scholarly journals Lymphovascular and perineural invasion in stage II rectal cancer: a report from the Swedish colorectal cancer registry

2016 ◽  
Vol 55 (12) ◽  
pp. 1418-1424 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maziar Nikberg ◽  
Abbas Chabok ◽  
Henry Letocha ◽  
Csaba Kindler ◽  
Bengt Glimelius ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Rectal Cancer ◽  
Cancer Registry ◽  
Perineural Invasion ◽  
Stage Ii

scholarly journals German oncology certification system for colorectal cancer – relative survival rates of a single certified centre vs. national and international registry data

2021 ◽  
Vol 0 (0) ◽  
Author(s):  
Maximilian Richter ◽  
Lena Sonnow ◽  
Amir Mehdizadeh-Shrifi ◽  
Axel Richter ◽  
Rainer Koch ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Rectal Cancer ◽  
International Comparison ◽  
Cancer Registry ◽  
Survival Data ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Relative Survival ◽  
Registry Data ◽  
Cancer Registry Data ◽  
Colon And Rectal Cancer

Abstract Objectives To evaluate how the certification of specialised Oncology Centres in Germany affects the relative survival of patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) by means of national and international comparison. Methods Between 2007 and 2013, 675 patients with colorectal cancer, treated at the Hildesheim Hospital, an academic teaching hospital of the Hannover Medical School (MHH), were included. A follow-up of the entire patient group was performed until 2014. To obtain international data, a SEER-database search was done. The relative survival of 148,957 patients was compared to our data after 12, 36 and 60 months. For national survival data, we compared our rates with 41,988 patients of the Munich Cancer Registry (MCR). Results Relative survival at our institution tends to be higher in advanced tumour stages compared to national and international cancer registry data. Nationally we found only little variation in survival rates for low stages CRC (UICC I and II), colon, and rectal cancer. There were notable variations regarding relative survival rates for advanced CRC tumour stages (UICC IV). These variations were even more distinct for rectal cancer after 12, 36 and 60 months (Hildesheim Hospital: 89.9, 40.3, 30.1%; Munich Cancer Registry (MCR): 65.4, 28.7, 16.6%). The international comparison of CRC showed significantly higher relative survival rates for patients with advanced tumour stages after 12 months at our institution (77 vs. 54.9% for UICC IV; raw p<0.001). Conclusions Our findings suggest that patients with advanced tumour stages of CRC and especially rectal cancer benefit most from a multidisciplinary and guidelines-oriented treatment at Certified Oncology Centres. For a better evaluation of cancer treatment and improved national and international comparison, the creation of a centralised national cancer registry is necessary.

Role of adjuvant chemotherapy following chemoradiation and surgery for locoregionally advanced rectal cancer: A Veterans Health Administration analysis.

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 741-741
Author(s):  
Daphna Spiegel ◽  
Matthew Boyer ◽  
Julian C. Hong ◽  
Christina D. Williams ◽  
Michael J. Kelley ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rectal Cancer ◽  
Adjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Cancer Registry ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Advanced Rectal Cancer ◽  
The United States ◽  
Stage Ii ◽  
Health Administration ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Multi Agent

741 Background: Adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) following chemoradiation (CRT) and total mesorectal excision (TME) for locoregionally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) is a standard of care in the United States despite limited data. The purpose of this study was to examine the role, optimal regimen, and duration of AC in the mandatory, prospectively collected cancer registry of the largest integrated health system in the US. Methods: Using the VA Central Cancer Registry, stage II-III rectal cancer patients diagnosed between 1/2001-4/2011 were included if they received neoadjuvant CRT followed by TME with or without AC. Adequate chemotherapy was defined as at least 4 months of therapy. Kaplan-Meier and Log-Rank tests were used to assess survival. Propensity score (PS) adjustment was performed to compare survival outcomes while adjusting for baseline characteristics, including AJCC stage, age, gender, race, smoking status, and comorbidity. Results: 649 patients were identified; 323 received AC while 326 did not (OBS). Median follow-up was 66 months. Mean age was 63 years. 85.1% were white; 98.8% were male. 49.2% had stage II disease. Median overall survival (OS) for all patients was 92 months; 6-year OS was 56.8%. Median OS was 72 months for the OBS group and not reached (NR) for the AC group (p < 0.001). OS at 6 years was 49.5% for OBS and 64.1% for AC (p < 0.0001). On PS matched analysis, OS was improved favoring AC (p < 0.0001). Median disease-specific survival (DSS) was NR for the whole group and NR for the OBS and AC groups. 6-year DSS was 73.6% for the whole group and 67.9% for OBS vs. 79.2% for AC (p < 0.001). PS matched analysis for DSS favored AC (p = 0.0004). There was no significant difference in OS (p = 0.554) or DSS (p = 0.680) when comparing single versus multi-agent chemotherapy and no significant difference in OS (p = 0.766) or DSS (p = 0.271) when comparing adequate ( > / = 4 months) versus inadequate chemotherapy ( < 4 months). Conclusions: In this VA population of LARC patients treated with neoadjuvant CRT followed by TME, the addition of AC was found to improve both OS and DSS compared to OBS. There was no improvement in OS or DSS with the addition of a multi-agent over single-agent chemotherapy.

