Adsorption of Sn on UHV cleaved WS2 surface: Signature of nearly commensurate growth

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Manu Mohan ◽  
Vipin Kumar Singh ◽  
Reshmi S. ◽  
Sudipta Roy Barman ◽  
K. Bhattacharjee
Keyword(s):  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Florian Schütte ◽  
Ivy Frenger ◽  
Kristin Burmeister ◽  
Sabrina Speich ◽  
Johannes Karstensen

<p>In ocean research, mesoscale eddies typically are detected through surface signatures based on satellite data. The assumption is that most eddies are surface intensified and have a vertical structure consistent with a surface intensified mode. However, in-situ eddy observations, especially in the tropical oceans, showed that the vertical eddy structure is often more complex than previously assumed (higher baroclinic modes), and a diverse subsurface eddy field is present, which does not show any surface signatures at all. Our objective here is a first step towards a quantification of the occurrence of subsurface relative to surface eddies. To do this, we use an actively eddying model to compare the subsurface eddy field to its surface signatures in order to be able to estimate which vertical eddy structures prevail and how much of the eddy field is hidden in the subsurface. In addition, the model results are compared against an unprecedented assemblage of observations of subsurface eddies in the tropical oceans. In a first step we focus on eddies in the model that are detectable at the surface for more than 120 days. We found that around 60 % of the detected eddies have a vertical structure associated with a surface intensified mode as previously assumed which are characterized by a strong surface signature. Around 40 % of the eddy field have a vertical structure associated to a higher baroclinic mode. They are often called “intrathermocline” eddies and are characterized by a rather weak surface signature. In a second step we track subsurface eddies (lifetime > 120 days) in the model by identifying density layer thickness anomalies and connect them with possible surface signatures. Around 30 % of the total eddy field of the model, are hidden in the subsurface with no detectable surface signature. In conclusion, our results show that subsurface eddies form a substantial contribution to the total eddy field. Consequently it is difficult to estimate the impact of the eddy field on the ocean when only working with surface based satellite data.</p>


Ocean Science ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 8 (6) ◽  
pp. 931-943 ◽  
Author(s):  
I. Bashmachnikov ◽  
X. Carton

Abstract. Meddies, intra-thermocline eddies of Mediterranean water, can often be detected at the sea surface as positive sea-level anomalies. Here we study the surface signature of several meddies tracked with RAFOS floats and AVISO altimetry. While pushing its way through the water column, a meddy raises isopycnals above. As a consequence of potential vorticity conservation, negative relative vorticity is generated in the upper layer. During the initial period of meddy acceleration after meddy formation or after a stagnation stage, a cyclonic signal is also generated at the sea-surface, but mostly the anticyclonic surface signal follows the meddy. Based on geostrophy and potential vorticity balance, we present theoretical estimates of the intensity of the surface signature. It appears to be proportional to the meddy core radius and to the Coriolis parameter, and inversely proportional to the core depth and buoyancy frequency. This indicates that surface signature of a meddy may be strongly reduced by the upper ocean stratification. Using climatic distribution of the stratification intensity, we claim that the southernmost limit for detection in altimetry of small meddies (with radii on the order of 10–15 km) should lie in the subtropics (35–45° N), while large meddies (with radii of 25–30 km) could be detected as far south as the northern tropics (25–35° N). Those results agree with observations.


2019 ◽  
Vol 46 (7) ◽  
pp. 3880-3890 ◽  
Author(s):  
Noé Lahaye ◽  
Jonathan Gula ◽  
Guillaume Roullet

2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
José Luis Torán ◽  
Juan Antonio López ◽  
Patricia Gomes-Alves ◽  
Susana Aguilar ◽  
Carlos Torroja ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Morgane Dessert ◽  
Xavier Carton ◽  
Jean-Marc Le Caillec ◽  
Christophe Messager ◽  
Lucie Bordois ◽  
...  

<p>Internal Solitary Waves (ISW) are particularly large amplitude internal waves which may propagate in the ocean over tens of kilometres while preserving their shape via a balance between non-linearity and non-hydrostatics effects. These waves may have wide impacts on the ocean dynamics (mixing or inducing vertical currents) and on human activities (fisheries, underwater acoustic or offshore activities).</p><p>ISW can be detected on satellite scenes. For instance, they may induce surface currents and thus enhance or damp the capillary waves at the sea surface which signed on the Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) scenes. On SAR images, ISW appear as successions of bright and dark bands over a grey background. From these images, the amplitude of the ISW and the depth of the pycnocline may be inferred using the Korteweg-DeVries (KdV) theoretical framework. Several SAR images interpretation methods have been developed based on curve fitting or Peak-to-Peak methods (Zheng et al., 2001) or parametric autoregressive techniques (Le Caillec, 2006). The KdV theory relies on the weakly nonlinear approximation and a Two-Layers Ocean Model (TLOM).</p><p>In Gibraltar Strait, the tidal dynamic leads to strong periodic currents. The exchanges between the Mediterranean sea and the Atlantic ocean occurred according a two layer scheme that maintains large density gradient located at the interface between Atlantic and Mediterranean Waters.  At some tidal outflow, an internal hydraulic jump is formed above Camarinal sill, when the tidal ouflow slackens, it is released and leads to the formation of eastward propagating internal solitary waves. The site is thus considered as an ISW “hot-spot”. Part of the energy carried by these waves propagates eastward into the Alborean Sea, although the stratification may differ from the TLOM.</p><p>If the stratification differs from TLOM, a given surface signature of ISW could match to several configurations of the pycnocline geometry and ISW amplitude, depending on the associated stratification.</p><p>In order to assess the impact of the stratification on the surface signature of the ISW, we implemented an idealized 2DV (one vertical and one longitudinal directions) configuration with the Coastal and Regional Ocean modelling COmmunity model (CROCO) using its non-Boussinesq (pseudo compressible) capability. The bathymetry and the density profile are inspired from oceanic observations. The tidal forcing is simplified to a pure monochromatic M2 tide.</p><p>First, simulations are initialized with a two-layer density profile and different pycnocline depths. Then, we added continuous stratification in each of the two (surface/bottom) layers. We tested also several tidal regimes in order to represent the various strengths between the neap and spring tide. SAR images interpretation techniques are then tested in each configurations. Pycnocline depths and ISW amplitudes computed from SAR methods are then compared with the ones initially simulated by the CROCO model.</p><p> </p><p>Le Caillec, J.-M., 2006. Study of the SAR signature of internal waves by nonlinear parametric autoregressive models. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 44, 148–158. https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2005.859954</p><p>Zheng, Q., Yuan, Y., Klemas, V., Yan, X.-H., 2001. Theoretical expression for an ocean internal soliton synthetic aperture radar image and determination of the soliton characteristic half width. J. Geophys. Res. Oceans 106, 31415–31423. https://doi.org/10.1029/2000JC000726</p>


2001 ◽  
Vol 106 (C11) ◽  
pp. 27163-27185 ◽  
Author(s):  
W. Eifler ◽  
C. J. Donlon

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document