scholarly journals Nivolumab in Recurrent/Metastatic Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck: A Tertiary Cancer Center Experience

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ananya Pareek ◽  
Apurva A. Patel ◽  
Mukesh Kumar ◽  
Philip G. Kuttikat ◽  
Harshavardhan Annadanam ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Squamous Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Head And Neck ◽  
Squamous Cell ◽  
Therapeutic Option ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Cancer Center ◽  
Baseline Characteristic ◽  
Safety Concerns

Abstract Background Immunotherapy is a proven therapeutic option in recurrent/metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (R/M HNSCC) after platinum therapy. At present, there are no published Indian data regarding administration of nivolumab in this setting. Aim The aim of this study is to retrospectively evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of nivolumab in R/M HNSCC among Indian patients who progressed after one or more lines of chemotherapy, including platinum agents. Methods All patients of R/M HNSCC who received nivolumab between 2/6/2018 to 31/3/2020 were assessed retrospectively for the efficacy and toxicity of nivolumab therapy. Statistical Analysis All the data analysis was performed using IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, version 25 (IBM Corp., Armonk, N.Y., USA). Descriptive analysis was performed to obtain baseline characteristic of the study sample. Survival analysis was done using the Kaplan–Meier method. Results Nivolumab therapy was tolerated well, with no new safety concerns, except one (8.3%) patient experienced grade ¾ toxicity (gastrointestinal). The clinical benefit rate (CBR) was found to be 66.7%. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 3 months (95% CI; 2.093–3.907), and median overall survival (OS) was 8 months (95% CI; 3.731–12.269) from the date of first dose of nivolumab. Conclusions In our study, efficacy and toxicity were comparable with international data with no new safety concerns. Nivolumab emerged as an astonishing treatment option with tolerable toxicity profile in patients with R/M HNSCC postplatinum therapy, although limited treatment options are available at present.

Chemotherapy Options for Patients With Metastatic or Recurrent Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (17) ◽  
pp. 2644-2652 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Dimitrios Colevas
Keyword(s):  
Squamous Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Head And Neck ◽  
Squamous Cell ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Clinical Trial Data ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Recurrent Squamous Cell Carcinoma

The purpose of this review is to provide readers with guidance concerning treatment of patients with advanced, recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN) in the context of clinical trial data. We discuss issues surrounding the treatment of patients with SCCHN, with an emphasis on recommendations based on results from phase II and III clinical trials published since 1980. Many options exist for the treatment of patients with SCCHN. The most important decisions involve determining which patients are in need of treatment and which are most likely to benefit from treatment. Although many chemotherapy treatments have been shown to induce responses, survival improvement remains an unfulfilled goal. Definitive data do not exist on the effects of chemotherapy on quality of life or progression-free survival as measures of clinical benefit in this setting. Performance status, history of prior treatment, extent of tumor, and need for palliation are the most important factors in the decision to treat a patient with chemotherapy for incurable SCCHN. Single-agent treatment with conventional doses of methotrexate remains a standard for most patients with advanced, recurrent or metastatic SCCHN. Cisplatin plus fluorouracil, cisplatin plus a taxane, and single-agent taxane are the most widely studied alternatives. There is a need for further trials with end points other than overall survival or tumor response in this patient population. Guidelines for patient selection and treatment options are provided.

Hyperfractionated Radiation Therapy With or Without Concurrent Low-Dose Daily Cisplatin in Locally Advanced Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck: A Prospective Randomized Trial

2000 ◽  
Vol 18 (7) ◽  
pp. 1458-1464 ◽  
Author(s):  
Branislav Jeremic ◽  
Yuta Shibamoto ◽  
Biljana Milicic ◽  
Nebojsa Nikolic ◽  
Aleksandar Dagovic ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Squamous Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Radiation Therapy ◽  
Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Head And Neck ◽  
Squamous Cell ◽  
Low Dose ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
High Grade ◽  
Free Survival

