Screening for hepatitis C in sexual health clinic attendees

Sexual Health ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 73 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Cristina Mapagu ◽  
Sarah J. Martin ◽  
Marian J. Currie ◽  
Francis J. Bowden
Keyword(s):  
Risk Assessment ◽  
Risk Factor ◽  
Hepatitis C ◽  
Sexual Health ◽  
Health Centre ◽  
Health Clinic ◽  
Health Clinics ◽  
History Of ◽  
Hcv Screening ◽  
Sexual Health Clinics

Introduction: Hepatitis C virus (HCV) prevalence has been shown to be higher in some sexual health clinic attendees than the general population. Screening for HCV in sexual health clinics may be based on risk assessment or universal screening. The aim of this audit was to explore the value of routine HCV screening in a sexual health centre population. Methods: Medical records and pathology data concerning all patients tested for HCV between 2000 and 2002 at Canberra Sexual Health Centre were audited to determine whether the diagnosis of HCV was already known and which, if any, risk factors were identified at the time of testing. Results: A total of 3845 tests were conducted on 3156 individuals over the 3-year period. HCV seropositivity was confirmed in 95 patients (3.0%; 95% CI 2.4–3.7), of which 29 (30.5%) were new diagnoses. A total of 85.3% of all patients with confirmed HCV infection reported a history of injecting drug use. Tattoos and body piercings were the most common risk factor in those who denied ever injecting. Risk factor assessment correctly identified all but one positive patient. Conclusions: HCV testing based on clinician-led risk assessment is an effective approach to HCV screening.

37. MONITORING HIV TRANSMISSION AMONG MEN SEEN AT METROPOLITAN SEXUAL HEALTH CLINICS IN AUSTRALIA, 1996-2005

Sexual Health ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 4 (4) ◽  
pp. 299
Author(s):  
A. McDonald ◽  
J. M. Kaldor
Keyword(s):  
Sexual Health ◽  
Hiv Infection ◽  
Health Centre ◽  
South Australia ◽  
Health Clinic ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Antibody Testing ◽  
Health Clinics ◽  
Sexual Health Clinics ◽  
Hiv Antibody Testing

National surveillance for newly diagnosed HIV infection indicates an increasing trend in Queensland, South Australia and Victoria but not in New South Wales. It was not clear if trends in newly diagnosed HIV infection were due to different patterns of HIV antibody testing. We report the pattern of HIV antibody testing among people seen through a network of sexual health clinics in Australia. Six public metropolitan sexual health clinics (Sydney Sexual Health Centre (SSHC), South West Sexual Health Centre (SSWSHC), NSW; Brisbane Sexual Health Clinic (BSHC), Gold Coast Sexual Health Clinic (GCSHC), QLD; Clinic 275, SA; Melbourne Sexual Health Centre (MSHC), VIC) provide annual tabulations of the number of people seen, the number tested for HIV antibody, and the number with newly diagnosed HIV infection, broken down by sex, exposure category and testing history. The number of men seen at the clinics ranged from 17 138 in 1996 to 19 184 in 2005. Among men seen, the percentage who were tested for HIV declined from 62% in 1996 to 50% in 2001 and increased to 56% in 2005. HIV prevalence remained stable in 1996-2005 at 0.5% and was highest at SSHC (0.7-1.1%) and among homosexually active men (1.8% in 1996 and 1.6% in 2005). The percentage of men retested within 12 months of a negative test increased from 41% in 1996 to 44% in 2005. At SSHC, retesting among homosexually active men declined from 56% in 1996 to 44% in 2001 and increased to 58% by 2005. At Clinic 275 and MSHC, 50-60% and around 50% of homosexually active men were retested in 1996 - 2005 and in 2004-2005, respectively. HIV infection was newly diagnosed in 0.4% (8) in 1996 and in 0.8% (26) in 2005. While HIV antibody testing patterns vary between the clinics, incidence of newly diagnosed HIV infection has remained low.

