Talking EPC - speech pathologists' views of the Enhanced Primary Care items four years on

2010 ◽  
Vol 34 (1) ◽  
pp. 25 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jemma Skeat ◽  
Angela Morgan ◽  
Tristan Nickless
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
General Practitioners ◽  
Health Professionals ◽  
Allied Health ◽  
Allied Health Professionals ◽  
Policy Makers ◽  
Starting Point ◽  
Wide Range ◽  
Speech Pathologists ◽  
Effective Use

Background.Allied health professionals have provided services under Enhanced Primary Care (EPC) since 2004; however, the experiences and views of AHPs about the initiative and how it has been utilised have not been well explored. Objective.We examined speech pathologists’ views and experiences under EPC. Methods.A survey of speech pathologists in private practice who provide services under EPC was undertaken. Results.Speech pathologists provide EPC services to a wide range of clients with communication and swallowing disorders. The five EPC sessions provide a ‘starting point’ for therapy for some clients, and supplement existing therapy for others. Speech pathologists expressed concern about the accessibility of the program, and its understanding and use in practice, but noted that the program can be valuable for clients who are able to negotiate the hurdles, and for themselves in terms of increased referrals and collaboration with general practitioners. Conclusions.Education around eligibility, access, and reporting requirements is needed for clients, GPs and allied health professionals in order to reduce the frustrating aspects of this program, and support its ongoing use. What is known about the topic?The Enhanced Primary Care (EPC) program relies on collaboration between general practitioners and allied health professionals, and aims to improve the management of chronic and complex conditions in the community. The experiences and views of allied health professionals (AHPs) in implementing the EPC program since 2004 are important to inform evaluation of the effectiveness, usefulness and value of the program. What does this paper add?We explored speech pathologists’ perspectives on EPC, including their experiences and views about the program. The paper informs understanding of the use of EPC in practice, for example, how sessions are provided to clients over the 12-month period, as well as how those who use it – allied health professionals – perceive the value and practicality of this program. What are the implications for practitioners?Education for GPs, clients and AHPs is needed to facilitate a more efficient and effective use of EPC. Policy makers should consider the views and experiences of AHPs when reviewing the EPC initiative, in order to understand aspects such as the accessibility of the programs for clients, and the perceived value for AHPs.

scholarly journals A mixed-methods study of challenges and benefits of clinical academic careers for nurses, midwives and allied health professionals

BMJ Open ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (10) ◽  
pp. e030595 ◽  
Author(s):  
Diane Trusson ◽  
Emma Rowley ◽  
Louise Bramley
Keyword(s):  
Health Professionals ◽  
Personal Development ◽  
Online Survey ◽  
Allied Health ◽  
Academic Career ◽  
Allied Health Professionals ◽  
Clinical Role ◽  
Wide Range ◽  
Depth Interviews ◽  
Academic Study

ObjectivesThe clinical academic trajectory for doctors and dentists is well-established, with research embedded in their career development. Recent years have also seen a burgeoning interest and push for nurses, midwives and allied health professionals (NMAHPs) to pursue a clinical academic career. However, the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) 10-year review suggested that there may be problems with progression post Master’s degree level for this group, with nurses and midwives receiving less NIHR funding than allied health professionals. This study responds to these concerns, tracking the progression and exploring experiences of NMAHPs in the East Midlands region of England.DesignAn online survey and in-depth interviews were used to capture a wide range of experiences.Participants67 NMAHPs who were pursuing a clinical academic career were surveyed, supplemented by 16 semi-structured in-depth interviews.ResultsThree themes emerged during data analysis: Embarking on a clinical academic career, overcoming barriers and benefits.ConclusionsNMAHPs are motivated to pursue a clinical academic career by a drive to improve services for the benefit of patients and the National Health Service more widely, as well as for personal development and career progression. People working in these roles have opportunities to explore possible solutions to issues that they encounter in their clinical role through academic study. Findings reveal benefits emanating from the individual level through to (inter)national levels, therefore academic study should be encouraged and supported. However, investment is needed to establish more clinical academic roles to enable NMAHPs to continue to use their experience and expertise post-PhD, otherwise the full extent of their value will not be recognised.

