A - 23 Confirmatory Factor Analysis of the Concussion Profile (CP) Screen

2021 ◽  
Vol 36 (4) ◽  
pp. 663-663
Author(s):  
Preszler J ◽  
Elbin RJ ◽  
Eagle S ◽  
Collins MW ◽  
Kontos AP
Keyword(s):  
Factor Model ◽  
Five Factor Model ◽  
Weighted Least Squares ◽  
A Priori ◽  
Second Order ◽  
Order Structure ◽  
Model Parameters ◽  
Cognitive Fatigue ◽  
Confirmatory Factor Analyses ◽  
Confirmatory Factor

Abstract Objective The Concussion Profile (CP)-screen is intended to assess symptom domains of concussion, including migraine, vestibular, ocular, mood/anxiety, and cognitive/fatigue domains. The CP-screen was developed to develop more targeted management by identifying presentation profiles. The hypothesized profile structure of the CP-screen has not yet been psychometrically validated. An a priori five-factor structure (migraine; vestibular; ocular; mood/anxiety; cognitive/fatigue) was hypothesized. Methods Three-hundred twenty-three patients (age M = 15.62 ± 4.03 years, 59% male; 74% sport-related) seen within 30 days of concussion (M = 7.58 ± 6.10 days) completed a medical history clinical interview and the CP-screen at their first clinical visit. Multiple confirmatory factor analyses (CFAs) of CP-screen items were estimated (using robust weighted least squares estimation). Results A CFA was completed for each factor separately and then a five-factor CFA was estimated. Model fit was evaluated using the Comparative Fit Index [CFI], Tucker-Lewis Index [TLI], Root Mean Square Error of Approximation [RMSEA], and inspection of model parameters (i.e., loadings, residuals, & factor correlations). The five-factor model had excellent fit, but factor correlations indicated a second-order model was more appropriate. Thus, the final CFA included a five-factor first-order structure, with migraine, ocular, and cognitive/fatigue factors loading onto a second-order factor. All models had good fit (CFI >0.965; TLI > 0.96; RMSEA <0.072), and all loadings were significant and substantial (>0.63). Conclusions This is the first study to provide psychometric support for the profile structure of the CP-screen. These results also provide support for using these profiles to help target management of those with concussions.

Old Wine in New Bottles? The Case of Self–Compassion and Neuroticism

2017 ◽  
Vol 31 (2) ◽  
pp. 160-169 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christian Kandler ◽  
Stefan Pfattheicher ◽  
Mattis Geiger ◽  
Johanna Hartung ◽  
Selina Weiss ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Life Satisfaction ◽  
Factor Model ◽  
Five Factor Model ◽  
Confirmatory Factor Analyses ◽  
Personality Psychology ◽  
Self Compassion ◽  
Negative Factor ◽  
Confirmatory Factor ◽  
Compassion Scale ◽  
Positive Factor

Research on self–compassion, which is defined as being understanding and kind to oneself when confronted with negative experiences, has produced an impressive number of articles in recent years. This research shows that individual differences in self–compassion, as measured by the Self–Compassion Scale (SCS), are positively related to life satisfaction, health and social functioning. However, a critical and systematic test of self–compassion from a personality perspective has not yet conducted so far. In the present study ( N = 576), we (i) tested the factor structure of the SCS, (ii) examined the distinctiveness of self–compassion with regard to the five–factor model of personality, focusing on neuroticism, and (iii) tested the incremental predictive power of self–compassion beyond the five–factor model in the context of life satisfaction. Confirmatory factor analyses supported a two–factor plus six facets solution of self–compassion (a positive factor and a negative factor). Additional analyses revealed that the negative factor was redundant with facets of neuroticism ( rs ≥ .85), whereas the positive factor had some unique variance left. However, neither the negative factor nor the positive factor could explain substantial incremental variance in life satisfaction beyond neuroticism. Recommendations for how to use the SCS are provided, and the future of research on self–compassion is discussed. Copyright © 2017 European Association of Personality Psychology

Measurement invariance of personality traits from a five-factor model perspective: multi-group confirmatory factor analyses of the HP5 inventory

