Statistical Analysis of Natural Experiments in Evolutionary Biology: Comments on Recent Criticisms of the Use of Comparative Methods to Study Adaptation

1996 ◽  
Vol 148 (5) ◽  
pp. 943-956 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul Doughty
Author(s):  
John Beatty

Philosophers of science have paid relatively little attention to ecology (compared to other areas of biology like evolution and genetics), but ecology poses many interesting foundational and methodological problems. For example, the problems of clarifying the differences and causal connections between the various levels of the ecological hierarchy (organism, population, community, ecosystem…); the issue of how central evolutionary biology is to ecology; long-standing issues concerning the extent to which the domain of ecology is more law-governed or more a matter of historical contingency, and the related question of whether ecologists should rely more on laboratory/manipulative versus field/comparative methods of investigation.


2019 ◽  
Vol 50 (1) ◽  
pp. 405-425 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dean C. Adams ◽  
Michael L. Collyer

Evolutionary biology is multivariate, and advances in phylogenetic comparative methods for multivariate phenotypes have surged to accommodate this fact. Evolutionary trends in multivariate phenotypes are derived from distances and directions between species in a multivariate phenotype space. For these patterns to be interpretable, phenotypes should be characterized by traits in commensurate units and scale. Visualizing such trends, as is achieved with phylomorphospaces, should continue to play a prominent role in macroevolutionary analyses. Evaluating phylogenetic generalized least squares (PGLS) models (e.g., phylogenetic analysis of variance and regression) is valuable, but using parametric procedures is limited to only a few phenotypic variables. In contrast, nonparametric, permutation-based PGLS methods provide a flexible alternative and are thus preferred for high-dimensional multivariate phenotypes. Permutation-based methods for evaluating covariation within multivariate phenotypes are also well established and can test evolutionary trends in phenotypic integration. However, comparing evolutionary rates and modes in multivariate phenotypes remains an important area of future development.


2014 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 40-83 ◽  
Author(s):  
Annemarie Verkerk

There are many different syntactic constructions that languages can use to encode motion events. In recent decades, great advances have been made in the description and study of these syntactic constructions from languages spoken around the world (Talmy 1985, 1991, Slobin 1996, 2004). However, relatively little attention has been paid to historical change in these systems (exceptions are Vincent 1999, Dufresne, Dupuis & Tremblay 2003, Kopecka 2006 and Peyraube 2006). In this article, diachronic change of motion event encoding systems in Indo-European is investigated using the available historical–comparative data and phylogenetic comparative methods adopted from evolutionary biology. It is argued that Proto-Indo-European was not satellite-framed, as suggested by Talmy (2007) and Acedo Matellán and Mateu (2008), but had a mixed motion event encoding system, as is suggested by the available historical–comparative data.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew J.S. Gibson ◽  
María de Lourdes Torres ◽  
Yaniv Brandvain ◽  
Leonie C. Moyle

AbstractThe introduction of non-native species into new habitats is one of the foremost risks to global biodiversity. Here, we evaluate a recent invasion of wild tomato (Solanum pimpinellifolium) onto the Galápagos islands from a population genomic perspective, using a large panel of novel collections from the archipelago as well as historical accessions from mainland Ecuador and Peru. We infer a recent invasion of S. pimpinellifolium on the islands, largely the result of a single event from central Ecuador which, despite its recency, has rapidly spread onto several islands in the Galápagos. By reconstructing patterns of local ancestry throughout the genomes of invasive plants, we uncover evidence for recent hybridization and introgression between S. pimpinellifolium and the closely related endemic species Solanum cheesmaniae. Two large introgressed regions overlap with known fruit color loci involved in carotenoid biosynthesis. Instead of red fruits, admixed individuals with endemic haplotypes at these loci have orange fruit colors that are typically characteristic of the endemic species. We therefore infer that introgression explains the observed trait convergence. Moreover, we infer roles for two independent loci in driving this pattern, and a likely history of selection favoring the repeated phenotypic transition from red to orange fruits. Together, our data reconstruct a complex history of invasion, expansion, and gene flow among wild tomatoes on the Galápagos islands. These findings provide critical data on the evolutionary importance of hybridization during colonization and its role in influencing conservation outcomes.Significance StatementThe isolation and unique diversity of the Galápagos Islands provide numerous natural experiments that have enriched our understanding of evolutionary biology. Here we use population genomic sequencing to reconstruct the timing, path, and consequences of a biological invasion by wild tomato onto the Galápagos. We infer that invasive populations originated from a recent human-mediated migration event from central Ecuador. Our data also indicate that invasive populations are hybridizing with endemic populations, and that this has led to some invasive individuals adopting both fruit color genes and the fruit color characteristic of the endemic island species. Our results demonstrate how hybridization can shape patterns of trait evolution over very short time scales, and characterize genetic factors underlying invasive success.


