Episiotomy: Evolution of a Common Obstetric Practice at a Public Hospital

Author(s):  
Shena J. Dillon ◽  
David B. Nelson ◽  
Catherine Y. Spong ◽  
Donald D. McIntire ◽  
Kenneth J. Leveno

Objective This study aimed to evaluate the rate and impact of episiotomy on maternal and newborn outcomes before and after restricted use of episiotomy. Study Design This population-based observational study used an obstetric database of all deliveries since 1990 that has been maintained with quality checks. Inclusion criteria were vaginal deliveries at ≥37 weeks. Exclusion criteria included fetal malformations, multifetal gestations, or fetal deaths known on arrival to Labor and Delivery. The primary outcomes of interest were episiotomy, perineal lacerations, and newborn outcomes. To evaluate the impact of restrictive episiotomy, data from 1990 to 1997 (35% overall episiotomy rate) were compared with data from 2010 to 2017 (2.5% overall episiotomy rate). Univariable analysis of maternal and infant outcomes were performed comparing the two-time epochs with the Pearson's Chi-squared test. Results Overall, 268,415 women met inclusion criteria and 49,089 (18.2%) had an episiotomy. The rate of episiotomy decreased from 37% of deliveries in 1990 to 2% in 2017. A total of 82,082 deliveries occurred in the 1990 to 1997 epoch and 57,183 in 2010 to 2017. Indicated use of episiotomy was associated with a significant decrease in third and fourth degree lacerations. Immediate newborn condition (5-minute Apgar's score ≤3 and umbilical artery pH <7.1) and neonatal outcomes (intraventricular hemorrhage [IVH] grade 3/4, positive culture sepsis, neonatal seizures, and neonatal demise) were not significantly different. Conclusion Selective, indicated use of episiotomy compared with routine was associated with lower rates of third/fourth-degree lacerations with no change in neonatal outcomes. The common obstetric practice of routinely performing episiotomy, presumably to prevent perineal trauma, proved untrue when analyzed over almost three decades. Key Points

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jin-Hua Huang ◽  
Mei Yu ◽  
Di-Bao Zhang ◽  
Jun-Ping Pan ◽  
Xiao-Tan Zhao ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: The purpose of the study was to investigate the impact of epidural analgesia usage vs. non-epidural labor on maternal and neonatal outcomes. Methods: We included 129 parturients who had vaginal deliveries in our hospital since December 1, 2018. The women were grouped into the epidural analgesia group or the non-epidural group. In order to investigate the effect of epidural analgesia on mother and newborn outcomes, we evaluated the differences in labor duration, the Apgar score of the newborn, and the overall outcome of the mother and newborn. Results: Compared to the non-epidural group, the durations of the first and second stages of labor in the analgesia group were significantly longer. In terms of neonatal outcome, the epidural analgesia group had a higher lactate value in the umbilical artery blood and higher pCO2 of umbilical vein blood of the neonates. However, there were no significant differences in Apgar Score, umbilical blood pH, base excess, or other umbilical cord blood gas analyses (pO2, HGB, SO2, HCO3 -) between epidural analgesia and non-epidural labor groups.Conclusion: The epidural analgesia prolongs the duration of the first and second stages of labor and affects the level of lactate in umbilical artery blood and the partial pressure of carbon dioxide in umbilical vein blood. There was no significant effect on the basic characteristics of the mothers and neonates, suggesting that epidural analgesia delivery technology is safe, but it may have a particular short-term impact on neonatal outcomes.


2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 8049-8049 ◽  
Author(s):  
Abdulwahab J. Al-Tourah ◽  
Laurie Helen Sehn ◽  
Alden A Moccia ◽  
Randy D. Gascoyne ◽  
Joseph M. Connors

8049 Background: Several published series have established that the risk of transformation of follicular lymphoma (FL) to aggressive lymphoma is approximately 3% /year (15%-20% at 5 years). The addition of rituximab (R) to chemotherapy (immuno-chemotherapy) has significantly improved the outcome of patients with FL. The impact of immuno-chemotherapy on the risk of transformation remains unknown. We assessed whether the introduction of immuno-chemotherapy has altered this risk. Methods: We examined the Lymphoid Cancer Database of the British Columbia Cancer Agency for FL patients treated with immuno-chemotherapy. Inclusion criteria: FL grades 1-3A by WHO criteria; only patients requiring treatment at diagnosis were included. Exclusion criteria: FL grade 3B or composite histology (FL and DLBCL) at diagnosis; pts who received anthracycline-based chemotherapy; and HIV positivity. The diagnosis of transformation was confirmed by biopsy when possible (n=19; 79%) but patients who were considered to have transformed based on pre-defined clinical assessment (n=5; 21%) were also included in the analysis. Results: We identified 261 pts with FL grade 1-3A requiring treatment at diagnosis, who received immuno-chemotherapy; median f/u 47 months (0.2-116), median age, 61 y (34-86). Treatment: 243 (93%), R-CVP of which 145 (59%) also received maintenance R; 9 (4%), R-Fludarabine combination. 24 pts developed transformed aggressive lymphoma. The risk of transformation for the entire group was approximately 2% per year or 10% at 5 years. However, pts treated with maintenance R (n=151) had a lower risk of transformation compared to pts who only received R-chemo at induction (n= 110), 8% vs 20% at 5 years respectively, (P= 0.003). The post-transformation outcome remains poor with a median survival of 6 months. Conclusions: We and other groups have demonstrated that the risk of transformation from FL to aggressive lymphoma is approximately 15% to 20% by 5 years. Our study suggests that the introduction of immuno-chemotherapy has reduced this risk to less than 10%. This effect is particularly apparent when patients receive maintenance R. The outcome for patients who develop transformation remains poor.