PURPOSE: To investigate whether the addition of cisplatin (CDDP) to hyperfractionation (Hfx) radiation therapy (RT) offers an advantage over the same Hfx RT given alone in locally advanced (stages III and IV) squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. PATIENTS AND METHODS: One hundred thirty patients were randomized to receive either Hfx RT alone to a tumor dose of 77 Gy in 70 fractions in 35 treatment days over 7 weeks (group I, n = 65) or the same Hfx RT and concurrent low-dose (6 mg/m2) daily CDDP (group II, n = 65). RESULTS: Hfx RT/chemotherapy offered significantly higher survival rates than Hfx RT alone (68% v 49% at 2 years and 46% v 25% at 5 years; P = .0075). It also offered higher progression-free survival (46% v 25% at 5 years; P = .0068), higher locoregional progression-free survival (LRPFS) (50% v 36% at 5 years; P = .041), and higher distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) (86% v 57% at 5 years; P = .0013). However, there was no difference between the two treatment groups in the incidence of either acute or late high-grade RT-induced toxicity. Hematologic high-grade toxicity was more frequent in group II patients. CONCLUSION: As compared with Hfx RT alone, Hfx RT and concurrent low-dose daily CDDP offered a survival advantage, as well as improved LRPFS and DMFS.

Analysis of bone metastasis in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: Experience of a regional cancer center

2015 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 206 ◽  
Author(s):  
Akhil Kapoor ◽  
Ashok Kalwar ◽  
Satya Narayan ◽  
Narender Kumar ◽  
MukeshKumar Singhal ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Squamous Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Bone Metastasis ◽  
Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Head And Neck ◽  
Squamous Cell ◽  
Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Cancer Center

scholarly journals Induction Chemotherapy Followed by Cetuximab Radiotherapy Is Not Superior to Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy for Head and Neck Carcinomas: Results of the GORTEC 2007-02 Phase III Randomized Trial

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (31) ◽  
pp. 3077-3083 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lionnel Geoffrois ◽  
Laurent Martin ◽  
Dominique De Raucourt ◽  
Xu Shan Sun ◽  
Yungan Tao ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Squamous Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Head And Neck ◽  
Induction Chemotherapy ◽  
Squamous Cell ◽  
Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Free Survival

Purpose Both concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CT-RT) and cetuximab radiotherapy (cetux-RT) have been established as the standard of care for the treatment of locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. It was not known whether the addition of induction chemotherapy before cetux-RT could improve outcomes compared with standard of care CT-RT. Patients and Methods The current trial was restricted to patients with nonmetastatic N2b, N2c, or N3 squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck and fit for taxotere, cisplatin, fluorouracil (TPF). Patients were randomly assigned to receive three cycles of TPF followed by cetux-RT versus concurrent carboplatin fluorouracil and RT as recommended in National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines. The trial was powered to detect a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.66 in favor of TPF plus cetux-RT for progression-free survival at 2 years. The inclusion of 180 patients per arm was needed to achieve 80% power at a two-sided significance level of .05. Results Between 2009 and 2013, 370 patients were included. All patients and tumors characteristics were well balanced between arms. There were more cases of grade 3 and 4 neutropenia in the induction arm, and the induction TPF was associated with 6.6% treatment-related deaths. With a median follow-up of 2.8 years, 2-year progression-free survival was not different between both arms (CT-RT, 0.38 v TPF + cetux-RT, 0.36; HR, 0.93 [95% CI, 0.73 to 1.20]; P = .58). HR was 0.98 (95% CI, 0.74 to 1.3; P = .90) for locoregional control and 1.12 (95% CI, 0.86 to 1.46; P = .39) for overall survival. These effects were observed regardless of p16 status. The rate of distant metastases was lower in the TPF arm (HR, 0.54 [95% CI, 0.30 to 0.99]; P = .05). Conclusion Induction TPF followed by cetux-RT did not improve outcomes compared with CT-RT in a population of patients with advanced cervical lymphadenopathy.

