Comparability of high-sensitivity CRP methods to detect maturity-onset diabetes of the young due to HNF1A mutations

2014 ◽  
Vol 71 (2) ◽  
pp. 84-85 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. Shah ◽  
G. Thanabalasingham ◽  
K.R. Owen ◽  
T. J. James
2018 ◽  
Vol 90 (4) ◽  
pp. 257-265 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elif Ozsu ◽  
Filiz Mine Cizmecioglu ◽  
Gul Yesiltepe Mutlu ◽  
Aysegul Bute Yuksel ◽  
Mursel Calıskan ◽  
...  

Background/Aims: Maturity onset diabetes of the young (MODY) is a rare condition often misdiagnosed as type 1 diabetes (T1D). The purposes of this study were: to identify any patients followed in a large Turkish cohort as T1D, with an atypical natural history, who may in fact have MODY, and to define the criteria which would indicate patients with likely MODY as early as possible after presentation to allow prompt genetic testing. Methods: Urinary C-peptide/creatinine ratio (UCPCR) was studied in 152 patients having a diagnosis of T1D for at least 3 years. Those with a UCPCR ≥0.2 nmol/mmol were selected for genetic analysis of the Glucokinase (GCK), Hepatocyte nuclear factor 1a (HNF1A), Hepatocyte nuclear factor 4a (HNF4A), and Hepatocyte nuclear factor 1b (HNF1B) genes. This UCPCR cut-off was used because of the reported high sensitivity and specificity. Cases were also evaluated using a MODY probability calculator. Results: Twenty-three patients from 152 participants (15.1%) had a UCPCR indicating persistent insulin reserve. The mean age ± SD of the patients was 13.6 ± 3.6 years (range 8.30–21.6). Of these 23, two (8.7%) were found to have a mutation, one with HNF4A and one with HNF1B mutation. No mutations were detected in the GCK or HNF1A genes. Conclusion: In Turkish children with a diagnosis of T1D but who have persistent insulin reserve 3 years after diagnosis, up to 9% may have a genetic mutation indicating a diagnosis of MODY.


2014 ◽  
Vol 5 (5) ◽  
pp. 513-516 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tsuyoshi Ohki ◽  
Yoshihiko Utsu ◽  
Shinya Morita ◽  
Md. Fazlul Karim ◽  
Yoshifumi Sato ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 15 ◽  
Author(s):  
Claudio Daniel Gonzalez ◽  
Victoria Insussarry Perkins ◽  
Agustina Alves de Lima ◽  
Rocio Fogar ◽  
Gustavo D. Frechtel ◽  
...  

Background: Monogenic diabetes (MFD) represents close to 2% of all the cases of diabetes diagnosed in people aged ≤45. Maturity-onset diabetes of the young (MODY), neonatal diabetes and several syndromic forms of diabetes are included among the most characteristic MDF. MODY is the most frequent type of MFD being MODY 1, 2, 3 and 5 the most prevalent forms. The aim of this narrative review is to describe pregnancy associated changes in the pharmacological profile of the antidiabetic drugs used in women with the most frequent MODY subtypes. Methods: A comprehensive literature search was carried out to identify eligible studies from MEDLINE/PubMed, EMBASE and SCIELO databases through 1970 first semester. Results: Pregnancy introduces changes in the pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic profile of some of the treatments used in MODY. MODY 3 (also known as HNF1-A MODY) is the most frequent MDF. MODY 3 patients are highly sensitive to sulfonylureas (SU). This is also the case in MODY pregnant women. This high sensitivity to SU is also registered in patients with MODY 1 (HNF4-A MODY). Pharmacodynamic changes have been proposed to explain this behavior (Epac2 hyperactivity). However, changes in expression/activity of the metabolizing CYP2C9 cytochrome and/or alterations in the drug transporters oatp1 (Slc21a1), Lst-1 (Slc21a6), OATPD (SLC21A11), and oat2 may better explain at least in part this phenomenon by an increase in the concentration of active drug. Conclusion : The impact of changes on the pharmacological behavior of drugs like SU and other metabolized/transported by mechanisms altered in pregnancy complicated by MODY is unknown. However, a switching-to-insulin recommendation formulated for MODY 1 and 3 seems to be justified. Further research in this field is needed for a better understanding of changes in drug activity associated with this particular subset of patients with MFD.


Diabetes Care ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 33 (9) ◽  
pp. 1919-1924 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. R. Owen ◽  
G. Thanabalasingham ◽  
T. J. James ◽  
F. Karpe ◽  
A. J. Farmer ◽  
...  

2007 ◽  
Vol 7 (04) ◽  
pp. 203-208
Author(s):  
Wieland Kiess ◽  
Thomas Kapellen ◽  
Angela Galler

ZusammenfassungGene spielen bei der Pathogenese des Diabetes mellitus eine wichtige Rolle. Die häufigste Form bei Kindern und Jugendlichen ist der Diabetes mellitus Typ 1. Bei vorhandener genetischer Prädisposition kann durch verschiedene Umweltfaktoren eine Autoimmunreaktion ausgelöst werden, welche durch Zerstörung der Betazellen zum Insulinmangel und somit zum Diabetes mellitus Typ 1 führt. Beim Diabetes mellitus Typ 2, welcher bei der zunehmenden Adipositas im Kindes- und Jugendalter in den letzten Jahren in Deutschland häufiger zu beobachten ist, spielen genetische Faktoren eine entscheidende Rolle. Der Diabetes mellitus Typ 2 wird polygen vererbt. Bisher liegen jedoch nur unzureichende Daten vor, um eine genetische Diagnostik in der Praxis sinnvoll erscheinen zu lassen. Bei einer Reihe von weiteren Diabetestypen ist deren genetische Ursache in den letzten Jahrzehnten geklärt worden. Eine genetische Diagnostik ist in diesen Fällen notwendig und sinnvoll. Der Maturity Onset Diabetes of the Young (MODY) fällt meist durch seine im Vergleich zum Diabetes mellitus Typ 1 mildere Verlaufsform auf und wird mit einer Häufigkeit von 5–10% aller Diabetesformen beziffert. Der MODY Typ 2 wird durch eine Mutation im Glukokinase-Gen hervorgerufen, der MODY Typ 3 durch eine Mutation im HNF-1α-Gen. Der mitochondriale Diabetes mellitus wird aufgrund der häufig auftretenden Schwerhörigkeit auch als MIDD (Maternally Inherited Diabetes and Deafness) bezeichnet und durch Mutationen im mitochondrialen Genom hervorgerufen. Weiterhin wurden in den letzten Jahren verschiedene Genmutationen beim sehr seltenen neonatalen Diabetes mellitus (transienter und permanenter neonataler Diabetes mellitus) aufgeklärt.


2006 ◽  
Vol 1 (S 1) ◽  
Author(s):  
O Fuchs ◽  
B Kusser ◽  
W Bonfig ◽  
S Bechtold-Dalla Pozza ◽  
HP Schwarz

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document