Safeguarding outcomes of 16 and 17-year-old service users of Sexual Health London (SHL.uk), a pan-London online sexual health service

2020 ◽  
Vol 31 (14) ◽  
pp. 1373-1379
Author(s):  
Sara Day ◽  
Ryan Kinsella ◽  
Sophie Jones ◽  
Victoria Tittle ◽  
Tara Suchak ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Assessment ◽  
Sexual Health ◽  
Social Services ◽  
Child Protection ◽  
Transmitted Infection ◽  
Sexually Transmitted ◽  
Health Clinics ◽  
Sti Testing ◽  
Sexual Health Service ◽  
Sexual Health Clinics

Guidance around how to safeguard young people using online sexual health services (e-SHSs) is limited. Sexual Health London (SHL.uk) is an e-SHS, integrated with London’s sexual health clinics (SHCs), offering users aged 16 years and above sexually transmitted infection (STI) testing. For a safeguarding risk assessment, under 18s must complete a safeguarding e-triage, and any concern raised results in a ‘call back’ (CB) by the SHL.uk team. The safeguarding outcomes of CBs between 8 January 2018 and 18 September 2018 were reviewed; 261/454 (57.5%) users never triggered a CB on their e-triage (non-CB group) and 193/454 (42.5%) users triggered one or more CB(s) (CB group). Safeguarding concerns disclosed predominantly related to drug/alcohol use and partner's age imbalance. Successful telephonic risk assessment took place in 84.5% CB cases. Safeguarding outcomes comprised referrals to: SHC in 35.5%; child protection team in 8.5%; social services in 7%. STI positivity was 16.4% and 15.2% in the CB and non-CB groups, respectively. Although a high number of safeguarding triggers were disclosed, only a small proportion warranted referral for further support/intervention. Using e-triage with telephony support to screen and safeguard adolescents accessing an e-SHS was acceptable to users and enabled their clinical and safeguarding needs to be safely met. e-SHS integration within a network of SHCs further supported this model.

scholarly journals Chemsex and the city: sexualised substance use in gay bisexual and other men who have sex with men attending sexual health clinics

2016 ◽  
Vol 28 (4) ◽  
pp. 362-366 ◽  
Author(s):  
A Hegazi ◽  
MJ Lee ◽  
W Whittaker ◽  
S Green ◽  
R Simms ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Substance Use ◽  
Hepatitis C ◽  
Drug Use ◽  
Sexual Health ◽  
Clinical Pathways ◽  
Post Exposure Prophylaxis ◽  
Hiv Incidence ◽  
Health Clinics ◽  
Sex With Men ◽  
Sexual Health Clinics

The objective of this study was to analyse associations between sexualised substance use (chemsex), STI diagnoses and sexual behaviour among gay bisexual and other men who have sex with men accessing sexual health clinics to better inform clinical pathways. A retrospective case notes review was undertaken following the introduction of more detailed and holistic profomas for all gay bisexual and other men who have sex with men attending two London sexual health clinics between 1 June 2014 and 31 January 2015. Chemsex status was documented for 655/818. Overall, 30% disclosed recreational drug use of whom 113 (57%) disclosed chemsex and 27 (13.5%) injecting drugs. HIV-positive gay bisexual and other men who have sex with men were more likely to disclose chemsex (AOR 6.68; 95% CI 3.91–11.42; p < 0.001). Those disclosing chemsex had a higher incidence of acute bacterial STIs (AOR 2.83 CI 1.79–4.47; p < 0.001), rectal STIs (AOR 3.10 CI 1.81–5.32; p < 0.001) or hepatitis C (AOR 15.41 CI 1.50–158.17; p = 0.021). HIV incidence in the study period was 1.8% (chemsex) vs. 0.9% (no chemsex) (p = 0.61). Chemsex was associated with having more sexual partners, transactional sex, group sex, fisting, sharing sex toys, injecting drug use, higher alcohol consumption and the use of ‘bareback’ sexual networking applications (p < 0.004). Chemsex participants were also more likely to have accessed post-exposure prophylaxis for HIV in the study period and report sex with a discordant HIV or hepatitis C-infected partner (p < 0.001). Chemsex disclosure is associated with higher risk-taking behaviours, acute bacterial STIs, rectal STIs and hepatitis C incidence. HIV incidence was higher but not significantly so in the study period. Chemsex disclosure in sexual health clinics should prompt an opportunity for prevention, health promotion and wellbeing interventions.

