Diagnosing and Reporting of Central Line–Associated Bloodstream Infections

2012 ◽  
Vol 33 (9) ◽  
pp. 875-882 ◽  
Author(s):  
Susan E. Beekmann ◽  
Daniel J. Diekema ◽  
W. Charles Huskins ◽  
Loreen Herwaldt ◽  
John M. Boyce ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Blood Culture ◽  
Infectious Diseases ◽  
Clinical Judgment ◽  
Bloodstream Infections ◽  
Central Line ◽  
Emerging Infections ◽  
Central Lines ◽  
Time To Positivity ◽  
Control And Prevention ◽  
Question Survey

Background.The diagnosis of central line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSIs) is often controversial, and existing guidelines differ in important ways.Objective.To determine both the range of practices involved in obtaining blood culture samples and how central line-associated infections are diagnosed and to obtain members' opinions regarding the process of designating bloodstream infections as publicly reportable CLABSIs.Design.Electronic and paper 11-question survey of infectious-diseases physician members of the Infectious Diseases Society of America Emerging Infections Network (IDSA EIN).Participants.All 1,364 IDSA EIN members were invited to participate.Results.692 (51%) members responded; 52% of respondents with adult practices reported that more than half of the blood culture samples for intensive care unit (ICU) patients with central lines were drawn through existing lines. A sizable majority of respondents used time to positivity, differential time to positivity when paired blood cultures are used, and quantitative culture of catheter tips when diagnosing CLABSI or determining the source of that bacteremia. When determining whether a bacteremia met the reportable CLABSI definition, a majority used a decision method that involved clinical judgment.Conclusions.Our survey documents a strong preference for drawing 1 set of blood culture samples from a peripheral line and 1 from the central line when evaluating fever in an ICU patient, as recommended by IDSA guidelines and in contrast to current Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommendations. Our data show substantial variability when infectious-diseases physicians were asked to determine whether bloodstream infections were primary bacteremias, and therefore subject to public reporting by National Healthcare Safety Network guidelines, or secondary bacteremias, which are not reportable.

scholarly journals 1169. Preventing Central Line-Associated Bloodstream Infections in Long-Term Acute Care

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. S418-S419
Author(s):  
Jerry Jacob ◽  
Ann Morace ◽  
Jisuk Park ◽  
Nina Renzi
Keyword(s):  
Blood Culture ◽  
Bloodstream Infections ◽  
Central Line ◽  
Culture Collection ◽  
Blood Cultures ◽  
Fiscal Year ◽  
Intervention Period ◽  
Central Lines ◽  
Clabsi Rate

Abstract Background Long-term acute care hospitals (LTACHs) care for chronically, critically ill patients with high utilization of central lines and high risk for morbidity from central line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSIs). Our 38-bed LTACH noted a substantial increase in the incidence of CLABSIs (as defined by the National Healthcare Safety Network) between fiscal year (FY) 2016 and FY 2018 (Figure 1). Detailed case review identified a large number of CLABSIs which were clinically consistent with blood culture contaminants from central lines. Feedback from bedside staff also suggested gaps between practice and evidence-based measures for central line care. Methods A three-pronged CLABSI prevention project was implemented in July 2018 consisting of (1) staff education regarding daily chlorhexidine (CHG) bathing for all patients, combined with an electronic audit report to identify patients without active CHG orders; (2) change in practice to the use of venipuncture alone for blood culture collection, combined with an electronic audit report to identify blood cultures collected from central lines; and (3) a recurring 6-part educational series for nurses focused on central line care. The pre-intervention period was defined as the 12-month period between July 1, 2017 and June 30, 2018 (FY 2018). The primary outcome was the fiscal year CLABSI rate. A secondary outcome was the proportion of blood cultures drawn from central lines. Results After 9 months of the intervention, one CLABSI had been reported for FY 2019 year-to-date at a rate of 0.4 per 1,000 CL-days, representing an 86% decrease from the FY 2018 rate of 2.8 per 1,000 CL-days. The 12-month rolling CLABSI rate decreased to 1.6 per 1,000 CL-days (Figure 2). The proportion of blood cultures collected from central lines decreased from 10.5% (69/658) to 4.5% (15/334), representing a 57% reduction. The proportion of patients ordered and receiving CHG bathing in the intervention period was >95%. Conclusion A multidisciplinary effort focused on CHG bathing, central line care, and blood culture collection led to a substantial reduction in CLABSIs in our LTACH. The use of electronic audit reports was particularly useful in achieving high adherence to practice changes. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.

scholarly journals Targeted Assessment for Prevention Facility Assessments: The Most Common CAUTI and CLABSI Infection Prevention Gaps

