scholarly journals Yeast Formins Bni1 and Bnr1 Utilize Different Modes of Cortical Interaction during the Assembly of Actin Cables

2007 ◽  
Vol 18 (5) ◽  
pp. 1826-1838 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shawnna M. Buttery ◽  
Satoshi Yoshida ◽  
David Pellman
Keyword(s):  
Mother Cell ◽  
Fluorescence Recovery After Photobleaching ◽  
Actin Assembly ◽  
Actin Cable ◽  
Bud Neck ◽  
Cable Assembly ◽  
Different Populations ◽  
Actin Cables ◽  
Assembly Activity

The budding yeast formins Bni1 and Bnr1 control the assembly of actin cables. These formins exhibit distinct patterns of localization and polymerize two different populations of cables: Bni1 in the bud and Bnr1 in the mother cell. We generated a functional Bni1-3GFP that improved the visualization of Bni1 in vivo at endogenous levels. Bni1 exists as speckles in the cytoplasm, some of which colocalize on actin cables. These Bni1 speckles display linear, retrograde-directed movements. Loss of polymerized actin or specifically actin cables abolished retrograde movement, and resulted in depletion of Bni1 speckles from the cytoplasm, with enhanced targeting of Bni1 to the bud tip. Mutations that impair the actin assembly activity of Bni1 abolished the movement of Bni1 speckles, even when actin cables were present. In contrast, Bnr1-GFP or 3GFP-Bnr1 did not detectably associate with actin cables and was not observed as cytoplasmic speckles. Finally, fluorescence recovery after photobleaching demonstrated that Bni1 was very dynamic, exchanging between polarized sites and the cytoplasm, whereas Bnr1 was confined to the bud neck and did not exchange with a cytoplasmic pool. In summary, our results indicate that formins can have distinct modes of cortical interaction during actin cable assembly.

scholarly journals Mechanism and cellular function of Bud6 as an actin nucleation–promoting factor

2011 ◽  
Vol 22 (21) ◽  
pp. 4016-4028 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brian R. Graziano ◽  
Amy Grace DuPage ◽  
Alphee Michelot ◽  
Dennis Breitsprecher ◽  
James B. Moseley ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Actin Assembly ◽  
Actin Cable ◽  
Polarized Cell Growth ◽  
Cable Assembly ◽  
Nucleation Promoting Factor ◽  
Actin Cables ◽  
Elongation Phase

Formins are a conserved family of actin assembly–promoting factors with diverse biological roles, but how their activities are regulated in vivo is not well understood. In Saccharomyces cerevisiae, the formins Bni1 and Bnr1 are required for the assembly of actin cables and polarized cell growth. Proper cable assembly further requires Bud6. Previously it was shown that Bud6 enhances Bni1-mediated actin assembly in vitro, but the biochemical mechanism and in vivo role of this activity were left unclear. Here we demonstrate that Bud6 specifically stimulates the nucleation rather than the elongation phase of Bni1-mediated actin assembly, defining Bud6 as a nucleation-promoting factor (NPF) and distinguishing its effects from those of profilin. We generated alleles of Bud6 that uncouple its interactions with Bni1 and G-actin and found that both interactions are critical for NPF activity. Our data indicate that Bud6 promotes filament nucleation by recruiting actin monomers to Bni1. Genetic analysis of the same alleles showed that Bud6 regulation of formin activity is critical for normal levels of actin cable assembly in vivo. Our results raise important mechanistic parallels between Bud6 and WASP, as well as between Bud6 and other NPFs that interact with formins such as Spire.

scholarly journals Regulation of the Formin for3p by cdc42p and bud6p

2007 ◽  
Vol 18 (10) ◽  
pp. 4155-4167 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sophie G. Martin ◽  
Sergio A. Rincón ◽  
Roshni Basu ◽  
Pilar Pérez ◽  
Fred Chang
Keyword(s):  
Cell Growth ◽  
Fission Yeast ◽  
Rho Gtpase ◽  
Intramolecular Interaction ◽  
Actin Cable ◽  
Polarized Cell Growth ◽  
N Terminus ◽  
Cable Assembly ◽  
Actin Cables

Formins are conserved actin nucleators responsible for the assembly of diverse actin structures. Many formins are controlled through an autoinhibitory mechanism involving the interaction of a C-terminal DAD sequence with an N-terminal DID sequence. Here, we show that the fission yeast formin for3p, which mediates actin cable assembly and polarized cell growth, is regulated by a similar autoinhibitory mechanism in vivo. Multiple sites govern for3p localization to cell tips. The localization and activity of for3p are inhibited by an intramolecular interaction of divergent DAD and DID-like sequences. A for3p DAD mutant expressed at endogenous levels produces more robust actin cables, which appear to have normal organization and dynamics. We identify cdc42p as the primary Rho GTPase involved in actin cable assembly and for3p regulation. Both cdc42p, which binds at the N terminus of for3p, and bud6p, which binds near the C-terminal DAD-like sequence, are needed for for3p localization and full activity, but a mutation in the for3p DAD restores for3p localization and other phenotypes of cdc42 and bud6 mutants. In particular, the for3p DAD mutation suppresses the bipolar growth (NETO) defect of bud6Δ cells. These findings suggest that cdc42p and bud6p activate for3p by relieving autoinhibition.