scholarly journals Changes in the time of COVID-19: a quality improvement initiative to maintain services at a youth sexual health clinic

2021 ◽  
pp. sextrans-2021-055265
Author(s):  
Andrew C Lim ◽  
Meghana Venkatesh ◽  
Danielle L Lewald ◽  
Patricia J Emmanuel ◽  
Lisa Sanders
Keyword(s):  
Quality Improvement ◽  
Service Delivery ◽  
Sexual Health ◽  
Urban Youth ◽  
Community Outreach ◽  
Health Clinic ◽  
Quality Improvement Initiative ◽  
Reproductive Health Services ◽  
Health Clinics ◽  
Sexual Health Clinics

ObjectivesAdolescents and young adults (AYAs) face difficulties accessing sexual and reproductive health services. These difficulties were exacerbated for a variety of reasons by the COVID-19 pandemic. We document strategies and outcomes implemented at an urban youth sexual health clinic in Florida that allowed uninterrupted provision of services while protecting against spread of COVID-19.MethodsThe plan–do–study–act (PDSA) model was used to implement COVID-19 interventions designed to allow continued service delivery while protecting the health and safety of staff and patients. This method was applied to clinic operations, community referral systems and community outreach to assess and refine interventions within a quick-paced feedback loop.ResultsDuring the COVID-19 pandemic, changes made via PDSA cycles to clinical/navigation services, health communications and youth outreach/engagement effectively responded to AYA needs. Although overall numbers of youth served decreased, all youth contacting the clinic for services were able to be accommodated. Case finding rates for chlamydia, gonorrhoea, syphilis and HIV were similar to pre-pandemic levels.ConclusionsQuality improvement PDSA initiatives at AYA sexual health clinics, particularly those for underserved youth, can be used to adapt service delivery when normal operating models are disrupted. The ability for youth sexual health clinics to adapt to a changing healthcare landscape will be crucial in ensuring that under-resourced youth are able to receive needed services and ambitious Ending the HIV Epidemic goals are achieved.

HIV is rare among low-risk heterosexual men and significant potential savings could occur through phone results

Sexual Health ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 7 (4) ◽  
pp. 495 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matiu R. Bush ◽  
Henrietta Williams ◽  
Christopher K. Fairley
Keyword(s):  
Sexual Health ◽  
Health Centre ◽  
Low Risk ◽  
Female Partner ◽  
Hiv Positive ◽  
Heterosexual Men ◽  
Test Results ◽  
Health Clinics ◽  
Hiv Test ◽  
Sexual Health Clinics

Background: The legislation in Victoria requires HIV-positive results to be given in person by an accredited health professional. Many sexual health clinics require all men to receive HIV results in person. Our aim was to determine the proportion of low-risk heterosexual men at a sexual health centre who tested HIV-positive. Methods: The electronic data on all HIV tests performed between 2002 and 2008 on heterosexual men at the Melbourne Sexual Health Centre (MSHC) was reviewed. The individual client files of all heterosexual men who tested HIV-positive were reviewed to determine their risks for HIV at the time that the HIV test was ordered. Results: Over the 6 years there were 33 681 HIV tests performed on men, of which 17 958 tests were for heterosexual men. From these heterosexual men, nine tested positive for the first time at MSHC (0.05%, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.01%, 0.09%). These nine cases included six men who had had sex with a female partner from the following countries: Thailand, Cambodia, China, East Timor, Botswana and South Africa. Two men had injected drugs and one had a HIV-positive female partner. Of the 17 958 test results for heterosexual males, 14 902 (83% 95% CI: 84%, 86%) test results were for men who did not have a history of intravenous drug use or had sexual contact overseas. Of these 14 902 low-risk men, none tested positive (0%, 95% CI: 0, 0.00025). Conclusion: Asking the 83% of heterosexual men who have an extremely low risk of HIV to return in person for their results is expensive for sexual health clinics and inconvenient for clients. We have changed our policy to permit heterosexual men without risk factors to obtain their HIV-negative results by phone.