scholarly journals Interobserver variation in the classification of tumor deposits in rectal cancer—is the use of histopathological characteristics the way to go?

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nelleke P. M. Brouwer ◽  
A. C. Lord ◽  
M. Terlizzo ◽  
A. C. Bateman ◽  
N. P. West ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Rectal Cancer ◽  
Lymph Node ◽  
Perineural Invasion ◽  
Interobserver Agreement ◽  
Binary Classification ◽  
Venous Invasion ◽  
Interobserver Variation ◽  
Node Metastases

Abstract The focus on lymph node metastases (LNM) as the most important prognostic marker in colorectal cancer (CRC) has been challenged by the finding that other types of locoregional spread, including tumor deposits (TDs), extramural venous invasion (EMVI), and perineural invasion (PNI), also have significant impact. However, there are concerns about interobserver variation when differentiating between these features. Therefore, this study analyzed interobserver agreement between pathologists when assessing routine tumor nodules based on TNM 8. Electronic slides of 50 tumor nodules that were not treated with neoadjuvant therapy were reviewed by 8 gastrointestinal pathologists. They were asked to classify each nodule as TD, LNM, EMVI, or PNI, and to list which histological discriminatory features were present. There was overall agreement of 73.5% (κ 0.38, 95%-CI 0.33–0.43) if a nodal versus non-nodal classification was used, and 52.2% (κ 0.27, 95%-CI 0.23–0.31) if EMVI and PNI were classified separately. The interobserver agreement varied significantly between discriminatory features from κ 0.64 (95%-CI 0.58–0.70) for roundness to κ 0.26 (95%-CI 0.12–0.41) for a lone arteriole sign, and the presence of discriminatory features did not always correlate with the final classification. Since extranodal pathways of spread are prognostically relevant, classification of tumor nodules is important. There is currently no evidence for the prognostic relevance of the origin of TD, and although some histopathological characteristics showed good interobserver agreement, these are often non-specific. To optimize interobserver agreement, we recommend a binary classification of nodal versus extranodal tumor nodules which is based on prognostic evidence and yields good overall agreement.

scholarly journals Identification of Genomic Alterations of Perineural Invasion in Patients with Stage II Colorectal Cancer

2020 ◽  
Vol Volume 13 ◽  
pp. 11571-11582
Author(s):  
Hao Su ◽  
Chen Chang ◽  
Jiajie Hao ◽  
Xin Xu ◽  
Mandula Bao ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Perineural Invasion ◽  
Stage Ii ◽  
Genomic Alterations ◽  
Stage Ii Colorectal Cancer

Outcome of rectal carcinoma patients receiving adjuvant chemoradiotherapy in Marmara University Hospital

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 13584-13584
Author(s):  
F. Dane ◽  
M. Gumus ◽  
S. Iyikesici ◽  
F. Yumuk ◽  
G. Basaran ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rectal Cancer ◽  
Treatment Outcome ◽  
Prognostic Factors ◽  
Survival Time ◽  
Adjuvant Treatment ◽  
Curative Resection ◽  
Perineural Invasion ◽  
Stage Ii ◽  
Adjuvant Chemoradiotherapy ◽  
Disease Free