A phase II study examining the feasibility of long-term and low-dose oral capecitabine in newly diagnosed head and neck squamous cell carcinoma after surgery, radiation, and/or chemotherapy

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 6053-6053
Author(s):  
A. Sukari ◽  
H. Mulrenan ◽  
K. Almhanna ◽  
Z. Kafri ◽  
H. Kim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Squamous Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Head And Neck ◽  
Squamous Cell ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Definitive Treatment ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Oral Capecitabine ◽  
One Year

6053 Background: In advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC), the five-year survival rate is less than 40%. Although the efficacy and tolerability of continuous IV 5-Fluorouracil (5FU) therapy has been established in HNSCC, the feasibility and tolerability of long-term therapy of oral capecitabine has not been established in HNSCC. Our primary objective is to assess the feasibility of treating patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (HNSCC) with adjuvant Capecitabine after undergone definitive treatment. The secondary objectives are to estimate time to recurrence, local-regional control and survival rates along with incidence of second primary tumors. Methods: Eligible patients with newly diagnosed locally advanced HNSCC received capecitabine 1,000 mg orally once daily for one year, after undergone definitive treatment. Patients’ compliance with oral capecitabine as will as the side effects profile was evaluated on monthly basis over the first 12 months. Feasibility, survival, progression and progression free survival were measured over 36 months. Results: Thirty five patients were enrolled in the study. 17 patients had stage IV b, 7 had stage III, and 5 had unknown primary HNSCC. All but one took at least 60% of dispensed tablets. Twenty six patients completed at least 7 months of capecitabine. Sixteen patients completed at least 10 month of capecitabine. Two years overall survival rate was 97%. Three years progression free survival was 86%. Conclusions: Adjuvant capecitabine in locally advanced HNSCC is a feasible approach with minimum side effects. A favorable 3-year progression-free survival was found as compare to historical results. We recommend a randomized phase III trail to examine the effect of one year of adjuvant capecitabine versus placebo in locally advanced HNSCC after definitive treatment. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

scholarly journals Prognostic Biomarkers of Salvage Chemotherapy Following Nivolumab Treatment for Recurrent and/or Metastatic Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma

Cancers ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (8) ◽  
pp. 2299 ◽  
Author(s):  
Takahiro Wakasaki ◽  
Ryuji Yasumatsu ◽  
Muneyuki Masuda ◽  
Toranoshin Takeuchi ◽  
Tomomi Manako ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Squamous Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Head And Neck ◽  
Squamous Cell ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Salvage Chemotherapy ◽  
Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Prognostic Biomarkers ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Reactive Protein

Recent studies have suggested the benefit of salvage chemotherapy (SCT) after immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) treatment for recurrent and metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (R/M HNSCC). We retrospectively examined the outcome of SCT and the usefulness of the serum C-reactive protein level (CRP) and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) as prognostic biomarkers. Thirty-nine patients with R/M HNSCC were enrolled in this study. Twenty-five patients (64.1%) received combination chemotherapy of weekly paclitaxel and cetuximab (PC) as SCT, and 14 patients (35.9%) received tegafur-gimestat-otastat potassium (S1), an oral fluoropyrimidine. In all patients, the response rate, disease control rate, median progression-free survival (PFS), and median overall survival (OS) were 45.2%, 85.7%, 6.5 months, and 13.5 months, respectively. No chemotherapy-related deaths were observed. These PC groups had low CRP (<1.2 mg/dL) or low NLR (<7.0) values at the time of SCT induction, which was significantly associated with an improved OS (p = 0.0440, p = 0.0354). A multivariate analysis also showed that a lower CRP value was significantly associated with a better OS (p = 0.0078). We clarified the usefulness of the PC and S1 regimens as SCT. In addition, SCT with the PC regimen showed a better prognosis with a lower CRP or NLR at induction than a higher CRP or NLR. This is the first report on biomarkers of SCT in R/M HNSCC.

