Outcome of acute lymphoblastic leukemia in children with down syndrome—Polish pediatric leukemia and lymphoma study group report

2017 ◽  
Vol 34 (4) ◽  
pp. 199-205 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joanna Zawitkowska ◽  
Teresa Odój ◽  
Katarzyna Drabko ◽  
Agnieszka Zaucha-Prażmo ◽  
Julia Rudnicka ◽  
...  
Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 123 (1) ◽  
pp. 70-77 ◽  
Author(s):  
Trudy D. Buitenkamp ◽  
Shai Izraeli ◽  
Martin Zimmermann ◽  
Erik Forestier ◽  
Nyla A. Heerema ◽  
...  

Key Points Although the risk of ALL relapse is significantly higher in children with DS, good-prognosis subgroups have been identified. Patients with DS-ALL have higher treatment-related mortality throughout the treatment period independent of the therapeutic regimen.


2008 ◽  
Vol 52 (1) ◽  
pp. 14-19 ◽  
Author(s):  
Niketa Shah ◽  
Ali Al-Ahmari ◽  
Arwa Al-Yamani ◽  
Lee Dupuis ◽  
Derek Stephens ◽  
...  

Blood ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 116 (21) ◽  
pp. 1025-1025
Author(s):  
Takako Miyamura ◽  
Katsuyoshi Koh ◽  
Daisuke Tomizawa ◽  
Takashi Sato ◽  
Koji Kato ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 1025 Introduction: Infantile acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is a rare leukemia subtype in infants with poor prognosis. Its outcome has gradually improved due to the development of treatment, including intensive chemotherapy or hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (SCT). However, prognosis of relapsed patients is extremely poor, which prompt us to establish the new treatment strategy for them. To establish the future treatment strategy for the relapsed cases, we here investigated the incidence of relapse, treatment, prognosis, and possible risk factors of relapsed cases with infantile ALL treated by the Japanese Pediatric Leukemia /Lymphoma Study Group (JPLSG) MLL03 study. Subjects: All relapsed cases with infantile ALL who underwent the MLL03 study between April 2004 and June 2009 were eligible for the study. The questionnaires were sent to all participants, asking the relapsed patients with infantile ALL by the MLL03 study. The questionnaires consisted of the time and site of relapse, treatment after relapse, presence or absence of remission prior to the second SCT, conditioning regimen for the second SCT, and age, white blood cell count, and presence or absence of central nervous system (CNS) infiltration at initial onset. Results: Total 63 patients were treated in this study period (mean follow-up, 31.8 months). Among them, 24 patients relapsed at any site after first complete remission (38%). These include 7 boys and 17 girls. Age at onset was less than 6 months in 19, and 6–12 months in 5. The overall survival (OS) rate of 24 patients was 60.2 ± 11.1% at 3 years; 44.6 ± 12.7% at 4 years, and 23.5 ± 13.4% at 5 years. Twenty-one of 24 patients (87.5%) relapsed after initial SCT; only three patients (12.5%) relapsed before SCT. Two patients relapsed early within 6 months after initial treatment terminally died. All four patients who relapsed at extramedullary site except CNS have survived, suggesting better prognosis. Patients diagnosed at age of less than 6 months also showed poor prognosis after relapse (5 year OS rate was 14.9 ± 13.0%). Presence or absence of remission prior to the second SCT was not a significant prognostic factor (28.3 ± 21.8% versus 15.6 ± 14.2%). Discussion: In the JPLSG MLL03 study, 38% of patients with infantile ALL relapsed. Only four patients relapsed prior to the initial SCT, indicating that the aim of the MLL03 study, to reduce the early relapse rate by performing the early SCT, could have been achieved. On the other hand, 87.5% of the patients relapsed after initial SCT in this study. Most of them were less than 6 months at onset. Several reasons for the high relapse rate after SCT should be considered, which include low graft-versus-leukemia (GVL) effect for infantile ALL, remained minimal residual disease (MRD) before SCT, or inappropriate conditioning regimen in this study. Since we have analyzed MRD before and after SCT in each patient treated by the MLL03 study, one reason could be resolved. In addition, the treatment strategy to induce GVL effect for infantile ALL should be established and we should reconsider the treatment strategy. Finally, appropriate treatment strategy for relapsed cases should be organized in the future. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (21) ◽  
