Frailty status predicts futility of cardiopulmonary resuscitation in older adults

Abstract Aim To determine if frailty is associated with poor outcome following in-hospital cardiac arrest; to find if there is a “frailty threshold” beyond which cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) becomes futile. Methods Retrospective review of patients aged over 60 years who received CPR between May 2017 and December 2018, in a tertiary referral hospital, which does not provide primary coronary revascularisation. Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) and Charlson Comorbidity Index were retrospectively assigned. Results Data for 90 patients were analysed, the median age was 77 (IQR 70-83); 71% were male; 44% were frail (CFS > 4). Frailty was predictive of in-hospital mortality independent of age, comorbidity and cardiac arrest rhythm (OR 2.789 95% CI 1.145–6.795). No frail patients (CFS > 4) survived to hospital discharge, regardless of cardiac arrest rhythm, whilst 13 (26%) of the non-frail (CFS ≤ 4) patients survived to hospital discharge. Of the 13 survivors (Age 72; range 61–86), 12 were alive at 1 year and had a good neurological outcome, the outcome for the remaining patient was unknown. Conclusion Frail patients are unlikely to survive to hospital discharge following in-hospital cardiac arrest, these results may facilitate clinical decision making regarding whether CPR may be considered futile. The Clinical Frailty Scale is a simple bedside assessment that can provide invaluable information when considering treatment escalation plans, as it becomes more widespread, larger scale observations using prospective assessments of frailty may become feasible.

Download Full-text

Intraosseous versus intravenous vascular access during cardiopulmonary resuscitation for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies

Scandinavian Journal of Trauma Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine ◽

10.1186/s13049-021-00858-6 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 29 (1) ◽

Author(s):

Yu-Lin Hsieh ◽

Meng-Che Wu ◽

Jon Wolfshohl ◽

James d’Etienne ◽

Chien-Hua Huang ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Cardiac Arrest ◽

Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation ◽

Hospital Discharge ◽

Vascular Access ◽

Subgroup Analysis ◽

Observational Studies ◽

Primary Outcome ◽

Meta Analysis ◽

Cochrane Library ◽

Hospital Cardiac Arrest

Abstract Introduction This study is aimed to investigate the association of intraosseous (IO) versus intravenous (IV) route during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) with outcomes after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). Methods We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library and Web of Science from the database inception through April 2020. Our search strings included designed keywords for two concepts, i.e. vascular access and cardiac arrest. There were no limitations implemented in the search strategy. We selected studies comparing IO versus IV access in neurological or survival outcomes after OHCA. Favourable neurological outcome at hospital discharge was pre-specified as the primary outcome. We pooled the effect estimates in random-effects models and quantified the heterogeneity by the I2 statistics. Time to intervention, defined as time interval from call for emergency medical services to establishing vascular access or administering medications, was hypothesized to be a potential outcome moderator and examined in subgroup analysis with meta-regression. Results Nine retrospective observational studies involving 111,746 adult OHCA patients were included. Most studies were rated as high quality according to Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. The pooled results demonstrated no significant association between types of vascular access and the primary outcome (odds ratio [OR], 0.60; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.27–1.33; I2, 95%). In subgroup analysis, time to intervention was noted to be positively associated with the pooled OR of achieving the primary outcome (OR: 3.95, 95% CI, 1.42–11.02, p: 0.02). That is, when the studies not accounting for the variable of “time to intervention” in the statistical analysis were pooled together, the meta-analytic results between IO access and favourable outcomes would be biased toward inverse association. No obvious publication bias was detected by the funnel plot. Conclusions The meta-analysis revealed no significant association between types of vascular access and neurological outcomes at hospital discharge among OHCA patients. Time to intervention was identified to be an important outcome moderator in this meta-analysis of observation studies. These results call for the need for future clinical trials to investigate the unbiased effect of IO use on OHCA CPR.

