scholarly journals Mechanism and cellular function of Bud6 as an actin nucleation–promoting factor

2011 ◽  
Vol 22 (21) ◽  
pp. 4016-4028 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brian R. Graziano ◽  
Amy Grace DuPage ◽  
Alphee Michelot ◽  
Dennis Breitsprecher ◽  
James B. Moseley ◽  
...  

Formins are a conserved family of actin assembly–promoting factors with diverse biological roles, but how their activities are regulated in vivo is not well understood. In Saccharomyces cerevisiae, the formins Bni1 and Bnr1 are required for the assembly of actin cables and polarized cell growth. Proper cable assembly further requires Bud6. Previously it was shown that Bud6 enhances Bni1-mediated actin assembly in vitro, but the biochemical mechanism and in vivo role of this activity were left unclear. Here we demonstrate that Bud6 specifically stimulates the nucleation rather than the elongation phase of Bni1-mediated actin assembly, defining Bud6 as a nucleation-promoting factor (NPF) and distinguishing its effects from those of profilin. We generated alleles of Bud6 that uncouple its interactions with Bni1 and G-actin and found that both interactions are critical for NPF activity. Our data indicate that Bud6 promotes filament nucleation by recruiting actin monomers to Bni1. Genetic analysis of the same alleles showed that Bud6 regulation of formin activity is critical for normal levels of actin cable assembly in vivo. Our results raise important mechanistic parallels between Bud6 and WASP, as well as between Bud6 and other NPFs that interact with formins such as Spire.

2007 ◽  
Vol 18 (10) ◽  
pp. 4155-4167 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sophie G. Martin ◽  
Sergio A. Rincón ◽  
Roshni Basu ◽  
Pilar Pérez ◽  
Fred Chang

Formins are conserved actin nucleators responsible for the assembly of diverse actin structures. Many formins are controlled through an autoinhibitory mechanism involving the interaction of a C-terminal DAD sequence with an N-terminal DID sequence. Here, we show that the fission yeast formin for3p, which mediates actin cable assembly and polarized cell growth, is regulated by a similar autoinhibitory mechanism in vivo. Multiple sites govern for3p localization to cell tips. The localization and activity of for3p are inhibited by an intramolecular interaction of divergent DAD and DID-like sequences. A for3p DAD mutant expressed at endogenous levels produces more robust actin cables, which appear to have normal organization and dynamics. We identify cdc42p as the primary Rho GTPase involved in actin cable assembly and for3p regulation. Both cdc42p, which binds at the N terminus of for3p, and bud6p, which binds near the C-terminal DAD-like sequence, are needed for for3p localization and full activity, but a mutation in the for3p DAD restores for3p localization and other phenotypes of cdc42 and bud6 mutants. In particular, the for3p DAD mutation suppresses the bipolar growth (NETO) defect of bud6Δ cells. These findings suggest that cdc42p and bud6p activate for3p by relieving autoinhibition.


2007 ◽  
Vol 18 (5) ◽  
pp. 1826-1838 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shawnna M. Buttery ◽  
Satoshi Yoshida ◽  
David Pellman

The budding yeast formins Bni1 and Bnr1 control the assembly of actin cables. These formins exhibit distinct patterns of localization and polymerize two different populations of cables: Bni1 in the bud and Bnr1 in the mother cell. We generated a functional Bni1-3GFP that improved the visualization of Bni1 in vivo at endogenous levels. Bni1 exists as speckles in the cytoplasm, some of which colocalize on actin cables. These Bni1 speckles display linear, retrograde-directed movements. Loss of polymerized actin or specifically actin cables abolished retrograde movement, and resulted in depletion of Bni1 speckles from the cytoplasm, with enhanced targeting of Bni1 to the bud tip. Mutations that impair the actin assembly activity of Bni1 abolished the movement of Bni1 speckles, even when actin cables were present. In contrast, Bnr1-GFP or 3GFP-Bnr1 did not detectably associate with actin cables and was not observed as cytoplasmic speckles. Finally, fluorescence recovery after photobleaching demonstrated that Bni1 was very dynamic, exchanging between polarized sites and the cytoplasm, whereas Bnr1 was confined to the bud neck and did not exchange with a cytoplasmic pool. In summary, our results indicate that formins can have distinct modes of cortical interaction during actin cable assembly.


