What We Know (and Do not Know) Regarding the Pathogenesis of Pulmonary Thrombosis in COVID-19

2022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Giuseppe Lippi ◽  
Emmanuel J. Favaloro
Keyword(s):  
Mechanical Ventilation ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Venous Thrombosis ◽  
Active Phase ◽  
Severe Illness ◽  
Pulmonary Tissue ◽  
Systematic Screening ◽  
Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Pulmonary Thrombosis ◽  
Deep Vein

AbstractThe clinical course of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is often complicated by the onset of venous thrombosis and thromboembolism (VTE), encompassing also pulmonary thrombosis. Recent statistics attests that the cumulative frequency of VTE can be as high as 30% in COVID-19 hospitalized patients, increasing to nearly 40 to 70% (depending on systematic screening) in those with severe illness, mechanical ventilation, or intensive care unit admission. The risk of venous thrombosis seems mostly limited to the active phase of disease, and is directly associated with some genetic (i.e., inherited prothrombotic predisposition) and demographical factors (male sex, overweight/obesity), disease severity (risk increasing progressively from hospitalization to development of severe illness, being the highest in patients needing mechanical ventilation and/or intensive care), presence and extent of pulmonary disease, coexistence of multiple risk factors (immobilization, mechanical ventilation, co- or superinfections), along with increased values of inflammatory and thrombotic biomarkers. At least three different phenotypes of pulmonary thrombosis may develop in COVID-19 patients, one caused by typical embolization from peripheral venous thrombosis (e.g., deep vein thrombosis), a second type triggered by local inflammation of nearby pulmonary tissue, and a third one mostly attributable to the prothrombotic state consequent to the pronounced systemic inflammatory response (i.e., the so-called cytokine storm) that is frequently observed in COVID-19. Although the pathogenesis of these three conditions has different features, their discrimination is essential for diagnostic and therapeutic purposes. The prognosis of COVID-19 patients who develop pulmonary thrombosis is also considerably worse than those who do not, thus probably needing frequent monitoring and more aggressive therapeutic management.

scholarly journals A preliminary study of intensivist-performed DVT ultrasound screening in trauma ICU patients (APSIT Study)

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Lloyd Roberts ◽  
Tom Rozen ◽  
Deirdre Murphy ◽  
Adam Lawler ◽  
Mark Fitzgerald ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care ◽  
Deep Vein Thrombosis ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Correlation Coefficient ◽  
Intraclass Correlation Coefficient ◽  
Major Trauma ◽  
Intraclass Correlation ◽  
Trauma Patients ◽  
Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Deep Vein

Abstract Background Multiple screening Duplex ultrasound scans (DUS) are performed in trauma patients at high risk of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) in the intensive care unit (ICU). Intensive care physician performed compression ultrasound (IP-CUS) has shown promise as a diagnostic test for DVT in a non-trauma setting. Whether IP-CUS can be used as a screening test in trauma patients is unknown. Our study aimed to assess the agreement between IP-CUS and vascular sonographer performed DUS for proximal lower extremity deep vein thrombosis (PLEDVT) screening in high-risk trauma patients in ICU. Methods A prospective observational study was conducted at the ICU of Alfred Hospital, a major trauma center in Melbourne, Australia, between Feb and Nov 2015. All adult major trauma patients admitted with high risk for DVT were eligible for inclusion. IP-CUS was performed immediately before or after DUS for PLEDVT screening. The paired studies were repeated twice weekly until the DVT diagnosis, death or ICU discharge. Written informed consent from the patient, or person responsible, or procedural authorisation, was obtained. The individuals performing the scans were blinded to the others’ results. The agreement analysis was performed using Cohen’s Kappa statistics and intraclass correlation coefficient for repeated binary measurements. Results During the study period, 117 patients had 193 pairs of scans, and 45 (39%) patients had more than one pair of scans. The median age (IQR) was 47 (28–68) years with 77% males, mean (SD) injury severity score 27.5 (9.53), and a median (IQR) ICU length of stay 7 (3.2–11.6) days. There were 16 cases (13.6%) of PLEDVT with an incidence rate of 2.6 (1.6–4.2) cases per 100 patient-days in ICU. The overall agreement was 96.7% (95% CI 94.15–99.33). The Cohen’s Kappa between the IP-CUS and DUS was 0.77 (95% CI 0.59–0.95), and the intraclass correlation coefficient for repeated binary measures was 0.75 (95% CI 0.67–0.81). Conclusions There is a substantial agreement between IP-CUS and DUS for PLEDVT screening in trauma patients in ICU with high risk for DVT. Large multicentre studies are needed to confirm this finding.

Outcome of Anticoagulation in Isolated Distal Deep Vein Thrombosis Compared to Proximal Deep Venous Thrombosis

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Danielle T Vlazny ◽  
Ahmed K Pasha ◽  
Wiktoria Kuczmik ◽  
Waldemar E Wysokinski ◽  
Matthew Bartlett ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Deep Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Venous Thrombosis ◽  
Deep Venous Thrombosis ◽  
Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Distal Deep Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Deep Vein

Low-dose subcutaneous heparin in prevention of deep-vein thrombosis

1972 ◽  
Vol 10 (23) ◽  
pp. 89-91
Keyword(s):  
Pulmonary Embolism ◽  
Deep Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Venous Thrombosis ◽  
Low Dose ◽  
Fatal Pulmonary Embolism ◽  
Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Subcutaneous Heparin ◽  
Prevention And Treatment ◽  
Deep Vein ◽  
Low Dosage

