Mass-Production Management

1974 ◽  
Vol 25 (2) ◽  
pp. 330-330
Author(s):  
F. de P. Hanika
2017 ◽  
Vol 108 (2) ◽  
pp. 150-157 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Tavares ◽  
L. Silva ◽  
L. Oliveira

AbstractEphestia kuehniella(Lepidoptera, Pyralidae) andSitotroga cerealella(Lepidoptera, Gelechiidae) are important factitious hosts used for production of biological control agents. Their differences in terms of biology and behavior require adjustments in their mass production, particularly when using corn or barley as food in grain or in bran. We modeled adult emergence, oviposition period and egg production along time after emergence, as a function of the food source. Significant differences between hosts or food type were found for these variables and for adult weight but not for sex ratio. Our results confirm the possibility of mass production of these hosts using corn or barley as food source. Integrating adult emergence patterns and age specific fecundity patterns into a single model, it is clear that rearingE. kuehniellaon barley would result in the highest egg output in much shorter time thanE. kuehniellaon corn orS. cerealellaon barley.


1974 ◽  
Vol 25 (2) ◽  
pp. 330
Author(s):  
F. de P. Hanika ◽  
R. Wild

Author(s):  
Ismael Luiz Dos Santos ◽  
Ruan Carlos Dos Santos ◽  
Daniel de Souza Silva Junior

The First Industrial Revolution potentiated the power of production through the steam engine, the Second Industrial Revolution, through steel and electricity, gave life to mass production. A Third Revolution can be attributed to the electronic automation of production lines and now, according to SCHWAB (2016), the world is witnessing the Fourth Industrial Revolution based on the digitization of industrial processes. This article takes a history approach of production management thinking demonstrating its evolution over seven periods. Through a bibliographical research will be presented the main elements that make up the Industry 4.0. In addition to analyzing its impact on the seventh period of Production Management.


2020 ◽  
Vol 16 (3) ◽  
pp. 317-332
Author(s):  
Vasily V. Zapariy ◽  
Nikita Melnikov

Introduction. Fordism, as a specific concept of production management, radically changed the face of the world industry. The system, proposed by the famous engineer and entrepreneur H. Ford, was based on the principle of large-scaled flow-conveyor production founded on the most specialized, standardized and automated industrial equipment. It made possible to produce goods cheaply under the conditions of the domination of low-skilled personnel. The American experience turned out to be widely in demand in the USSR during the industrialization period, since the country needed to create a modern and competitive mechanical engineering in the shortest possible time, primarily with the aim of strengthening its defense capability. Materials and Methods. The basis of the methodology of the work is the problem-chronological approach, which ensures the identification of tendencies and contradictions in the implementation of plans for the construction of the tank industry of the USSR in the 1930–1940s, allows them to be interpreted in a historical sequence. The principle of objectivity is based on the recognition of cause-and-effect patterns in the development of phenomena and events. In addition, the following methods are used: analysis of documents, scientific literature and state regulatory acts. Results and Discussion. The formation of the tank industry of the USSR in the pre-war period proceeded according to the principle of convergence of the technological characteristics of specialized military factories, traditionally engaged in the manufacture of tanks, and large civil engineering enterprises appeared during the years of industrialization, relying on Fordist, auto-tractor technology. In the pre-war period, low qualified personnel of the Soviet automobile and tractor plants, never been able to master the mass production of armored vehicles developed by engineers of specialized factories. The outbreak of the Great Patriotic War led to the evacuation of the capacities of most specialized military factories involved in the production of tanks in the USSR to the sites of civil engineering plants created during the period of industrialization. At the same time, the main forces of the country’s tank industry were moved to the Volga region, at the Urals and Siberia. In order to start producing tanks in a new place, in the extreme conditions of war, with the loss of qualified personnel and valuable industrial equipment, the industry leadership turned to radically transformation of the whole technology of tank production towards at Fordist principles. Key elements of the Fordism concept, as applied to the socialist command economy of the USSR during the war, were used by the party-state leadership to achieve the maximum concentration of limited resources. Conclusion. The system of organization and management of tank production, built during the war years in the tank industry of the USSR and the Urals in accordance with the basic principles of Fordism, can be assessed as “inflexible mass production”. This meant that it was impossible to quickly change the characteristics of products manufactured on a flow-conveyor basis, since this required stopping the conveyor and changing equipment. The system made it possible to mass produce and even improve the designs of the T-34 and “KV” (then “IS”) – tanks developed in the pre-war period, creating the prerequisites for their gradual transformation into an acceptable instrument of “total war”.


