scholarly journals Hitting a moving target: digital transformation and welfare technology in Swedish municipal eldercare

Author(s):  
Susanne Frennert
2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katarina Baudin ◽  
Christine Gustafsson ◽  
Susanne Frennert

BACKGROUND Swedish municipalities are facing demographic challenges due to the growing number of older people and the resulting increased need for health care services. Welfare technologies are being launched as possible solutions for meeting some of these challenges. OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to explore the perception, experimentation, evaluation, and procurement of welfare technology practices among professionals working in municipal elder care in relation to their gender, age, and profession. METHODS Data for this explorative cross-sectional study were collected from 393 responses to a web-based survey on municipal elder care in Sweden. Chi square tests were performed to determine the associations. RESULTS The results revealed gender, age, and professional differences in perspectives of municipal elder care workers. Differences were particularly evident in attitudes toward technology, both the use of technology in general and in the workplace, and involvement and participation in decision making regarding the procurement of new welfare technologies. Men (37/53, 70%) expressed a more positive attitude toward and curiosity regarding new technologies than women (157/336, 46.7%) (<i>P</i>=.03). Regarding age, the younger respondents (18-24 years old) perceived the digital transformation in the workplace as “too slow” (4/4, 100%), whereas the majority of older respondents (65-74 years old) perceived it as happening at the “right pace” (4/7, 57%). The elder care personnel felt encouraged by management to explore and experiment with new welfare technologies, but never did so either for management or with patients. Even though the majority of the respondents were women, more men (4/7, 57%) were involved in the procurement process for welfare technology devices and solutions than women (98/336, 29.2%) (<i>P</i>&lt;.001). CONCLUSIONS Personnel working within municipal elder care were generally very positive toward new technologies. However, both gender and age differences may influence these perspectives such as the personnel’s resistance to welfare technology and patients’ participation in welfare technology usage and deployment. Different levels of participation in the decision-making process regarding new technology deployment may negatively affect the overall digital transformation within municipal elder care.


PsycCRITIQUES ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 52 (13) ◽  
Author(s):  
Douglas A. MacDonald
Keyword(s):  

2017 ◽  
Vol 62 (3) ◽  
pp. 223-226 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jacqueline N. Kaufman ◽  
Sarah Lahey ◽  
Beth S. Slomine

2018 ◽  
Vol 23 (09) ◽  
pp. 25-25
Author(s):  
Sabine Schützmann

Am 17. und 18. Oktober findet im Hasso-Plattner-Institut (HPI) in Potsdam zum zweiten Mal die HIMSS Impact statt: Ein englischsprachiges Symposium, welches aktuelle Trends im Gesundheitswesen, digitale Strategien und jüngste Forschungserkenntnisse beleuchtet.


2020 ◽  
pp. 37-55 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. E. Shastitko ◽  
O. A. Markova

Digital transformation has led to changes in business models of traditional players in the existing markets. What is more, new entrants and new markets appeared, in particular platforms and multisided markets. The emergence and rapid development of platforms are caused primarily by the existence of so called indirect network externalities. Regarding to this, a question arises of whether the existing instruments of competition law enforcement and market analysis are still relevant when analyzing markets with digital platforms? This paper aims at discussing advantages and disadvantages of using various tools to define markets with platforms. In particular, we define the features of the SSNIP test when being applyed to markets with platforms. Furthermore, we analyze adjustment in tests for platform market definition in terms of possible type I and type II errors. All in all, it turns out that to reduce the likelihood of type I and type II errors while applying market definition technique to markets with platforms one should consider the type of platform analyzed: transaction platforms without pass-through and non-transaction matching platforms should be tackled as players in a multisided market, whereas non-transaction platforms should be analyzed as players in several interrelated markets. However, if the platform is allowed to adjust prices, there emerges additional challenge that the regulator and companies may manipulate the results of SSNIP test by applying different models of competition.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document