Gemcitabine versus cisplatin concurrent with radiation therapy in locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 5557-5557
Author(s):  
Magda Mostafa ◽  
Hesham Atif ◽  
Mahmoud Fawzy ◽  
Amr Yehia Sakr ◽  
Ahmed Alashwah
Keyword(s):  
Squamous Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Radiation Therapy ◽  
Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Head And Neck ◽  
Squamous Cell ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Advanced Head ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Weekly Cisplatin

5557 Background: In locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) weekly cisplatin concurrent with radiation therapy is the standared treatment. However some patients cannot tolerate cisplatin. So we conduct a prospective randomized trial comparing cisplatin versus gemcitabine. Methods: This trial was done in Kasr El-Ainy Center of Clinical Oncology and Radiation therapy (NEMROCK), during the period from March 2010 till June 2011. Sixty patients with locally advanced HNSCC were randomized to receive Cisplatin (30 mg/m2) weekly for 6 consecutive weeks (30 patients) or Gemcitabine (50 mg/m2) weekly for 6 consecutive weeks (30 patients) both concomitant with radiation therapy reaching a dose of 70 Gy over 7 weeks. Primary end points include response rate, progression free survival and toxicity. Toxicities were graded according to NCI-CTCAE v3.0. Results: Thewhole study group included 48 (80%) males and 12 (20%) females. Mean age was 47.9 (± 6.5) years (range 26-61). Both arms were comparable regarding their age, gender, performance status and stage. There were 9 (30%) CR, 7 (23.3%) PR, 2 (6.7%) SD and 12 (40%) PD in cisplatin arm versus 12 (40%) CR, 4 (13.3%) PR, 1 (3.3%) SD and 11 (36.7%) PD in gemcitabine arm. Median progression free survival (PFS) in cisplatin arm was 9 months versus 11months in gemcitabine arm with a hazard ratio of 0.08 (95% CI 0.005 – 1.47). We did not reach median overall survival. Radiotherapy induced skin toxicity (slight or patchy atrophy), nausea, vomiting, mucositis, salivary gland affection and weight loss were equally distributed in both arms. Dysphagia and fatigue were markedly higher in gemcitabine arm. While infection and neutropenia were slightly higher in cisplatin arm. Conclusions: Weekly gemcitabine 50mg/m2 concomitant with radiotherapy was found to be of equal efficacy and toxicity comparable with weekly cisplatin in the treatment of locally advanced HNSCC.

Cisplatin and Radiotherapy With or Without Erlotinib in Locally Advanced Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck: A Randomized Phase II Trial

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (11) ◽  
pp. 1415-1421 ◽  
Author(s):  
Renato G. Martins ◽  
Upendra Parvathaneni ◽  
Julie E. Bauman ◽  
Anand K. Sharma ◽  
Luis E. Raez ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Squamous Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Head And Neck ◽  
Squamous Cell ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Advanced Squamous Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Egfr Inhibition ◽  
End Point

Purpose The combination of cisplatin and radiotherapy is a standard treatment for patients with locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN). Cetuximab-radiotherapy is superior to radiotherapy alone in this population, validating epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) as a target. Erlotinib is a small-molecule inhibitor of EGFR. Adding EGFR inhibition to standard cisplatin-radiotherapy may improve efficacy. Patients and Methods Patients with locally advanced SCCHN were randomly assigned to receive cisplatin 100 mg/m2 on days 1, 22, and 43 combined with 70 Gy of radiotherapy (arm A) or the same chemoradiotherapy with erlotinib 150 mg per day, starting 1 week before radiotherapy and continued to its completion (arm B). The primary end point was complete response rate (CRR), evaluated by central review. The secondary end point was progression-free survival (PFS). Available tumors were tested for p16 and EGFR by fluorescent in situ hybridization. Results Between December 2006 and October 2011, 204 patients were randomly assigned. Arms were well balanced for all patient characteristics including p16, with the exception of more women on arm A. Patients on arm B had more rash, but treatment arms did not differ regarding rates of other grade 3 or 4 toxicities. Arm A had a CRR of 40% and arm B had a CRR of 52% (P = .08) when evaluated by central review. With a median follow-up time of 26 months and 54 progression events, there was no difference in PFS (hazard ratio, 0.9; P = .71). Conclusion Erlotinib did not increase the toxicity of cisplatin and radiotherapy in patients with locally advanced HNSCC but failed to significantly increase CRR or PFS.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document