scholarly journals Myosin Vs organize actin cables in fission yeast

2012 ◽  
Vol 23 (23) ◽  
pp. 4579-4591 ◽  
Author(s):  
Libera Lo Presti ◽  
Fred Chang ◽  
Sophie G. Martin
Keyword(s):  
Flexible Structures ◽  
Cell Polarization ◽  
Retrograde Flow ◽  
Actin Assembly ◽  
Myosin V ◽  
Actin Cable ◽  
Dense Cytoplasm ◽  
Pulling Forces ◽  
Actin Cables

Myosin V motors are believed to contribute to cell polarization by carrying cargoes along actin tracks. In Schizosaccharomyces pombe, Myosin Vs transport secretory vesicles along actin cables, which are dynamic actin bundles assembled by the formin For3 at cell poles. How these flexible structures are able to extend longitudinally in the cell through the dense cytoplasm is unknown. Here we show that in myosin V (myo52 myo51) null cells, actin cables are curled, bundled, and fail to extend into the cell interior. They also exhibit reduced retrograde flow, suggesting that formin-mediated actin assembly is impaired. Myo52 may contribute to actin cable organization by delivering actin regulators to cell poles, as myoV∆ defects are partially suppressed by diverting cargoes toward cell tips onto microtubules with a kinesin 7–Myo52 tail chimera. In addition, Myo52 motor activity may pull on cables to provide the tension necessary for their extension and efficient assembly, as artificially tethering actin cables to the nuclear envelope via a Myo52 motor domain restores actin cable extension and retrograde flow in myoV mutants. Together these in vivo data reveal elements of a self-organizing system in which the motors shape their own tracks by transporting cargoes and exerting physical pulling forces.

scholarly journals Integrated control of formin-mediated actin assembly by a stationary inhibitor and a mobile activator

2018 ◽  
Vol 217 (10) ◽  
pp. 3512-3530 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mikael V. Garabedian ◽  
Tatiana Stanishneva-Konovalova ◽  
Chenyu Lou ◽  
Thomas J. Rands ◽  
Luther W. Pollard ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Electron Microscopy ◽  
Integrated Control ◽  
Secretory Vesicles ◽  
Actin Assembly ◽  
Bar Domain ◽  
Binding Partners ◽  
Bud Neck ◽  
Actin Cables

Formins are essential actin assembly factors whose activities are controlled by a diverse array of binding partners. Until now, most formin ligands have been studied on an individual basis, leaving open the question of how multiple inputs are integrated to regulate formins in vivo. Here, we show that the F-BAR domain of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Hof1 interacts with the FH2 domain of the formin Bnr1 and blocks actin nucleation. Electron microscopy of the Hof1–Bnr1 complex reveals a novel dumbbell-shaped structure, with the tips of the F-BAR holding two FH2 dimers apart. Deletion of Hof1’s F-BAR domain in vivo results in disorganized actin cables and secretory defects. The formin-binding protein Bud6 strongly alleviates Hof1 inhibition in vitro, and bud6Δ suppresses hof1Δ defects in vivo. Whereas Hof1 stably resides at the bud neck, we show that Bud6 is delivered to the neck on secretory vesicles. We propose that Hof1 and Bud6 functions are intertwined as a stationary inhibitor and a mobile activator, respectively.

scholarly journals Regulation of a formin complex by the microtubule plus end protein tea1p

2004 ◽  
Vol 165 (5) ◽  
pp. 697-707 ◽  
Author(s):  
Becket Feierbach ◽  
Fulvia Verde ◽  
Fred Chang
Keyword(s):  
Cell Growth ◽  
Cell Polarization ◽  
Actin Assembly ◽  
Triple Mutant ◽  
Spatial Regulation ◽  
Actin Cable ◽  
Polarized Cell Growth ◽  
Cable Assembly ◽  
Actin Cables ◽  
Mutant Cells

The plus ends of microtubules have been speculated to regulate the actin cytoskeleton for the proper positioning of sites of cell polarization and cytokinesis. In the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe, interphase microtubules and the kelch repeat protein tea1p regulate polarized cell growth. Here, we show that tea1p is directly deposited at cell tips by microtubule plus ends. Tea1p associates in large “polarisome” complexes with bud6p and for3p, a formin that assembles actin cables. Tea1p also interacts in a separate complex with the CLIP-170 protein tip1p, a microtubule plus end–binding protein that anchors tea1p to the microtubule plus end. Localization experiments suggest that tea1p and bud6p regulate formin distribution and actin cable assembly. Although single mutants still polarize, for3Δbud6Δtea1Δ triple-mutant cells lack polarity, indicating that these proteins contribute overlapping functions in cell polarization. Thus, these experiments begin to elucidate how microtubules contribute to the proper spatial regulation of actin assembly and polarized cell growth.

