Principal leadership effects on student achievement: a multilevel analysis using  Programme for International Student Assessment 2015 data

2019 ◽  
Vol 46 (3) ◽  
pp. 316-336 ◽  
Author(s):  
Huang Wu ◽  
Xingyuan Gao ◽  
Jianping Shen
Keyword(s):  
Student Achievement ◽  
Multilevel Analysis ◽  
Principal Leadership ◽  
International Student ◽  
Student Assessment ◽  
International Student Assessment

Principals and Student Achievement

2018 ◽  
pp. 84-117 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Marshall Perry ◽  
Karen M. Sealy ◽  
Héctor X. Ramírez-Pérez ◽  
Thomas C. DeNicola ◽  
Yair Cohen
Keyword(s):  
Academic Achievement ◽  
Student Achievement ◽  
Instructional Leadership ◽  
Teaching And Learning ◽  
International Student ◽  
Student Assessment ◽  
School Context ◽  
School Level ◽  
International Student Assessment ◽  
Context Specific

Connections between principal leadership activities, school context, and student achievement are examined within this paper. Data for this quantitative study are from the 2013 Teaching and Learning International Survey (TALIS) and the 2012 Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA). The eight countries of examination participated in both the TALIS and PISA and the researchers merged datasets, yielding a study sample of 1,301 schools. This paper supports a context-specific view of instructional leadership. When looking across countries, the researchers found different practices were more strongly associated with the academic achievement of students, and suggest that school leaders have a meaningful overall relationship with academic achievement, both directly and indirectly. This study therefore supports prior research about the direct and indirect effects of instructional leadership. Further study, which accounts for differences in family academic resources and school-level opportunities to learn, will better illuminate the connection between instructional leadership practices and academic achievement.

TIMSS 2015: Illustrating Advancements in Large-Scale International Assessments

2019 ◽  
Vol 44 (6) ◽  
pp. 752-781
Author(s):  
Michael O. Martin ◽  
Ina V.S. Mullis
Keyword(s):  
Student Achievement ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
International Student ◽  
Variance Estimation ◽  
International Association ◽  
Student Assessment ◽  
Population Sampling ◽  
International Student Assessment ◽  
International Assessments ◽  
Matrix Sampling

International large-scale assessments of student achievement such as International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement’s Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS) and Progress in International Reading Literacy Study and Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development’s Program for International Student Assessment that have come to prominence over the past 25 years owe a great deal in methodological terms to pioneering work by National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP). Using TIMSS as an example, this article describes how a number of core techniques, such as matrix sampling, student population sampling, item response theory scaling with population modeling, and resampling methods for variance estimation, have been adapted and implemented in an international context and are fundamental to the international assessment effort. In addition to the methodological contributions of NAEP, this article illustrates how the large-scale international assessments go beyond measuring student achievement by representing important aspects of community, home, school, and classroom contexts in ways that can be used to address issues of importance to researchers and policymakers.

Principals and Student Achievement

2021 ◽  
pp. 1378-1404
Author(s):  
S. Marshall Perry ◽  
Karen M. Sealy ◽  
Héctor X. Ramírez-Pérez ◽  
Thomas C. DeNicola ◽  
Yair Cohen
Keyword(s):  
Academic Achievement ◽  
Student Achievement ◽  
Instructional Leadership ◽  
Teaching And Learning ◽  
International Student ◽  
Student Assessment ◽  
School Context ◽  
School Level ◽  
International Student Assessment ◽  
Context Specific

Connections between principal leadership activities, school context, and student achievement are examined within this paper. Data for this quantitative study are from the 2013 Teaching and Learning International Survey (TALIS) and the 2012 Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA). The eight countries of examination participated in both the TALIS and PISA and the researchers merged datasets, yielding a study sample of 1,301 schools. This paper supports a context-specific view of instructional leadership. When looking across countries, the researchers found different practices were more strongly associated with the academic achievement of students, and suggest that school leaders have a meaningful overall relationship with academic achievement, both directly and indirectly. This study therefore supports prior research about the direct and indirect effects of instructional leadership. Further study, which accounts for differences in family academic resources and school-level opportunities to learn, will better illuminate the connection between instructional leadership practices and academic achievement.

Finding the missing link: Do principal qualifications make a difference in student achievement?