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (S1) ◽  
pp. s4-s5
Author(s):  
Rachel Snyder ◽  
Katelyn White ◽  
Janet Glowicz ◽  
Shannon Novosad ◽  
Elizabeth Soda ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Infection Prevention ◽  
Technical Assistance ◽  
Bloodstream Infections ◽  
Central Line ◽  
Postanesthesia Care Unit ◽  
Central Lines ◽  
Control And Prevention ◽  
Acute Care Facilities ◽  
Tract Infections ◽  
Competency Assessments

Background: The Targeted Assessment for Prevention (TAP) strategy is a quality improvement framework created by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) to facilitate the reduction of healthcare-associated infections (HAIs). TAP facility assessments are a component of the TAP strategy and are completed by staff across the facility to help identify perceptions of and target infection prevention gaps. We have described the gaps most commonly reported by facilities completing TAP facility assessments for catheter-associated urinary tract infections (CAUTIs) and central-line–associated bloodstream infections (CLABSIs). Methods: TAP CAUTI and CLABSI assessments were completed by acute-care facilities across the nation, with CDC technical assistance, from December 2014 to August 2019. Similar questions across 2 versions of CAUTI assessments and 3 versions of CLABSI assessments were combined. Analysis was limited to facilities with ≥10 assessments. Infection prevention gaps were defined as ≥33% respondents answering Unknown, ≥33% respondents answering “no,” or ≥50% of respondents answering “no” and “unknown” or “never” and “rarely” “sometimes” “unknown.” The analysis was completed at the facility level, and the gaps most commonly reported across facilities were identified. Results: In total, 1,942 CAUTI assessments from 42 facilities in 12 states and 1,623 CLABSI assessments from 29 facilities in 11 states were included for analysis. The mean numbers of assessments per facility were 46.2 for CAUTIs and 56.0 for CLABSIs. Across both CAUTIs and CLABSIs, commonly reported perceptions about infection prevention gaps included lack of physician and nurse champions for prevention activities, failure to conduct competency assessments, and inconsistency in select device insertion practices (Fig. 1). For CAUTIs, lack of practices to facilitate timely removal of urinary catheters were also commonly reported, with one-third of facilities reporting inconsistency in use of alerts for catheter removal, 78.6% reporting lack of physician response to these alerts, and 90.5% reporting deficiencies in removing unnecessary catheters in the postanesthesia care unit. For CLABSIs, 79.3% of facilities reported failure to replace central lines within 48 hours after emergent insertion, and 62.1% reported that feedback was not provided to staff on central-line device utilization ratios. Conclusion: For both assessments, absence of CAUTI and CLABSI prevention champions, failure to conduct competency assessments, and inconsistency in performing device insertion practices were commonly reported across facilities. These common gaps have and will continue to inform the development of tools and resources to improve infection prevention practices as well as help to better target the implementation of interventions.Funding: NoneDisclosures: None

scholarly journals Secondary Bacterial Pneumonias and Bloodstream Infections in Patients Hospitalized with COVID-19

2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (S1) ◽  
pp. s46-s46
Author(s):  
Max Adelman ◽  
Divya Bhamidipati ◽  
Alfonso Hernandez ◽  
Ahmed Babiker ◽  
Michael Woodworth ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bacterial Pneumonia ◽  
Healthcare Delivery ◽  
Specific Effect ◽  
Bloodstream Infections ◽  
Central Line ◽  
Common Source ◽  
Coagulase Negative Staphylococci ◽  
Central Lines ◽  
Secondary Infections ◽  
Control And Prevention

