Real world clinical outcomes and patient characteristics for canagliflozin treated patients in a specialty diabetes clinic

2016 ◽  
Vol 33 (1) ◽  
pp. 77-84 ◽  
Author(s):  
June Felice Johnson ◽  
Rahul Parsa ◽  
Robert Bailey
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Junji Lin ◽  
Lynn McRoy ◽  
Maxine D Fisher ◽  
Nan Hu ◽  
Cralen Davis ◽  
...  

Background: Limited studies have evaluated palbociclib-based therapy use in patients with advanced/metastatic breast cancer in the real world. This retrospective study used medical records from US community oncology practices to address the gap. Materials & methods: Eligible patients receiving palbociclib-based therapy per label indication from 3 February 2015 to 31 December 2017 were included. Descriptive analyses were conducted for patient characteristics, treatment patterns and clinical outcomes. Results: The study included 233 patients who received palbociclib + aromatase inhibitor (P+AI) and 48 who received palbociclib + fulvestrant (P+F). Real-world progression-free rate for P+AI was 69.8% (46.8%) at 12 (24) months (P+F: 43.5% [39.9%]) months. Real-world survival rate was 89.8% (71.4%) at 12 (24) months (P+F: 76.3% [65.0%]). Conclusion: The study findings are consistent with previous studies of palbociclib-based therapy.


Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 5003-5003
Author(s):  
Yan Wang ◽  
Imad Al-Dakkak ◽  
Katherine Garlo ◽  
Moh-Lim Ong ◽  
Ioannis Tomazos ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction Atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome (aHUS) is a rare disease that can cause irreversible organ damage or death. Ravulizumab is a long-acting complement C5 inhibitor approved in the USA, Europe, and Japan for the treatment of aHUS. Ravulizumab was engineered from eculizumab to leverage its clinical benefits and safety profile while reducing dosing frequency. This study assessed real-world patient characteristics, treatment patterns, and clinical outcomes for adult and pediatric patients with aHUS in the USA who switched from eculizumab to ravulizumab. Methods This retrospective, non-interventional study evaluated the period from January 1, 2012 to March 22, 2021, using US claims data from the Decision Resources Group Real World Data repository. Eligible patients had ≥ 1 medical claim with an aHUS-related International Classification of Diseases 9/10 diagnosis code and ≥ 1 medical or pharmacy claim for treatment with eculizumab or ravulizumab. Patients with evidence of paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria, myasthenia gravis, neuromyelitis optical spectrum disorder or Shiga toxin Escherichia coli-related hemolytic uremic syndrome in the 3 months prior to their first aHUS-related treatment were excluded. A patient was classified as 'switched' if they had ≥ 1 claim for eculizumab followed by an initial claim for ravulizumab from 14 to 30 days after the last eculizumab claim. Patients were required to have ≥ 3 months of continuous enrollment in the database prior to their first ravulizumab claim. Ravulizumab treatment was considered to be continuous if all treatment intervals were ≤ 63 days. Data extracted included: demographics and clinical characteristics at the time of switching to ravulizumab; treatment patterns (including service setting, treatment history before switching to ravulizumab, and subsequent adherence); and clinical outcomes (dialysis, plasma exchange [PE], kidney transplant, and utilization of other end-stage renal disease [ESRD] services) in the 6 months before and after switching to ravulizumab. Data were summarized using descriptive statistics. Results Overall, 2101 patients had ≥ 1 eculizumab or ravulizumab claim and an aHUS-related diagnosis. Of these patients, 227 had claims for both eculizumab and ravulizumab with ≥ 3 months of continuous enrollment data before the first ravulizumab claim. The median (lower quartile, upper quartile) treatment interval between the last eculizumab claim and the first ravulizumab claim was 15 (14, 41) days. In total, 131 patients met the 'switched' criteria. Table 1 presents patient characteristics at the time of switching from eculizumab to ravulizumab. Outpatient facilities were the most common places of service for initiation of switch to ravulizumab (n = 41/89 patients [46%]); private practice facilities were the most common sites for administration of ravulizumab maintenance treatment (n = 84/213 claims [39%]). Prior to switching to ravulizumab, the median (lower quartile, upper quartile) duration between the first and last eculizumab claim was 788 (252, 1719) days. Among the 95 patients with ≥ 6 months of continuous enrollment after switching to ravulizumab, 73 (77%) patients were treated with ravulizumab continuously for ≥ 6 months. Selected clinical outcomes in the 6 months before and after switching to ravulizumab treatment are presented in Table 2. Although no inferential statistical comparisons were made, data show that fewer switched patients underwent dialysis or utilized other ESRD services in the 6-month post-switch period (with no recorded cases of PE or kidney transplant) compared with the 6-month pre-switch period. Discussion and conclusions This study provides real-world data on clinical characteristics and treatment patterns for patients with aHUS who have switched from eculizumab to ravulizumab. The majority of patients switching to ravulizumab were treated continuously for ≥ 6 months according to the treatment schedule in the prescribing information. Ongoing analyses with longer follow-up time will provide inferential assessment of the clinical and economic impacts of switching to ravulizumab. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Wang: Alexion: Current Employment; AstraZeneca: Current Employment. Al-Dakkak: Alexion: Current Employment; AstraZeneca: Current Employment. Garlo: Alexion: Current Employment; AstraZeneca: Current Employment. Ong: Alexion: Current Employment; AstraZeneca: Current Employment. Tomazos: Alexion, AstraZeneca Rare Disease: Current Employment. Mahajerin: Alexion: Consultancy; AstraZeneca: Current Employment.