Download Full-text

Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: variations in clinical decision making for immediate coronary angiography

Heart Lung and Circulation ◽

10.1016/j.hlc.2015.06.412 ◽

2015 ◽

Vol 24 ◽

pp. S287-S288

Author(s):

H. Han ◽

E. Jones ◽

O. Farouque

Keyword(s):

Decision Making ◽

Cardiac Arrest ◽

Coronary Angiography ◽

Clinical Decision Making ◽

Clinical Decision ◽

Hospital Cardiac Arrest

Download Full-text

Survival of pediatric patients after cardiopulmonary resuscitation for in-hospital cardiac arrest: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Italian Journal of Pediatrics ◽

10.1186/s13052-021-01058-9 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 47 (1) ◽

Author(s):

Melaku Bimerew ◽

Adam Wondmieneh ◽

Getnet Gedefaw ◽

Teshome Gebremeskel ◽

Asmamaw Demis ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Systematic Review ◽

Cardiac Arrest ◽

Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation ◽

Hospital Discharge ◽

Pediatric Patients ◽

Meta Analysis ◽

Cochrane Review ◽

Probability Of Survival ◽

Pooled Prevalence ◽

Hospital Cardiac Arrest

Abstract Background In-hospital cardiac arrest is a major public health issue. It is a serious condition; most probably end up with death within a few minutes even with corrective measures. However, cardiopulmonary resuscitation is expected to increase the probability of survival and prevent neurological disabilities in patients with cardiac arrest. Having a pooled prevalence of survival to hospital discharge after cardiopulmonary resuscitation is vital to develop strategies targeted to increase probability of survival among patients with cardiac arrest. Therefore, this systematic review and meta-analysis was aimed to assess the pooled prevalence of survival to hospital discharge among pediatric patients who underwent cardiopulmonary resuscitation for in-hospital cardiac arrest. Methods PubMed, Google Scholar, and Cochrane review databases were searched. To have current (five-year) evidence, only studies published in 2016 to 2020 were included. The weighted inverse variance random-effects model at 95%CI was used to estimate the pooled prevalence of survival. Heterogeneity assessment, test of publication bias, and subgroup analyses were also employed accordingly. Results Twenty-five articles with a total sample size of 28,479 children were included in the final analysis. The pooled prevalence of survival to hospital discharge was found to be 46% (95% CI = 43.0–50.0%; I2 = 96.7%; p < 0.001). Based on subgroup analysis by “continent” and “income level”, lowest prevalence of pooled survival was observed in Asia (six studies; pooled survival =36.0% with 95% CI = 19.01–52.15%; I2 = 97.4%; p < 0.001) and in low and middle income countries (six studies, pooled survival = 34.0% with 95% CI = 17.0–51.0%, I2 = 97.67%, p < 0.001) respectively. Conclusion Although there was an extremely high heterogeneity among reported results (I2 = 96.7%), in this meta-analysis more than half of pediatric patients (54%) who underwent cardiopulmonary resuscitation for in-hospital cardiac arrest did not survived to hospital discharge. Therefore, developing further strategies and encouraging researches might be crucial.

Download Full-text

Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients with an initial non-shockable rhythm could be candidates for extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a retrospective study.

10.21203/rs.3.rs-31150/v1 ◽

2020 ◽

Author(s):

Atsunori Tanimoto ◽

Kazuhiro Sugiyama ◽

Maki Tanabe ◽

Kanta Kitagawa ◽

Ayumi Kawakami ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Cardiac Arrest ◽

Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation ◽

Hospital Discharge ◽

Cerebral Performance Category ◽

Low Flow ◽

Extracorporeal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation ◽

Emergency Medical Service Personnel ◽

Good Outcome ◽

Shockable Rhythm ◽

Hospital Cardiac Arrest

Abstract Background Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) is a promising treatment for refractory out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). Most studies evaluating the effectiveness of ECPR include patients with an initial shockable rhythm. However, the effectiveness of ECPR for patients with an initial non-shockable rhythm remains unknown. This retrospective single-center study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of ECPR for patients with an initial non-shockable rhythm, with reference to the outcomes of OHCA patients with an initial shockable rhythm. Methods Adult OHCA patients treated with ECPR at our center during 2011–2018 were included in the study. Patients were classified into the initial shockable rhythm group and the non-shockable rhythm group. The primary outcome was the cerebral performance category (CPC) scale score at hospital discharge. A CPC score of 1 or 2 was defined as a good outcome. Results In total, 186 patients were eligible. Among them, 124 had an initial shockable rhythm and 62 had an initial non-shockable rhythm. Among all patients, 158 (85%) were male, with a median age of 59 (interquartile range [IQR], 48–65) years, and the median low flow time was 41 (IQR, 33–48) min. Collapse was witnessed in 169 (91%) patients, and 36 (19%) achieved return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) transiently. Proportion of female patients, presence of bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation, and collapse after the arrival of emergency medical service personnel were significantly higher in the non-shockable rhythm group. The rate of good outcomes at hospital discharge was not significantly different between the shockable and non-shockable groups (19% vs. 16%, p=0.69). Initial shockable rhythm was not significantly associated with good outcome after controlling for potential confounders (adjusted odds ratio 1.58, 95% confidence interval: 0.66–3.81, p=0.31). In the non-shockable group, patients with good outcomes had a higher rate of transient ROSC, and pulmonary embolism was the leading etiology. Conclusions The outcomes of patients with an initial non-shockable rhythm are comparable with those having an initial shockable rhythm. OHCA patients with an initial non-shockable rhythm could be candidates for ECPR, if they are presumed to have reversible etiology and potential for good neurological recovery.