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tina Begum ◽  
Marc Robinson-Rechavi

AbstractHow gene function evolves is a central question of evolutionary biology. It can be investigated by comparing functional genomics results between species and between genes. Most comparative studies of functional genomics have used pairwise comparisons. Yet it has been shown that this can provide biased results, since genes, like species, are phylogenetically related. Phylogenetic comparative methods should allow to correct for this, but they depend on strong assumptions, including unbiased tree estimates relative to the hypothesis being tested. Such methods have recently been used to test the “ortholog conjecture”, the hypothesis that functional evolution is faster in paralogs than in orthologs. Whereas pairwise comparisons of tissue specificity (τ) provided support for the ortholog conjecture, phylogenetic independent contrasts did not. Our reanalysis on the same gene trees identified problems with the time calibration of duplication nodes. We find that the gene trees used suffer from important biases, due to the inclusion of trees with no duplication nodes, to the relative age of speciations and duplications, to systematic differences in branch lengths, and to non-Brownian motion of tissue-specificity on many trees. We find that incorrect implementation of phylogenetic method in empirical gene trees with duplications can be problematic. Controlling for biases allows to successfully use phylogenetic methods to study the evolution of gene function, and provides some support for the ortholog conjecture using three different phylogenetic approaches.


2017 ◽  
Vol 114 (30) ◽  
pp. 7861-7868 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dietrich Stout ◽  
Erin E. Hecht

Culture suffuses all aspects of human life. It shapes our minds and bodies and has provided a cumulative inheritance of knowledge, skills, institutions, and artifacts that allows us to truly stand on the shoulders of giants. No other species approaches the extent, diversity, and complexity of human culture, but we remain unsure how this came to be. The very uniqueness of human culture is both a puzzle and a problem. It is puzzling as to why more species have not adopted this manifestly beneficial strategy and problematic because the comparative methods of evolutionary biology are ill suited to explain unique events. Here, we develop a more particularistic and mechanistic evolutionary neuroscience approach to cumulative culture, taking into account experimental, developmental, comparative, and archaeological evidence. This approach reconciles currently competing accounts of the origins of human culture and develops the concept of a uniquely human technological niche rooted in a shared primate heritage of visuomotor coordination and dexterous manipulation.


2017 ◽  
pp. 37
Author(s):  
Eduardo Morales

In this paper a review of the uses of the comparative method in plant eco logy is presented. Particular attention is devoted to statistical methods that analyze variation in continuos phenotypic traits. The comparative method incorporates the phylogenetic relationships of the species in recognition that species usually do not provide independent points in statistical analysis because they share characteristics through descent from common ancestors. This review is divided in three sections. In the first one, the different statistical analysis that comprises the comparative method are presented, particular attention is devoted to: i] Evolutionary correlations, ii] phylogenetic inertia, and iii] ancestral character estimation. The second section presents the different papers that had applied these different methodologies, in both, origin al or reanalyzed data. Finally, in the third section the use of comparative methods to study adaptation and the debate between the use of phylogenetically based statistical methods and conventional statistical analyses are discussed.


2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (4) ◽  
pp. 1237-1240
Author(s):  
A. A. Gimadeeva ◽  
D. B. Garifullina ◽  
A. Yu. Giniyatullina ◽  
G. R. Chumarina

The purpose of the article: The purpose of the article is to determine the lexical and semantic features of the concept of fear. It is essential to identify general and national features in the presentation of this concept by phraseological units of the investigated languages. This article discusses the lexical and semantic features of the concept of fear in the English and Tatar languages. Materials and methods: The comparison of concepts in the world picture of the mentioned languages reveals their national and cultural peculiarities. In the study of this problem, the authors used descriptive-analytical and comparative methods. However, the methods of component, contextual and statistical analysis were applied. To some degree, the authors used the method of phraseological modeling. Results of the research: As a rule, a specific image of animals conveys certain features and characteristics of people; consequently, all the names of animals that are part of phraseological units are mainly used in figurative meaning. As a result, by phraseological means of the English and Tatar languages we could reveal general and national features in the analyzed concepts. About 5 names of animals are used in the Tatar and English phraseological units. The materials of the article can be useful for students, masters who study English and Tatar languages. The results of the study can also be used in the methodology of teaching the investigated languages. Applications: This research can be used for universities, teachers, and students. Novelty/Originality: In this research, the model of National and Cultural Peculiarities of the Concept FEAR is presented in a comprehensive and complete manner.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document