Unlinked anonymous HIV prevalence among New Zealand sexual health clinic attenders: 2005–2006

2008 ◽  
Vol 19 (11) ◽  
pp. 752-757 ◽  
Author(s):  
S M McAllister ◽  
N P Dickson ◽  
K Sharples ◽  
M R Reid ◽  
J M Morgan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
New Zealand ◽  
Sexual Health ◽  
Health Clinic ◽  
Bisexual Men ◽  
Sexually Transmitted ◽  
Health Clinics ◽  
Undiagnosed Hiv ◽  
And Bisexual ◽  
Sex With Men ◽  
Sexual Health Clinics

This unlinked anonymous study aimed at determining the prevalence of HIV among sexual health clinic attenders having blood samples taken for syphilis and/or hepatitis B serology in six major New Zealand cities over a 12-month period in 2005–2006. Overall, seroprevalence was five per 1000 (47/9439). Among men who have sex with men (MSM), the overall prevalence and that of previously undiagnosed HIV were 44.1 and 20.1 per 1000, respectively. In heterosexual men, the overall prevalence was 1.2 per 1000 and in women 1.4 per 1000. HIV remains to be concentrated among homosexual and bisexual men. Comparison with a previous survey in 1996–1997 suggests an increase in the prevalence of undiagnosed HIV among MSM and also an increase in the number of MSM attending sexual health clinics. The low prevalence of HIV among heterosexuals suggests no extensive spread into the groups identified at risk of other sexually transmitted infections.

Confidentiality and access to sexual health services

Sexual Health ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 153 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nathan Ryder ◽  
Anna M. McNulty
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Health Services ◽  
Sexual Health ◽  
Risk Groups ◽  
Health Clinic ◽  
Sexual Health Care ◽  
Health Clinics ◽  
Care Workers ◽  
English Speaking ◽  
Sexual Health Clinics

Background: Confidentiality concerns are often described as barriers to seeking sexual health care. There has been little research describing the relative importance of confidentiality to clients of sexual health clinics, and whether members of high-risk groups have greater concerns. This study aimed to determine the importance of confidentiality and anonymity to clients of a public sexual health clinic, and determine associations with gender and sexuality. Methods: A self-administered questionnaire was offered to consecutive new English-speaking clients in October and November 2007. Participants were asked to describe the reasons for presenting, likelihood of disclosing identifying information, and concern should specific people and agencies become aware of their attendance. Results: Of 350 eligible clients, 270 (77%) participated in the survey. Expert care was included in the top three reasons for choosing a sexual health clinic rather than a general practitioner by over half of participants, while confidentiality and cost were each included in the top three reasons by one-third of respondents respectively. Over 90% of clients reported they were likely to give accurate identifying information to the clinic. Participants were comfortable with disclosure of information to other health-care workers but became increasingly unwilling for information to be shared with services not directly involved in their care. Overall there were few associations with gender or sexuality. Conclusion: Clients choose to attend our clinic for a variety of reasons, with confidentiality and anonymity being of lesser importance than competence and cost. Confidentiality is important to the majority of clients, whereas few desire anonymity. Most clients would accept information being shared with other health services, suggesting that confidentiality may not be a barrier to the use of electronic health records in sexual health clinics.

scholarly journals The Acceptability and Feasibility of Implementing a Bio-Behavioral Enhanced Surveillance Tool for Sexually Transmitted Infections in England: Mixed-Methods Study (Preprint)

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sonali Wayal ◽  
David Reid ◽  
Paula B Blomquist ◽  
Peter Weatherburn ◽  
Catherine H Mercer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Sexual Health ◽  
Health Clinic ◽  
Bisexual Men ◽  
Transmitted Infection ◽  
Web Based ◽  
Sexually Transmitted ◽  
Clinic Staff ◽  
Research And Innovation ◽  
Health Clinics ◽  
Sexual Health Clinics

