Responsive Environmental Compliance Management in a Public-Private-Partnership/Design-Build Delivery

ICSDEC 2012 ◽  
2012 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher Tolar ◽  
Mark K. Boyd ◽  
Douglas B. Cargo ◽  
Y. Lynn Clark ◽  
Eric Huff
2007 ◽  
Vol 32 (2) ◽  
pp. 53-60 ◽  
Author(s):  
Edward Murray

While the world has changed dramatically in the last five decades or so, transportation has not been able to keep pace with the overall development. However, in order to ensure prosperity of a country or a state, it is imperative that the ability to move people and products must improve. This paper examines the status of transportation infrastructure and its funding in the State of Washington, USA and suggests some new approaches towards public-private partnership (PPP) in the area. In the process, the success and some of the challenges of PPP are also discussed. In the US, traditionally, people were not charged direct tax such as a toll for using the roads, the primary mode of financing transportation being gas tax. The new sources of revenue collection being developed include: Specific roadway pricing Mileage-based user fees Real-time variable rate roadway pricing. Traditionally, in the US, the public sector shouldered the main responsibility for managing transportation�acquire right-of-way (ROW), design, finance, operate, own, and maintain while the private sector was only allowed to build roads following all the regulation and permits introduced by the government. The reformed PPP model awards ‘design-build’ contracts on a competitive ‘best-value’ basis instead of the conventional ‘low-bid’ basis and thus turn over the design build responsibility to the private sector leaving with the government the financing and maintenance of the roads. The idea is to give road to everybody while allowing the private sector to earn some profit and the public sector to save some money. However, PPP could face a problem if: the traffic and revenue estimates are wrong traffic and revenue risks are taken by private sector but at a huge price construction costs are underestimated the people do not accept the proposition the PPP legislation is not favourable. For any infrastructure project such as transportation to succeed, what is most critical is a set of factors including feasibility, essentiality, reliable revenue forecasts, collateral, credibility, political stability, and transparency. Above all, the government has the responsibility to all its citizens while the private sector is accountable to its stockholders and business partners. What is therefore important is to see how the two parties meet their obligations while building a suitable transportation infrastructure.


2018 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
L. Vasytynska ◽  
G. Nemchenko

The problems of formation of revenues of local budgets are investigated in the article. It has been established that significant centralization has affected the reduction of financial independence of local selfgovernment bodies. Changes in the management of local budgets caused by the introduction of a decentralized model encourage local self-government bodies to attract additional financial resources and form a certain economic potential. The feasibility of introducing a public-private partnership through the application ofdifferent methods and tools based on the form of interaction of project participants is substantiated. Suchcooperation requires the organization of complex, mixed private-public structures that can provide largescale infrastructure projects with resources. The advantages of project financing of economic development ofterritories in the framework of public-private partnership (PPP) are revealed.In order to ensure the financial attractiveness of projects implemented on the basis of public privatepartnership and aimed at ensuring the sustainable economic development of regions, it is recommended touse organizational models such as DBFO (Design, Build, Finance, Operate) and DBO (Design, Build, Operate).


2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (5) ◽  
pp. 44
Author(s):  
Innocent Nuwagaba ◽  
Thekiso Molokwane

Public Private Partnership Projects continue to gain momentum across the world. Governments in developing countries now find PPP projects as an alternative to conventional financing and providing public infrastructure. Guided by the principal agency theory, this study examines different types of PPP Project contracts in the roads sector with specific focus on the Uganda National Roads Authority (UNRA). Contracting out of projects in the roads sector has led to increased costs of road construction in Uganda. The main objectives of this study are to examine the relevance of the principal-agency theory to the adoption of PPP project contracts by UNRA and establish the types of PPP Project contracts suitable for adoption by UNRA. Data was collected through literature survey and interviews. Study findings revealed that Principal-Agency theory is relevant to adoption of PPP project contracts and that UNRA intends to use mainly management PPP contract. It is concluded that principal-agent relationship is very crucial if the execution of PPP Project contracts is to be a success and that there is a very high chance that UNRA is planning to also adopt the use of Build, Own and Transfer (BOT) PPP Project contract in the roads sector. The study recommends that UNRA should ensure a cordial relationship with private parties and not rely solely on management PPP contracts. The organisation should explore other PPP project contracts such as Private Finance Initiative, Leasing, Design Build, Build Operate and Transfer, and then Design Build and Finance. The choice of contracts should always be based on affordability and value for money.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document