Group Name: The Emory COVID-19 Quality and Clinical Research CollaborativeBackground: Patients hospitalized with COVID-19 are at risk of secondary infections—10%–33% develop bacterial pneumonia and 2%–6% develop bloodstream infection (BSI). We conducted a retrospective cohort study to identify the prevalence, microbiology, and outcomes of secondary pneumonias and BSIs in patients hospitalized with COVID-19. Methods: Patients aged ≥18 years with a positive SARS-CoV-2 real-time polymerase chain reaction assay admitted to 4 academic hospitals in Atlanta, Georgia, between February 15 and May 16, 2020, were included. We extracted electronic medical record data through June 16, 2020. Microbiology tests were performed according to standard protocols. Possible ventilator-associated pneumonia (PVAP) was defined according to Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) criteria. We assessed in-hospital mortality, comparing patients with and without infections using the χ2 test. SAS University Edition software was used for data analyses. Results: In total, 774 patients were included (median age, 62 years; 49.7% female; 66.6% black). In total, 335 patients (43.3%) required intensive care unit (ICU) admission, 238 (30.7%) required mechanical ventilation, and 120 (15.5%) died. Among 238 intubated patients, 65 (27.3%) had a positive respiratory culture, including 15 with multiple potential pathogens, for a total of 84 potential pathogens. The most common organisms were Staphylococcus aureus (29 of 84; 34.5%), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (16 of 84; 19.0%), and Klebsiella spp (14 of 84; 16.7%). Mortality did not differ between intubated patients with and without a positive respiratory culture (41.5% vs 35.3%; P = .37). Also, 5 patients (2.1%) had a CDC-defined PVAP (1.7 PVAPs per 1,000 ventilator days); none of them died. Among 536 (69.3%) nonintubated patients, 2 (0.4%) had a positive Legionella urine antigen and 1 had a positive respiratory culture (for S. aureus). Of 774 patients, 36 (4.7%) had BSI, including 5 with polymicrobial BSI (42 isolates total). Most BSIs (24 of 36; 66.7%) had ICU onset. The most common organisms were S. aureus (7 of 42; 16.7%), Candida spp (7 of 42; 16.7%), and coagulase-negative staphylococci (5 of 42; 11.9%); 12 (28.6%) were gram-negative. The most common source was central-line–associated BSI (17 of 36; 47.2%), followed by skin (6 of 36; 16.7%), lungs (5 of 36; 13.9%), and urine (4 of 36; 11.1%). Mortality was 50% in patients with BSI versus 13.8% without (p < 0.0001). Conclusions: In a large cohort of patients hospitalized with COVID-19, secondary infections were rare: 2% bacterial pneumonia and 5% BSI. The risk factors for these infections (intubation and central lines, respectively) and causative pathogens reflect healthcare delivery and not a COVID-19–specific effect. Clinicians should adhere to standard best practices for preventing and empirically treating secondary infections in patients hospitalized with COVID-19.Funding: NoDisclosures: None

scholarly journals Transrectal Prostate Biopsy-Associated Prophylaxis and Infectious Complications: Report of a Query to the Emerging Infections Network of the Infectious Diseases Society of America

2015 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
James R. Johnson ◽  
Philip M. Polgreen ◽  
Susan E. Beekmann
Keyword(s):  
Infectious Diseases ◽  
Prostate Biopsy ◽  
Infectious Complications ◽  
Emerging Infections ◽  
Prophylactic Regimen ◽  
Transrectal Prostate Biopsy ◽  
Control And Prevention ◽  
Resistant Strains ◽  
Antibiotic Dose ◽  
Question Survey

Abstract Background.  Fluoroquinolone-resistant infections after transrectal prostate biopsy (TRPB) are increasing. Methods.  Members of the Emerging Infections Network, a consortium of adult infectious diseases physicians sponsored by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the Infectious Diseases Society of America, were administered an electronic 9-question survey regarding post-TRPB infections and associated prophylaxis. Results were compared with respondent characteristics. Results.  The overall response rate was 47% (552 of 1180). Of the 552 respondents, 234 (42%) reported that this problem was not applicable to their practice. The remaining 318 (58%) reported that, despite widespread recent changes in prophylactic regimens, fluoroquinolone monotherapy still was most common, but diverse alternate or supplemental oral and parenteral antibiotics (including imipenem) also were used. Reports of culture-guided prophylaxis were rare (9%). The most common duration of prophylaxis was a single prebiopsy antibiotic dose. However, 16%–23% of respondents reported prophylaxis continuing for ≥24 hours postbiopsy. Post-TRPB infections were reported as being more frequent now than 4 years ago, with sepsis and genitourinary presentations predominating, but with osteomyelitis, endocarditis, and epidural abscess also occurring. Infection isolates reportedly were usually resistant to the prophylactic regimen. Conclusions.  Emerging Infections Network members perceive post-TRPB infections as increasingly frequent, caused by resistant strains, and involving serious illness. Prophylactic approaches, although in flux, still usually entail ciprofloxacin monotherapy, which often is given for excessive durations. Multiple opportunities exist for infectious diseases specialists to partner with proceduralists in devising, studying, and implementing improved prophylaxis regimens for TRPB.

scholarly journals Reduction of Central-Line–Associated Bloodstream Infections in a Spinal Cord Injury Unit

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (S1) ◽  
pp. s370-s370
Author(s):  
Stephanie L. Baer ◽  
Amy Halcyon Larsh ◽  
Annalise Prunier ◽  
Victoria Thurmond ◽  
Donna Goins ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Spinal Cord ◽  
Spinal Cord Injury ◽  
Patient Population ◽  
Bloodstream Infections ◽  
Central Line ◽  
Fiscal Year ◽  
Improvement Project ◽  
Central Lines ◽  
Cord Injury ◽  
Bundle Compliance

