Altered bowel function

This chapter explores the three most common bowel-related issues that cancer patients often face: diarrhoea, constipation, and bowel obstruction. Cancer-related causes of diarrhoea are discussed, including new cancer drug therapies. Assessment and management of diarrhoea are explored in detail, with a focus on reversible causes and pharmacological and non-pharmacological management. Constipation is explored in similar detail. Management includes dietary advice, use of laxatives, and non-pharmacological measures. Bowel obstruction is discussed, focusing on early identification of symptoms and a look at both surgical and medical management options, including management of associated symptoms.

2019 ◽  
Vol 35 (2) ◽  
pp. 93-102 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sreeharshan Thampy ◽  
Pavan Najran ◽  
Damian Mullan ◽  
Hans-Ulrich Laasch

Malignant bowel obstruction (MBO) is a common manifestation in patients with advanced intra-abdominal malignancy. It is especially common with bowel or gynecological cancers and produces distressing symptoms, including nausea, vomiting, and pain. Medical management options are less effective than decompressive strategies for symptom control. Surgery is the gold-standard treatment but is unsuitable for most patients with high complication rates. Consensus guidelines recommend nonsurgical management with a venting gastrostomy in those unsuitable for surgery or for whom medical management is ineffective. The aim of this systematic review is to establish the safety and efficacy of percutaneous venting gastrostomy in relieving symptoms of MBO. Twenty-five studies were included in this review comprising 1194 patients. Gastrostomy insertion was successful at first attempt in 91% of cases and reduction in symptoms of nausea and vomiting was reported in 92% of cases. Mean survival following the procedure ranged from 35 to 147 days. Major complications were rare, with most complications classed as minor wound infections or leakage of fluid around the tube. Studies suggest that the presence of ascites is not an absolute contraindication to the insertion of percutaneous venting gastrostomy in patients with MBO; however, these studies lack longitudinal outcomes and complication rates related to this. However, it is reasonable to suggest that ascitic drainage is performed to reduce potential complications. There is a relative lack of good quality robust data on the utilization of percutaneous venting gastrostomy in MBO, but overall, the combination of being a safe and efficacious procedure alongside the known complication profile suggests that it should be considered a suitable management option.


2020 ◽  
pp. 20-25
Author(s):  
Denise Sackett ◽  
Tala Dajani ◽  
David Shoup ◽  
Uzoma Ikonne

The benefits of breastfeeding are well established. The World Health Organization and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommend that mothers breastfeed infants for at least one year, but most children are not breastfed that long because of many factors. Breastfeeding mothers face many challenges to continued breastfeeding, including medical conditions that arise during this period, such as postpartum depression and lactational mastitis. Because of a perceived lack of consistent guidance on medication safety, it can be difficult for the family physician to treat these conditions while encouraging mothers to continue breastfeeding. The purpose of the current review is to summarize and clarify treatment options for the osteopathic family physician treating lactating mothers. We specifically focus on the pharmacological management of contraception, postpartum depression, and lactational mastitis.


2017 ◽  
Vol 51 (9) ◽  
pp. 797-803 ◽  
Author(s):  
Donald C. Moore ◽  
Annie E. Pellegrino

Objective: To review the incidence, risk factors, and management of pegfilgrastim-induced bone pain (PIBP). Data Sources: PubMed was searched from 1980 to March 31, 2017, using the terms pegfilgrastim and bone pain. Study Selection and Data Extraction: English-language, human studies and reviews assessing the incidence, risk factors, and management of PIBP were incorporated. Data Synthesis: A total of 3 randomized, prospective studies and 2 retrospective studies evaluated pharmacological management of PIBP. Naproxen compared with placebo demonstrated a reduction in the degree, incidence, and duration of bone pain secondary to pegfilgrastim. Loratadine was not effective in reducing the incidence of bone pain prophylactically, but a retrospective study evaluating dual antihistamine blockade with loratadine and famotidine demonstrated a decreased incidence in bone pain when administered before pegfilgrastim. Conclusion: Naproxen is effective at managing PIBP. Although commonly used, antihistamines have a paucity of data supporting their use. Dose reductions of pegfilgrastim and opioids may also be potential management options; however, data supporting these treatment modalities are scarce.


2018 ◽  
Vol 154 (6) ◽  
pp. S-1352
Author(s):  
Riku Yamamoto ◽  
Shinya Munakata ◽  
Tomoyuki Kushida ◽  
Hajime Orita ◽  
Mutsumi Sakurada ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 7 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. A18.2-A19
Author(s):  
Claire McKenzie ◽  
Rachel McDonald ◽  
Amara Nwosu ◽  
Alison White ◽  
Jenny Smith ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 72 (13) ◽  
pp. B244
Author(s):  
Dinu Balanescu ◽  
Teodora Donisan ◽  
Michael Schechter ◽  
Tariq Dayah ◽  
Daryl Sudasena ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
pp. 277-281
Author(s):  
N.M. Millan ◽  
J Morano ◽  
L Florez ◽  
J Carugno ◽  
C.A. Medina

Background: Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) represents a complex therapeutic challenge. As the pandemic progresses, patients are presenting with ectopic pregnancies (EPs) and symptomatic COVID-19. Objective: We present the management of a patient with multiple medical comorbidities and tubal EP in the setting of severe symptomatic COVID-19 infection where all management options were precluded. Methods: Case report with literature review of management of tubal EP in the setting of severe symptomatic COVID-19 infection. Result: After careful consideration of options, the patient underwent successful medical management with methotrexate while receiving supportive care for COVID-19. Conclusions: Methotrexate proved to be the safest therapeutic option in this patient. Management of patients with severe COVID-19 and gynaecologic emergencies should be individualised and carefully reviewed with evolving knowledge of COVID-19.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document