scholarly journals Does Enhanced Primary Care enhance primary care? Policy‐induced dilemmas for allied health professionals

2008 ◽  
Vol 188 (1) ◽  
pp. 29-32 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michele M Foster ◽  
Geoffrey Mitchell ◽  
Terry Haines ◽  
Sean Tweedy ◽  
Petrea Cornwell ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Health Professionals ◽  
Allied Health ◽  
Care Policy ◽  
Allied Health Professionals

scholarly journals Methods and Effectiveness of Communication Between Hospital Allied Health and Primary Care Practitioners: a Systematic Narrative Review

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jacinta Sheehan ◽  
Kate Laver ◽  
Anoo Bhopti ◽  
Miia Rahja ◽  
Tim Usherwood ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Primary Care ◽  
Health Professionals ◽  
Information Technologies ◽  
Allied Health ◽  
Allied Health Professionals ◽  
Multidisciplinary Communication ◽  
Gold Standard Method ◽  
Health Information Technologies ◽  
Primary Care Practitioners

Abstract Background There is a compelling rationale that effective communication between hospital allied health professionals and primary care practitioners could improve quality and continuity of patient care. It is not known which methods of communication are used, nor how effectively they facilitate the transition of care when a patient is discharged home from hospital. Our systematic review aims to investigate the methods and effectiveness of communication between hospital allied health professionals and primary care practitioners. Method Systematic review of quantitative and qualitative studies with narrative synthesis. Medline, CINAHL, EMBASE, PsycInfo and Proquest Nursing and Allied Health Sources were searched from January 2003 until January 2020 for studies that examined hospital allied health professionals communicating with primary care practitioners. Risk of bias in the different study designs were appraised using recognised tools and a content analysis conducted of the methodologies used. Results From the located 12,281 papers (duplicates removed), 24 studies met the inclusion criteria with hospital allied health professionals communicating in some form with primary care practitioners. There was, however, limited literature investigating the methods and/or the effectiveness of communication between hospital allied health professionals and primary care practitioners.Conclusion There is currently no 'gold standard' method or measure of communication between hospital allied health professionals and primary care practitioners. There is an urgent need to develop and evaluate multidisciplinary communication with enhanced health information technologies to improve collaboration across healthcare settings and facilitate continuity of integrated people-centred care.Registration: www.crd.york.uk PROSPERO CRD42019120410

scholarly journals Barriers and Facilitators to Weight and Lifestyle Management in Women with Polycystic Ovary Syndrome: General Practitioners’ Perspectives

Nutrients ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (5) ◽  
pp. 1024 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexis Arasu ◽  
Lisa J Moran ◽  
Tracy Robinson ◽  
Jacqueline Boyle ◽  
Siew Lim
Keyword(s):  
Polycystic Ovary Syndrome ◽  
General Practitioners ◽  
Health Professionals ◽  
Allied Health ◽  
Polycystic Ovary ◽  
Barriers And Facilitators ◽  
Structured Interviews ◽  
Ovary Syndrome ◽  
Allied Health Professionals ◽  
Lifestyle Management

Background: Weight and lifestyle management is advocated as the first-line treatment for polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) by evidence-based guidelines. Current literature describes both systems- and individual-related challenges that general practitioners (GPs) face when attempting to implement guideline recommendations for lifestyle management into clinical practice for the general population. The GPs’ perspective in relation to weight and lifestyle advice for PCOS has not been captured. Methods: Fifteen GPs were recruited to take part in semi-structured interviews. NVIVO software was used for qualitative analysis. Results: We report that GPs unanimously acknowledge the importance of weight and lifestyle management in PCOS. Practice was influenced by both systems-related and individual-related facilitators and barriers. Individual-related barriers include perceived lack of patient motivation for weight loss, time pressures, lack of financial reimbursement, and weight management being professionally unrewarding. System-related barriers include costs of accessing allied health professionals and unavailability of allied health professionals in certain locations. Individual-related facilitators include motivated patient subgroups such as those trying to get pregnant and specific communication techniques such as motivational interviewing. System-related facilitators include the GP’s role in chronic disease management. Conclusions: This study contributes to the understanding of barriers and facilitators that could be addressed to optimize weight and lifestyle management in women with PCOS in primary care.

