Vitrification as a cryopreservation method has many advantages compared with slow freezing. Many variables in the vitrification process exists that influence the survival rates of vitrified oocytes and embryos. These include the cryoprotectants (type, concentration, and duration of exposure), the temperature of the vitrification solution at exposure, the device used for vitrification, and the quality and developmental stage of embryos. It is worthwhile to mention that vitrification protocols successfully used in bovine oocytes and embryos have been used also with human oocytes and embryos. Vitrification is relatively simple, requires no freezing equipment, and relies on the placement of the embryos in a very small volume of vitrification medium that must be cooled at extreme rates not obtainable in regular enclosed straws. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the efficiency of 4 different vitrification protocols on the survival rate of in vitro produced (IVP) bovine embryos. Blastocysts were produced by a standard IVP procedure following in vitro maturation, fertilization, and culture in synthetic oviduct fluid supplemented with 5% fetal calf serum (FCS). On Day 7 (Day of IVF = Day 0), a total of 297 blastocysts were vitrified using (i) the open pulled straw (OPS) in 20% DMSO and 20% ethylene glycol (EG) in a basal medium of TCM-199 with HEPES supplemented with 20% FCS; (ii) the modified OPS, in 20% DMSO, 20% EG, and 0.5 M sucrose in a basal medium of phosphate buffer saline (PBS) supplemented with 20% FCS; (iii) the cryoloop, in 15% DMSO, 15% EG, 10 mg mL–1 Ficoll 70, and 0.65 M sucrose in a basal medium of PBS supplemented with 20% FCS; and (iv) in 0.25 straws in 20% glycerol, 20% EG, 0.3 M sucrose, 3% polyethylene glycol, and 0.3 M xylose in a basal medium of PBS. After warming, embryos were placed in culture for additional 24 h. Re-expansion and hatching rates were measured at 2 and 24 h after warming. Data were analysed by 1-way ANOVA. At 2 h post-warming, the re-expansion of blastocysts vitrified with cryoloop was significantly higher compared with OPS, modified OPS, and the 0.25 straw methods (54.08 ± 15.53 v. 10.40 ± 3.00, 22.67 ± 9.20, and 8.82 ± 2.15, respectively; P ≤ 0.028). At 24 h post-warming, only embryos from cryoloop and modified OPS were still alive with a survival rate of embryos vitrified with cryoloop significantly higher than that of those vitrified with modified OPS (48.45 ± 17.56 v. 3.75 ± 3.75, respectively; P ≤ 0.007). Hatching rates at 24 h post-warming were not different between cryoloop and modified OPS groups (5.63 ± 4.40 and 1.25 ± 1.25, respectively). These results clearly demonstrate that embryo cryotolerance is affected by the method used for cryopreservation. Moreover, cryoloop vitrification was found to be more effective than OPS and 0.25 straw methods for the cryopreservation of bovine embryos.
86COMPARISON OF TWO VITRIFICATION PROTOCOLS FOR CROSSBRED
BOS INDICUS×BOS TAURUS IN VITRO-PRODUCED EMBRYOS