Sustainability trends in oil and gas

2019 ◽  
Vol 59 (2) ◽  
pp. 738
Author(s):  
Piers P. Tonge
Keyword(s):  
Climate Change ◽  
Business Models ◽  
Oil And Gas ◽  
Oil And Gas Industry ◽  
Gas Industry ◽  
Company Strategy ◽  
Net Zero ◽  
Global Investors ◽  
Oil And Gas Companies

This paper addresses multiple examples of sustainability across the oil, gas and energy sectors, and relevance application to APPEA members. The sustainability of oil and gas companies is now a key issue for the financial and investment sectors. Investors’ concerns over environmental, social and governance (ESG) risks and business models that may destroy value are growing, with clear analogues from the coal sector. Companies need to maintain their focus on safety, social licence issues and compliance of human rights. Mainstream global investors are increasing pressure on companies to address the long-term risks associated with climate change, as investors look to reduce the carbon-emissions footprints of their equity portfolios. The oil industry is still largely reactive, and not perceived by investors and society to be a part of the climate change solution. Investor pressure to address climate change is driving change in oil and gas company strategy and sustainability activity. Companies need resilience and credible plans to reduce scope 1, 2 – and in the future scope 3 emissions – and to achieve the net zero objectives of the Paris Agreement. Investor and societal scrutiny on the oil and gas industry is likely to increase with plastics an area of growing focus, with implications for future oil and gas demand.

Technological Power as a Strategic Dilemma: CO2 Capture and Storage in the International Oil and Gas Industry

2012 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 8-29 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andreas Tjernshaugen
Keyword(s):  
Climate Change ◽  
Comparative Analysis ◽  
Oil And Gas ◽  
Oil And Gas Industry ◽  
Change Strategies ◽  
Gas Industry ◽  
Mitigation Option ◽  
Long Time ◽  
Oil And Gas Companies ◽  
And Storage

This article offers a comparative analysis of the emergence of CO2 capture and storage (CCS) activities and strategies in three multinational oil and gas companies. Exxon/ExxonMobil was first to make plans for a major, pioneering CCS project, but later pursued a relatively cautious strategy. In contrast, BP showed little interest in CCS up until 1997, but from that point on developed a particularly ambitious strategy. Statoil, meanwhile, has been relatively strongly involved in CCS activities for a long time. An explanatory framework with potential for wider application is developed, highlighting how the overall compatibility of CCS with oil and gas industry characteristics created a strategic dilemma for the companies. In explaining their responses, the article emphasizes the process towards institutionalization of CCS as a widely recognized mitigation option, and the three companies' different climate change strategies.

Industry: Turning the Titanic

2021 ◽  
pp. 119-154
Author(s):  
Deborah Gordon
Keyword(s):  
Climate Change ◽  
Greenhouse Gas ◽  
Oil And Gas ◽  
Self Regulation ◽  
Ghg Emissions ◽  
Oil And Gas Industry ◽  
Gas Industry ◽  
Combat Climate Change ◽  
Oil And Gas Companies

Chapter 5 examines the structure and role of the oil industry and details the various actors that make up the industry. It argues that self-reported greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions are not comprehensive or trustworthy. There are too many ways that companies can game emissions reports. Different companies are surveyed to separate the leaders from the laggards. The investigation reaches beyond multinational and national oil and gas companies and touches upon industry actors in the wings: investors, industry advisers, traders, and certification agents. Efforts to establish industry benchmarks are laid out. The chapter recommends rethinking self-regulation and concludes with a challenging premise about whether the goal is to defeat or partner with the oil and gas industry to effectively combat climate change.

Risk Management in the Oil and Gas Industry Related to the AI Tools

2021 ◽  
pp. 339-364
Author(s):  
Catalin Popescu ◽  
Lazăr Avram ◽  
Ion Mocanu
Keyword(s):  
Oil And Gas ◽  
Price Volatility ◽  
Oil And Gas Industry ◽  
Petroleum Products ◽  
Executive Directors ◽  
Gas Industry ◽  
Domain Specific ◽  
Corporate Social ◽  
Oil And Gas Companies

The oil and gas industry is in a stage of intense focus on safety, preparing for better management of environmental risks and mitigating them. Given the policy of corporate social responsibility, technical and economic challenges, as well pressures in domain-specific regulations, it has become increasingly obvious that the management of these risks is essential for long-term sustainability of oil and gas companies. Research shows that safety and environmental issues, compliance with regulatory rules, price volatility, and rising challenges associated with access to oil and gas reserves and markets are the top risks identified by oil and gas industry executive directors. In this sense, the tools offered by artificial intelligence can contribute to the proper management of these risks and to the adequate monitoring of all the categories of processes that take place at the level of the optimized production generated by the gas wells, regarding the transport of petroleum products through the pipelines and especially with regard to offshore activities.

