scholarly journals Making health care responsive to the needs of older people

2019 ◽  
Vol 48 (6) ◽  
pp. 785-788 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jackie Bridges ◽  
Catherine Pope ◽  
Jeffrey Braithwaite

Abstract This commentary highlights the importance of health system responsiveness to older people living with complex health needs. Age-related changes and associated morbidity can present barriers to identifying an individual’s health needs, expectations, values and preferences, and so sufficient time, skill and resource is required to inform the development of a tailored plan for each individual. A focus on responsiveness moves thinking beyond the responsibilities of the individual clinician in the single encounter, and allows us to identify elements of the wider system that may constrain how well the clinician is able to respond. Setting the goal of responsive health care requires us to assess the suitability of wider health system features and processes for meeting the diverse needs of individual people throughout their journey, and the extent to which the system can adapt dynamically as needs change. Standardised approaches to care prescribed across organisations (such as time-based targets or routinised approaches to inpatient nursing care) are likely to result in low responsiveness as individual complexity grows, disadvantaging patients with needs that do not fit the prescribed approach. Responsiveness is high when individual practitioners and clinical teams have the resources, decentralised authority, flexibility and autonomy to provide the care required. Building a more responsive health system requires a greater understanding of how these conditions can be achieved.

2021 ◽  
Vol 45 ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
Emmanuel Gonzalez-Bautista ◽  
Patricia Morsch ◽  
Mallika Mathur ◽  
Angelo Goncalves Bos ◽  
Carolina Hommes ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Leila Doshmangir ◽  
Ahmad Ahmadi Teymourlouy ◽  
Parinaz Doshmangir ◽  
Rahim Khodayari-Zarnaq ◽  
Vladimir Gordeev

Abstract Introduction: Globally, the number and proportion of people aged 60 years and older is growing fast. As people age, health needs become more complex, and the health system responsiveness to older people's needs requires evidence-informed policies. This study explored the factors affecting the process of health policies development for older people in Iran. Methods: We reviewed and analysed policy documents related to health policies development for older people in Iran. We also conducted 32 interviewers with people aged 60 years and older and 21 interviews with key informants involved in policy-making related to older people. Qualitative data were analysed using thematic analysis.Findings: Actors and stakeholders, policy structure and selected health policy processes, the system of health care service delivery, government financial support, community and culture building are prominent factors that influence health policy-making for older people. Conclusion: To identify and implement effective policy options for older people, the Iranian health system needs to change its health policy-making approach for this target group. It requires a revision of existing structures and processes, timely planning and provision of a comprehensive range of quality services tailored to specific needs of older people, strengthening intersectoral cooperation and coordination to enable evidence-informed policies, facilitation and maintenance of health system responsiveness.


Author(s):  
Daniela C. Fuhr ◽  
Bayard Roberts ◽  
Aniek Woodward ◽  
Egbert Sondorp ◽  
Marit Sijbrandij ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wubshet Debebe Negash ◽  
Chalie Tadie Tsehay ◽  
Lake Yazachew ◽  
Desale Bihonegn Asmamaw ◽  
Dawit Zenamarkos Desta ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Health system responsiveness is defined as the outcome of designing health facility relationships in such a way that they are familiar and respond appropriately to patients’ universally legitimate expectations. Even though different strategies have been implemented to measure responsiveness, only scanty evidence exists in Sub-Saharan Africa. In Ethiopia information about the level of health system responsiveness among outpatients is scant. Assessing responsiveness could help facilities in improving service delivery based on patient expectations. Objective: The study aimed to assess health system responsiveness and associated factors among outpatients in primary health care facilities, Asagirt District, North Shewa Zone, Ethiopia, 2021. Methods: Facility-based cross-sectional quantitative study was implemented between 30th March and April 30/2021. A systematic random sampling technique was employed to select 423 participants, and interviewer-administered data were collected using a structured and pretested questionnaires. Both bivariable and multivariable logistic regressions were employed to identify factors that have an association with health system responsiveness. Adjusted Odds Ratio with their corresponding 95% CI was used to declare factors associated with health system responsiveness. A p-value less than 0.05 was used to declare statistical significance in this study. Results: The overall health system responsiveness was 66.2% (95% CI: 61.4% - 70.7%). Confidentiality and dignity domains were the highest responsiveness score. Health system responsiveness was higher among satisfied outpatients (AOR: 9.9, 95% CI: 5.11-19.46), utilized private clinics (AOR: 8.8, 95% CI: 4.32-18.25), and no transport cost (AOR: 1.7, 95% CI: 1.03-2.92) in the study setting. Conclusion: Overall health system responsiveness was higher as compared to other case-specific study in Ethiopia. The domains of Autonomy, Waiting time, Basic amenities, and Choice were identified as vital areas needing the effort to raise responsiveness of health care service in the District. HSR was higher in private than public healthcare facilities, among satisfied clients and those who didn’t pay for transport on their way to the health facility than their counterparts. Thus, enhancing patient satisfaction, using input from service users, Collaboration, and experience exchange between public and private facilities will be important interventions to improve HSR.


2021 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Gadija Khan ◽  
Nancy Kagwanja ◽  
Eleanor Whyle ◽  
Lucy Gilson ◽  
Sassy Molyneux ◽  
...  

Abstract Background The World Health Organisation framed responsiveness, fair financing and equity as intrinsic goals of health systems. However, of the three, responsiveness received significantly less attention. Responsiveness is essential to strengthen systems’ functioning; provide equitable and accountable services; and to protect the rights of citizens. There is an urgency to make systems more responsive, but our understanding of responsiveness is limited. We therefore sought to map existing evidence on health system responsiveness. Methods A mixed method systemized evidence mapping review was conducted. We searched PubMed, EbscoHost, and Google Scholar. Published and grey literature; conceptual and empirical publications; published between 2000 and 2020 and English language texts were included. We screened titles and abstracts of 1119 publications and 870 full texts. Results Six hundred twenty-one publications were included in the review. Evidence mapping shows substantially more publications between 2011 and 2020 (n = 462/621) than earlier periods. Most of the publications were from Europe (n = 139), with more publications relating to High Income Countries (n = 241) than Low-to-Middle Income Countries (n = 217). Most were empirical studies (n = 424/621) utilized quantitative methodologies (n = 232), while qualitative (n = 127) and mixed methods (n = 63) were more rare. Thematic analysis revealed eight primary conceptualizations of ‘health system responsiveness’, which can be fitted into three dominant categorizations: 1) unidirectional user-service interface; 2) responsiveness as feedback loops between users and the health system; and 3) responsiveness as accountability between public and the system. Conclusions This evidence map shows a substantial body of available literature on health system responsiveness, but also reveals evidential gaps requiring further development, including: a clear definition and body of theory of responsiveness; the implementation and effectiveness of feedback loops; the systems responses to this feedback; context-specific mechanism-implementation experiences, particularly, of LMIC and fragile-and conflict affected states; and responsiveness as it relates to health equity, minority and vulnerable populations. Theoretical development is required, we suggest separating ideas of services and systems responsiveness, applying a stronger systems lens in future work. Further agenda-setting and resourcing of bridging work on health system responsiveness is suggested.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document