Pharmacoeconomic analysis for pemetrexed as a maintenance therapy for NSCLC patients with patient assistance program in China

2017 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
pp. 60-65 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yongji Lu ◽  
Ji Cheng ◽  
Ziyi Lin ◽  
Yuan Chen ◽  
Jianwei Xuan
2016 ◽  
Vol 19 (3) ◽  
pp. A148-A149
Author(s):  
Q Shi ◽  
S Hu ◽  
W Furnback ◽  
JJ Shen ◽  
GF Guzauskas ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol Volume 9 ◽  
pp. 99-106 ◽  
Author(s):  
Qiang Shi ◽  
Shanlian Hu ◽  
Wesley Furnback ◽  
Gregory Guzauskas ◽  
Jiejing Shen ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 39 (6) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jianming Hu ◽  
Jiawei Hu ◽  
Xiaolan Liu ◽  
Long Li ◽  
Xue Bai

Abstract Background: Single agent maintenance therapy has been approved for the treatment of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) due to its potential survival benefits, but whether combined maintenance therapy would improve the survival of advanced NSCLC remains undetermined. Methods: Relevant trials were identified by searching electronic databases and conference meetings. Prospective randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing combination maintenance therapy in advanced NSCLC patients were included. Outcomes of interest included overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and grade 3–4 toxicities. Results: A total of 1950 advanced NSCLC patients received combination maintenance treatment from six trials were included for analysis. The use of doublet maintenance therapy in NSCLC patients significantly improved PFS (HR 0.74, 95%CI: 0.59–0.93, P = 0.010), but not for OS (HR 0.95, 95%CI: 0.85–1.07, P = 0.40) in comparison with single agent maintenance therapy. Similar results were observed in sub-group analysis according to treatment regimens. In addition, there was no significantly risk difference between doublet and single agent maintenance therapy in terms of grade 3/4 hematologic and non-hematologic toxicities. Conclusion: The findings of the present study show that doublet combination maintenance therapy is superior to single agent maintenance therapy in terms of PFS, without increased grade 3–4 toxicities. Future prospective studies are recommended to clearly assess the long-term clinical benefit of doublet maintenance therapy and its impact on health-related quality of life.


Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (21) ◽  
pp. 4752-4752
Author(s):  
Renee Lachance ◽  
Douglas A. Stewart ◽  
Katie Worthington ◽  
Beena Mistry ◽  
Simon Yunger ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 4752 Background In Canada, gaps exist in access to therapy for patients with rare hematological disorders. Although a growing body of evidence exists for these rare disorders, they remain off-label as they are not Health Canada approved and as a result, limited drug funding options are available through Canadian funding bodies. For patients suffering with Warm Autoimmune Hemolytic Anemia (AIHA), Cold Agglutinin Disease (CAD), Cryoglobulinemia, Graft versus Host Disease (GvHD), Idiopathic Thrombocytopenic Purpura (ITP), Thrombotic Thrombocytopenic Purpura (TTP) and Waldenstrom's, challenges exist for physicians to access appropriate treatment for these patients. With no formalized public or private reimbursement available for these off-label indications, patients must pay for costly treatments out-of-pocket, or be left untreated. In response to this unmet medical need, Roche Canada initiated a patient assistance program to ease the burden for physicians and their patients seeking limited treatment options for these rare disorders. Roche Canada's Patient Assistance Program (RPAP), managed by a 3rd party, assists patients with timely access to treatment through reimbursement navigation, financial assistance and private infusion clinics. To address the gap in patient care, Roche Canada piloted a non-promoted Compassionate Use (CU) program to provide access to therapy for patients with rare hematological disorders enrolled in RPAP after all public and private funding options have been exhausted. At the discretion of a 3rd party adjudication panel, the CU program provides rituximab on a case-by-case basis to patients with the above stated rare hematological disorders, where substantial evidence exists to suggest its safety and efficacy (Garvey B, BJH, 2008). All participating physicians enter a contractual agreement acknowledging the off-label use of rituximab. Response outcome data was not collected or required for the program. Objective This observational study compares, across two consecutive years, physician enrollment of patients in RPAP and patients' subsequent access to therapy in an environment with and without a compassionate use program. Methods An analysis of anonymized data from RPAP and the CU program was conducted, comparing 1 year of RPAP without the CU program, May 2009-April 2010(Y1), to 1 year of RPAP with the CU program, May 2010-April 2011(Y2). Patients were assessed by enrollment, indication, reimbursement coverage type, reimbursement approval, and access to rituximab. Results Total enrollment into RPAP over the 2 year period was 218 patients. 65 (30%) patients were enrolled in Y1, while 153 (70%) patients were enrolled in Y2, indicating a 153% (88 patient) increase in enrollment. Of the 218 patients enrolled, 154 (71%) subsequently received rituximab therapy. In Y1, 36 of 65 enrolled patients received rituximab therapy (55%), while 118 of the 153 patients enrolled in Y2 received rituximab therapy (77%). This indicates a 228% (82 patient) increase in access to therapy. Table 1 illustrates the number of patients who received access to therapy after enrollment in RPAP, and the type of reimbursement they received. Table 2 illustrates the enrollment and access to therapy by year and disease area. Conclusion The pilot compassionate program has highlighted that an unmet medical need exists for patients with rare hematological disorders. There remains a need for additional regulatory and provincial programs to help address the gaps in care for these patients. Disclosures: Lachance: Hoffman-La Roche Limited: Employment. Off Label Use: Rituximab is a chimeric mouse/human monoclonal antibody that binds specifically to the transmembrane antigen CD20. Rituxan is indicated in Canada for Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma (NHL), Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL) and Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA). This abstract describes the use of rituximab in the following rare hematological disorders: Warm Autoimmune Hemolytic Anemia (AIHA), Cold Agglutinin Disease (CAD), Cryoglobulinemia, Graft versus Host Disease (GvHD), Idiopathic Thrombocytopenic Purpura (ITP), Thrombotic Thrombocytopenic Purpura (TTP) and Waldenstrom's. Stewart:Hoffmann-La Roche Limited: Honoraria. Worthington:Hoffmann-La Roche Limited: Employment. Mistry:Hoffmann-La Roche Limited: Employment. Yunger:Hoffmann-La Roche Limited: Employment. Garnica:Hoffmann-La Roche Limited: Employment. Knight:Hoffmann-La Roche Limited: Employment. Milliken:Hoffmann-La Roche Limited: Employment.