Development of business models of managing oil service processes in big oil and gas companies

2021 ◽  
pp. 91-109
Author(s):  
Aleksey Isakov ◽  
Eric Liron ◽  
Igor Shtopakov ◽  
Svetlana Semushkina
Keyword(s):  
Business Models ◽  
Oil And Gas ◽  
Oil And Gas Industry ◽  
Business Environment ◽  
Economic Science ◽  
Gas Industry ◽  
Advantages And Disadvantages ◽  
Efficiency And Effectiveness ◽  
Modern Business ◽  
Oil And Gas Companies

The article considers the features of the business model for managing oilfield service processes in big oil and gas companies using the example of PJSC Oil Company «Rosneft». The purpose of the article is to study current business models in oil and gas industry, identify their advantages and disadvantages, and develop recommendations for improving sourcing procedures in accordance with the dynamics and changes in the external environment of companies' functioning. The research applies a variety of scientific methods which include analysis, synthesis and systematization of conceptual and practical aspects of sourcing in the context of the Russian oil and gas industry. The authors provide a critical analysis of theoretical aspects related to the concepts of sourcing, outsourcing and insourcing, which have been in the focus of Russian economic science since the mid-2000s. Special attention is paid to the insourcing model, which is available and used by large companies in capital-intensive industries with long-term investment and production cycles, such as oil and gas. The signs of production and management inefficiency of insourcing are formalized. In terms of transaction costs, a comparison is made between the efficiency and effectiveness of outsourcing and vertical integration. Taking into account the peculiarities and distinctive features of modern business environment, its uncertainty and new challenges for oil and gas producing companies, the authors conclude that strategic outsourcing is most in demand. The results obtained in the study can be used in practice of oil and gas companies, as well as by government bodies in the process of developing a regulatory policy in the relevant area.

Trends and Prospects of Development of the Oil and Gas Sector in the Context of Digitalization

2020 ◽  
Vol 26 (1) ◽  
pp. 35-45 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. G. Kazanin
Keyword(s):  
Oil And Gas ◽  
Digital Technologies ◽  
Oil And Gas Industry ◽  
Global Market ◽  
The Arctic ◽  
Business And Society ◽  
Gas Industry ◽  
Exploration And Production ◽  
Oil And Gas Sector

The modern oil and gas industry is heavily dependent on the processes and trends driven by the accelerating digitalization of the economy. Thus, the digitalization of the oil and gas sector has become Russia’s top priority, which involves a technological and structural transformation of all production processes and stages.Aim. The presented study aims to identify the major trends and prospects of development of the Russian oil and gas sector in the context of its digitalization and formation of the digital economy.Tasks. The authors analyze the major trends in the development of the oil and gas industry at a global scale and in Russia with allowance for the prospects of accelerated exploration of the Arctic; determine the best practices of implementation of digital technologies by oil and gas companies as well as the prospects and obstacles for the subsequent transfer of digital technologies to the Russian oil and gas industry.Methods. This study uses general scientific methods, such as analysis, synthesis, and scientific generalization.Results. Arctic hydrocarbons will become increasingly important to Russia in the long term, and their exploration and production will require the implementation of innovative technologies. Priority directions for the development of many oil and gas producers will include active application of digital technologies as a whole (different types of robots that could replace people in performing complex procedures), processing and analysis of big data using artificial intelligence to optimize processes, particularly in the field of exploration and production, processing and transportation. Digitalization of the oil and gas sector is a powerful factor in the improvement of the efficiency of the Russian economy. However, Russian companies are notably lagging behind in this field of innovative development and there are problems and high risks that need to be overcome to realize its potential for business and society.Conclusions. Given the strategic importance of the oil and gas industry for Russia, its sustainable development and national security, it is recommendable to focus on the development and implementation of digital technologies. This is crucial for the digitalization of long-term projection and strategic planning, assessment of the role and place of Russia and its largest energy companies in the global market with allowance for a maximum number of different internal and external factors.

