Caressing in the age of social immunity: haptics, technology and the sacred

Author(s):  
João Nunes de Almeida
Keyword(s):  
2014 ◽  
Vol 10 (7) ◽  
pp. 20140306 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lise Diez ◽  
Philippe Lejeune ◽  
Claire Detrain

Sociality increases exposure to pathogens. Therefore, social insects have developed a wide range of behavioural defences, known as ‘social immunity’. However, the benefits of these behaviours in terms of colony survival have been scarcely investigated. We tested the survival advantage of prophylaxis, i.e. corpse removal, in ants. Over 50 days, we compared the survival of ants in colonies that were free to remove corpses with those that were restricted in their corpse removal. From Day 8 onwards, the survival of adult workers was significantly higher in colonies that were allowed to remove corpses normally. Overall, larvae survived better than adults, but were slightly affected by the presence of corpses in the nest. When removal was restricted, ants removed as many corpses as they could and moved the remaining corpses away from brood, typically to the nest corners. These results show the importance of nest maintenance and prophylactic behaviour in social insects.


2014 ◽  
Author(s):  
Raquel G Loreto ◽  
Simon L Elliot ◽  
Mayara LR Freitas ◽  
Thairine M Pereira ◽  
David P Hughes

Despite the widely held position that the social insects have evolved effective ways to limit infectious disease spread, many pathogens and parasites do attack insect societies. Maintaining a disease-free nest environment is an important evolutionary feature, but since workers have to leave the nest to forage they are routinely exposed to disease. Here we show that despite effective social immunity, in which workers act collectively to reduce disease inside the nest, 100% of studied ant colonies of Camponotus rufipes in a Brazilian Rainforest were infected by the specialized fungal parasite Ophiocordyceps unilateralis s.l. Not only is disease present for all colonies but long-term dynamics over 20 months revealed disease is a permanent feature. Using 3D maps, we showed the parasite optimizes its transmission by controlling workers’ behavior to die on the doorstep of the colony, where susceptible foragers are predictable in time and space. Therefore, despite social immunity, specialized diseases of ants have evolved effective strategies to exploit insect societies.


Insects ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (8) ◽  
pp. 528
Author(s):  
Michael Goblirsch ◽  
Jenny F. Warner ◽  
Brooke A. Sommerfeldt ◽  
Marla Spivak

Honey bees use several strategies to protect themselves and the colony from parasites and pathogens. In addition to individual immunity, social immunity involves the cumulative effort of some individuals to limit the spread of parasites and pathogens to uninfected nestmates. Examples of social immunity in honey bees that have received attention include hygienic behavior, or the removal of diseased brood, and the collection and deposition of antimicrobial resins (propolis) on interior nest surfaces. Advances in our understanding of another form of social immunity, social fever, are lacking. Honey bees were shown to raise the temperature of the nest in response to temperature-sensitive brood pathogen, Ascosphaera apis. The increase in nest temperature (−0.6 °C) is thought to limit the spread of A. apis infection to uninfected immatures. We established observation hives and monitored the temperature of the brood nest for 40 days. This observation period was broken into five distinct segments, corresponding to sucrose solution feedings—Pre-Feed, Feed I, Challenge, Feed II, and Post-Feed. Ascosphaera apis was administered to colonies as a 1% solution of ground sporulating chalkbrood mummies in 50% v/v sucrose solution, during the Challenge period. Like previous reports, we observed a modest increase in brood nest temperature during the Challenge period. However, all hives presented signs of chalkbrood disease, suggesting that elevation of the nest temperature was not sufficient to stop the spread of infection among immatures. We also began to explore the molecular mechanisms of temperature increase by exposing adult bees in cages to A. apis, without the presence of immatures. Compared to adult workers who were given sucrose solution only, workers exposed to A. apis showed increased expression of the antimicrobial peptides abaecin (p = 0.07) and hymenoptaecin (p = 0.04), but expression of the heat shock response protein Hsp 70Ab-like (p = 0.76) and the nutritional marker vitellogenin (p = 0.72) were unaffected. These results indicate that adult honey bee workers exposed to a brood pathogen elevate the temperature of the brood nest and initiate an immune response, but the effect of this fever on preventing disease requires further study.


2019 ◽  
Vol 29 (11) ◽  
pp. R458-R463 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sylvia Cremer
Keyword(s):  

2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (10) ◽  
pp. 4852-4859 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ben Jones ◽  
Emily Shipley ◽  
Kathryn E. Arnold

2018 ◽  
Vol 28 (7) ◽  
pp. R322-R324 ◽  
Author(s):  
Duur K. Aanen
Keyword(s):  

Science ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 356 (6345) ◽  
pp. 1395-1397 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. Tsvetkov ◽  
O. Samson-Robert ◽  
K. Sood ◽  
H. S. Patel ◽  
D. A. Malena ◽  
...  

Experiments linking neonicotinoids and declining bee health have been criticized for not simulating realistic exposure. Here we quantified the duration and magnitude of neonicotinoid exposure in Canada’s corn-growing regions and used these data to design realistic experiments to investigate the effect of such insecticides on honey bees. Colonies near corn were naturally exposed to neonicotinoids for up to 4 months—the majority of the honey bee’s active season. Realistic experiments showed that neonicotinoids increased worker mortality and were associated with declines in social immunity and increased queenlessness over time. We also discovered that the acute toxicity of neonicotinoids to honey bees doubles in the presence of a commonly encountered fungicide. Our work demonstrates that field-realistic exposure to neonicotinoids can reduce honey bee health in corn-growing regions.


2015 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Janina MC Diehl ◽  
Maximilian Körner ◽  
Michael Pietsch ◽  
Joël Meunier

2015 ◽  
Vol 30 (1) ◽  
pp. 123-135 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ana Duarte ◽  
Sheena C. Cotter ◽  
Catherine E. Reavey ◽  
Richard J. S. Ward ◽  
Ornela De Gasperin ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document