Rho, Rac and Cdc42 regulate actin organization and cell adhesion in macrophages

1997 ◽  
Vol 110 (6) ◽  
pp. 707-720 ◽  
Author(s):  
W.E. Allen ◽  
G.E. Jones ◽  
J.W. Pollard ◽  
A.J. Ridley
Keyword(s):  
Actin Reorganization ◽  
Membrane Ruffling ◽  
Actin Organization ◽  
Phosphorylated Proteins ◽  
Adhesion Sites ◽  
Actin Cable ◽  
Cable Assembly ◽  
Beta1 Integrin ◽  
Actin Cables ◽  
In Cells

Rho family proteins are known to regulate actin organization in fibroblasts, but their functions in cells of haematopoietic origin have not been studied in detail. Bac1.2F5 cells are a colony-stimulating factor-1 (CSF-1)-dependent murine macrophage cell line; CSF-1 stimulates their proliferation and motility, and acts as a chemoattractant. CSF-1 rapidly induced actin reorganization in Bac1 cells: it stimulated the formation of filopodia, lamellipodia and membrane ruffles at the plasma membrane, as well as the appearance of fine actin cables within the cell interior. Microinjection of constitutively activated (V12)Rac1 stimulated lamellipodium formation and membrane ruffling. The dominant inhibitory Rac mutant, N17Rac1, inhibited CSF-1-induced lamellipodium formation, and also induced cell rounding. V12Cdc42 induced the formation of long filopodia, while the dominant inhibitory mutant N17Cdc42 prevented CSF-1-induced formation of filopodia but not lamellipodia. V14RhoA stimulated actin cable assembly and cell contraction, while the Rho inhibitor, C3 transferase, induced the loss of actin cables. Bac1 cells had cell-to-substratum adhesion sites containing beta1 integrin, pp125FAK, paxillin, vinculin, and tyrosine phosphorylated proteins. These ‘focal complexes’ were present in growing and CSF-1-starved cells, but were disassembled in cells injected with N17Cdc42 or N17Rac1. Interestingly, beta1 integrin did not disperse until long after focal phosphotyrosine and vinculin staining had disappeared. We conclude that in Bac1 macrophages Cdc42, Rac and Rho regulate the formation of distinct actin filament-based structures, and that Cdc42 and Rac are also required for the assembly of adhesion sites to the extracellular matrix.

scholarly journals Aip1 and Cofilin Promote Rapid Turnover of Yeast Actin Patches and Cables: A Coordinated Mechanism for Severing and Capping Filaments

2006 ◽  
Vol 17 (7) ◽  
pp. 2855-2868 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kyoko Okada ◽  
Harini Ravi ◽  
Ellen M. Smith ◽  
Bruce L. Goode
Keyword(s):  
Close Correlation ◽  
Actin Binding ◽  
Temperature Sensitive ◽  
Interacting Protein ◽  
Rapid Turnover ◽  
Actin Cable ◽  
Actin Turnover ◽  
Actin Cables

Rapid turnover of actin structures is required for dynamic remodeling of the cytoskeleton and cell morphogenesis, but the mechanisms driving actin disassembly are poorly defined. Cofilin plays a central role in promoting actin turnover by severing/depolymerizing filaments. Here, we analyze the in vivo function of a ubiquitous actin-interacting protein, Aip1, suggested to work with cofilin. We provide the first demonstration that Aip1 promotes actin turnover in living cells. Further, we reveal an unanticipated role for Aip1 and cofilin in promoting rapid turnover of yeast actin cables, dynamic structures that are decorated and stabilized by tropomyosin. Through systematic mutagenesis of Aip1 surfaces, we identify two well-separated F-actin–binding sites, one of which contributes to actin filament binding and disassembly specifically in the presence of cofilin. We also observe a close correlation between mutations disrupting capping of severed filaments in vitro and reducing rates of actin turnover in vivo. We propose a model for balanced regulation of actin cable turnover, in which Aip1 and cofilin function together to “prune” tropomyosin-decorated cables along their lengths. Consistent with this model, deletion of AIP1 rescues the temperature-sensitive growth and loss of actin cable defects of tpm1Δ mutants.