Technology Focus: Decarbonization (July 2021)

2021 ◽  
Vol 73 (07) ◽  
pp. 64-64
Author(s):  
Nigel Jenvey
Keyword(s):  
Business Models ◽  
Oil And Gas ◽  
Natural Capital ◽  
Ghg Emissions ◽  
Oil And Gas Industry ◽  
Policy Support ◽  
Continuous Change ◽  
Gas Industry ◽  
The Past ◽  
Technology Focus

Have you noticed the change in the oil and gas industry over the past year with its engagement in carbon management, decarbonization, and net-zero-emissions targets? Policy support and technology advances in alternative energies have delivered massive cost reduction in renewables more quickly, and to a greater degree, than expected. Over the past few years, more of the world’s capital has been spent on electricity than oil and gas sup-ply, and more than half of all new energy-generation capacity is now renewable. Some elements of society, therefore, have suggested that this is the beginning of the end for the fossil-fuel sector and call for investors to turn away from oil and gas and “leave it in the ground.” In more than a century of almost continuous change, however, the oil and gas industry has a long track record of innovative thinking, creative solutions, and different business models. SPE papers and events that covered decarbonization during the past year show that a wide variety of solutions already exist that avoid, reduce, replace, offset, or sequester greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. It is clear, therefore, that decarbonization technologies will now be as important as 4D seismic, horizontal wells, and hydraulic fracturing. That is why we now bring you this inaugural Technology Focus feature dedicated to decarbonization. The experience and capability of the entire JPT community in decarbonization is critical. Please enjoy the following summary of three selected papers on the role of natural gas in fuel-switching; carbon capture, use, and storage (CCUS); and hydrogen technologies that deliver the dual challenge of providing more energy with less GHG emission. There are many ways to engage in the SPE decarbonization efforts in the remainder of 2021. Regional events have addressed CCUS, hydrogen, geothermal, and methane. There is also the new SPE Gaia sustainability program to enable and empower all members who wish to engage in the alignment of the future of energy with sustainable development. The Gaia program has an on-demand library of materials, including an existing series on methane, and upcoming similar events on other energy transition, natural capital and regeneration, and social responsibility priorities. Get involved through your SPE section or chapter or contact your regional Gaia liaison to find out what Gaia programming you can support or lead at www.spe.org/en/gaia.

EBITDA and DACF multipliers as an indicator of investment attractiveness of domestic vertically integrated companies

2021 ◽  
Vol 20 (4) ◽  
pp. 718-752
Author(s):  
Oleg V. SHIMKO
Keyword(s):  
Oil And Gas ◽  
Stock Exchange ◽  
Oil And Gas Industry ◽  
Financial Economic ◽  
Consolidated Financial Statements ◽  
Gas Industry ◽  
Debt Burden ◽  
Fixed Assets ◽  
Settlement Agreements ◽  
Oil And Gas Companies

Subject. The article addresses the EV/EBITDA and EV/DACF ratios of the twenty five largest public oil and gas corporations from 2008 to 2018. Objectives. The purpose is to identify key trends in the value of EV/EBITDA and EV/DACF ratios of biggest public oil and gas corporations, determine factors resulted in the changes over the studied period, and establish the applicability of these multipliers for assessing the business value within the industry. Methods. I apply methods of comparative and financial-economic analysis, and generalization of consolidated financial statements data. Results. The study revealed that EV/EBITDA and EV/DACF multiples are acceptable for valuing oil and gas companies. The EV level depends on profitability, proved reserves, and a country factor. It is required to adjust EBITDA for information on impairment, revaluation and write-off for assets that are reported separately from depreciation, depletion and amortization costs, as well as for income or expenses arising after the sale of fixed assets and as a result of effective court decisions or settlement agreements. It is advisable to adjust DACF for income, expenses and changes in assets and liabilities, which are caused by events that are unusual for oil and gas companies. Conclusions. The application of EV/EBITDA and EV/DACF multiples requires a detailed analysis and, if necessary, adjustments of their constituent components. However, they are quite relevant in the context of declining profitability and growing debt burden in the stock exchange sector of the global oil and gas industry.

On Approaches to Taking into Account the Risks of Changing Climatic Conditions when Planning and Implementing Oil and Gas Projects

2021 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
pp. 52-65
Author(s):  
P. N. Mikheev
Keyword(s):  
Climate Change ◽  
Oil And Gas ◽  
Oil And Gas Industry ◽  
Climatic Conditions ◽  
Qualitative Assessment ◽  
Physical Factors ◽  
Gas Industry ◽  
Climate Risks ◽  
The Impact

The article discusses issues related to the impact of climate change on the objects of the oil and gas industry. The main trends in climate change on a global and regional (on the territory of Russian Federation) scale are outlined. Possible approaches to the identification and assessment of climate risks are discussed. The role of climatic risks as physical factors at various stages of development and implementation of oil and gas projects is shown. Based on the example of oil and gas facilities in the Tomsk region, a qualitative assessment of the level of potential risk from a weather and climatic perspective is given. Approaches to creating a risk management and adaptation system to climate change are presented.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document