2021 ◽  
pp. 174114322110519
Author(s):  
Sedat Gümüş ◽  
Mehmet Şükrü Bellibaş ◽  
Sedat Şen ◽  
Philip Hallinger
Keyword(s):  
Student Achievement ◽  
Teaching And Learning ◽  
International Student ◽  
Formal Education ◽  
Student Assessment ◽  
Teaching Experience ◽  
School Management ◽  
Principal Training ◽  
International Student Assessment ◽  
Management Positions

Despite the growing scholarly interest in the effects of principal leadership on student achievement, empirical evidence concerning how principal qualifications might be related to student learning outcomes has been limited. This study investigates the relationship between different principal qualifications (prior experience in teaching, principalship and other school management roles, formal education, principal training, and professional development) and student achievement by analyzing cross-national teaching and learning international survey and program on international student assessment data from seven countries. The results showed that experience in principalship and other school management positions, principal training, and participation in networking activities and teaching/pedagogy-focused seminars had small but statistically significant associations with student achievement, though the results were not consistent across different subjects. Level of education and years of teaching experience did not, however, predict student achievement. Implications of the findings are offered for policy and further research.

scholarly journals Results of an Exploratory Analysis of PISA 2015 Survey of Student Participation in Outside-School-Time Programs

2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (1-2019) ◽  
pp. 36-59
Author(s):  
Larry E. Suter
Keyword(s):  
Student Achievement ◽  
International Student ◽  
Student Assessment ◽  
Study Time ◽  
School Subject ◽  
Theoretical Frameworks ◽  
International Student Assessment ◽  
School Time ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Formal School

The Program for International Student Assessment (PISA) by the OECD measures student study time during formal school periods and during periods of out-of-school-time (OST). The purpose of these items is to account for differences in country to country achievement levels. However, analyses of the impact of additional study time on student achievement have produced conflicting results across countries. While more time given to a school subject within formal school is positively related to achievement in that topic, more time spent on OST is negatively related to average achievement between and within countries. The paper proposes a reconceptualization of OST and achievement by integrating theoretical frameworks of study time, student abilities, and student feelings of efficacy. The results of a descriptive and conceptual analysis of a set of new survey items in the 2015 PISA for 22 countries shows that students benefit from additional study time by having increased feelings of efficacy in a school subject (such as science) but not in measurable levels of achievement. While country to country levels OST participation rates are different, the patterns of relationships between OST participation, student achievement, and attitudes are similar.

scholarly journals Assessing global competence in PISA 2018: Challenges and approaches to capturing a complex construct

2018 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 5-20 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christine Sälzer ◽  
Nina Roczen
Keyword(s):  
Student Achievement ◽  
Comparative Studies ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
International Student ◽  
Student Assessment ◽  
Quality Standards ◽  
Global Competence ◽  
International Student Assessment ◽  
Large Scale Assessments ◽  
International Comparative

International large-scale assessments such as the Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) yield comparative indicators of student achievement in various competence domains. This article focuses on global competence as a suggested cross-curricular domain for the PISA 2018 study. The measurement of global competence is related to a number of challenges, which are elaborated, described and discussed. As these challenges have so far not been sufficiently targeted, Germany, among several other countries, has decided not to assess global competence in the upcoming PISA cycle. In conclusion, propositions are made regarding viable options to capture global competence in international comparative studies so that established quality standards can be met.

scholarly journals The Association Between Parent Participation in School Management and Student Achievement in Eight Countries and Economies

2020 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 115
Author(s):  
Jutaro Sakamoto
Keyword(s):  
Student Achievement ◽  
International Student ◽  
Parent Participation ◽  
Student Assessment ◽  
School Management ◽  
Parental Engagement ◽  
School Level ◽  
Learning In Context ◽  
Individual Level ◽  
International Student Assessment

Parent participation in school management has been promoted as a strategy for holding schools accountable for education quality and outcomes. However, the evidence has proven inconclusive and limited in explaining mechanisms to affect student achievement. By using public school student data derived from the Programme for International Student Assessment 2015, this study examines how 1) participation of a student’s own parents in school management, which would affect their learning support at home and 2) participation of a group of parents, which would influence school decisions and thus affect the learning environment at school, are associated with student achievement in Croatia, Georgia, Portugal, the Dominican Republic, Mexico, Korea, Hong Kong, and Macao. I found no evidence that parent participation in school management contributed to improving student achievement. Instead, depending on the country, a negative association is derived from either individual-level or school-level parent participation. The associations are not moderated by parents’ socioeconomic status but by school’s openness to parental engagement in some of the countries, indicating that what matters might not be participation per se but the degree of engagement. The findings underscore the importance of understanding mechanisms and conditions in which parent participation affects student learning in context to design effective participatory school governance.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document