A Unified Theory of Party Competition: A Cross-National Analysis Integrating Spatial and Behavioral Factors

Acta Politica ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 42 (4) ◽  
pp. 476-478
Author(s):  
Martin Kroh
2005 ◽  
Vol 38 (4) ◽  
pp. 1077-1079
Author(s):  
Csaba Nikolenyi

A Unified Theory of Party Competition: A Cross-National Analysis Integrating Spatial and Behavioral Factors, J.F. Adams, S. Merill, III and B. Grofman, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005, pp. 311.A Unified Theory of Party Competition continues the development of the important research agenda started by Merrill and Grofman's A Unified Theory of Voting: Directional and Spatial Proximity Models (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999). This agenda focuses on integrating hitherto diverging streams of the literature in order to present sophisticated formal models that lead to empirically testable predictions with more realistic results than earlier models. As such, this book is at the cutting edge of developing the scientific study of politics. Although written with an explicit theoretical concern in mind, it presents a wealth of rigorous empirical tests, drawn from case studies of Britain, France, Norway and the Unites States, to demonstrate how well the theory travels across very different institutional and contextual settings.


Author(s):  
James F. Adams ◽  
Samuel Merrill III ◽  
Bernard Grofman

2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mansoor Moaddel ◽  
Kristine J. Ajrouch

Author(s):  
Russell J. Dalton

This chapter summarizes the results of this study: changes in social structure and participation patterns are increasing social-status-based inequality in political participation. Those with higher educational levels, incomes, or occupation have greater political voice, while lower-status individuals are less politically involved. Moreover, the politically rich are getting richer, and the politically poor are getting poorer. The chapter then discusses the implications of these results. The chapter considers claims that participation erodes governance and some form of epistocracy (rule by the knowledgeable) is preferable. Cross-national analysis shows that well-governed democracies have high levels of citizen participation, including both conventional and contentious forms of action. In addition, the size of the SES participation gap is negatively related to good governance. The conclusion discusses ways that democracies might narrow the participation gap and give voice to those citizens who need government support.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document