2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 7126-7126 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. P. Abratt ◽  
H. Macha ◽  
S. Del Barco ◽  
D. Aubert ◽  
M. Mitrovic ◽  
...  

7126 Background: NVB i.v. day 1 (25 mg/ m2) & NVBo day 8 (60 mg/ m2) and CBDCA AUC 5 have been previously studied in chemonaive NSCLC patients (pts) (O’Brien et al, Ann Oncol 2004; 15: 921). We investigated the efficacy and safety of NVBo weekly with CBDCA AUC 5 q3w for 4 cycles(Cy) followed by maintenance therapy with single agent NVBo in non progressive pts. Methods: Inoperable NSCLC stage IIIB, stage IV or delayed relapse of any stage becoming unresectable, KPS ≥ 80%, treated with combination therapy every 3 weeks for 4 Cy: NVBo 60 mg/m2 on days 1, 8 and 15 (Cy1), 80 mg/m2 (Cy2–4) in absence of neutropenia NCI CTC V2 G3/4; CBDCA AUC 5 day 1, administered over 1 hour. Maintenance therapy if pts did not have a PD: NVBo 60 mg/m2 for the first three weekly administrations, followed by NVBo at 80 mg/m2/week until PD. Results: from December 2003 to January 2005 57/56 pts have been registered/treated: median age 61 yrs (37–71); median KPS 90%; male 71.4%; Squamous cell 30%, Adenocarcinoma 50%; Stage III/IV 32.1/62.5% ; median dose intensity NVBo (% RDI) : combination, 50.1 mg/m2/w (67.3%), maintenance 56.2 mg/m2/w (70.2%); pts with NVBo dose escalation from 60 to 80 mg/m2 during combination : 36/52 (69.2%). Tolerance (% of pts with G3/4 NCI CTC V2) : Neutropenia 23.2/44.6; Platelets 16.1/1.8; Hb 19.6/3.6; Nausea 7.1/0; Vomiting 7.1/0; Diarrhea 5.4/0. No G3/4 toxicity was reported for Infection, Bilirubin, Creatinine, Stomatitis, and motor/sensory Neuropathy. Febrile Neutropenia was reported in 5 patients (8.9%). Efficacy: (RECIST) Percent Overall Response rates (n =56 pts) PR 17.9, SD 53.6, PD 23.2, NE 5.4; Progression-Free Survival 4.3 (95% CI [3.1–5.1]) months; Overall Survival 9.7 (95% CI [7.7–11.9]) months. Conclusions: NVBo on a weekly schedule and CBDCA AUC5 in combination therapy for 4 Cy followed by NVBo in maintenance therapy is an effective and safe treatment regimen for advanced NSCLC. The avoidance of further CBDCA administrations after 4 Cy and the use of NVBo as a maintenance therapy until PD has promise as an alternative to the 6 Cy option and calls for further comparative studies. [Table: see text]


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document