IMpower131: Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) analysis of a randomised phase III study of atezolizumab + carboplatin + paclitaxel or nab-paclitaxel vs carboplatin + nab-paclitaxel in 1L advanced squamous NSCLC

Purpose There is no consensus on the optimal systemic treatment of patients with extranodal marginal zone lymphoma of mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue. The IELSG-19 phase III study, to our knowledge, was the first such study to address the question of first-line treatment in a randomized trial. Patients and Methods Eligible patients were initially randomly assigned (1:1 ratio) to receive either chlorambucil monotherapy (6 mg/m2/d orally on weeks 1 to 6, 9 to 10, 13 to 14, 17 to 18, and 21 to 22) or a combination of chlorambucil (same schedule as above) and rituximab (375 mg/m2 intravenously on day 1 of weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 9, 13, 17, and 21). After the planned enrollment of 252 patients, the protocol was amended to continue with a three-arm design (1:1:6 ratio), with a new arm that included rituximab alone (same schedule as the combination arm) and with a final sample size of 454 patients. The main end point was event-free survival (EFS). Analysis of chlorambucil versus the combination arm was performed and reported separately before any analysis of the third arm. Results At a median follow-up of 7.4 years, addition of rituximab to chlorambucil led to significantly better EFS (hazard ratio, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.38 to 0.77). EFS at 5 years was 51% (95% CI, 42 to 60) with chlorambucil alone, 50% (95% CI, 42 to 59) with rituximab alone, and 68% (95% CI, 60 to 76) with the combination ( P = .0009). Progression-free survival was also significantly better with the combination ( P = .0119). Five-year overall survival was approximately 90% in each arm. All treatments were well tolerated. No unexpected toxicities were recorded. Conclusion Rituximab in combination with chlorambucil demonstrated superior efficacy in mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue lymphoma; however, improvements in EFS and progression-free survival did not translate into longer overall survival.

Download Full-text

Randomized phase III study of gemcitabine and cisplatin (GC) versus dose dense methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin and cisplatin (DD-MVAC) in the perioperative setting for patients with locally advanced transitional cell cancer of the bladder: The French GETUG/AFU V05 VESPER trial.

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.2018.36.6_suppl.tps530 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 36 (6_suppl) ◽

pp. TPS530-TPS530 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Christian Pfister ◽

Gwenaelle Gravis ◽

Geraldine Pignot ◽

Aude Flechon ◽

Michel Soulie ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Overall Survival ◽

Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy ◽

Cell Cancer ◽

Transitional Cell ◽

Progression Free Survival ◽

Phase Iii ◽

Free Survival ◽

Cancer Of The Bladder ◽

Transitional Cell Cancer ◽

Phase Iii Study

TPS530 Background: Radical cystectomy remains the gold standard treatment for invasive non metastatic transitional cell cancer of the bladder. Perioperative chemotherapy (adjuvant ou neoadjuvant) has been developed to increase overall survival. However, the chemotherapy administration time and optimal chemotherapy regimen are not yet determined. As DD-MVAC has been shown to be associated with higher response rates in bladder metastatic disease, also a better efficacy can be suspected in the perioperative setting. Methods: We designed a randomized phase III study to compare the efficacy of GC and DD-MVAC in term of progression-free survival in patients for whom chemotherapy has been decided, before or after radical cystectomy (disease defined by a T2, T3 or T4a N0 M0 stadification for patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy or pT3 or pT4 or pN+ and M0 for patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy). Secondary endpoints include overall survival, side effects, response rate in the neoadjuvant setting. Main exclusion criteria were histological variants (pure adenocarcinoma or pure epidermoid carcinoma or pure or mixed small-cell neuro-endocrine carcinoma) and ventricular ejection fraction under 50%. The total number of patients projected was 500 based on the median progression-free survival rate of 50% at 3 years observed in patients treated with GC (standard arm A) in the perioperative setting. An absolute improvement of 10% (HR = 0.74) was expected with DD-MVAC (experimental arm B) with a = 0.05 and b = 0.20. In October 2017, 460 patients have been included. An interim analysis is planned after the occurrence of 174 events. With an estimated uniform accrual rate of 140 patients per year for 3.5 years and exponential survival, the final analysis is expected to occur 8 years after the start of the trial. Concomitant ancillary study has also started, focusing on the identification of subgroups for muscle invasive bladder tumors sensitivity to neoadjuvant chemotherapy, as suggested by the recent MDA classification. Clinical trial information: NCT 018 12369.

