scholarly journals Study on the sensitive ecological flow of mountainous river under the action of the weir group

Author(s):  
A J You ◽  
L Hua ◽  
K P Xu
2021 ◽  
Vol 121 ◽  
pp. 107188
Author(s):  
Zhengfei Li ◽  
Jani Heino ◽  
Xiao Chen ◽  
Zhenyuan Liu ◽  
Xingliang Meng ◽  
...  

Water ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (11) ◽  
pp. 1548
Author(s):  
Suresh Marahatta ◽  
Deepak Aryal ◽  
Laxmi Prasad Devkota ◽  
Utsav Bhattarai ◽  
Dibesh Shrestha

This study aims at analysing the impact of climate change (CC) on the river hydrology of a complex mountainous river basin—the Budhigandaki River Basin (BRB)—using the Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) hydrological model that was calibrated and validated in Part I of this research. A relatively new approach of selecting global climate models (GCMs) for each of the two selected RCPs, 4.5 (stabilization scenario) and 8.5 (high emission scenario), representing four extreme cases (warm-wet, cold-wet, warm-dry, and cold-dry conditions), was applied. Future climate data was bias corrected using a quantile mapping method. The bias-corrected GCM data were forced into the SWAT model one at a time to simulate the future flows of BRB for three 30-year time windows: Immediate Future (2021–2050), Mid Future (2046–2075), and Far Future (2070–2099). The projected flows were compared with the corresponding monthly, seasonal, annual, and fractional differences of extreme flows of the simulated baseline period (1983–2012). The results showed that future long-term average annual flows are expected to increase in all climatic conditions for both RCPs compared to the baseline. The range of predicted changes in future monthly, seasonal, and annual flows shows high uncertainty. The comparative frequency analysis of the annual one-day-maximum and -minimum flows shows increased high flows and decreased low flows in the future. These results imply the necessity for design modifications in hydraulic structures as well as the preference of storage over run-of-river water resources development projects in the study basin from the perspective of climate resilience.


Water ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 10 (8) ◽  
pp. 1091 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lejun Ma ◽  
Xingnan Zhang ◽  
Huan Wang ◽  
Changjun Qi

Water and flow reductions in the channels downstream of water storage and hydropower projects have significant impacts on aquatic ecosystems. Understanding and analyzing the ecosystem status is of great significance to facilitate the protection of riverine ecosystems. A database was established based on the 2000–2017 environmental impact assessment (EIA) reports on water storage and hydropower projects in China, and corresponding analysis software was built based on an ArcGIS spatial analysis platform. The projects in China are mainly found in the Yangtze and Pearl River basins and in south-western China. The hydropower projects have a larger influence than the water storage projects on the flow of downstream rivers sections, and most of the hydropower projects, especially the water diversion projects, cause flow reductions in the downstream rivers. An ecological flow management mechanism in China implemented in 2006 provided a promising method to alleviate river flow reductions. However, there is still only one kind of ecological flow calculation method and few ecological flow regulation measures in use. Based on the advantages and problems of the existing ecological flow management system, this paper proposes a management scheme based on a regional-engineering calculation method. The results can facilitate decision making in ecological flow management.


2017 ◽  
Vol 63 (1) ◽  
pp. 17-30 ◽  
Author(s):  
Congjian Sun ◽  
Yanjun Shen ◽  
Yaning Chen ◽  
Wei Chen ◽  
Weibo Liu ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 16 (5) ◽  
pp. 1539-1543 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhen-Hui Dong ◽  
Xiao-Hua Yang ◽  
Ya-Nan Guo ◽  
Ying Mei ◽  
Yu-Qi Li ◽  
...  

The paper describes a modified frequency computation method to calculate the optimal environmental flows. This method was used to design monthly environmental flows in Lancang river. The environmental flows calculated by the method are compared with those by the ecological flow method and the Tennant method, revealing its effectiveness.


2016 ◽  
Vol 162 ◽  
pp. 98-105 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vlasta Ondrejka Harbuľáková ◽  
Martina Zeleňáková ◽  
Martina Rysulová ◽  
Adam Repel ◽  
Dorota Simonová
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document