pp. 669-669
Author(s):  
Franziska Meyr ◽  
Fabian Baumann ◽  
Gabriele Escherich ◽  
Georg Mann ◽  
Thomas Klingebiel ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 669 Background. Children with Down syndrome (DS) have a higher risk for developing not only acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) but also significant adverse effects of chemotherapy compared to the overall pediatric population. Currently, it is unknown how children with DS, who develop a relapse of ALL, respond to treatment protocols that were optimized in the pediatric population without DS. We hypothesized that a concomitant diagnosis of DS is an independent prognostic factor of survival after treatment for relapsed ALL and that decreased tolerance of therapy impairs the success of relapse treatment in children with DS. Patients and Methods. The probability of event-free (EFS) and overall survival (OS) and the causes of treatment failure were determined for 51 children with DS and a matched cohort of 102 children without DS among 2736 children and young adults (up to 22 years of age) who were treated for relapsed ALL on a series of clinical trials conducted by the ALL-REZ-BFM Study Group between 1983 and 2012. Results. Among children with DS, who were enrolled on clinical trials of the ALL-REZ-BFM Study Group, ALL relapse more frequently exhibited favorable prognostic characteristics compared to the unmatched population of 2579 patients without DS. High risk forms of relapse were less frequent among children with DS (risk group S4, 10 vs. 28%, p<0.001) including relapse at a very early and early time point (35 vs. 56%, p<0.001). A higher proportion of relapse in DS involved the bone marrow (94 vs. 83% p<0.001). Transcripts of ETV6-RUNX1 or BCR-ABL1 were detected in none of the cases of relapsed ALL in DS compared to 20% (231/895, p<0.001) and 6% (83/1379, p=0.02) of cases in the population without DS. Treatment for relapsed ALL in children with DS less frequently included irradiation (of the central nervous system or total body) and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation compared to the matched non-DS group (28 vs. 70%, p<0.001, and 15 vs. 40%, p=0.002), respectively. Despite the apparent favorable risk profile, EFS and OS were lower in children with DS than the matched control group without DS (EFS 16 ± 08% vs. 39 ± 06%, p=0.005; OS 17 ± 08% vs. 48 ± 06%, p<0.001). Fatal adverse events of treatment developed more frequently in children with DS than the control group (36 ± 07% vs. 9 ± 03%, p<0.001). In contrast, the cumulative incidence of a subsequent relapse was similar in both groups (32 ± 07%, DS vs. 36 ± 05%, non-DS, p=0.373). The proportion of children with DS registered on clinical trials for relapsed ALL after frontline treatment on ALL-BFM trials showed an increase over time (from 1 registered vs. 1 non registered patient in ALL-BFM 81 to 18 registered vs. 8 non registered patients in ALL-BFM 2000). Furthermore, the proportion of patients with high risk relapse features (S4 group) and DS increased from 5 to 15%. During the more recent study period (2000–2012) EFS and OS were no longer significantly different in children with and without DS (EFS 30 ± 09% vs. 35 ± 09%, p=0.403; OS 30 ± 11% vs. 51 ± 08%, p=0.158). DS was an independent prognostic factor of outcome after relapse of ALL in multivariate analysis. Conclusion. A higher rate of induction deaths and treatment-related mortality was the main barrier to successful outcomes of relapse therapy in children with DS whereas relapse rates were not different from patients without DS. An increased representation of children with DS including those with high risk features in recent time suggests that access to clinical trials for relapsed ALL has been successfully broadened for children with DS. Specific optimization of treatment modifications and supportive care have improved survival in children with DS and are suggested to further decrease the number of fatal treatment-related events during relapse therapy in this group. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document