scholarly journals Analysis of the efficacy of naloxegol in a real-world 12 weeks of follow-up study, in patients with cancer and opioid-induced constipation with laxative-inadequate response

2019 ◽  
Vol 30 ◽  
pp. v740
Author(s):  
M. Cobo Dols ◽  
M.D.C. Beato Zambrano ◽  
L. Cabezón Gutiérrez ◽  
R. Chicas Sett ◽  
I. Blancas ◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e24155-e24155
Author(s):  
Manuel Cobo Dols ◽  
Carmen Beato ◽  
Luis Cabezon-Gutierrez ◽  
Rodolfo Chicas Sett ◽  
Isabel Blancas ◽  
...  

e24155 Background: Naloxegol is a peripherally acting, µ-opioid receptor antagonist for treatment of opioid-induced constipation (OIC). The main objective of this study was to analyze the efficacy and safety of naloxegol in patients with cancer in a real-world 12-month follow-up study. Methods: An observational prospective study was conducted in 16 Spanish centers. Patients older than 18 years, with active oncological disease who were under treatment with opioids for pain control and Karnofsky ≥ 50 were selected. OIC with inadequate response to treatment with laxative (s) was the main diagnostic. All the patients received treatment with naloxegol according to clinical criteria. Efficacy was measured by the response rate and symptoms evolution measured by means of PAC-SYM questionnaire. Intensity of pain was measured by a 0-10-point visual analogue scale (VAS). Intent to treat last observation carried forward was applied. Results: A total of 126 patients were included in the study. About 58.7% were men, with a mean age of 61.5 years (34-89). Lung cancer was observed in 35.7%, breast cancer in 16.7%, 10.3% digestive cancer and 8.7% had prostate cancer. About 67.5% had metastases. Naloxegol at doses of 25 mg/day was administered to 88.1% and with concomitant laxatives in 48.4%. At 12 months, 77.8% of the patients were responders to naloxegol treatment: 78.6% at doses of 12.5 mg/day, and 78.4% with 25 mg/day. Furthermore, response was observed in 78.5% of patients without concomitant laxative treatment and 77% of patients with any concomitant laxative. PAC-SYM total score and all the dimensions improved from baseline (p < 0.0001). VAS pain intensity was reduced and controlled from baseline onwards (Baseline-12 months: 4.6 to 3.6, p < 0.001). A total of 28 adverse reactions mainly gastrointestinal were observed in 15.1% of the patients (19/126), 75% (21) mild, 17.9% (5) moderate and 7.1% (2) severe. Most adverse reactions (67.9%) were observed the first 15 days of treatment with naloxegol. Conclusions: The results of this first real-world-data study in patients with cancer confirm the long-term efficacy of naloxegol for the treatment of OIC in this group of patients. Naloxegol is safe and well tolerated in patients with cancer while maintaining pain control.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amador Priede ◽  
Noelia Rodríguez‐Pérez ◽  
Fernando Hoyuela ◽  
Patricia Cordero‐Andrés ◽  
Olga Umaran‐Alfageme ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 196-203 ◽  
Author(s):  
Diego Ángeles‐Sistac ◽  
Alexandra Martin‐Onraet ◽  
Patricia Cornejo‐Juárez ◽  
Patricia Volkow ◽  
Carolina Pérez‐Jimenez ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
pp. bmjspcare-2020-002249
Author(s):  
Manuel Cobo Dols ◽  
Carmen Beato Zambrano ◽  
Luis Cabezón Gutiérrez ◽  
Rodolfo Chicas Sett ◽  
María Isabel Blancas López-Barajas ◽  
...  

ObjectivesOpioid-induced constipation (OIC) can affect up to 63% of all patients with cancer. The objectives of this study were to assess quality of life as well as efficacy and safety of naloxegol, in patients with cancer with OIC.MethodsAn observational study was made of a cohort of patients with cancer and with OIC exhibiting an inadequate response to laxatives and treated with naloxegol. The sample consisted of adult outpatients with a Karnofsky performance status score ≥50. The Patient Assessment of Constipation Quality of Life Questionnaire (PAC-QOL) and the Patient Assessment of Constipation Symptoms (PAC-SYM) were applied for 3 months.ResultsA total of 126 patients (58.2% males) with a mean age of 61.3 years (range 34–89) were included. Clinically relevant improvements (>0.5 points) were recorded in the PAC-QOL and PAC-SYM questionnaires (p<0.0001) from 15 days of treatment. The number of days a week with complete spontaneous bowel movements increased significantly (p<0.0001) from 2.4 to 4.6 on day 15, 4.7 after 1 month and 5 after 3 months. Pain control significantly improved (p<0.0001) during follow-up. A total of 13.5% of the patients (17/126) presented some gastrointestinal adverse reaction, mostly of mild (62.5%) or moderate intensity (25%).ConclusionsClinically relevant improvements in OIC-related quality of life, number of bowel movements and constipation-related symptoms were recorded as early as after 15 days of treatment with naloxegol in patients with cancer and OIC, with a good safety profile.