2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 102-102
Author(s):  
Mayur Amonkar ◽  
David Gomez-Ulloa ◽  
Smita Kothari ◽  
Winson Y. Cheung ◽  
Ian Chau ◽  
...  

102 Background: Despite increased survival demonstrated for patients with advanced / metastatic GC due to 2L chemotherapy, different standard of care options exist. This study aims to describe RW treatment patterns and clinical outcomes in patients with advanced / metastatic GC receiving 2L treatment. Methods: Retrospective chart review study conducted in Australia, Canada, Italy and UK. Patients diagnosed with metastatic / unresectable GC receiving 2L treatment between January 2013 and July 2015 were enrolled. Patient characteristics, treatment patterns and clinical outcomes were captured for 12 months from the start of 2L treatment or until death. Results: 280 patients were included (mean age 60.9 years, 68.9% male). Half of the patients (51.8%) received monotherapy in 2L. Among these, taxanes were most prescribed (69.0%) followed by irinotecan (22.1%). Doublet chemotherapy was the most common combination therapy in 2L (75.6%) with fluoropyrimidine + irinotecan (33.3%) being the most used, followed by fluoropyrimidine + platinum (17.8%). Less than a third of patients (29.3%) received subsequent third-line (3L) treatment; 62.7% received monotherapy [mainly taxanes (69.2%) or irinotecan (19.2%)]. Most 3L patients who had combination therapy received a doublet (86.7%), most frequently fluoropyrimidine combined with irinotecan (53.3%) or platinum (20.0%). The majority of 2L patients (93.6%) had received combination therapy as first-line treatment, of whom 67.9% had received triplet chemotherapy, most commonly anthracycline + fluoropyrimidine + platinum (51.1%). Estimated median real-world progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) after 2L treatment initiation was 3.09 (95% CI: 2.76-3.68) and 6.54 (5.29-7.76) months, respectively, and estimated probability of PFS and OS at 12 months was 8% and 26%, respectively. Conclusions: The clinical management of advanced / metastatic GC patients in 2L treatment commonly involves taxanes or irinotecan as monotherapy, or irinotecan or platinum-based combinations with fluoropyrimidines. RW clinical outcomes for 2L treatment are similar to randomised controlled trials but remain poor.


2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (7) ◽  
pp. 1527
Author(s):  
Jamie Duckers ◽  
Beth Lesher ◽  
Teja Thorat ◽  
Eleanor Lucas ◽  
Lisa J. McGarry ◽  
...  

Cystic fibrosis (CF) is a rare, progressive, multi-organ genetic disease. Ivacaftor, a small-molecule CF transmembrane conductance regulator modulator, was the first medication to treat the underlying cause of CF. Since its approval, real-world clinical experience on the use of ivacaftor has been documented in large registries and smaller studies. Here, we systematically review data from real-world observational studies of ivacaftor treatment in people with CF (pwCF). Searches of MEDLINE and Embase identified 368 publications reporting real-world studies that enrolled six or more pwCF treated with ivacaftor published between January 2012 and September 2019. Overall, 75 publications providing data from 57 unique studies met inclusion criteria and were reviewed. Studies reporting within-group change for pwCF treated with ivacaftor consistently showed improvements in lung function, nutritional parameters, and patient-reported respiratory and sino-nasal symptoms. Benefits were evident as early as 1 month following ivacaftor initiation and were sustained over long-term follow-up. Decreases in pulmonary exacerbations, Pseudomonas aeruginosa prevalence, and healthcare resource utilization also were reported for up to 66 months following ivacaftor initiation. In studies comparing ivacaftor treatment to modulator untreated comparator groups, clinical benefits similarly were reported as were decreases in mortality, organ-transplantation, and CF-related complications. The safety profile of ivacaftor observed in these real-world studies was consistent with the well-established safety profile based on clinical trial data. Our systematic review of real-world studies shows ivacaftor treatment in pwCF results in highly consistent and sustained clinical benefit in both pulmonary and non-pulmonary outcomes across various geographies, study designs, patient characteristics, and follow-up durations, confirming and expanding upon evidence from clinical trials.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document