Retinopathy prematurity: a systematic review and meta-analysis study based on neonatal and maternal risk factors

Author(s):  
Tahereh Bahmani ◽  
Arezoo Karimi ◽  
Nazanin Rezaei ◽  
Salman Daliri
2021 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 73
Author(s):  
Jianti Fina Lestari ◽  
Risa Etika ◽  
Pudji Lestari

Abstract Background: Low Birth Weight Babies (LBW) accounts for 60 - 80% of all neonatal deaths in the world. Not the only major predictor of mortality and morbidity in neonates, individuals with a history of LBW have a greater risk of experiencing various diseases such as hypertension, heart disease, and diabetes later in life. This systematic review study aims to identify maternal risk factors that contributing to LBW Method: Articles published between 2015 - 2020 in the Science Direct, Scopus and Cochrane library databases are systematically reviewed. Eleven articles that met the inclusion and exclusion criteria were included as samples for further review. Results regarding maternal risk factors for LBW events are synthesized systematically .Results: From the search results, there were 818 articles, after the screening process, the final results were 11 articles. Risk factors that are significantly related to LBW incidence in the article, are grouped in the subtheme, include: maternal age (<20 years, and each increase in age), parity (primipara and grandemultipara), low maternal upper arm circumference, hemoglobin levels less than 11 gr / dl, gestational age below 37 weeks, and complications during pregnancy. Conclusion: maternal age, parity, arm circumference, hemoglobin level, gestational age, and complications during pregnancy were significaly found to be maternal risk factors for LBW. 


2017 ◽  
Vol 5 (4) ◽  
pp. 253-263 ◽  
Author(s):  
Faezeh Kiani ◽  
Marzieh Saei Ghare Naz ◽  
Fatemeh Sayehmiri ◽  
Kourosh Sayehmiri ◽  
Hakimeh Zali

2021 ◽  
Vol 27 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mostafa Bahremand ◽  
Ehsan Zereshki ◽  
Behzad Karami Matin ◽  
Mansour Rezaei ◽  
Hamidreza Omrani

Abstract Background Coronary artery ectasia (CAE) is characterized by the enlargement of a coronary artery to 1.5 times or more than other non-ectasia parts of the vessel. It is important to investigate the association of different factors and CAE because there are controversial results between available studies. We perform this systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the effects of hypertension (HTN) on CAE. Methods To find the potentially relevant records, the electronic databases, including Scopus, PubMed, and Science Direct were searched on 25 July 2019 by two of the authors independently. In the present study, the pooled odds ratio (OR) accompanied by 95 % confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated by a random-effects model. Heterogeneity presented with the I2 index. Subgroup analysis and sensitivity analysis by the Jackknife approach was performed. Results Forty studies with 3,263 cases and 7,784 controls that investigated the association between HTN and CAE were included. The pooled unadjusted OR of CAE in subjects with HTN in comparison by subjects without HTN was estimated 1.44 (95 % CI, 1.24 to 1.68) with moderate heterogeneity (I2 = 41 %, Cochran’s Q P = 0.004). There was no evidence of publication bias in the analysis of HTN and CAE with Egger’s test (P = 0.171), Begg’s test (P = 0.179). Nine articles reported the adjusted effect of HTN on CAE by 624 cases and 628 controls. The findings indicated the overall adjusted OR was 1.03 (95 % CI, 0.80 to 1.25) with high heterogeneity (I2 = 58.5 %, Cochran’s Q P = 0.013). Conclusions We found that when the vessel was in normal condition, HTN was not very effective in increasing the chance of CAE and only increased the CAE chance by 3 %. This is an important issue and a warning to people who have multiple risk factors together. More studies need to be performed to further establish these associations by reported adjusted effects.


2020 ◽  
pp. 019394592096767
Author(s):  
Yuan Deng ◽  
Yan Huang ◽  
Ping Ning ◽  
Se-Ge Ma ◽  
Pei-Yu He ◽  
...  

This meta-analysis was conducted to identify maternal risk factors for lactational mastitis. Studies published in English or Chinese were retrieved from Medline (PubMed), Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, CNKI, WANFANG, and VIP databases according to predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Study quality was assessed by the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale. A random-effects model was used for data pooling and I2 tests to assess study heterogeneity. Pooled data from 8 cohorts and 10 case–control studies identified previous mastitis during breastfeeding (P<0.00001), cesarean section (P=0.001), breast trauma (P<0.001), anemia (P=0.0001), latch problems ≤ 8 weeks post-delivery (P=0.003), milk overproduction (P=0.002), blocked duct (P<0.0001), cracked nipple (especially ≤ 4 weeks post-delivery) (P=0.0001), use of nipple shields (P<0.00001), nipple cream (P<0.0001), brassieres (P<0.0001), and breast pumps (P<0.00001), and breastfeed duration > 30 min (P=0.008) as significant risk factors. Washing nipples before breastfeeding decreased lactational mastitis risk. Identification of these risk factors may facilitate the development of nursing care protocols for reducing lactational mastitis.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document