Background: Central-line–associated bloodstream infections (CLABSIs) are a complication of indwelling central venous catheters, which increase morbidity, mortality, and cost to patients. Objective: Due to increased rates in a spinal cord injury unit (SCIU), a performance improvement project was started to reduce CLABSI in the patient population. Methods: To reduce the incidence of CLABSI, a prevention bundle was adopted, and a peer-surveillance tool was developed to monitor compliance with the bundle. Staff were trained to monitor their peers and submit weekly surveillance. Audits were conducted by the clinical nurse leader with accuracy feedback. Bundle peer-surveillance was implemented in February of 2018 with data being fed back to leadership, peer monitors, and stakeholders. Gaps in compliance were addressed with peer-to-peer education, changes in documentation requirements, and meetings to improve communication and reduce line days. In addition, the use of an antiseptic-impregnated disc for vascular accesses was implemented for dressing changes. Further quality improvement cycles during the first 2 quarters of fiscal year 2019 included service-wide education reinforcement, identification in variance of practice, and reporting to staff and stakeholders. Results: CLABSI bundle compliance increased from 67% to 98% between February and October 2018. The weekly audit reporting accuracy improved from 33% to 100% during the same period. Bundle compliance was sustained through the fourth quarter of 2019 at 98%, and audit accuracy was 99%. The initial CLABSI rates the quarter prior to the intervention were 6.10 infections per 1,000 line days for 1 of the 3 SCIUs and 2.68 infections per 1,000 line days for the service overall. After the action plan was initiated, no CLABSIs occurred for the next 3 quarters in all SCIUs despite unchanged use of central lines (5,726 line days in 2018). The improvement was sustained, and the line days decreased slightly for 2019, with a fiscal year rate of 0.61 per 1,000 line days (ie, 3 CLABSIs in 4,927 central-line days). Conclusions: The incidence of CLABSI in the SCIU was reduced by an intensive surveillance intervention to perform accurate peer monitoring of bundle compliance with weekly feedback, communication, and education strategies, improvement of the documentation, and the use of antiseptic-impregnated discs for dressings. Despite the complexity of the patient population requiring long-term central lines, the CLABSI rate was greatly impacted by evidence-based interventions coupled with reinforcement of adherence to the bundle.Funding: NoneDisclosures: None

scholarly journals Prevention of central line-associated bloodstream infections: a survey of ICU nurses’ knowledge and practice in China

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiuwen Chi ◽  
Juan Guo ◽  
Xiaofeng Niu ◽  
Ru He ◽  
Lijuan Wu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Insertion Site ◽  
Bloodstream Infections ◽  
Guangdong Province ◽  
Central Line ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Department Of Health ◽  
Control And Prevention ◽  
Knowledge And Practice ◽  
Evidence Based Guidelines ◽  
Nurses Knowledge

Abstract Background Central line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSI) are largely preventable when evidence-based guidelines are followed. However, it is not clear how well these guidelines are followed in intensive care units (ICUs) in China. This study aimed to evaluate Chinese ICU nurses’ knowledge and practice of evidence-based guidelines for prevention of CLABSIs issued by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, US and the Department of Health UK. Method Nurses completed online questionnaires regarding their knowledge and practice of evidence-based guidelines for the prevention of CLABSIs from June to July 2019. The questionnaire consisted of 11 questions, and a score of 1 was given for a correct answer (total score = 0–11). Results A total of 835 ICU nurses from at least 104 hospitals completed the questionnaires, and 777 were from hospitals in Guangdong Province. The mean score of 11 questions related to evidence-based guidelines for preventing CLABSIs was 4.02. Individual total scores were significantly associated with sex, length of time as an ICU nurse, educational level, professional title, establishment, hospital grade, and incidence of CLABSIs at the participant’s ICU. Importantly, only 43% of nurses reported always using maximum barrier precautions, 14% of nurses reported never using 2% chlorhexidine gluconate for antisepsis at the insertion site, only 40% reported prompt removal of the catheter when it was no longer necessary, and 33% reported frequently and routinely changing catheters even if there was no suspicion of a CLABSI. Conclusion Chinese ICU nurses in Guangdong Province lack of knowledge and practice of evidence-based guidelines for the prevention of CLABSIs. National health administrations should adopt policies to train ICU nurses to prevent CLABSIs.