2004 ◽  
Vol 165 (5) ◽  
pp. 697-707 ◽  
Author(s):  
Becket Feierbach ◽  
Fulvia Verde ◽  
Fred Chang

The plus ends of microtubules have been speculated to regulate the actin cytoskeleton for the proper positioning of sites of cell polarization and cytokinesis. In the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe, interphase microtubules and the kelch repeat protein tea1p regulate polarized cell growth. Here, we show that tea1p is directly deposited at cell tips by microtubule plus ends. Tea1p associates in large “polarisome” complexes with bud6p and for3p, a formin that assembles actin cables. Tea1p also interacts in a separate complex with the CLIP-170 protein tip1p, a microtubule plus end–binding protein that anchors tea1p to the microtubule plus end. Localization experiments suggest that tea1p and bud6p regulate formin distribution and actin cable assembly. Although single mutants still polarize, for3Δbud6Δtea1Δ triple-mutant cells lack polarity, indicating that these proteins contribute overlapping functions in cell polarization. Thus, these experiments begin to elucidate how microtubules contribute to the proper spatial regulation of actin assembly and polarized cell growth.


2006 ◽  
Vol 17 (7) ◽  
pp. 2855-2868 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kyoko Okada ◽  
Harini Ravi ◽  
Ellen M. Smith ◽  
Bruce L. Goode

Rapid turnover of actin structures is required for dynamic remodeling of the cytoskeleton and cell morphogenesis, but the mechanisms driving actin disassembly are poorly defined. Cofilin plays a central role in promoting actin turnover by severing/depolymerizing filaments. Here, we analyze the in vivo function of a ubiquitous actin-interacting protein, Aip1, suggested to work with cofilin. We provide the first demonstration that Aip1 promotes actin turnover in living cells. Further, we reveal an unanticipated role for Aip1 and cofilin in promoting rapid turnover of yeast actin cables, dynamic structures that are decorated and stabilized by tropomyosin. Through systematic mutagenesis of Aip1 surfaces, we identify two well-separated F-actin–binding sites, one of which contributes to actin filament binding and disassembly specifically in the presence of cofilin. We also observe a close correlation between mutations disrupting capping of severed filaments in vitro and reducing rates of actin turnover in vivo. We propose a model for balanced regulation of actin cable turnover, in which Aip1 and cofilin function together to “prune” tropomyosin-decorated cables along their lengths. Consistent with this model, deletion of AIP1 rescues the temperature-sensitive growth and loss of actin cable defects of tpm1Δ mutants.


2006 ◽  
Vol 17 (3) ◽  
pp. 1354-1363 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kyoungtae Kim ◽  
Brian J. Galletta ◽  
Kevin O. Schmidt ◽  
Fanny S. Chang ◽  
Kendall J. Blumer ◽  
...  

Actin assembly nucleated by Arp2/3 complex has been implicated in the formation and movement of endocytic vesicles. The dendritic nucleation model has been proposed to account for Arp2/3-mediated actin assembly and movement. Here, we explored the model by examining the role of capping protein in vivo, with quantitative tracking analysis of fluorescence markers for different stages of endocytosis in yeast. Capping protein was most important for the initial movement of endocytic vesicles away from the plasma membrane, which presumably corresponds to vesicle scission and release. The next phase of endosome movement away from the plasma membrane was also affected, but less so. The results are consistent with the dendritic nucleation model's prediction of capping protein as important for efficient actin assembly and force production. In contrast, the movement of late-stage endocytic vesicles, traveling through the cytoplasm en route to the vacuole, did not depend on capping protein. The movement of these vesicles was found previously to depend on Lsb6, a WASp interactor, whereas Lsb6 was found here to be dispensable for early endosome movement. Thus, the molecular requirements for Arp2/3-based actin assembly differ in early versus later stages of endocytosis. Finally, acute loss of actin cables led to increased patch motility.