Download Full-text

Impact of the prior chemotherapy with two different fluoropyrimidines on the efficacy of CapeIRI or FOLFIRI in metastatic colorectal cancer: An exploratory analysis of the phase III AXEPT trial.

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.2019.37.4_suppl.711 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 37 (4_suppl) ◽

pp. 711-711

Author(s):

Tae Won Kim ◽

Kei Muro ◽

Rui-hua Xu ◽

Young Suk Park ◽

Wei Wang ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Overall Survival ◽

Progression Free Survival ◽

Exploratory Analysis ◽

Phase Iii ◽

Free Survival ◽

Prior Chemotherapy ◽

Oral Fluoropyrimidine ◽

Significant Difference ◽

Phase Iii Study ◽

The Impact

711 Background: Modified CapeIRI (irinotecan 200 mg/m2 on day 1, capecitabine 1600 mg/m2 on days 1–14 every 3 weeks) with or without bevacizumab (± BV) has shown non-inferiority of overall survival compared with FOLFIRI ± BV based on the phase III study, AXEPT, as second-line chemotherapy for patients with mCRC. In this exploratory analysis of the AXEPT trial, we evaluated the impact of the prior chemotherapy with two different fluoropyrimidine backbones (fluorouracil and leucovorin vs oral fluoropyrimidine) on the efficacy of CapeIRI and FOLFIRI. Methods: Patients were randomized to receive standard FOLFIRI ± bevacizumab or modified CapeIRI ± bevacizumab after failure to fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy in the AXEPT study. Prior fluoropyrimidine backbones were categorized into oral fluoropyrimidine-based (eg, capecitabine or S-1) regimen (oral 5-FU group) and fluorouracil and leucovorin-based regimen (infusional 5-FU group). Assessed endpoints included overall survival, progression-free survival, response rate, and safety. Results: Prior fluoropyrimidine backbone was available for 642 patients among all 650 randomized patients (oral 5-FU group in 291, and infusional 5-FU group in 351). Median overall survival was 17.0 and 16.7 months for FOLFIRI ± BV and CapeIRI ± BV in the prior oral 5-FU group, and 14.9 and 16.7 months for FOLFIRI ± BV and CapeIRI ± BV in the prior infusional 5-FU group. Median progression-free survival was 7.9 and 8.6 months for FOLFIRI ± BV and CapeIRI ± BV in the prior oral 5-FU group, and 6.8 and 8.3 months for FOLFIRI ± BV and CapeIRI ± BV in the prior infusional 5-FU group. Conclusions: There was no significant difference in the efficacy of CapeIRI or FOLFIRI regardless of prior fluoropyrimidine backbones. Therefore, CapeIRI ± BV could also be effective for patients after failure of oral fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy (eg, CapeOX ± BV). Clinical trial information: NCT01996306. [Table: see text]

Download Full-text

Gemcitabine Plus Cisplatin Versus Fluorouracil Plus Cisplatin as First-Line Therapy for Recurrent or Metastatic Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: Final Overall Survival Analysis of GEM20110714 Phase III Study

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.21.00396 ◽

2021 ◽

pp. JCO.21.00396

Author(s):

Shaodong Hong ◽

Yaxiong Zhang ◽

Gengsheng Yu ◽

Peijian Peng ◽

Jiewen Peng ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Overall Survival ◽

Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma ◽

Progression Free Survival ◽

Hazard Ratio ◽

Phase Iii ◽

Once Daily ◽

Free Survival ◽

End Point ◽

Metastatic Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma ◽

Phase Iii Study

PURPOSE GEM20110714 (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01528618 ), the first randomized, phase III study of systemic chemotherapy in recurrent or metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC), reported significant progression-free survival improvement with gemcitabine plus cisplatin (GP) versus fluorouracil plus cisplatin (FP; hazard ratio, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.44 to 0.68; P < .001). Data from the final analysis of overall survival (OS) are presented here. METHODS From February 2012 to October 2015, 362 patients were randomly assigned to receive either GP (gemcitabine 1 g/m2 once daily on days 1 and 8 and cisplatin 80 mg/m2 once daily on day 1; n = 181) or FP (fluorouracil 4 g/m2 in continuous intravenous infusion over 96 hours and cisplatin 80 mg/m2 once daily on day 1; n = 181) once every 21 days. The primary end point was progression-free survival, which has been previously reported; OS was a secondary end point. RESULTS After a median follow-up time of 69.5 months with GP and 69.7 months with FP, 148 (81.8%) and 166 (91.7%) deaths occurred in the GP and FP arms, respectively. The estimated hazard ratio for OS was 0.72 (95% CI, 0.58 to 0.90; two-sided P = .004). The median OS was 22.1 months (95% CI, 19.2 to 25.0 months) with GP versus 18.6 months (95% CI, 15.4 to 21.7 months) with FP. The OS probabilities at 1, 3, and 5 years were 79.9% versus 71.8%, 31.0% versus 20.4%, and 19.2% versus 7.8%, respectively. Poststudy therapy was administered in 51.9% and 55.2% of patients in the GP and FP arms, respectively. CONCLUSION Among patients with previously untreated advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma, those who receive GP have longer OS than those receive FP. Gemcitabine plus cisplatin should be considered a preferred front-line option for these patients.

Download Full-text

A multicenter randomized phase III study for newly diagnosed maximally resected glioblastoma comparing carmustine wafer implantation followed by chemoradiotherapy with temozolomide with chemoradiotherapy alone; Japan Clinical Oncology Group Study JCOG1703 (MACS study)

Japanese Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1093/jjco/hyz169 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 49 (12) ◽

pp. 1172-1175

Author(s):

Tomohiro Kadota ◽

Ryuta Saito ◽

Toshihiro Kumabe ◽

Junki Mizusawa ◽

Hiroshi Katayama ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Overall Survival ◽

Progression Free Survival ◽

Phase Iii ◽

Newly Diagnosed ◽

Phase Iii Trial ◽

Free Survival ◽

Carmustine Wafer ◽

Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma ◽

Secondary Endpoints ◽

Phase Iii Study

Abstract A randomized phase III trial in Japan commenced in June 2019. The present standard treatment for newly diagnosed glioblastoma is maximal resection followed by chemoradiotherapy with temozolomide. The purpose of this study is to confirm the superiority of maximal resection with carmustine wafer implantation followed by chemoradiotherapy with temozolomide over the standard maximal resection followed by chemoradiotherapy with temozolomide in terms of overall survival for newly diagnosed glioblastoma. A total of 250 patients will be accrued from 35 Japanese institutions in 5.5 years. Patients with >90% surgical resection will be registered and randomly assigned to each group with 1:1 allocation. The primary endpoint is overall survival and the secondary endpoints are progression-free survival, loco-regional progression-free survival and incidence of adverse events. This trial has been registered in the Japan Registry of Clinical Trial, as jRCT1031190035 [https://jrct.niph.go.jp/en-latest-detail/jRCT1031190035].

Download Full-text

METRIC phase III study: Efficacy of trametinib (T), a potent and selective MEK inhibitor (MEKi), in progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) compared with chemotherapy (C) in patients (pts) with BRAFV600/k mutant advanced or metastatic melanoma (MM).

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.2012.30.15_suppl.lba8509 ◽

2012 ◽

Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽

pp. LBA8509-LBA8509

Author(s):

Caroline Robert ◽

Keith T. Flaherty ◽

Peter Hersey ◽

Paul D. Nathan ◽

Claus Garbe ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Overall Survival ◽

Metastatic Melanoma ◽

Progression Free Survival ◽

Mek Inhibitor ◽

Phase Iii ◽

Daily News ◽

Free Survival ◽

Online Supplement ◽

Phase Iii Study ◽

Final Text

LBA8509 The full, final text of this abstract will be available at abstract.asco.org at 12:01 AM (EDT) on Monday, June 4, 2012, and in the Annual Meeting Proceedings online supplement to the June 20, 2012, issue of Journal of Clinical Oncology. Onsite at the Meeting, this abstract will be printed in the Monday edition of ASCO Daily News.

Download Full-text

AMEERA-5: A randomized, double-blind phase III study of amcenestrant (SAR439859) + palbociclib versus letrozole + palbociclib for previously untreated ER+/HER2- advanced breast cancer.