Download Full-text

Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients with an initial non-shockable rhythm could be candidates for extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a retrospective study

Scandinavian Journal of Trauma Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine ◽

10.1186/s13049-020-00800-2 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 28 (1) ◽

Author(s):

Atsunori Tanimoto ◽

Kazuhiro Sugiyama ◽

Maki Tanabe ◽

Kanta Kitagawa ◽

Ayumi Kawakami ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Cardiac Arrest ◽

Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation ◽

Hospital Discharge ◽

Cerebral Performance Category ◽

Low Flow ◽

Extracorporeal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation ◽

Emergency Medical Service Personnel ◽

Good Outcome ◽

Shockable Rhythm ◽

Hospital Cardiac Arrest

Abstract Background Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) is a promising treatment for refractory out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). Most studies evaluating the effectiveness of ECPR include patients with an initial shockable rhythm. However, the effectiveness of ECPR for patients with an initial non-shockable rhythm remains unknown. This retrospective single-center study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of ECPR for patients with an initial non-shockable rhythm, with reference to the outcomes of OHCA patients with an initial shockable rhythm. Methods Adult OHCA patients treated with ECPR at our center during 2011–2018 were included in the study. Patients were classified into the initial shockable rhythm group and the non-shockable rhythm group. The primary outcome was the cerebral performance category (CPC) scale score at hospital discharge. A CPC score of 1 or 2 was defined as a good outcome. Results In total, 186 patients were eligible. Among them, 124 had an initial shockable rhythm and 62 had an initial non-shockable rhythm. Among all patients, 158 (85%) were male, with a median age of 59 (interquartile range [IQR], 48–65) years, and the median low flow time was 41 (IQR, 33–48) min. Collapse was witnessed in 169 (91%) patients, and 36 (19%) achieved return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) transiently. Proportion of female patients, presence of bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation, and collapse after the arrival of emergency medical service personnel were significantly higher in the non-shockable rhythm group. The rate of good outcomes at hospital discharge was not significantly different between the shockable and non-shockable groups (19% vs. 16%, p = 0.69). Initial shockable rhythm was not significantly associated with good outcome after controlling for potential confounders (adjusted odds ratio 1.58, 95% confidence interval: 0.66–3.81, p = 0.31). In the non-shockable group, patients with good outcomes had a higher rate of transient ROSC, and pulmonary embolism was the leading etiology. Conclusions The outcomes of patients with an initial non-shockable rhythm are comparable with those having an initial shockable rhythm. OHCA patients with an initial non-shockable rhythm could be candidates for ECPR, if they are presumed to have reversible etiology and potential for good neurological recovery.

Download Full-text

Abstract 13209: Law Enforcement-Initiated Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation in the Care of Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest

Circulation ◽

10.1161/circ.144.suppl_2.13209 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 144 (Suppl_2) ◽

Author(s):

Luke A Wohlford ◽

Bruce J Barnhart ◽

Daniel W Spaite ◽

Joshua B Gaither ◽

Amber D Rice ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Cardiac Arrest ◽

