Interview with Bishop Pedro Casaldaliga

1983 ◽  
Vol 12 (5) ◽  
pp. 13-13
Author(s):  
Jan Rocha

Bishop Pedro Casaldaliga is a tiny, slightly-built man with a husky voice and a sense of humour; a fervently religious man who burns with indignation when he talks about injustice, and shines with compassion when he talks about the sufferings of his people. He is also a poet, whose verses on liberation, the poor and the guerrilla struggles of Latin America have been translated into many languages. Now 55, Casaldaliga was born into an ultra-right wing Catholic family in Catalonia. In 1952 he became a priest in the Claretian order, inspired to a great extent by an uncle — also a priest - who was murdered by anarchists during the Spanish Civil War. In 1968, following Vatican II and the Church's new ‘option for the poor’, Casaldaliga came to Brazil to take charge of a vast abandoned region on the edge of the Amazon, the Prelacy of São Felix do Araguaia. He found a land where ‘money and a .38 pistol were the rule of law’. Huge cattle farms, many owned by transnational companies, drove peasant farmers off their land, and employed labourers in slave conditions. There were no schools or hospitals, and Casaldaliga and the priest who arrived– with him soon discovered ‘the multiple, devastating presence of illness and death’. He recalls that, ‘In our first week in São Felix four children died and were carried past our house down to the cemetery in cardboard boxes which looked like shoeboxes. We were to bury so many children there – each family loses three or four dead infants – and so many adults, dead or killed, many without even a coffin, and some without even a name’. But in these people, exploited and cheated by the rich and powerful, and ‘swept backwards and forwards by the tide of poverty’ Casaldaliga saw the people of God. In 1970 he published a pastoral letter denouncing feudalism and slavery. Immediately banned by the authorities, this was the first warcry in a battle which continues today. Men have been hired to kill him, and attempts have been made to expel him from the country (see Index/Index 2/1981). The Prelacy has been invaded by the military, and priests and lay-workers have been arrested, tortured, and imprisoned. Another priest was shot dead beside him when they tried to stop police torturing two women. A systematic campaign of lies and distortion is waged against him on the official radio and TV. He is hated by the landowners and by the military. For years he has expected assassination. One cannot help being reminded of the life of Jesus Christ.

2005 ◽  
Vol 62 (2) ◽  
pp. 245-270 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paulo Drinot

… And tell me, which President looked to the future? It was, believe it or not, [Sánchez] Cerro. I fully recognize that he was able to look to the future and … he grabbed the rich [by the neck] and took part of their wealth, you there [he said], you’re going to give me potatoes, you’re going to give me yucca, you’re going to give me sweet potatoes, he told them, to feed the poor neighborhoods, you bring me rice, meat, you tell me you have five hundred cows, well then, kill only five cows, otherwise, slash-slash, I’m going to snuff you too, and then, no!, you have to do what Nine-Fingers [Sánchez Cerro—who lost one of his fingers during a military uprising] says. He was a strange president. What did he do? He’d bring out the military officers, the soldiers, [and he would say] you here, you’re going to cook, and he’d go off with the trucks to the poor neighborhoods with the food, all ready to eat, the people should not be dying of hunger he would say, buthe saw that that too was indecent, so he built the comedores populares[sic]. Who inaugurated them? One-eyed Oscar R. Benavides, but who started them? [Sánchez] Cerro [my emphasis].This article examines the creation, in the 1930s, of restaurants, known asrestaurantes populares,which were funded and run by the Peruvian state in order to “solve the urgent problem of [the provision of] easy, comfortable and healthy nutrition to the popular classes.”


