Long-term survival and prognostic factors in the surgical treatment of mass-forming type cholangiocarcinoma

Surgery ◽  
2000 ◽  
Vol 127 (5) ◽  
pp. 498-505 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kazuto Inoue ◽  
Masatoshi Makuuchi ◽  
Tadatoshi Takayama ◽  
Guido Torzilli ◽  
Junji Yamamoto ◽  
...  
2003 ◽  
Vol 10 (6) ◽  
pp. 432-440 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yoshikazu Morimoto ◽  
Yasuhiro Tanaka ◽  
Toshinori Ito ◽  
Masaaki Nakahara ◽  
Hiroyuki Nakaba ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Nuno Abecasis ◽  
Fernando Cortez ◽  
Antonio Bettencourt ◽  
Carlos Santos Costa ◽  
Fernando Orvalho ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 31 (1) ◽  
pp. e41124
Author(s):  
Carlos Eduardo Moura Carvalho Rocha ◽  
Júlio César Saraiva Santos ◽  
Rafael Everton Assunção Ribeiro da Costa ◽  
Eduardo Salmito Soares Pinto ◽  
Ana Luisa Rios Barbosa de Almeida ◽  
...  

Objective: this study aimed to evaluate long-term survival and prognostic factors in patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) in an economically poor region of Brazil.Methods: the data were obtained from analysis of medical and mortality records of 210 patients with OSCC treated at an oncology hospital providing services to the Brazilian Unified National Health System in a State of northeastern Brazil between January 2006 and December 2008. Sociodemographic and clinical information, treatment performed, recurrence and evolution were collected. Survival curves were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method and the log rank and Cox regression tests were used to compare the curves.Results: the median survival in the study period was 47.4 months (95% CI = 38.2 - 56.7). The overall survival rates at 5 and 10 years were 29% and 19.8%, respectivelly. Individuals over 60 years of age (HR = 1.70; 95% CI = 1.06 - 2.73), presence of regional metastasis (HR = 2.51; 95% CI = 1.55 - 4.08), presence of recurrence (HR = 3.18; 95% CI = 1.88 - 5.39) and no surgical treatment (HR = 2.10; 95% CI = 1.31 - 3.35) had a worse prognosis.Conclusions: advanced age, presence of regional metastasis, tumor recurrence and non-surgical treatment predict poorer survival in patients diagnosed with OSCC.


2021 ◽  
Vol 42 (6) ◽  
pp. 103070
Author(s):  
Nicholas B. Abt ◽  
Lauren E. Miller ◽  
Tara E. Mokhtari ◽  
Derrick T. Lin ◽  
Jeremy D. Richmon ◽  
...  

Cancers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (12) ◽  
pp. 2918
Author(s):  
Ioannis A. Ziogas ◽  
Irving J. Zamora ◽  
Harold N. Lovvorn III ◽  
Christina E. Bailey ◽  
Sophoclis P. Alexopoulos

This study evaluates the clinicopathological characteristics and outcomes of children vs. adults with undifferentiated embryonal sarcoma of the liver (UESL). A retrospective analysis of 82 children (<18 years) and 41 adults (≥18 years) with UESL registered in the National Cancer Database between 2004–2015 was conducted. No between-group differences were observed regarding tumor size, metastasis, surgical treatment, margin status, and radiation. Children received chemotherapy more often than adults (92.7% vs. 65.9%; p < 0.001). Children demonstrated superior overall survival vs. adults (log-rank, p < 0.001) with 5-year rates of 84.4% vs. 48.2%, respectively. In multivariable Cox regression for all patients, adults demonstrated an increased risk of mortality compared to children (p < 0.001), while metastasis was associated with an increased (p = 0.02) and surgical treatment with a decreased (p = 0.001) risk of mortality. In multivariable Cox regression for surgically-treated patients, adulthood (p = 0.004) and margin-positive resection (p = 0.03) were independently associated with an increased risk of mortality. Multimodal treatment including complete surgical resection and chemotherapy results in long-term survival in most children with UESL. However, adults with UESL have poorer long-term survival that may reflect differences in disease biology and an opportunity to further refine currently available treatment schemas.


2007 ◽  
Vol 32 (1) ◽  
pp. 93-103 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marcella Arru ◽  
Luca Aldrighetti ◽  
Renato Castoldi ◽  
Saverio Di Palo ◽  
Elena Orsenigo ◽  
...  

1999 ◽  
Vol 29 (1) ◽  
pp. 14 ◽  
Author(s):  
Seok-Yeon Kim ◽  
Joo-Yong Han ◽  
Yong-Jin Kim ◽  
Ji-Dong Sung ◽  
In-Ho Chae ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document