2021 ◽  
Vol 36 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
E Kadour-Peero ◽  
H Baghlaf ◽  
A Badeghiesh ◽  
M Dahan

Abstract Study question Does primary hyperaldosteronism(PA) confer an independent risk for adverse pregnancy or neonatal outcomes, based on analysis of the Healthcare-Cost and Utilization Project-Nationwide Inpatient Sample(HCUP-NIS) database? Summary answer After controlling for all significant confounders, women with PA are at increased risk for gestational hypertension, eclampsia, and operative vaginal delivery, but unexpectedly not preeclampsia What is known already PA is extremely rare in pregnancy, and our current knowledge regarding PA during pregnancy is derived only from case reports and series. No pregnancy control studies exist in the literature for this endocrinopathy. PA is characterized by autonomous aldosterone and suppressed rennin production from the adrenals. Caused by adenomas or hyperplasia, it presents with hypertension and hypokalaemia. Study design, size, duration This is a retrospective population-based cohort study utilizing data from the HCUP-NIS from 2004 to 2014, inclusively. A cohort of all deliveries during the study period was created. Within this group, all deliveries to women with PA were identified as part of the study group (n = 102), and the remaining deliveries were categorized as the reference group (n = 9,096,686). Participants/materials, setting, methods HCUP-NIS is the largest inpatient sample database in the USA and is comprised of hospital stays throughout the country. It provides information relating to seven million inpatient stays yearly, includes 20% of admissions, and represents over 96% of the American population. Multivariate logistic regression, controlling for confounders, was conducted to explore associations between PA and delivery outcomes. According to the Tri-Council Policy Statement (2018), IRB-approval was not required, given data was anonymous and publicly available. Main results and the role of chance Women with PA were older(P = 0.0001), more likely obese(10.8% vs. 3.6%), with higher rates of chronic hypertension(53.9% vs. 1.8%), thyroid disease(15.7% vs. 2.5%), pre-gestational diabetes(5.9% vs. 1%)(all P = 0.0001), and were more commonly African American and not Hispanic(P = 0.04) than the controls. There was no statistical difference between the two groups in the other demographic features including; income distribution(P = 0.45), hospital type (P = 0.63), rates of smoking(P = 0.99), illicit drug use(P = 0.73) or use of assisted reproductive technology(P = 0.94). After adjustment for significant confounders women with PA were more likely to experience gestational hypertension(aOR 3.6 95%CI:1.6–8.1, P = 0.001) and eclampsia(aOR 19.0, 95%CI:2.6–138.2, P = 0.004). Moreover, women with PA were more likely to deliver by operative vaginal delivery(aOR 9.7 95%CI:6.3–15.1, P = 0.0001). However, there was no increased risk for preeclampsia in women with PA(aOR 1.47 95%CI:0.78–2.76, P = 0.23). This finding was consistent even when not controlling for confounding effects including pre-gestational hypertention(OR 0.81 95%CI:0.26–2.56, P = 0.72. There were no differences in the number of women with PPROM(P = 0.81), preterm delivery(P = 0.88), placental abruptio(P = 0.7), maternal death(P = 0.99), hysterectomy(P = 0.99), cesarean section(P = 0.76), chorioamnionitis(P = 0.99), postpartum hemorrhage (P = 0.53), maternal infection(P = 0.99), pulmonary embolism(P = 0.99) or disseminated intravascular coagulation(P = 0.99) between the two groups. Furthermore, there was no difference in other neonatal outcomes including: small for gestational age(P = 0.18), fetal demise(P = 0.85) or congenital anomalies(P = 0.15). Limitations, reasons for caution This is a retrospective analysis utilizing an administrative database that relies on data coding accuracy and consistency. Wider implications of the findings: Women with PA were more likely to experience adverse pregnancy outcomes, including gestational hypertension, eclampsia, and operative vaginal deliveries. Neonatal complications were not increased in PA. Surprisingly, there was no increased risk for preeclampsia in women with PA, which needs to be further studied. Trial registration number NA


2008 ◽  
Vol 47 (04) ◽  
pp. 153-166 ◽  
Author(s):  
I. Weber ◽  
W. Eschner ◽  
F. Sudbrock ◽  
M. Schmidt ◽  
M. Dietlein ◽  
...  

SummaryAim: This study was performed to analyse the impact of the choice of antithyroid drugs (ATD) on the outcome of ablative radioiodine therapy (RIT) in patients with Graves' disease. Patients, material, methods: A total of 571 consecutive patients were observed for 12 months after RIT between July 2001 and June 2004. Inclusion criteria were the confirmed diagnosis of Graves' disease, compensation of hyperthyroidism and withdrawal of ATD two days before preliminary radioiodine-testing and RIT. The intended dose of 250 Gy was calculated from the results of the radioiodine test and the therapeutically achieved dose was measured by serial uptake measurements. The end-point measure was thyroid function 12 months after RIT; success was defined as elimination of hyperthyroidism. The pretreatment ATD was retrospectively correlated with the results achieved. Results: Relief from hyperthyroidism was achieved in 96 % of patients. 472 patients were treated with carbimazole or methimazole (CMI) and 61 with propylthiouracil (PTU). 38 patients had no thyrostatic drugs (ND) prior to RIT. The success rate was equal in all groups (CMI 451/472; PTU 61/61; ND 37/38; p=0.22). Conclusion: Thyrostatic treatment with PTU achieves excellent results in ablative RIT, using an accurate dosimetric approach with an achieved post-therapeutic dose of more than 200 Gy.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document