATION AND GOALS FOR THUMB CARPOMETACARPAL OSTEOARTHRITIS SURGERY

2020 ◽  
Vol 79 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 921.2-922
Author(s):  
E. M. H. Gravås ◽  
I. Kjeken ◽  
R. Nossum ◽  
R. E. Mehl Eide ◽  
Å. Klokkeide ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pharmacological Treatment ◽  
Cross Sectional Study ◽  
Activity Limitations ◽  
Hand Osteoarthritis ◽  
Sectional Study ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Eular Recommendations ◽  
High Motivation ◽  
Thumb Carpometacarpal ◽  
Carpometacarpal Osteoarthritis

Background:Osteoarthritis (OA) in the thumb carpometacarpal joint (CMCJ) is a prevalent disease which may lead to structural damage, severe pain and functional limitations, but for which there is yet no cure. Evidence-based treatment recommendations state that all patients with hand OA should be offered patient education, hand exercises, and provision of assistive devices and orthoses. Pharmacological therapy is recommended as a symptom relieving supplement. The main indication for CMCJ surgery is pain and poor function, and such surgery should be considered only when other treatment has proven insufficient in relieving pain (1). Previous research has shown that high motivation is a significant predictor for deciding to undergo CMCJ surgery (2), but there is little knowledge regarding which factors that motivates patients for undergoing such surgery.Objectives:The objective of this study was to explore patient goals and motivation for surgery, and factors characterizing patients highly motivated for surgery.Methods:This cross-sectional study included 180 patients referred from their general practitioner for CMCJ surgical consultation. Goals for surgery were collected with an open-ended question and analysed by linking the content of each goal to domains in the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health coding system. Motivation for surgery was rated with a Numeric Rating Scale (NRS, 0-10, 0=no motivation). Activity limitations was self-reported using the Measure of Activity Performance of the Hand (MAP-Hand, score 1 to 4, 1=no activity problems) and the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaire (QuickDASH; score 0-100, 0=no disability). Factors that characterized patients highly motivated for surgery (NRS≥8) were explored with multivariate regression analyses.Results:Mean age of participants was 63 years (SD 7.6) and 142 (79%) were women. The most common goals for surgery were to reduce pain and improve arm and hand use. Fifty-six (31%) of the patients were characterized as highly motivated for surgery. High motivation for surgery was strongly associated with more activity limitations (MAP-Hand; (OR 4.00, p=0.008)), living alone (OR 3.18, p=0.007) and a young age (OR 0.94, p=0.002).Conclusion:Decisions on CMCJ OA surgery should be based on assessment and discussion of patients’ life situation, hand pain, activity limitations and motivation and goals for surgery. According to the EULAR recommendations, previously received conservative and pharmacological treatment should also be evaluated.References:[1] Kloppenburg, M., et al. (2018). “2018 update of the EULAR recommendations for the management of hand osteoarthritis.” Ann Rheum Dis. 0; 1-9[2] Gravas, E. M. H., et al. (2019). “Non-pharmacological treatment gap preceding surgical consultation in thumb carpometacarpal osteoarthritis - a cross-sectional study.” BMC Musculoskelet Disord 20(1): 180.Disclosure of Interests:None declared

A custom-made neoprene thumb carpometacarpal orthosis with thermoplastic stabilization: An orthosis that promotes function and improvement in patients with the first carpometacarpal joint osteoarthritis

2013 ◽  
Vol 38 (1) ◽  
pp. 79-82 ◽  
Author(s):  
Monireh Ahmadi Bani ◽  
Mokhtar Arazpour ◽  
Stephen William Hutchins ◽  
Fereydoun Layeghi ◽  
Mahmood Bahramizadeh ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Grip Strength ◽  
Clinical Relevance ◽  
Hand Function ◽  
Pinch Strength ◽  
Conservative Approach ◽  
Carpometacarpal Joint ◽  
Custom Made ◽  
First Carpometacarpal Joint ◽  
Thumb Carpometacarpal ◽  
Improved Function

Background and aim: Patients with mild to moderate first carpometacarpal joint osteoarthritis report pain, a reduction in pinch and grip strength and hand function. The purpose of this study was to analyze the effect of a custom-made neoprene thumb carpometacarpal orthosis with thermoplastic stabilization on pain, function, grip strength, and key pinch in these patients. Technique: A total of 11 volunteer patients participated in this study. All the above-mentioned parameters were evaluated at baseline and also 30, 60, and 90 days after using the splint. Discussion: A decrease in pain was observed after 30 days, and this continued to improve during treatment with the splint. After 90 days of using the splint, grip strength was improved. Function and pinch strength also increased significantly and was maintained during the study period compared to baseline. Clinical relevance A custom-made neoprene thumb carpometacarpal orthosis with thermoplastic stabilization may be a suitable conservative approach for the treatment of first carpometacarpal joint osteoarthritis.

High revision rates with the metal-on-metal Motec carpometacarpal joint prosthesis

2015 ◽  
Vol 41 (3) ◽  
pp. 322-327 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. K. Thillemann ◽  
T. M. Thillemann ◽  
B. Munk ◽  
K. Krøner
Keyword(s):  
Rating Scale ◽  
Revision Rate ◽  
Numerical Rating Scale ◽  
Elevated Serum ◽  
Consecutive Series ◽  
Dash Score ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Pain Scores ◽  
Thumb Carpometacarpal

We retrospectively evaluated a consecutive series of 42 Motec thumb carpometacarpal total joint arthroplasties. The primary endpoint was revision with implant removal and trapeziectomy. At follow-up the disability of the arm shoulder and hand (DASH) score, pain on numerical rating scale at rest and with activity and serum chrome and cobalt concentrations were assessed for both unrevised and revised patients. At a mean follow-up of 26 months, 17 patients had been revised. The 2 year cumulative revision rate was 42% (95% CI, 28–60%). The DASH score and pain scores at rest and with activity were comparable between the patients whose thumbs remained unrevised and those revised. Patients with elevated serum chrome and cobalt levels had significantly higher DASH and pain scores, but elevated levels were not associated with revision. The revision rate in this study is unacceptably high. However, pain and DASH scores after revision are acceptable and comparable with patients with non-revised implants. Level of evidence: IV

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document