The effect of new cancer drug approvals on the life expectancy of American cancer patients, 1978–2004

2009 ◽  
Vol 18 (5) ◽  
pp. 407-428 ◽  
Author(s):  
Frank R. Lichtenberg
2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (14) ◽  
pp. 1882-1890 ◽  
Author(s):  
Diana Crivellari ◽  
Matti Aapro ◽  
Robert Leonard ◽  
Gunter von Minckwitz ◽  
Etienne Brain ◽  
...  

Screening and adjuvant postoperative therapies have increased survival among women with breast cancer. These tools are seldom applied in elderly patients, although the usually reported incidence of breast cancer is close to 50% in women 65 years or older, reaching 47% after 70 years in the updated Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Elderly breast cancer patients, even if in good medical health, were frequently excluded from adjuvant clinical trials. Women age 70 years who are fit actually have a median life expectancy of 15.5 years, ie, half of them will live much longer and will remain exposed for enough time to the potentially preventable risks of a relapse and specific death. In the last few years, a new concern about this issue has developed. Treatment now faces two major end points, as in younger women: to improve disease-free survival in the early stages, and to palliate symptoms in advanced disease. However, in both settings, the absolute benefit of treatment is critical because protecting quality of life and all its related aspects (especially functional status and independence), is crucial in older persons who have more limited life expectancy. Furthermore, the new hormonal compounds (aromatase inhibitors) and chemotherapeutic drugs (capecitabine, liposomal doxorubicin), are potentially less toxic than and equally as effective as older more established therapies. These new treatments bring new challenges including higher cost, and defining their benefit in elderly breast cancer must include an analysis of the cost/benefit ratio. These issues emphasize the urgent need to develop and support clinical trials for this older population of breast cancer patients both in the adjuvant and metastatic settings, a move that will take us from a prejudiced, age-based medicine to an evidence-based medicine.


2017 ◽  
Vol 177 (2) ◽  
pp. 278 ◽  
Author(s):  
Scott R. Bauer ◽  
Rita F. Redberg
Keyword(s):  

1994 ◽  
Vol 78 (5) ◽  
pp. 1268-1270 ◽  
Author(s):  
M Pecherstorfer ◽  
T Schilling ◽  
E Blind ◽  
I Zimmer-Roth ◽  
G Baumgartner ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 100 (10) ◽  
pp. 1820-1827 ◽  
Author(s):  
I. Henselmans ◽  
E.M.A. Smets ◽  
P.K.J. Han ◽  
H.C.J.C. de Haes ◽  
H.W.M.van Laarhoven

This chapter explores the three most common bowel-related issues that cancer patients often face: diarrhoea, constipation, and bowel obstruction. Cancer-related causes of diarrhoea are discussed, including new cancer drug therapies. Assessment and management of diarrhoea are explored in detail, with a focus on reversible causes and pharmacological and non-pharmacological management. Constipation is explored in similar detail. Management includes dietary advice, use of laxatives, and non-pharmacological measures. Bowel obstruction is discussed, focusing on early identification of symptoms and a look at both surgical and medical management options, including management of associated symptoms.


2011 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 1
Author(s):  
Camillo Porta

In the past few years, impressing improvements have been made in the treatment of advanced colorectal cancer. Following decades of modest achievements, in which it was just a matter of dose and schedule for 5-FU and leucovorin—the only treatment then available—first, the development of irinotecan and oxaliplatin, and then the use of the two biologicals, bevacizumab and cetuximab, have dramatically improved the life expectancy of our colorectal cancer patients...


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document