2019 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 118-123 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ichiro Yoshida ◽  
Yuki Kondo ◽  
Go Wakatsuki ◽  
Munetoshi Numada ◽  
◽  
...  

A surface with stratified functional properties (hereafter, referred to as the “plateau surface”) improves the tribological characteristics of sliding surfaces in machine tools, automobile parts, engines, etc. The evaluation methods of the plateau surface are listed in the ISO 13565 standard. However, since the evaluation methods listed in ISO 13565-3 are associated with several problems, these evaluation methods have been rarely used in production management. A plateau surface evaluation method that applied image recognition technology was developed in previous research studies to solve these problems. However, this method is time consuming with a calculation time of approximately 20 s. Therefore, in this research, we developed a new plateau surface evaluation method that applied the fast M-estimation type Hough transformation to achieve a computational time of a few seconds. It is expected that this method will be used in mass production processes.


Polymers ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (6) ◽  
pp. 1292
Author(s):  
Razvan Udroiu ◽  
Ion Cristian Braga

Polymer-based additive manufacturing (AM) gathers a great deal of interest with regard to standardization and implementation in mass production. A new methodology for the system and process capabilities analysis in additive manufacturing, using statistical quality tools for production management, is proposed. A large sample of small specimens of circular shape was manufactured of photopolymer resins using polymer jetting (PolyJet) technology. Two critical geometrical features of the specimen were investigated. The variability of the measurement system was determined by Gage repeatability and reproducibility (Gage R&R) methodology. Machine and process capabilities were performed in relation to the defined tolerance limits and the results were analyzed based on the requirements from the statistical process control. The results showed that the EDEN 350 system capability and PolyJet process capability enables obtaining capability indices over 1.67 within the capable tolerance interval of 0.22 mm. Furthermore, PolyJet technology depositing thin layers of resins droplets of 0.016 mm allows for manufacturing in a short time of a high volume of parts for mass production with a tolerance matching the ISO 286 IT9 grade for radial dimension and IT10 grade for linear dimensions on the Z-axis, respectively. Using microscopy analysis some results were explained and validated from the capability study.


Author(s):  
Yung-Chih Chen

Taiwan's small to the medium-sized traditional manufacturing industry is generally believed to have flourished in the 1970s due to the encouragement of the government to promote turning family living rooms into factories. With the hardworking attitude, these small factories were able to accumulate tiny good results and to converge into a significant force. Gradually, these family factories began to grow stronger, and they tried desperately to increase their productivity. They began to follow the model of standardization and mass production. However, did everything possible to reduce costs and to improve international competitiveness? In the study, we used Y Factory as an example to figure out their difficulties and achievements.


2015 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 309
Author(s):  
Apriani Kurnia Suci ◽  
Desman Hidayat ◽  
Andhi Bharata

Production Management is the act of designing, operating, and improving the productive systems – a system for getting the work done. Along the process, the synergy in between machineries, facilities and people could empower the sustainable of the production. In fact, for some cases, the implementation of unique system is needed for the production process. The example for this transformation production management is in the case of CV Wiracana, a handmade manufacturing company for folding hand fans from Bali. CV Wiracana's products are very unique, combined from mass production for the speed and an art for the custom made product. At one side, the market forces them to speed up the production and for this purpose, they must set up the new system on their production line. On the other side, the masterpiece also needs to be produced without jeopardizing mass production line schedule. The transformation production system needs to be done no later than 2015 as the urgency to fulfill the customer demand, business growth, compete in the industry and sustainability. The changes are expected to improve the production at least about 20% or doubled from the current production.


2019 ◽  
Vol 42 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joseph A. Tainter ◽  
Temis G. Taylor

Abstract We question Baumard's underlying assumption that humans have a propensity to innovate. Affordable transportation and energy underpinned the Industrial Revolution, making mass production/consumption possible. Although we cannot accept Baumard's thesis on the Industrial Revolution, it may help explain why complexity and innovation increase rapidly in the context of abundant energy.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document