Family and Community Burdens of Addiction: case-mix analysis at a new community-based methadone treatment service

2002 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 221-231 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul Quigley
2016 ◽  
Vol 31 ◽  
pp. 99-103 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrea Donatti Gallassi ◽  
Eduardo Yoshio Nakano ◽  
Gabriela Arantes Wagner ◽  
Maria de Nazareth Rodrigues Malcher de Oliveira Silva ◽  
Benedikt Fischer

Author(s):  
Gavin Silber ◽  
Nathan Geffen

Brandon Huntley was granted asylum in Canada earlier this year based on the argument that whites are disproportionately affected by crime in South Africa. The decision was generally condemned, but it did receive support from various groups and individuals including Afriforum, the Freedom Front and James Myburgh (editor of Politicsweb). In this article we show the flaws in Huntley's argument by presenting evidence from several sources that demonstrate that black and poor people are disproportionately the victims of violent crime in South Africa. We are concerned that painting whites as the primary victims of South Africa's social ills is unproductive, ungenerous and potentially hampers the appropriate distribution of resources to alleviate crime. Furthermore, in order to move the debate on crime in South Africa into a more productive direction, we also describe the Social Justice Coalition (SJC) – a relatively new community based organisation that aims to mobilise communities around improving safety and security for all in South Africa, regardless of race or income. Campaigning for novel pragmatic and coordinated community and government responses to the broader lack of safety and security in the country, the SJC focuses on the introduction and development of basic infrastructure and services as a means of reducing crime.


2012 ◽  
Vol 77 (4) ◽  
pp. 646-670 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer Birch

AbstractThis paper explores processes of settlement aggregation among ancestral Huron-Wendat populations in south-central Ontario, Canada. During the fifteenth century A.D., numerous small communities came together, forming large, fortified village aggregates. In order to understand these processes a multiscalar analytical approach was combined with a conceptual framework emphasizing cross-cultural perspectives on coalescent societies, the archaeology of communities, and historical trajectories of societal change. Regional settlement data are presented to illustrate the movement and increasing size of settlements. In order to determine how individual coalescent communities were formed and maintained, a single village relocation sequence is examined in detail. This sequence illustrates how people constructed, inhabited, and negotiated domestic and public spaces in these new community aggregates. Detailed analyses of the occupational histories of these sites point to the creation of new community-based identities, corporate decision-making structures, and increasing social integration over time. The results of this study demonstrate that while settlement aggregation can be documented at the regional level, only detailed intrasite analyses can identify the small-scale changes in practice that reflect the lived experience of coalescence.


2010 ◽  
Vol 95 (2) ◽  
pp. 178-184 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. Court ◽  
B. Ryan ◽  
C. Bunce ◽  
T. H. Margrain

2007 ◽  
Vol 384 (2) ◽  
pp. 725-732 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhou Xie ◽  
Xiang Li ◽  
Xiaofan Wang

2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Kirsten Marchand ◽  
Corinne Tallon ◽  
Christina Katan ◽  
Jill Fairbank ◽  
Oonagh Fogarty ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Opioid use is one of the most critical public health issues as highly potent opioids contribute to rising rates of accidental opioid-related toxicity deaths. This crisis has affected people from all age groups, including youth (ages 15–24) who are in a critical developmental period where the stakes of opioid use are especially high. Efforts to reduce the significant harms of opioid use have focused on the expansion of evidence-based treatments, including medications for opioid use disorder (e.g. buprenorphine). While these treatments are unequivocally life saving, recent evidence suggests that they may not align with youths’ needs. Accordingly, the ‘Improving Treatment Together’ (ITT) project has been designed with the aim to improve youths’ opioid treatment service experiences and outcomes by co-developing, implementing, and measuring youth-centred opioid use treatment service innovations. This manuscript describes the protocol for this multi-phase project. Methods The ITT project follows community-based participatory research (CBPR) and strategically integrates co-design processes throughout its four phases. Upon establishing a project partnership between national, provincial and community-based organizations, Phase 1 follows four core elements of human-centred co-design (empathy, needs identification, ideation, prototyping) in nine separate workshops. These workshops will be held in four diverse communities with youth, caregivers and service providers who have accessed or delivered opioid treatment services. Phase 1 will culminate in the co-production of opioid treatment service innovations to be considered by the project’s partners for further co-development, pilot testing, and wider implementation during the remaining phases of the project. Throughout each phase, the project will collect and analyse both qualitative and quantitative research and evaluation data to determine the project’s impact. Discussion This protocol provides a detailed description of the ITT project, with an emphasis on the project’s application of co-design and CBPR processes, the planned research and implementation procedures, and the establishment of a unique partnership. To our knowledge, this is one of the first projects to integrate these participatory processes to the design, implementation and measurement of youth-centred opioid treatment services. Embedding these processes throughout each phase of the project will strengthen the relevance and feasibility of the project’s service delivery innovations.


2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (2) ◽  
pp. 75-89 ◽  
Author(s):  
Olivia Barata-Cavalcanti ◽  
May May Leung ◽  
Sergio Costa ◽  
Katrina F. Mateo ◽  
Michelle Guillermin ◽  
...  

Aims We developed and pilot-tested a new methodology to evaluate the collective impact (CI) of food and beverage company-funded community-based programs aimed at improving nutrition and physical activity. Methods The Collective Impact Community Assessment Scale assesses programs across 14 dimensions. Five community programs funded by five companies participated in the testing of this tool. Qualitative data were collected through in-person key informant interviews, focus groups, and direct observations of program activities. Eight interviews/focus groups (representing program management, delivery staff, participants, and community champions) were selected in each program for review and analysis using a scoring system with preestablished anchors and algorithms. Raw scores ranged on a scale from 0 to 8 for each dimension and were standardized as percentages. Dimension scores were averaged to generate a total composite score. Results Total composite scores of CI for programs ranged from 63% to 89%. The CI dimensions that scored the highest were backbone infrastructure (median = 94%, range = 88%–100%) and common agenda (median = 91%, range = 59%–97%). All programs scored lower on dimensions related to their ability to impact funding flows (median = 47%, range = 34%–94%), cultural norms (median = 69%, range = 34%–88%), and advocacy and public policy (median = 56%, range = 25%–69%). Conclusion Variability in CI approach scores demonstrates the tool’s ability to differentiate the impact of a wide range of programs across multiple dimensions. The CI Community Assessment Scale provides a common metric platform to compare different community-based initiatives.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document