scholarly journals Actin-based Motility during Endocytosis in Budding Yeast

2006 ◽  
Vol 17 (3) ◽  
pp. 1354-1363 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kyoungtae Kim ◽  
Brian J. Galletta ◽  
Kevin O. Schmidt ◽  
Fanny S. Chang ◽  
Kendall J. Blumer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Plasma Membrane ◽  
Force Production ◽  
Actin Assembly ◽  
Capping Protein ◽  
Actin Cables ◽  
Endocytic Vesicles ◽  
Initial Movement ◽  
Fluorescence Markers

Actin assembly nucleated by Arp2/3 complex has been implicated in the formation and movement of endocytic vesicles. The dendritic nucleation model has been proposed to account for Arp2/3-mediated actin assembly and movement. Here, we explored the model by examining the role of capping protein in vivo, with quantitative tracking analysis of fluorescence markers for different stages of endocytosis in yeast. Capping protein was most important for the initial movement of endocytic vesicles away from the plasma membrane, which presumably corresponds to vesicle scission and release. The next phase of endosome movement away from the plasma membrane was also affected, but less so. The results are consistent with the dendritic nucleation model's prediction of capping protein as important for efficient actin assembly and force production. In contrast, the movement of late-stage endocytic vesicles, traveling through the cytoplasm en route to the vacuole, did not depend on capping protein. The movement of these vesicles was found previously to depend on Lsb6, a WASp interactor, whereas Lsb6 was found here to be dispensable for early endosome movement. Thus, the molecular requirements for Arp2/3-based actin assembly differ in early versus later stages of endocytosis. Finally, acute loss of actin cables led to increased patch motility.

scholarly journals Formin-dependent actin assembly is regulated by distinct modes of Rho signaling in yeast

2003 ◽  
Vol 161 (6) ◽  
pp. 1081-1092 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuqing Dong ◽  
David Pruyne ◽  
Anthony Bretscher
Keyword(s):  
Rho Gtpases ◽  
Elevated Temperatures ◽  
Mapk Pathway ◽  
Actin Assembly ◽  
Rho Proteins ◽  
Polarized Secretion ◽  
Cable Assembly ◽  
Bud Growth ◽  
Essential Function ◽  
Actin Cables

Formins are actin filament nucleators regulated by Rho-GTPases. In budding yeast, the formins Bni1p and Bnr1p direct the assembly of actin cables, which guide polarized secretion and growth. From the six yeast Rho proteins (Cdc42p and Rho1–5p), we have determined that four participate in the regulation of formin activity. We show that the essential function of Rho3p and Rho4p is to activate the formins Bni1p and Bnr1p, and that activated alleles of either formin are able to bypass the requirement for these Rho proteins. Through a separate signaling pathway, Rho1p is necessary for formin activation at elevated temperatures, acting through protein kinase C (Pkc1p), the major effector for Rho1p signaling to the actin cytoskeleton. Although Pkc1p also activates a MAPK pathway, this pathway does not function in formin activation. Formin-dependent cable assembly does not require Cdc42p, but in the absence of Cdc42p function, cable assembly is not properly organized during initiation of bud growth. These results show that formin function is under the control of three distinct, essential Rho signaling pathways.

scholarly journals Autoinhibition regulates cellular localization and actin assembly activity of the diaphanous-related formins FRLα and mDia1

2006 ◽  
Vol 174 (5) ◽  
pp. 701-713 ◽  
Author(s):  
Abhinav Seth ◽  
Chinatsu Otomo ◽  
Michael K. Rosen
Keyword(s):  
Cellular Localization ◽  
Membrane Localization ◽  
Actin Assembly ◽  
Cytoskeletal Dynamics ◽  
Rho Family ◽  
Guanosine Triphosphatase ◽  
Actin Cytoskeletal Dynamics ◽  
Assembly Activity

Diaphanous-related formins (DRFs) are key regulators of actin cytoskeletal dynamics whose in vitro actin assembly activities are thought to be regulated by autoinhibition. However, the in vivo consequences of autoinhibition and the involvement of DRFs in specific biological processes are not well understood. In this study, we show that in the DRFs FRLα (formin-related gene in leukocytes α) and mouse diaphanous 1, autoinhibition regulates a novel membrane localization activity in vivo as well as actin assembly activity in vitro. In FRLα, the Rho family guanosine triphosphatase Cdc42 relieves the autoinhibition of both membrane localization and biochemical actin assembly activities. FRLα is required for efficient Fc-γ receptor–mediated phagocytosis and is recruited to the phagocytic cup by Cdc42. These results suggest that mutual autoinhibition of biochemical activity and cellular localization may be a general regulatory principle for DRFs and demonstrate a novel role for formins in immune function.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document