Blood ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 106 (11) ◽  
pp. 636-636
Author(s):  
Marie-Dominique Filippi ◽  
Haiming Xu ◽  
Kathleen Szczur ◽  
Yi Zheng ◽  
David A. Williams

Abstract Neutrophils (PMN) are a critical cell in inflammation. In response to external stimuli, they activate various signaling pathways to move rapidly to a site of microbial invasion and perform phagocytosis, cytokine and reactive oxygen species release. Rho GTPases, Rac1, Rac2, CDC42 and Rho, are central regulators of cell movement via actin rearrangement. We have shown the specific role of Rac1 and Rac2 in PMN functions (Gu, Science 2003; Filippi, Nat Immunol, 2004) which raises the question of the role of other Rho GTPases in PMN functions. CDC42 primarily regulates filopodia formation and controls cell polarity and migration in non-hematopoietic cells and some hematopoietic cell lines. Most of previous studies have used dominant active or negative mutants which lack specificity and cannot be used to define in vivo cell biology. Here, we used mice genetically deficient in the CDC42 negative regulator CDC42 GTPase Activating Protein (GAP) to study the role of CDC42 in PMN functions in vitro and in vivo. PMN deficient in CDC42GAP (CDC42GAP−/−) displayed a 2-fold increase in CDC42 activity. In vivo recruitment of PMN in peritoneal cavities was significantly higher in CDC42GAP−/− animals than in WT mice (4.5 ± 0.3x106 vs 3.4 ± 0.2x106, p<0.05) indicating that CDC42 plays a physiological role in neutrophil migration. We examined F-actin assembly upon integrin ligation. Podosome-like structures identified by a vinculin ring surrounding F-actin that are present at the leading edge in WT PMN were significantly reduced in frequency in the mutant cells (15% vs 3%). In addition, CDC42GAP−/− PMN showed increased lateral filopodia-like formation and abnormally elongated uropod with tail filopodia. Thus, CDC42GAP−/− PMN appeared less polarized than WT PMN (50% vs 16%). This abnormal F-actin assembly was associated with abnormal cell motility. In vitro, CDC42GAP−/− PMN showed increase random movement (chemokinesis) compared with WT PMN. By contrast but similar to the loss of CDC42 activity, CDC42GAP−/− PMN displayed defective directed migration towards fMLP suggesting that CDC42 activity plays a critical role in both chemokinesis and directed migration. These functions may be regulated by podosome-like and filopodia formation respectively. To further understand this correlation at a mechanistic level, we examined MAPK signaling. CDC42GAP−/− PMN showed sustained ERK phosphorylation at 15min compared to WT PMN. By contrast, p38MAPK was significantly decreased in CDC42GAP−/− PMN compared to WT at both 5 and 15min. Pharmacological inhibition of ERK activity in CDC42GAP−/− PMN using U0126 rescued the abnormal increased chemokinesis to level similar to WT and was associated with partial rescue of podosome-like formation at the leading edge of the cells. Inhibition of p38MAPK activity in WT PMN using SB203580 reduced directed migration and was associated with increased tail filopodia that mimicked CDC42GAP−/− PMN. Taken together, these results suggest that CDC42GAP plays an important role in PMN chemokinesis and directed migration likely via distinct signaling pathways. CDC42GAP may control chemokinesis via ERK-mediated podosome-like turnover at the leading edge. CDC42GAP may regulate directed migration by inhibiting filopodia at the uropod via p38MAPK and subsequently by restraining filopodia to the leading edge. This reinforces the importance of turnover of attachment structures during cell movement and suggests a new role for CDC42 in attachment structures in neutrophils and for p38MAPK in CDC42-mediated directed migration.


2019 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ying Xie ◽  
Jialin Sun ◽  
Xiao Han ◽  
Alma Turšić-Wunder ◽  
Joel D. W. Toh ◽  
...  

Abstract A multiprotein complex polarisome nucleates actin cables for polarized cell growth in budding yeast and filamentous fungi. However, the dynamic regulations of polarisome proteins in polymerizing actin under physiological and stress conditions remains unknown. We identify a previously functionally unknown polarisome member, actin-interacting-protein 5 (Aip5), which promotes actin assembly synergistically with formin Bni1. Aip5-C terminus is responsible for its activities by interacting with G-actin and Bni1. Through N-terminal intrinsically disordered region, Aip5 forms high-order oligomers and generate cytoplasmic condensates under the stresses conditions. The molecular dynamics and reversibility of Aip5 condensates are regulated by scaffolding protein Spa2 via liquid-liquid phase separation both in vitro and in vivo. In the absence of Spa2, Aip5 condensates hamper cell growth and actin cable structures under stress treatment. The present study reveals the mechanisms of actin assembly for polarity establishment and the adaptation in stress conditions to protect actin assembly by protein phase separation.


