Abstract
Study question
How does the meiotic spindle tubulin PTMs of MII oocytes matured in vitro compare to that of MII oocytes matured in vivo?
Summary answer
MII cultured in vitro present detyrosinated tubulin in the spindle microtubules, while MII oocytes matured in vivo do not.
What is known already
A functional spindle is required for chromosomal segregation during meiosis, but the role of tubulin post-translational modifications (PTMs) in spindle meiotic dynamics remains poorly characterized. In contrast with GVs matured in vitro within the cumulus oophorous, in vitro maturation of denuded GVs to the MII stage (GV-MII) is associated with spindle abnormalities, chromosome misalignment and compromised developmental potential. Although aneuploidy rates in GV-MII are not higher than in vivo matured MII, disorganized chromosomes may contribute to compromised developmental potential. However, to date, spindle PTMs morphology of GV-MII has not been compared to that of in vivo cultured MII oocytes.
Study design, size, duration
GV (n = 125), and MII oocytes (n = 24) were retrieved from hormonally stimulated women, aged 20 to 35 years old. GVs were matured to the MII stage in vitro in G-2 PLUS medium for 30h; the maturation rate was 68,2%; the 46 GV-MII oocytes obtained were vitrified, stored, and warmed before fixing and subjecting to immunofluorescent analysis. In vivo matured MII oocytes donated to research were used as controls.
Participants/materials, setting, methods
Women were stimulated using a GnRH antagonist protocol, with GnRH agonist trigger. Trigger criterion was ≥2 follicles ≥18mm; oocytes were harvested 36h later. Spindle microtubules were incubated with antibodies against alpha tubulin and tubulin PTMs (acetylation, tyrosination, polyglutamylation, Δ2-tubulin, and detyrosination); chromosomes were stained with Hoechst 33342 and samples subjected to confocal immunofluorescence microscopy (ZEISS LSM780), with ImageJ software analysis. Differences in spindle morphometric parameters were assessed by non-parametric Kruskal–Wallis and Fisher’s exact tests.
Main results and the role of chance
Qualitatively, Δ2-tubulin, tyrosination and polyglutamylation were similar for both groups. Acetylation was also present in both groups, albeit in different patterns: while in vivo matured MII oocytes showed acetylation at the poles, GV-MII showed a symmetrical distribution of signal intensity, but discontinuous signal on individual microtubule tracts, suggesting apparent islands of acetylation. In contrast, detyrosination was detected in in vivo matured MII oocytes but was absent from GV-MII. Regarding spindle pole morphology, of the four possible phenotypes described in the literature (double flattened and double focused; flattened-focused, focused-flattened, with the first word characterizing the cortex side of the spindle), we observed double flat shaped spindle poles in 86% of GV-MII oocytes (25/29) as opposed to 40.5% (15/37) for the in vivo matured MII oocytes (p = 0.0004, Fisher’s exact test). Further morphometric analysis of the spindle size (maximum projection, major and minor axis length) and the metaphase plate position (proximal to distal ratio, angle) revealed decreased spindle size in GV-MII oocytes (p = 0.019, non parametric Kruskal- Wallis test).
Limitations, reasons for caution
Oocytes retrieved from hyperstimulation cycles could be intrinsically impaired since they failed to mature in vivo. Our conclusions should not be extrapolated to IVM in non-stimulated cycles, as in this model, the cumulus oophorus is a major factor in oocyte maturation and correlation with spindle dynamics has been inferred.
Wider implications of the findings
The metaphase II spindle stability compared to the mitotic or metaphase I meiotic one justifies the presence of PTMs such as acetylation and glutamylation, which are found in stable, long-lived microtubules. The significance of the absence of detyrosinated microtubules in the MII-GV group remains to be determined
Trial registration number
not applicable
MICROTUBULE BIOGENESIS AND CELL SHAPE IN OCHROMONAS
