Magnetic flux participation in solar surface magnetism during solar cycle 24

2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (5) ◽  
pp. 069
Author(s):  
Chun-Lan Jin ◽  
Jing-Xiu Wang
Science ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 369 (6503) ◽  
pp. 587-591 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kanya Kusano ◽  
Tomoya Iju ◽  
Yumi Bamba ◽  
Satoshi Inoue

Solar flares are highly energetic events in the Sun’s corona that affect Earth’s space weather. The mechanism that drives the onset of solar flares is unknown, hampering efforts to forecast them, which mostly rely on empirical methods. We present the κ-scheme, a physics-based model to predict large solar flares through a critical condition of magnetohydrodynamic instability, triggered by magnetic reconnection. Analysis of the largest (X-class) flares from 2008 to 2019 (during solar cycle 24) shows that the κ-scheme predicts most imminent large solar flares, with a small number of exceptions for confined flares. We conclude that magnetic twist flux density, close to a magnetic polarity inversion line on the solar surface, determines when and where solar flares may occur and how large they can be.


2018 ◽  
Vol 619 ◽  
pp. A100 ◽  
Author(s):  
Y. J. Hou ◽  
J. Zhang ◽  
T. Li ◽  
S. H. Yang ◽  
X. H. Li

Context. Solar active region (AR) 12673 in 2017 September produced the two largest flares in Solar Cycle 24: the X9.3 flare on September 6 and the X8.2 flare on September 10. Aims. We attempt to investigate the evolutions of the two large flares and their associated complex magnetic system in detail. Methods. Combining observations from the Solar Dynamics Observatory and results of nonlinear force-free field (NLFFF) modeling, we identify various magnetic structures in the AR core region and examine the evolution of these structures during the flares. Results. Aided by the NLFFF modeling, we identify a double-decker flux rope configuration above the polarity inversion line (PIL) in the AR core region. The north ends of these two flux ropes were rooted in a negative- polarity magnetic patch, which began to move along the PIL and rotate anticlockwise before the X9.3 flare on September 6. The strong shearing motion and rotation contributed to the destabilization of the two magnetic flux ropes, of which the upper one subsequently erupted upward due to the kink-instability. Then another two sets of twisted loop bundles beside these ropes were disturbed and successively erupted within five minutes like a chain reaction. Similarly, multiple ejecta components were detected as consecutively erupting during the X8.2 flare occurring in the same AR on September 10. We examine the evolution of the AR magnetic fields from September 3 to 6 and find that five dipoles emerged successively at the east of the main sunspot. The interactions between these dipoles took place continuously, accompanied by magnetic flux cancellations and strong shearing motions. Conclusions. In AR 12673, significant flux emergence and successive interactions between the different emerging dipoles resulted in a complex magnetic system, accompanied by the formations of multiple flux ropes and twisted loop bundles. We propose that the eruptions of a multi-flux-rope system resulted in the two largest flares in Solar Cycle 24.


2014 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 477-483
Author(s):  
Debojyoti Halder

Sunspots are temporary phenomena on the photosphere of the Sun which appear visibly as dark spots compared to surrounding regions. Sunspot populations usually rise fast but fall more slowly when observed for any particular solar cycle. The sunspot numbers for the current cycle 24 and the previous three cycles have been plotted for duration of first four years for each of them. It appears that the value of peak sunspot number for solar cycle 24 is smaller than the three preceding cycles. When regression analysis is made it exhibits a trend of slow rising phase of the cycle 24 compared to previous three cycles. Our analysis further shows that cycle 24 is approaching to a longer-period but with smaller occurrences of sunspot number.


Solar Physics ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 290 (5) ◽  
pp. 1417-1427 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Shanmugaraju ◽  
M. Syed Ibrahim ◽  
Y.-J. Moon ◽  
A. Mujiber Rahman ◽  
S. Umapathy

Space Weather ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 15 (12) ◽  
pp. 1649-1660 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. M. B. Thiemann ◽  
M. Dominique ◽  
M. D. Pilinski ◽  
F. G. Eparvier

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document