Law Enforcement ◽

Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation ◽

Patient Care ◽

Hospital Discharge ◽

System Response ◽

Healthcare Facilities ◽

Bystander Cpr ◽

Provision Of Care ◽

Hospital Cardiac Arrest

Background: Little is known about the provision of care by law enforcement (LE) personnel within modern EMS systems. We evaluated LE performance of bystander CPR (BCPR) and associated outcomes in OHCA across Arizona. Methods: A total of 5,654 OHCA cases (1/1/2019-12/31/2019) were evaluated using the Save Hearts in Arizona Registry and Education (SHARE) cardiac arrest registry. Data were abstracted from all EMS patient care records (PCRs). If two parties provided BCPR, the first to give compressions was considered the provider for this analysis. Cases identified as “Stranger” or “Unknown” BCPR were manually evaluated for narrative data to identify BCPR provider when possible. Results: BCPR was provided in 2285 cases [48.8%; (95% CIs 47.4%, 50.3%)] after excluding 850 cases that occurred in healthcare facilities where personnel are duty-bound to provide CPR. LE provided BCPR in 444 patients [19.4% (17.8%, 21.1%)], second only to family/spouse [1143 pts; 50.0% (48.0%, 52.1%)]. Overall, 279 patients survived to hospital discharge [12.2%, (10.9%, 13.6%)]. The Table shows the rates of BCPR in each provider category and the associated rates of survival. Of note is that the rate of bystander AED use was more than four times higher in LE BCPR [6.3% (4.23%, 8.99%)] than family-provided BCPR [1.5% (0.87%, 2.37%; p < 0.0001)], but was still very low. Conclusions: In this statewide study that included more than 130 EMS agencies from frontier to urban settings, LE personnel were frequently involved in the care of OHCA patients within the 911 system response. To our knowledge, this magnitude of provision of BCPR by LE (nearly one in five BCPR cases) has not been reported previously. Furthermore, the consequential rate of LE response to OHCA provides the opportunity to significantly increase AED use. Our findings support the widespread and intentional training of LE in CPR and AED use and has the potential to improve survival in diverse settings.

Download Full-text

Neuromarkers and neurological outcome in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients treated with therapeutic hypothermia–experience from the HAnnover COoling REgistry (HACORE)

PLoS ONE ◽

10.1371/journal.pone.0245210 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 16 (1) ◽

pp. e0245210

Author(s):

Muharrem Akin ◽

Vera Garcheva ◽

Jan-Thorben Sieweke ◽

John Adel ◽

Ulrike Flierl ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Cardiac Arrest ◽

Therapeutic Hypothermia ◽

Neurological Outcome ◽

Clinical Decision Making ◽

Cerebral Performance Category ◽

Neuron Specific Enolase ◽

Clinical Decision ◽

St Segment Elevation ◽

Poor Neurological Outcome ◽

Hospital Cardiac Arrest

Background Neuron-specific enolase (NSE) and S-100b have been used to assess neurological damage following out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). Cut-offs were derived from small normothermic cohorts. Whether similar cut-offs apply to patients treated with hypothermia remained undetermined. Methods We investigated 251 patients with OHCA treated with hypothermia but without routine prognostication. Neuromarkers were determined at day 3, neurological outcome was assessed after hospital discharge by cerebral performance category (CPC). Results Good neurological outcome (CPC≤2) was achieved in 41%. Elevated neuromarkers, older age and absence of ST-segment elevation after ROSC were associated with increased mortality. Poor neurological outcome in survivors was additionally associated with history of cerebrovascular events, sepsis and higher admission lactate. Mean NSE was 33μg/l [16–94] vs. 119μg/l [25–406]; p<0.001, for survivors vs. non-survivors, and 21μg/l [16–29] vs. 40μg/l [23–98], p<0.001 for good vs. poor neurological outcome. S-100b was 0.127μg/l [0.063–0.360] vs. 0.772μg/l [0.121–2.710], p<0.001 and 0.086μg/l [0.061–0.122] vs. 0.138μg/l [0.090–0.271], p = 0.009, respectively. For mortality, thresholds of 36μg/l for NSE and 0.128μg/l for S-100b could be determined; for poor neurological outcome 33μg/l (NSE) and 0.123μg/l (S-100b), respectively. Positive predictive value for NSE was 81% (74–88) and 79% (71–85) for S-100b. Conclusions Thresholds for NSE and S-100b predicting mortality and poor neurological outcome are similar in OHCA patients receiving therapeutic hypothermia as in those reported before the era of hypothermia. However, both biomarkers do not have enough specificity to predict mortality or poor neurological outcome on their own and should only be additively used in clinical decision making.