Analysis of Central Line–Associated Bloodstream Infections in the Intensive Care Unit after Implementation of Central Line Bundles

2010 ◽  
Vol 31 (05) ◽  
pp. 551-553 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emily K. Shuman ◽  
Laraine L. Washer ◽  
Jennifer L. Arndt ◽  
Christy A. Zalewski ◽  
Robert C. Hyzy ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Intensive Care Units ◽  
Bloodstream Infections ◽  
Central Line ◽  
Line Bundles ◽  
Blood Samples ◽  
Central Lines ◽  
Definition Of ◽  
Contaminated Blood

Central line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSIs) have been reduced in number but not eliminated in our intensive care units with use of central line bundles. We performed an analysis of remaining CLABSIs. Many bloodstream infections that met the definition of CLABSI had sources other than central lines or represented contaminated blood samples.

Quality Improvement to Reduce Neonatal CLABSI: The Journey to Zero

2020 ◽  
Vol 37 (S 02) ◽  
pp. S14-S17
Author(s):  
Stephen A. Pearlman
Keyword(s):  
Quality Improvement ◽  
Central Venous Access ◽  
Bloodstream Infections ◽  
Venous Access ◽  
Central Line ◽  
Central Lines ◽  
The Past ◽  
Healthcare Improvement ◽  
Key Points ◽  
Innovative Techniques

Neonatal infections, including those associated with central lines, continue to be a major cause of morbidity and mortality despite many other improvements in neonatal outcomes. Over the past decades, significant advances have been made to reduce central line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSIs) using quality improvement methodology. This article will review pertinent studies that used both the Institute for Healthcare Improvement Model for Improvement and other innovative techniques such as orchestrated testing and health care failure mode and effects analysis. These studies, by applying best practices, have demonstrated substantial and sustainable reductions in CLABSI. Some initiatives have been able to achieve rates of zero CLABSI for prolonged periods of time. While neonates often require prolonged central venous access and suffer from impaired immunity which increases the risk of CLABSI, this review demonstrates the journey to zero is feasible. Key Points

scholarly journals Improvement in the Diagnosis of Patients With Central Line-Related Bloodstream Infections by Proper Blood Culture Drawing and Labeling in an Emergency Center

2016 ◽  
Vol 3 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Anne-Marie Chaftari ◽  
Patrick Chaftari ◽  
Javier Adachi ◽  
Ray Hachem ◽  
Sammy Raad ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Blood Culture ◽  
Bloodstream Infections ◽  
Central Line ◽  
Emergency Center

scholarly journals Electronic Surveillance for Healthcare-Associated Central Line—Associated Bloodstream Infections Outside the Intensive Care Unit

2011 ◽  
Vol 32 (11) ◽  
pp. 1086-1090 ◽  
Author(s):  
Keith F. Woeltje ◽  
Kathleen M. McMullen ◽  
Anne M. Butler ◽  
Ashleigh J. Goris ◽  
Joshua A. Doherty
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care ◽  
Blood Culture ◽  
Predictive Value ◽  
Chart Review ◽  
Positive Culture ◽  
Bloodstream Infections ◽  
Central Line ◽  
Electronic Surveillance ◽  
Predictive Values ◽  
Best Fit

Background.Manual surveillance for central line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSIs) by infection prevention practitioners is time-consuming and often limited to intensive care units (ICUs). An automated surveillance system using existing databases with patient-level variables and microbiology data was investigated.Methods.Patients with a positive blood culture in 4 non-ICU wards at Barnes-Jewish Hospital between July 1, 2005, and December 31, 2006, were evaluated. CLABSI determination for these patients was made via 2 sources; a manual chart review and an automated review from electronically available data. Agreement between these 2 sources was used to develop the best-fit electronic algorithm that used a set of rules to identify a CLABSI. Sensitivity, specificity, predictive values, and Pearson's correlation were calculated for the various rule sets, using manual chart review as the reference standard.Results.During the study period, 391 positive blood cultures from 331 patients were evaluated. Eighty-five (22%) of these were confirmed to be CLABSI by manual chart review. The best-fit model included presence of a catheter, blood culture positive for known pathogen or blood culture with a common skin contaminant confirmed by a second positive culture and the presence of fever, and no positive cultures with the same organism from another sterile site. The best-performing rule set had an overall sensitivity of 95.2%, specificity of 97.5%, positive predictive value of 90%, and negative predictive value of 99.2% compared with intensive manual surveillance.Conclusions.Although CLABSIs were slightly overpredicted by electronic surveillance compared with manual chart review, the method offers the possibility of performing acceptably good surveillance in areas where resources do not allow for traditional manual surveillance.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document