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.2021.39.15_suppl.tps1104 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽

pp. TPS1104-TPS1104

Author(s):

Aditya Bardia ◽

Javier Cortes ◽

Sara A. Hurvitz ◽

Suzette Delaloge ◽

Hiroji Iwata ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Breast Cancer ◽

Estrogen Receptor ◽

Phase I ◽

Advanced Breast Cancer ◽

Progression Free Survival ◽

Advanced Breast ◽

Phase Iii ◽

Double Blind ◽

Free Survival ◽

Phase Iii Study

TPS1104 Background: Selective estrogen receptor degraders (SERDs) block estrogen receptor (ER) associated signaling and have created interest for treating patients (pts) with advanced ER+ breast cancer (BC). Fulvestrant is currently the only SERD available for advanced BC but requires intramuscular administration, limiting the applied dose, exposure and receptor engagement. Amcenestrant (SAR439859) is an oral SERD that binds with high affinity to both wild-type and mutant ER, blocking estradiol binding and promoting up to 98% ER degradation in preclinical studies. In the phase I AMEERA-1 study of pretreated pts with ER+/HER2- advanced BC, amcenestrant 150–600 mg once daily (QD) showed a mean ER occupancy of 94% with plasma concentrations > 100 ng/mL and a favorable safety profile (Bardia, 2019; data on file). Combination therapy with amcenestrant + palbociclib (palbo) was also evaluated as part of this ongoing phase I study. CDK 4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) combined with an aromatase inhibitor (AI), the gold standard for first line treatment for advanced breast cancer, prolong progression free survival (PFS) in pts with no prior treatment for ER+/HER2- advanced BC, but OS benefit has not been shown yet in postmenopausal pts. There remains a clinical need for more effective treatments in this setting. Methods: AMEERA-5 (NCT04478266) is an ongoing, prospective, randomized, double-blind phase III study comparing the efficacy and safety of amcenestrant + palbo with that of letrozole + palbo in pts with advanced, locoregional recurrent or metastatic ER+/HER2- BC who have not received prior systemic therapy for advanced disease. The study includes men, pre/peri-menopausal (with goserelin) and post-menopausal women. Pts with progression during or within 12 months of (neo)adjuvant endocrine therapy using any of the following agents are excluded: AI, selective estrogen receptor modulators, CDK4/6i. Pts are randomized 1:1 to either continuous amcenestrant 200 mg or letrozole 2.5 mg QD orally with matching placebos; both combined with palbo 125 mg QD orally (d1–21 every 28-d cycle). Randomization is stratified according to disease type (de novo metastatic vs recurrent disease), the presence of visceral metastasis, and menopausal status. The primary endpoint is investigator assessed progression free survival (PFS) (RECIST v1.1). Secondary endpoints are overall survival, PFS2, objective response rate, duration of response, clinical benefit rate, pharmacokinetics of amcenestrant and palbo, health-related quality of life, time to chemotherapy, and safety. Biomarkers will be measured in paired tumor biopsies and cell free deoxyribonucleic acid (cfDNA) over time. Target enrolment = 1066 pts; enrolment as of 1/2021 = 33 pts. Bardia A, et al., J Clin Oncol. 2019; 37 (15 suppl):1054 Clinical trial information: NCT04478266 .

Download Full-text

Once-a-Week Versus Once-Every-3-Weeks Cisplatin Chemoradiation for Locally Advanced Head and Neck Cancer: A Phase III Randomized Noninferiority Trial

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.2017.74.9457 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 36 (11) ◽

pp. 1064-1072 ◽

Cited By ~ 78

Author(s):

Vanita Noronha ◽

Amit Joshi ◽

Vijay Maruti Patil ◽

Jaiprakash Agarwal ◽

Sarbani Ghosh-Laskar ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Overall Survival ◽