2005 ◽  
Vol 62 (02) ◽  
pp. 245-270 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paulo Drinot

… And tell me, which President looked to the future? It was, believe it or not, [Sánchez] Cerro. I fully recognize that he was able to look to the future and … he grabbed the rich [by the neck] and took part of their wealth, you there [he said], you’re going to give me potatoes, you’re going to give me yucca, you’re going to give me sweet potatoes, he told them, to feed the poor neighborhoods, you bring me rice, meat, you tell me you have five hundred cows, well then, kill only five cows, otherwise, slash-slash, I’m going to snuff you too, and then, no!, you have to do what Nine-Fingers [Sánchez Cerro—who lost one of his fingers during a military uprising] says. He was a strange president. What did he do? He’d bring out the military officers, the soldiers, [and he would say] you here, you’re going to cook, and he’d go off with the trucks to the poor neighborhoods with the food, all ready to eat, the people should not be dying of hunger he would say, buthe saw that that too was indecent, so he built the comedores populares[sic]. Who inaugurated them? One-eyed Oscar R. Benavides, but who started them? [Sánchez] Cerro [my emphasis].This article examines the creation, in the 1930s, of restaurants, known asrestaurantes populares,which were funded and run by the Peruvian state in order to “solve the urgent problem of [the provision of] easy, comfortable and healthy nutrition to the popular classes.”


Author(s):  
Ormond Rush

For 400 years after the Council of Trent, a juridical model of the church dominated Roman Catholicism. Shifts towards a broader ecclesiology began to emerge in the nineteenth century. Despite the attempts to repress any deviations from the official theology after the crisis of Roman Catholic Modernism in the early twentieth century, various renewal movements, known as ressourcement, in the decades between the world wars brought forth a period of rich ecclesiological research, with emphasis given to notions such as the Mystical Body, the People of God, the church as mystery, as sacrament, and as communio. The Second Vatican Council incorporated many of these developments into its vision for renewal and reform of the Roman Catholic Church. Over half a century after Vatican II, a new phase in its reception is emerging with the pontificate of Pope Francis.


Author(s):  
Francis Appiah-Kubi ◽  
Robert Bonsu

The nature and the missionary role of the laity in the church is one of the issues currently vital to the church and theologians. From the Second Vatican Council (1962-1965) perspective, the word laity is technically understood to mean all the faithful except those in holy orders and those in the state of religious life specially approved by the Catholic Church (LG31). These faithful are by baptism made one with Christ and constitute the People of God; they are sharers in the priestly, prophetic and kingly functions of Christ; and they carry out for their own part the mission of the whole Christian people in the church and in the world. However, the distinction between the ordained and the lay is a real one. A great deal of attention has been paid to the ordained ministry of the Church, its nature, its authority and its functions. The laity tends, by way of contrast, to be taken very much for granted, as though in their case no special problems arise. This study discusses the nature, role, and participation of lay people in the mission of the Church as proposed by the Second Vatican Council. It treats succinctly the historical development of the Laity and the challenges and opportunities inherent in their mission.


2009 ◽  
Vol 52 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 255-319
Author(s):  
Janusz Gręźlikowski

The introduce analysis the synodal resolution of the dioceses of Włocławek on space eight centuries on angle dean’s office, its authorization, duty and tasks in diocese, give conviction haw important is this office and necessary to realization religious mission of Church and his spiritual mission. From the beginning formation this office, through its evolution and actual obligatory norms of canon law, this office always write in mission of Church, joint action in realize and many methods activity community of the People of God. Moreover office of deans, definite authorizations and obligations always have on in view help of the diocesan bishop in performance pastoral service in particular Church. The deans as representative of presbytery the Włocławek Church, in light discussion rules of Włocławek synodal legislation, had belong and belong to nearest and most trustworthy collaborators of the diocesan bishop and have very important part in structure of this Church. The synodal legislation of Włocławek made and make with dean assistant of the diocesan bishop, mediator between the diocesan bishop and the diocesan curia, and priest and faithful deanery in specified matter. In the beginning dean introduced synodal legislation and orders of the diocesan bishop in life denary and individual parishes, was guardian of faith, customs and discipline. After the Council of Trent this office took bigger meaning and not limit to function control and inspect work priest in deanery, but also administrative in design assistance of the diocesan bishop in control of the diocese. After the Council of Vatican II to duty of the dean join pastoral duty in deanery. On the person dean and his service in big degree depend realization of mission of the Church. The synodal legislation of Włocławek made for detail designation function and assignment of deans servant designs inspection and administration-pastoral of the Włocławek Church. In they light office and service dean had and has take for this, that under leadership of the dean all priest in deanery commit in priesthood realize priest and pastoral vocation, realize duty result with leadership of parish, take cooperation, with fruit will be animation religious and pastoral life in the particular Church, and also will be realize – peaceably with rules of cannon law – service pastoral, sanctify and teaching of faithful.