13584 Background: Surgical resection is the cornerstone of curative therapy for rectal cancer. Relapse rate following potentially curative resection is high in patients with stage II/III disease. Thus, chemoradiotherapy is the standard adjuvant treatment in resected stage II/III rectal carcinoma. There are limited studies, if any, analyzing the outcome of rectal cancer patients with stage II/III who received adjuvant chemoradiotherapy after curative resection in Turkey. Therefore, we aimed to analyze the treatment outcome, and the prognostic significance of various parameters in these patients. Methods: 106 patients with stage II/III rectal cancer treated with adjuvant chemoradiotherapy since 1997 until present were analyzed retrospectively. Patients received 5-fluorouracil (370–425mg/m2/day × 5days) and calcium leucovorin (20mg/m2/day × 5days), q4weeks, two courses before and two courses after radiotherapy. The 5-fluorouracil dose was reduced to, 225mg/m2/day given continuously as protracted short-term infusion during radiotherapy. 45–50.4 Gy radiotherapy was given to the pelvic region. Patients were followed-up every 3 months for the first 2 years and every 6 months thereafter. Age, gender, T stage, N stage, histological grade, lymphatic, vascular, and perineural invasion were analyzed as prognostic factors. Results: The median follow-up was 34 months. Median age was 59.5 years. Forty-four percent of the patients were node-negative. Lymphatic, vascular, and perineural invasion rate were 50.5%, 47.3%, and 32.3% respectively. Five-year disease-free and overall survival rates were 68.8% and 72.2%, respectively. Median survival time and median disease free-survival time were not reached at the time of analysis. In multivariate Cox regression analysis; T stage (p: 0.022), nodal stage (0.019), presence of lymphatic invasion (p: 0.0001), and the presence of vascular invasion (p:0.01) were independent prognostic factors. Conclusion: The adjuvant treatment outcome in Turkish patients in our department with stage II/III rectal cancer is similar to those reported in the Western studies. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Adjuvant treatment in extreme elderly patients with colorectal cancer.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 784-784
Author(s):  
Marta Llopis Cuquerella ◽  
Maria del Carmen Ors Castaño ◽  
María Ballester Espinosa ◽  
Alejandra Magdaleno Cremades ◽  
Vicente Boix Aracil ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Rectal Cancer ◽  
Colon Cancer ◽  
Elderly Patients ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Adjuvant Treatment ◽  
Stage Ii ◽  
Stage Iii ◽  
Complementary Treatment ◽  
Colorectal Cancer Patients

784 Background: Surgical and adjuvant treatment in extreme elderly ( > 80 years) patients with localized colorectal cancer is an unresolved issue. Owing to the lack of available neither clinical practice nor investigational data in this field we present our experience in this scenario. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed data regarding surgical and complementary treatment for colorectal cancer patients aged more than 80 consecutively attended by General Surgery Department in Vega Baja Hospital between 2008 and 2013. Results: A total number of 115 colorectal cancer patients were registered. 95 patients diagnosed of localized disease were selected for analysis. Colon vs rectal cancer ratio was 4:1. Median age was 83.6 years (80-94). Male sex was predominant (60 patients, 63.2%). Emergency surgery was performed in 15 patients (15.8%). Complementary treatment to surgery was advised, according to international guidelines, in 53 patients (55.8%). 10 patients (18.9%) with an advise of adjuvant treatment finally received it. More patients with rectal cancer received recommended treatment (41.7% rectal vs 12.2% colon cancer). Patients with stage III disease were more frequently finally treated according to guidelines (22.2 % stage III vs 11.8% stage II). More patients with stage II rectal cancer were advised and received treatment (recommendation: 66.7% rectal vs 36.1% colon cancer; administration: 25% rectal vs 7.7% colon cancer). Treatment was also more frequently administered to stage III rectal cancer (50% rectal vs 14.3% rectal cancer) (Table). Conclusions: Our experience in localized colorectal cancer in extreme elderly patients ( > 80 years) showed that, although advised according to guidelines, most of them did not receive adjuvant treatment to surgery. Complementary treatment administration was more common in rectal cancer patients and with more advanced disease. [Table: see text]

Use of Adjuvant Chemotherapy and Radiation Therapy for Colorectal Cancer in a Population-Based Cohort