Head And Neck ◽

Locally Advanced ◽

Progression Free Survival ◽

Phase Iii ◽

Absolute Difference ◽

Comparable Efficacy ◽

Advanced Head ◽

Adjuvant Setting ◽

Free Survival

Purpose Chemoradiation with cisplatin 100 mg/m2 given once every 3 weeks is the standard of care in locally advanced head and neck squamous cell cancer (LAHNSCC). Increasingly, low-dose once-a-week cisplatin is substituted because of perceived lower toxicity and convenience. However, there is no level 1 evidence of comparable efficacy to cisplatin once every 3 weeks. Patients and Methods In this phase III randomized trial, we assessed the noninferiority of cisplatin 30 mg/m2 given once a week compared with cisplatin 100 mg/m2 given once every 3 weeks, both administered concurrently with curative intent radiotherapy in patients with LAHNSCC. The primary end point was locoregional control (LRC); secondary end points included toxicity, compliance, response, progression-free survival, and overall survival. Results Between 2013 and 2017, we randomly assigned 300 patients, 150 to each arm. Two hundred seventy-nine patients (93%) received chemoradiotherapy in the adjuvant setting. At a median follow-up of 22 months, the estimated cumulative 2-year LRC rate was 58.5% in the once-a-week arm and 73.1% in the once-every-3-weeks arm, leading to an absolute difference of 14.6% (95% CI, 5.7% to 23.5%); P = .014; hazard ratio (HR), 1.76 (95% CI, 1.11 to 2.79). Acute toxicities of grade 3 or higher occurred in 71.6% of patients in the once-a-week arm and in 84.6% of patients in the once-every-3-weeks arm ( P = .006). Estimated median progression-free survival in the once-a-week arm was 17.7 months (95% CI, 0.42 to 35.05 months) and in the once-every-3-weeks arm, 28.6 months (95% CI, 15.90 to 41.30 months); HR, 1.24 (95% CI, 0.89 to 1.73); P = .21. Estimated median overall survival in the once-a-week arm was 39.5 months and was not reached in the once-every-3-weeks arm (HR, 1.14 [95% CI, 0.79 to 1.65]; P = .48). Conclusion Once-every-3-weeks cisplatin at 100 mg/m2 resulted in superior LRC, albeit with more toxicity, than did once-a-week cisplatin at 30 mg/m2, and should remain the preferred chemoradiotherapy regimen for LAHNSCC in the adjuvant setting.

Download Full-text

Phase III Trial of Infusional Fluorouracil, Leucovorin, Oxaliplatin, and Irinotecan (FOLFOXIRI) Compared With Infusional Fluorouracil, Leucovorin, and Irinotecan (FOLFIRI) As First-Line Treatment for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: The Gruppo Oncologico Nord Ovest

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.2006.09.0928 ◽

2007 ◽

Vol 25 (13) ◽

pp. 1670-1676 ◽

Cited By ~ 735

Author(s):

Alfredo Falcone ◽

Sergio Ricci ◽

Isa Brunetti ◽

Elisabetta Pfanner ◽

Giacomo Allegrini ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Colorectal Cancer ◽

Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽

Progression Free Survival ◽

Phase Iii ◽

Peripheral Neurotoxicity ◽

Phase Iii Trial ◽

Free Survival ◽

Secondary Resection ◽

Phase Iii Study ◽

Grade 3

Purpose The Gruppo Oncologico Nord Ovest (GONO) conducted a phase III study comparing fluorouracil, leucovorin, oxaliplatin, and irinotecan (FOLFOXIRI [irinotecan 165 mg/m2 day 1, oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2 day 1, leucovorin 200 mg/m2 day 1, fluorouracil 3,200 mg/m2 48-hour continuous infusion starting on day 1, every 2 weeks]) with infusional fluorouracil, leucovorin, and irinotecan (FOLFIRI). Methods Selection criteria included unresectable metastatic colorectal cancer, age 18 to 75 years, and no prior chemotherapy for advanced disease. The primary end point was response rate (RR). Results A total of 244 patients were randomly assigned. An increase of grade 2 to 3 peripheral neurotoxicity (0% v 19%; P < .001), and grade 3 to 4 neutropenia (28% v 50%; P < .001) were observed in the FOLFOXIRI arm. The incidence of febrile neutropenia (3% v 5%) and grade 3 to 4 diarrhea (12% v 20%) were not significantly different. Responses, as assessed by investigators, were, for FOLFIRI and FOLFOXIRI, respectively, complete, 6% and 8%; and partial, 35% and 58%, (RR, 41% v 66%; P = .0002). RR confirmed by an external panel was 34% versus 60% (P < .0001). The R0 secondary resection rate of metastases was greater in the FOLFOXIRI arm (6% v 15%; P = .033, among all 244 patients; and 12% v 36%; P = .017 among patients with liver metastases only). Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were both significantly improved in the FOLFOXIRI arm (median PFS, 6.9 v 9.8 months; hazard ratio [HR], 0.63; P = .0006; median OS, 16.7 v 22.6 months; HR, 0.70; P = .032). Conclusion The FOLFOXIRI regimen improves RR, PFS, and OS compared with FOLFIRI, with an increased, but manageable, toxicity in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer with favorable prognostic characteristics. Further studies of FOLFOXIRI in combination with targeted agents and in the neoadjuvant setting are warranted.

Download Full-text