2020 ◽  
Vol 44 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Benjamin Diara ◽  
Mmesoma Onukwufor ◽  
Favour Uroko

This article examines the activities of Christian religious communities and the birth of a commercialised Christian religion. It begins by creating an atmosphere that the Nigerians find themselves in, and explaining as to why they rely more on religious vendors for solutions to their physical and spiritual problems. Thus, the real causalities are the people with no contentment. The commercialisation of religion in Nigeria has been characterised by increased poverty and social vices such as armed robbery, bad leadership and bad citizenship. Findings reveal that adherents of the various churches that have commercialised their blessings comprise both the poor and the rich of the society. The poor are seeking God for instant blessing, while the rich are seeking God for the sustainability of their wealth and protection. True religion is now lost in Nigeria. Some pastors treat the church as an investment, expecting to get something in return personally when the institution prospers financially. This is evident in the rise in sugar-coated preaching in most Nigerian churches. It was discovered that commercialisation of churches is mainly for financial gains, and it is an offshoot of the proliferation of churches in Nigeria.


Author(s):  
Luiz Alezandre Solano Rossi E Francisco Erdos

Resumo: Amós denuncia a opressão e a violência contra os inocentes que foram empobrecidos devido à ganância dos ricos e poderosos de Israel. Os sacerdotes, os juízes e o rei, que eram os representantes de Deus entre o povo, que deveriam proteger os mais fracos, atendendo-os em suas necessidades, eram os cúmplices daqueles que praticavam os atos opressivos e roubavam tudo o que os mais fracos possuíam inclusive suas vestes. Em seguida iam aos lugares de culto, deitando-se sobre as vestes confiscadas e bebiam o vinho proveniente de multas aplicadas. A voz profética de Amós acusa a alta sociedade de Israel de ferir o povo de Deus e, consequentemente, ferir ao próprio Deus. A falta de solidariedade de Israel demonstra a ingratidão de um povo que foi abençoado e liberto do cativeiro, mas se esqueceu. Ao invés de praticar a justiça para ser abençoado, pratica a injustiça, despertando a ira de Deus que move Amós a proferir seu juízo contra todos os inimigos da justiça. Palavras-chave: Amós. Justiça. Opressão. Pobres. Inocentes. Solidariedade. Abstract: Amos denounces the oppression and violence against the innocent people who were impoverished due to the greed of the rich and powerful of Israel. The priests, the judges and the king, who were the representatives of God among the people and who were supposed to protect the weak, serving them in their needs, were the accomplices of those who practiced the oppressive acts and would stole everything the weak had, even their clothes. Then they would go to the places of worship, lie down on the confiscated vests and drink the wine obtained from the fines levied. The prophetic voice of Amos accuses Israel's high society of hurting the people of God and consequently of injuring God himself. The lack of solidarity of Israel shows the ingratitude of a people that had been blessed and set free from bondage, but had forgotten that. Instead of practicing justice to be blessed, they practice lawlessness, arousing the wrath of God who moves Amos to deliver judgment against all the enemies of justice. Keywords: Amos. Justice. Oppression. Poor. Innocent. Solidarity.


2016 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 1
Author(s):  
Budiono Kusumohamidjojo

<p><em>This paper is based on a two decade observation on the dilemma of order and justice, leading to an attempt to analyze the social-economic factors underlying the historical roots of injustice. On its course it attempted to take lessons from historically proven axioms provided by certain heavy weight thinkers. While trying to make the best out of those axioms, the analysis could not ignore the hard facts of the daily life of the billions of people suffering from unending injustice in most parts of the world, in the rich and let alone in the poor parts of it. Neither could it escape from criticizing the ubiquitous mess in the justice system, almost universally. Although the overall problem of injustice does not seem to provide much hope for a better life of the people at large, the conclusion of this paper tried to distant away from a pessimistic stance and instead proposed an agenda for those who may concern to be carried out. This paper contains forethoughts of a book in the making regarding basically the same problem.  </em></p><p><em> </em></p><p align="right"><strong><em>Keywords</em></strong><em>:</em></p><em>history, authority, rationality, law, order, equality, justice</em>


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document