Download Full-text

In-hospital cardiac arrests: effect of amended Australian Resuscitation Council 2006 guidelines

Australian Health Review ◽

10.1071/ah11112 ◽

2013 ◽

Vol 37 (2) ◽

pp. 178 ◽

Cited By ~ 4

Author(s):

Mary S. Boyde ◽

Michelle Padget ◽

Elizabeth Burmeister ◽

Leanne M. Aitken

Keyword(s):

Cardiac Arrest ◽

Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation ◽

Confidence Interval ◽

Clinical Outcomes ◽

Odds Ratio ◽

Life Support ◽

Study Phase ◽

Tertiary Referral Hospital ◽

Multiple Factors ◽

Hospital Cardiac Arrest

Objective To evaluate cardiac arrest outcomes following the introduction of the Australian Resuscitation Council (ARC) 2006 amended guidelines for basic and advanced life support. Methods A retrospective study of all consecutive cardiac arrests during a 3-year phase pre-implementation (2004–06) and a 3-year phase post-implementation (2007–09) of the ARC 2006 guidelines was conducted at a tertiary referral hospital in Brisbane, Australia. Results Over the 6-year study phase 690 cardiac arrests were reported. Resuscitation was attempted in 248 patients pre-implementation and 271 patients post-implementation of the ARC 2006 guidelines. After adjusting for significant prognostic factors we found no significant change in return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) (odds ratio 1.21, 95% confidence interval 0.80–1.85, P = 0.37) or survival to discharge (odds ratio 1.49, 95% confidence interval 0.94–2.37, P = 0.09) after the implementation of the ARC 2006 guidelines. Factors that remained significant in the final model for both outcomes included having an initial shockable rhythm, a shorter length of time from collapse to arrival of cardiac arrest team, location of the patient in a critical-care area, shorter length of resuscitation and a day-time arrest (0700–2259 hours). In addition the arrest being witnessed was significant for ROSC and younger age was significant for survival to discharge. Conclusions There are multiple factors that influence clinical outcomes following an in-hospital cardiac arrest and further research to refine these significant variables will assist in the future management of cardiac arrests. What is known about this topic? The evaluation of outcomes from in-hospital cardiac arrests focuses on immediate survival expressed as ROSC and survival to hospital discharge. These clinical outcomes have not improved substantially over the last two decades. What does this paper add? This paper identifies the factors that are related to ROSC and survival to discharge following the implementation of the ARC 2006 guidelines, which included a refocus on providing quality cardiopulmonary resuscitation with minimal interruptions. What are the implications for practitioners? Given that multiple factors can influence clinical outcomes following an in-hospital cardiac arrest, focusing on maximising a range of factors surrounding cardiopulmonary resuscitation is essential to improve outcomes.

Download Full-text

Abstract P62: Derangements in Blood Glucose Following Initial Resuscitation from In-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: A Report from the American Heart Association National Registry of Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation

Circulation ◽

10.1161/circ.118.suppl_18.s_1458-c ◽

2008 ◽

Vol 118 (suppl_18) ◽

Author(s):

David G Beiser ◽

Gordon E Carr ◽

Dana P Edelson ◽

Mary A Peberdy ◽

Terry L Vanden Hoek

Keyword(s):

Cardiac Arrest ◽

Blood Glucose ◽

Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation ◽

Hospital Discharge ◽

Heart Association ◽

Spontaneous Circulation ◽

National Registry ◽

Critically Ill Patient ◽

Diabetic Patients ◽

Hospital Cardiac Arrest

BACKGROUND: Hyperglycemia is associated with poor outcomes in a variety of critically-ill patient populations; however, little is known about the role of hyperglycemia in determining outcomes following in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA). METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of 17,800 adult in-hospital cardiac arrests from the National Registry of Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation. Minimum and maximum blood glucose values during the first 24 hours following return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) were examined. RESULTS: Glucose data from 3,226 patients were available for analysis. Post-ROSC maximum blood glucose values were markedly elevated in diabetic (median, 226 mg/dL, [IQR, 165 – 307 mg/dL)] as well as non-diabetic patients (176 mg/dL, 135 – 239 mg/dL). Survival to hospital discharge was higher in non-diabetics than diabetics (45.5% [95% CI, 43.3 – 47.6%] vs. 41.7% [95% CI, 38.9 –44.5%], p = 0.037). In non-diabetics, survival to hospital discharge varied significantly when stratified by glucose value with optimal survival odds occurring across a broad range of minimum (71 – 170 mg/dL) and maximum (111 – 240 mg/dL) glucose values. Cardiac arrest duration quartile was identified as a significant factor associated with the development of post-ROSC hypo- and hyperglycemia in non-diabetics. CONCLUSIONS: Derangements in blood glucose are common following IHCA in both diabetic and non-diabetic patients. Optimal survival odds occur across a relatively broad range of glucose values in non-diabetics; however, both hypo- and hyperglycemia are associated with worse outcomes and associated with longer arrest durations.

Download Full-text