BACKGROUND Sexually transmitted infection (STI) surveillance is vital for tracking the scale and pattern of epidemics; however, it often lacks data on the underlying drivers of STIs. OBJECTIVE This study aimed to assess the acceptability and feasibility of implementing a bio-behavioral enhanced surveillance tool, comprising a self-administered Web-based survey among sexual health clinic attendees, as well as linking this to their electronic health records (EHR) held in England’s national STI surveillance system. METHODS Staff from 19 purposively selected sexual health clinics across England and men who have sex with men and black Caribbeans, because of high STI burden among these groups, were interviewed to assess the acceptability of the proposed bio-behavioral enhanced surveillance tool. Subsequently, sexual health clinic staff invited all attendees to complete a Web-based survey on drivers of STI risk using a study tablet or participants’ own digital device. They recorded the number of attendees invited and participants’ clinic numbers, which were used to link survey data to the EHR. Participants’ online consent was obtained, separately for survey participation and linkage. In postimplementation phase, sexual health clinic staff were reinterviewed to assess the feasibility of implementing the bio-behavioral enhanced surveillance tool. Acceptability and feasibility of implementing the bio-behavioral enhanced surveillance tool were assessed by analyzing these qualitative and quantitative data. RESULTS Prior to implementation of the bio-behavioral enhanced surveillance tool, sexual health clinic staff and attendees emphasized the importance of free internet/Wi-Fi access, confidentiality, and anonymity for increasing the acceptability of the bio-behavioral enhanced surveillance tool among attendees. Implementation of the bio-behavioral enhanced surveillance tool across sexual health clinics varied considerably and was influenced by sexual health clinics’ culture of prioritization of research and innovation and availability of resources for implementing the surveys. Of the 7367 attendees invited, 85.28% (6283) agreed to participate. Of these, 72.97% (4585/6283) consented to participate in the survey, and 70.62% (4437/6283) were eligible and completed it. Of these, 91.19% (4046/4437) consented to EHR linkage, which did not differ by age or gender but was higher among gay/bisexual men than heterosexual men (95.50%, 722/756 vs 88.31%, 1073/1215; P<.003) and lower among black Caribbeans than white participants (87.25%, 568/651 vs 93.89%, 2181/2323; P<.002). Linkage was achieved for 88.88% (3596/4046) of consenting participants. CONCLUSIONS Implementing a bio-behavioral enhanced surveillance tool in sexual health clinics was feasible and acceptable to staff and groups at STI risk; however, ensuring participants’ confidentiality and anonymity and availability of resources is vital. Bio-behavioral enhanced surveillance tools could enable timely collection of detailed behavioral data for effective commissioning of sexual health services.

51. PATTERNS OF TREATMENT AND RESOURCE UTILISATION IN THE TREATMENT OF GENITAL WARTS IN AUSTRALIAN SEXUAL HEALTH CLINICS

Sexual Health ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 4 (4) ◽  
pp. 304
Author(s):  
A. Morrow ◽  
J. Chuah ◽  
E. L. Conway ◽  
C. K. Fairley ◽  
J. McCloskey ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Sexual Health ◽  
Genital Warts ◽  
Quadrivalent Vaccine ◽  
Health Clinic ◽  
Resource Utilisation ◽  
Common Disease ◽  
Treatment Practices ◽  
Health Clinics ◽  
Topical Treatments ◽  
Sexual Health Clinics

The introduction of the quadrivalent vaccine (HPV types 6, 11, 16, 18), GARDASIL, in the National HPV Vaccination program has the potential to eliminate a substantial proportion of the health burden of genital warts, currently the most common sexually transmitted viral disease in Australia. Although there are an estimated 10�000 cases per year managed through sexual health clinics in Australia, there is very limited data on treatment practices and resource use in this setting. A clinical audit was undertaken in five sexual health clinics in different states of Australia. A total of 500 cases (100 consecutive cases per clinic) were identified of patients aged 18 to 45 years with a first ever diagnosis of genital warts between 1 January 2004 and 31 December 2004. The average age of cases was 27 years for females and 31 years for males with 43% cases female. There was an average of 2.7 visits per case (range 1-22). Ablative measures (cryotherapy, laser or diathermy) were the most common form of treatment applied in 58% cases (mean per case�=�2.4; range 1-16); topical treatments were prescribed in 44% cases (mean per case�=�1.5; range 1-8) and topical treatments were applied by the health care provider in 22% cases (mean per case�=�1.5; range 1-8). Additional analyses including type of treatment, variation in treatment practices by sexual health clinic and duration of cases will be presented. This study confirms the considerable individual and clinical burden of this common disease.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document