Earlier this year1 we discussed the prevention and treatment of venous thrombosis and concluded that heparin in low dosage seemed the most promising drug for preventing deep-vein thrombosis postoperatively, although the optimum regimen was not yet known. Sharnoff and his associates who began this work 10 years ago claim to have shown that this treatment largely prevents fatal pulmonary embolism.2

scholarly journals INVESTIGATING EFFECT OF NURSING INTERVENTIONS, BASED ON WELLS SCORE RESULTS, ON THE INCIDENCE OF DEEP VEIN THROMBOSIS IN PATIENTS ADMITTED TO THE INTENSIVE CARE UNIT

2018 ◽  
Vol 11 (5) ◽  
pp. 377
Author(s):  
Morteza Habibi Moghadam ◽  
Marzieh Asadizaker ◽  
Simin Jahani ◽  
Elham Maraghi ◽  
Hakimeh Saadatifar ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Deep Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Intervention Group ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Nursing Interventions ◽  
Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Wells Score ◽  
Deep Vein ◽  
Pitting Edema

 Objective: Venous thromboembolism, including deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE), is a common complaint in critically ill patients. Therefore, the present study was conducted to determine the effect of nursing interventions, based on the Wells results, on the incidence of DVT in intensive care unit (ICU) patients.Methods: The present clinical trial was conducted on 72 ICU patients without DVT and PE who met the inclusion criteria according to Wells score in Dr. Ganjavian Hospital, Dezful in 2012. The participants were investigated and randomly divided into intervention (n=36) and control groups (n=36). The intervention group received preventive nursing measures based on the risk level determined by the Wells score, and routine therapeutic interventions were performed for the control group. Then, patients were evaluated using Wells score, D-dimer testing, and Doppler sonography on the 1st, 5th, and 10th days. Data were finally coded and entered into SPSS version 23. Data analysis was performed using Chi-square, Fisher’s exact, and Mann–Whitney U tests.Results: The incidence of DVT in both groups showed that 2 patients of the control group who were identified to be at risk using the Wells score were diagnosed with DVT while none of the patients of the intervention group experienced DVT. The present study showed that 22.2% of the patients of the control group suffered from non-pitting edema, which was significantly different from the intervention group (p=0.005).Conclusion: The results of the present study showed that using the Wells score for early identification of the at-risk patients and nursing interventions based on this score’s results is helpful in the prevention of DVT. Appropriate nursing interventions were also effective in reducing the incidence of non-pitting edema in the lower extremities.

Surveillance Ultrasound in the Neuro Intensive Care Unit: Time to Deep Vein Thrombosis Diagnosis

2018 ◽  
Vol 30 (3) ◽  
pp. 645-651
Author(s):  
Kristi L. Hargrove ◽  
Colleen A. Barthol ◽  
Stefan Allen ◽  
Crystal Franco-Martinez
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Deep Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Deep Vein

scholarly journals Deep vein thrombosis in a neurosurgical intensive care: An institutional experience

2017 ◽  
Vol 03 (02) ◽  
pp. 093-096
Author(s):  
Prakash Nair ◽  
Jayesh Sardhara ◽  
Ashish Kumar ◽  
Anant Mehotra ◽  
Arun Srivastava ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care ◽  
Deep Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Neurosurgical Intensive Care ◽  
Institutional Experience ◽  
Deep Vein

Venous Thromboembolism

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Samuel Z. Goldhaber
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Pulmonary Embolism ◽  
Venous Thromboembolism ◽  
Venous Thrombosis ◽  
Antithrombotic Agents ◽  
Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Recurrent Venous Thrombosis ◽  
Deep Vein ◽  
D Dimer ◽  
In Pregnancy

Venous thromboembolism, which involves venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism, is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in hospitalized patients and is being seen with increasing frequency in outpatients. This chapter discusses the risk factors, etiology, classification, pathophysiology, natural history, prognosis, diagnosis (including venous thrombosis, recurrent venous thrombosis, and pulmonary embolism), prophylaxis, and treatment of venous thromboembolism (including the pharmacology of antithrombotic agents), as well as venous thromboembolism in pregnancy and miscellaneous thromboembolic disorders (including thrombosis of unusual sites).  This review contains 8 figures, 16 tables, and 79 references. Keywords: Venous thromboembolism, pulmonary embolism, deep vein thrombosis, embolectomy, thrombolysis, hypercoagulability, duplex ultrasonography, D-dimer, anticoagulation

The Clinical Diagnosis Of Deep Venous Thrombosis

1981 ◽  
Author(s):  
E Briët ◽  
M J Boekhout-Mussert ◽  
L H van Hulsteijn ◽  
C W Koch ◽  
H W C Loose ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Deep Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Venous Thrombosis ◽  
Deep Venous Thrombosis ◽  
Doppler Ultrasound ◽  
Clinical Examination ◽  
False Positive ◽  
False Negative ◽  
Diagnostic Strategies ◽  
Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Deep Vein

Fifty-three patients were examined because of suspected deep venous thrombosis, by means of clinical examination, Doppler ultrasound and venography. Eighty-two legs were examined with all three methods. Venography was positive in 40 and normal in 42. The clinical examination was false positive in 4 legs and false negative in 6. The Doppler ultrasound studies gave false positive results in 3 legs and false negative results in 6. These results are better than those reported in the literature probably because the thrombosis extended to the popliteal vein or the more proximal veins in 38 of the 40 legs with deep vein thrombosis. This high percentage of upper leg vein thrombosis can be explained by the fact that 47 of the 53 patients were ambulant when they developed the signs and symptoms of thrombosis. It is concluded, that the clinical examination and Doppler ultrasonography can be used to diagnose deep vein thrombosis in ambulant patients in our clinic. We presume that the findings reported in the literature cannot be used indiscriminately as a basis for diagnostic strategies in other hospitals because of widely varying categories of patients, referral patterns and diagnostic criteria that are virtually impossible to standardize.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document