scholarly journals General medical services by non-medical health professionals: a systematic quantitative review of economic evaluations in primary care

2019 ◽  
Vol 69 (682) ◽  
pp. e304-e313 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bethany F Anthony ◽  
Alun Surgey ◽  
Julia Hiscock ◽  
Nefyn H Williams ◽  
Joanna M Charles
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Systematic Reviews ◽  
Health Professionals ◽  
Allied Health ◽  
Cost Effective ◽  
Chronic Fatigue ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Economic Evaluations ◽  
Economic Evidence ◽  
Allied Health Professionals

BackgroundPrevious systematic reviews have found that nurses and pharmacists can provide equivalent, or higher, quality of care for some tasks performed by GPs in primary care. There is a lack of economic evidence for this substitution.AimTo explore the costs and outcomes of role substitution between GPs and nurses, pharmacists, and allied health professionals in primary care.Design and settingA systematic review of economic evaluations exploring role substitution of allied health professionals in primary care was conducted. Role substitution was defined as ‘the substitution of work that was previously completed by a GP in the past and is now completed by a nurse or allied health professional’.MethodThe following databases were searched: Ovid MEDLINE, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE), and the Centre for Reviews and Dissemination. The review followed guidance from the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA).ResultsSix economic evaluations were identified. There was some limited evidence that nurse-led care for common minor health problems was cost-effective compared with GP care, and that nurse-led interventions for chronic fatigue syndrome and pharmacy-led services for the medicines management of coronary heart disease and chronic pain were not. In South Korea, community health practitioners delivered primary care services for half the cost of physicians. The review did not identify studies for other allied health professionals such as physiotherapists and occupational therapists.ConclusionThere is limited economic evidence for role substitution in primary care; more economic evaluations are needed.

scholarly journals Making fall prevention routine in primary care practice: perspectives of allied health professionals

2018 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeannine Liddle ◽  
Meryl Lovarini ◽  
Lindy Clemson ◽  
Lynette Mackenzie ◽  
Amy Tan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Health Professionals ◽  
Fall Prevention ◽  
Allied Health ◽  
Primary Care Practice ◽  
Care Practice ◽  
Allied Health Professionals

scholarly journals Improving access to allied health professionals through the Champlain BASE™eConsult service: a cross-sectional study in Canada

2017 ◽  
Vol 67 (664) ◽  
pp. e757-e763 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fanny McKellips ◽  
Erin Keely ◽  
Amir Afkham ◽  
Clare Liddy
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Health Services ◽  
Health Professionals ◽  
Allied Health ◽  
Primary Care Providers ◽  
Cross Sectional Study ◽  
Sectional Study ◽  
Allied Health Professionals ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Medical Specialties

BackgroundAllied health services are an important part of providing effective team-based care. The Champlain BASE™ (Building Access to Specialists through eConsultation) eConsult service facilitates quick and secure communication between primary care providers (PCPs) and allied health professionals (AHPs).AimTo assess the eConsult service’s ability to improve access to advice from AHPs.Design and settingA cross-sectional study was carried out on all cases submitted to AHPs through the eConsult service between April 2011 and May 2016. The service covers Ottawa, Canada, and its surrounding rural communities.MethodA descriptive overview of all cases submitted to allied health services was conducted. Utilisation and survey metrics for AHP eConsults were compared with those sent to medical specialties, in order to understand the potential differences and generalisability of eConsult access beyond the traditional medical specialty referral.ResultsPCPs submitted 127 cases to nine allied health specialties during the study period. The most popular specialty was clinical pharmacist, which received an average of 1.5 cases per month. The median specialist response time was 2.1 days (interquartile range [IQR] 0.7–5.3 days, range 0.01–14.2 days) versus 0.9 days (IQR 0.2–3.4 days, range 0–49.5 days) for medical specialties. PCPs received advice for a new or additional course of action in 70% (versus 58% for medical specialties) of cases. They rated the service as being of high or very high value for their patients in 88% of cases (versus 93% for medical specialties), and for themselves in 89% (94% for medical specialties) of cases.ConclusionThe eConsult service has demonstrated the ability to support prompt communication between PCPs and AHPs, improving patients’ access to AHP care. Given the importance of AHPs in providing primary care, allied health services should be offered in the menu of specialties available through electronic consultation services.