2006 ◽  
Vol 17 (10) ◽  
pp. 4564-4575 ◽  
Author(s):  
Scott A. Myers ◽  
Laura R. Leeper ◽  
Chang Y. Chung

The role of WASP-interacting protein (WIP) in the process of F-actin assembly during chemotaxis of Dictyostelium was examined. Mutations of the WH1 domain of WASP led to a reduction in binding to WIPa, a newly identified homolog of mammalian WIP, a reduction of F-actin polymerization at the leading edge, and a reduction in chemotactic efficiency. WIPa localizes to sites of new pseudopod protrusion and colocalizes with WASP at the leading edge. WIPa increases F-actin elongation in vivo and in vitro in a WASP-dependent manner. WIPa translocates to the cortical membrane upon uniform cAMP stimulation in a time course that parallels F-actin polymerization. WIPa-overexpressing cells exhibit multiple microspike formation and defects in chemotactic efficiency due to frequent changes of direction. Reduced expression of WIPa by expressing a hairpin WIPa (hp WIPa) construct resulted in more polarized cells that exhibit a delayed response to a new chemoattractant source due to delayed extension of pseudopod toward the new gradient. These results suggest that WIPa is required for new pseudopod protrusion and prompt reorientation of cells toward a new gradient by initiating localized bursts of actin polymerization and/or elongation.


2012 ◽  
Vol 23 (23) ◽  
pp. 4579-4591 ◽  
Author(s):  
Libera Lo Presti ◽  
Fred Chang ◽  
Sophie G. Martin

Myosin V motors are believed to contribute to cell polarization by carrying cargoes along actin tracks. In Schizosaccharomyces pombe, Myosin Vs transport secretory vesicles along actin cables, which are dynamic actin bundles assembled by the formin For3 at cell poles. How these flexible structures are able to extend longitudinally in the cell through the dense cytoplasm is unknown. Here we show that in myosin V (myo52 myo51) null cells, actin cables are curled, bundled, and fail to extend into the cell interior. They also exhibit reduced retrograde flow, suggesting that formin-mediated actin assembly is impaired. Myo52 may contribute to actin cable organization by delivering actin regulators to cell poles, as myoV∆ defects are partially suppressed by diverting cargoes toward cell tips onto microtubules with a kinesin 7–Myo52 tail chimera. In addition, Myo52 motor activity may pull on cables to provide the tension necessary for their extension and efficient assembly, as artificially tethering actin cables to the nuclear envelope via a Myo52 motor domain restores actin cable extension and retrograde flow in myoV mutants. Together these in vivo data reveal elements of a self-organizing system in which the motors shape their own tracks by transporting cargoes and exerting physical pulling forces.


2016 ◽  
Vol 27 (5) ◽  
pp. 828-837 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julian A. Eskin ◽  
Aneliya Rankova ◽  
Adam B. Johnston ◽  
Salvatore L. Alioto ◽  
Bruce L. Goode

Formins comprise a large family of proteins with diverse roles in remodeling the actin cytoskeleton. However, the spatiotemporal mechanisms used by cells to control formin activities are only beginning to be understood. Here we dissected Smy1, which has dual roles in regulating formins and myosin. Using mutagenesis, we identified specific sequences in Smy1 critical for its in vitro inhibitory effects on the FH2 domain of the formin Bnr1. By integrating smy1 alleles targeting those sequences, we genetically uncoupled Smy1’s functions in regulating formins and myosin. Quantitative imaging analysis further demonstrated that the ability of Smy1 to directly control Bnr1 activity is crucial in vivo for proper actin cable length, shape, and velocity and, in turn, efficient secretory vesicle transport. A Smy1-like sequence motif was also identified in a different Bnr1 regulator, Bud14, and found to be essential for Bud14 functions in regulating actin cable architecture and function in vivo. Together these observations reveal unanticipated mechanistic ties between two distinct formin regulators. Further, they emphasize the importance of tightly controlling formin activities in vivo to generate specialized geometries and dynamics of actin structures tailored to their physiological roles.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document