2019 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
pp. 105-115 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christel Bruggmann ◽  
Juan F. Iglesias ◽  
Marianne Gex-Fabry ◽  
Rachel Fesselet ◽  
Pierre Vogt ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 15 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S392-S392
Author(s):  
B Bokemeyer ◽  
N Picker ◽  
T Wilke ◽  
L Rosin ◽  
H Patel

Abstract Background Therapeutic management of Ulcerative Colitis (UC) is challenging, and clinicians are often obliged to attempt a variety of therapies in sequence until an adequate clinical response is achieved. However, real-world data regarding response rates in UC treatment are rare, particularly for later lines of therapy. Thus, this study aimed to investigate the incidence of inadequate response to advanced therapies in patients with UC. Methods This retrospective study was based on claims data from a regional German sickness fund covering the period from 01/2014-06/2019. Patients were included if they had at least two outpatient diagnoses in two different quarters or one inpatient diagnosis of UC (ICD-10: K51) and started a newly introduced advanced therapy (adalimumab, golimumab, infliximab, tofacitinib, vedolizumab) in 01/2015-06/2019. Patients were followed from treatment initiation (index date) until the end of the study period or loss to follow-up (median = 23.4 months). Proxies of inadequate response included: discontinuation (a supply gap of &gt;60 days), switch, escalation (as dose increase exceeding 1.5 times the recommended maintenance dose), augmentation with 5-ASA, corticosteroid (CS) dependency (two CS prescriptions were observed starting more than 14 weeks after the index date), UC-related hospitalization, or UC-related surgery. CS dependency and treatment escalation were only assessed in the maintenance phase. Inadequate response in the analyzed sample was evaluated by means of Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. Results Among 574 UC patients (median age: 39 years; female: 53.5%), in whom an advanced therapy was initiated, 458 (79.8%) received an anti-TNF therapy, 113 (19.7%) vedolizumab and 3 (0.5%) tofacitinib. According to the available baseline period, 72 (12.4%) patients were identified as biologic-experienced. Most patients received CS (86.4%) and/or 5-aminosalicylic acids (81.7%) in the 12-month pre-index period. The median time to inadequate response to the initiated advanced therapy was 4.8 months (IQR: 2.6-11.9; Figure 1) with an inadequate response over 12 months in 75% (Figure 2). There was no significant difference in median time to inadequate response between biologic-naïve and biologic-experienced patients (4.9 vs. 4.7 months; p-value = 0.285). During the observable follow-up period, 172 (61%) patients switched from their index agent to another advanced therapy. Conclusion From the real-world settings in Germany, we found an inadequate response in UC-patients starting an advanced therapy in 75% of patients over 12 months. There is a need for more effective therapies among these patients.


2021 ◽  
pp. 102917
Author(s):  
Kotaro Hatta ◽  
Shigemasa Katayama ◽  
Takuya Ishizuka ◽  
Yasuhiko Sudo ◽  
Mitsuru Nakamura ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
pp. 001316442092656
Author(s):  
Yutian T. Thompson ◽  
Hairong Song ◽  
Dexin Shi ◽  
Zhengkui Liu

Conventional approaches for selecting a reference indicator (RI) could lead to misleading results in testing for measurement invariance (MI). Several newer quantitative methods have been available for more rigorous RI selection. However, it is still unknown how well these methods perform in terms of correctly identifying a truly invariant item to be an RI. Thus, Study 1 was designed to address this issue in various conditions using simulated data. As a follow-up, Study 2 further investigated the advantages/disadvantages of using RI-based approaches for MI testing in comparison with non-RI-based approaches. Altogether, the two studies provided a solid examination on how RI matters in MI tests. In addition, a large sample of real-world data was used to empirically compare the uses of the RI selection methods as well as the RI-based and non-RI-based approaches for MI testing. In the end, we offered a discussion on all these methods, followed by suggestions and recommendations for applied researchers.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document