The Medical Treatment Planning and Decisions Act 2016: what is the role for allied health professionals?

2020 ◽  
Vol 26 (5) ◽  
pp. 383
Author(s):  
Aidan Borthwick ◽  
Peter Higgs
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Medical Treatment ◽  
Advance Care Planning ◽  
Health Professionals ◽  
Allied Health ◽  
Care Setting ◽  
Primary Care Setting ◽  
Care Planning ◽  
Allied Health Professionals ◽  
Advance Care

Advance care planning is increasingly common practice in contemporary health care for individuals living with a chronic condition. Currently, limited research has been conducted into how newly adopted legislation in Victoria, Australia, facilitates advance care planning. The purpose of this study was to explore the uptake of the Medical Treatment Planning and Decisions Act 2016 in the primary care setting. The study also aimed to explore barriers that allied health professionals encounter when practicing advance care planning with patients. Four interdisciplinary focus groups and two in-depth interviews with participants were conducted and thematically analysed using an interpretivist inquiry paradigm. Analysis revealed two key themes: promoting client wellbeing and scope of practice. The data suggest that advance care planning by allied health professionals in the primary care setting is limited. Focussing on enhancing clients’ wellbeing was more important than the development of advanced care directives. Attempting to promote the wellbeing of patients may foster hesitation to commence advance care planning in primary care. This study demonstrated that knowledge of the fundamental legislative changes are evident among allied health professionals which provides a foundation for successful development of advance care planning post implementation of the new Act.

Paediatric emergency department referrals from primary care

2016 ◽  
Vol 40 (6) ◽  
pp. 691
Author(s):  
Erin Turbitt ◽  
Gary Lee Freed
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Emergency Department ◽  
General Practice ◽  
General Practitioners ◽  
Health Professionals ◽  
Absolute Number ◽  
Patterns Of Care ◽  
Or Education ◽  
Policy Makers ◽  
Number Of Children

Background Over the last decade, paediatric referrals from general practitioners (GPs) to the emergency department (ED) have increased by 60% in Australia. Objective To investigate the characteristics of Victorian children referred by GPs to the ED with lower-urgency conditions. Method Data were collected from four hospital EDs in Victoria, May–November 2014. Parents attending the ED with their child triaged as lower urgency were surveyed. Descriptive, frequency, and bivariate analyses were performed. Results Of the 1150 responses, 28% (320) visited their GP before attending ED. Of these 66% (212), were referred by their GP. A greater proportion with injury than illness (84% vs 59%; P < 0.0001) was referred to the ED if they had first visited their GP. Conclusion Motivations of GPs to send lower-urgency injured and ill children to ED are not well understood. The high number of referrals from GPs to the ED for lower urgency conditions suggests attention by policy makers and health professionals must be paid to the current patterns of care of children in general practice. What is known about the topic? Paediatric referrals in Australia from GPs to EDs have increased in the last decade, along with the absolute number of children in Victoria presenting to the ED. What does this paper add? A significant number of children (66%) who attend the GP before visiting the ED are referred to the ED for their lower urgency condition. What are the implications for practitioners? It may be appropriate for GPs to be further supported to manage lower urgency conditions, through better resources or education.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document