2003 ◽  
Vol 21 (7) ◽  
pp. 1293-1300 ◽  
Author(s):  
John Z. Ayanian ◽  
Alan M. Zaslavsky ◽  
Charles S. Fuchs ◽  
Edward Guadagnoli ◽  
Cynthia M. Creech ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Rectal Cancer ◽  
Colon Cancer ◽  
Radiation Therapy ◽  
Adjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Adjuvant Therapy ◽  
Population Based ◽  
Stage Ii ◽  
Stage Iii Colon Cancer ◽  
Adjuvant Therapies

Purpose: Randomized trials have demonstrated that adjuvant chemotherapy improves survival for patients with stage III colon cancer and that chemotherapy combined with radiation therapy improves survival for patients with stage II or III rectal cancer. This population-based study was designed to assess use of these treatments in clinical practice. Patients and Methods: From the California Cancer Registry, we identified all patients diagnosed during 1996 to 1997 with stage III colon cancer (n = 1,422) and stage II or III rectal cancer (n = 534) in 22 northern California counties. To supplement registry data on adjuvant therapies and ascertain reasons they were not used, we surveyed physicians or reviewed office records for 1,449 patients (74%). Results: Chemotherapy rates varied widely by age from 88% (age < 55 years) to 11% (age ≥ 85 years), and radiation therapy varied similarly. Adjusting for demographic, clinical, and hospital characteristics, chemotherapy was used less often among older and unmarried patients, and radiation therapy was used less often among older patients, black patients, and those initially treated in low-volume hospitals. Adjusted rates of chemotherapy varied significantly (P < .01) among individual hospitals: 79% and 51%, respectively, at one SD above and below average (67%). Physicians’ reasons for not providing adjuvant therapy included patient refusal (30% for chemotherapy, 22% for radiation therapy), comorbid illness (22% and 14%, respectively), or lack of clinical indication (22% and 45%, respectively). Conclusion: Use of adjuvant therapy for colorectal cancer varies substantially by age, race, marital status, hospital volume, and individual hospital, indicating opportunities to improve care. With enhanced data on adjuvant therapies, population-based registries could become a valuable resource for monitoring the quality of cancer care.

scholarly journals Treatment and Outcomes of Colorectal Cancer in Armenia: A Real-World Experience From a Developing Country

2020 ◽  
pp. 1286-1297
Author(s):  
Samvel Bardakhchyan ◽  
Sergo Mkhitaryan ◽  
Davit Zohrabyan ◽  
Liana Safaryan ◽  
Armen Avagyan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Rectal Cancer ◽  
Prognostic Factors ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Stage Iv ◽  
Final Analysis ◽  
Stage Ii ◽  
Stage Iii ◽  
Rank Test

PURPOSE In Armenia, colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the most frequently diagnosed cancers. It is in the third place by incidence. The aim of this study was to evaluate treatment and outcomes of CRC in Armenia during the last 9 years. MATERIALS AND METHODS For this retrospective hospital-based study, we have collected data from two main oncology centers in Armenia: National Oncology Center and “Muratsan” Hospital of Yerevan State Medical University. The information about patients with CRC who were treated at these two centers between January 1, 2010 and July 1, 2018 was collected from the medical records. Log-rank test and Kaplan-Meier curves were used for survival analysis. Prognostic factors were identified by Cox regression. RESULTS A total of 602 patients with CRC were involved in the final analysis. Median follow-up time was 37 months (range, 3-207 months). A total of 8.6% of patients had stage I, 32.9% stage II, 38.0% stage III, and 17.6% stage IV cancer; for 2.7% patients, the stage was unknown. The main independent prognostic factors for overall survival (OS) were tumor stage, grade, and histology. Adjuvant chemotherapy has been shown to improve survival in stage II colon cancer and stage III rectal but not in stage II rectal cancer. Radiotherapy did not yield survival improvement in stage II or III rectal cancer. Three- and 5-year OS rates were 62.9% and 51.8% for all stages combined and 79.7% and 68.5% for stages I-II, 62.5% and 48.4% for stage III, and 24.4% and 17% for stage IV respectively. CONCLUSION As seen from our results, our survival rates are lower than those of the developed world. Additional research is needed to identify the underlying reasons and to improve patients’ treatment and outcomes in Armenia.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document