2008 ◽  
Vol 49 (5) ◽  
pp. 459-467 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. PETTER GUSTAVSSON ◽  
ANNA-KARIN ERIKSSON ◽  
AGNETA HILDING ◽  
MATTIAS GUNNARSSON ◽  
CLAES-GÖRAN ÖSTENSSON
Keyword(s):  
Personality Traits ◽  
Measurement Invariance ◽  
Factor Model ◽  
Five Factor Model ◽  
Factor Analyses ◽  
Confirmatory Factor Analyses ◽  
Confirmatory Factor

Initial Validation of a Math Progress Monitoring Measure for Prekindergarten Students

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (8) ◽  
pp. 1014-1032
Author(s):  
Mike A. Assel ◽  
Janelle J. Montroy ◽  
Jeffrey M. Williams ◽  
Matt Foster ◽  
Susan H. Landry ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Progress Monitoring ◽  
Factor Model ◽  
Five Factor Model ◽  
Internal Consistency Reliability ◽  
Confirmatory Factor Analyses ◽  
Confirmatory Factor ◽  
Development Evaluation ◽  
Test Retest Reliability ◽  
Prekindergarten Students

Given the importance of math in today’s society, it is critical that children who are at risk for math difficulty are identified early. We developed and validated a prekindergarten math subtest (i.e., CIRCLE Progress Monitoring [CPM] Math Subtest). This teacher-completed measure evaluates domains considered important for later math development. Evaluation of validity was undertaken in a longitudinal sample of 383 children ( Mage = 4.9 years), and a follow-up sample of 3,691 children ( Mage = 4.4 years). The measure demonstrated adequate psychometric properties, including strong internal consistency reliability (α = .94) and test–retest reliability ( r = .78). Evaluation of concurrent and predictive validity demonstrated scores on the CPM Math Subtest were correlated with scores on other assessments at high levels ( rs from .55–.65). Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses revealed that the subtest conforms to a well-defined five-factor model that parallels areas considered to be important in the math literature.

Reliability and Factor Structure in an Adolescent Sample of the Dutch 20-Item Toronto Alexithymia Scale

2012 ◽  
Vol 111 (2) ◽  
pp. 393-404 ◽  
Author(s):  
Reitske Meganck ◽  
Samuel Markey ◽  
Stijn Vanheule
Keyword(s):  
Factor Model ◽  
Age Groups ◽  
Second Order ◽  
Confirmatory Factor Analyses ◽  
Toronto Alexithymia Scale ◽  
Younger Age ◽  
Confirmatory Factor ◽  
Adolescent Sample ◽  
Order Factor ◽  
Tas 20

This study investigated the psychometric properties of the 20-item Toronto Alexithymia Scale (TAS–20) in an adolescent sample ( N = 406, ages 12 to 17). This is rarely done even though the TAS–20 is used in adolescent research. Five published factor models were tested. For good fitting models, a second-order model with alexithymia as a higher-order factor and metric invariance across sex and age groups was tested. Confirmatory factor analyses showed that the original three-factor model and a four-factor model provided acceptable fit. Both models were invariant across sex, but not across age. Second-order models did not provide good fit. Reliability was good for the “Difficulty identifying feelings” subscale and acceptable for the “Difficulty describing feelings” subscale, but not for the “Externally oriented thinking” subscale. Measuring alexithymia with the TAS–20 in adolescents thus seems problematic, especially in younger age groups.

scholarly journals Development and Validation of the Moral Disengagement in Sport Scale

2007 ◽  
Vol 29 (5) ◽  
pp. 608-628 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ian D. Boardley ◽  
Maria Kavussanu
Keyword(s):  
Moral Disengagement ◽  
Discriminant Validity ◽  
Team Sports ◽  
Second Order ◽  
Order Structure ◽  
Confirmatory Factor Analyses ◽  
Convergent And Discriminant Validity ◽  
Confirmatory Factor ◽  
Factor Study ◽  
Development And Validation

A sport-specific measure of moral disengagement was developed in 2 studies. In Study 1, a 59-item questionnaire was developed and tested with 308 athletes from 5 team sports. A series of confirmatory factor analyses (CFA) testing different models suggested the model that best fitted the data had 6 first-order factors that could be represented by 1 second-order factor. Study 2 involved 305 athletes from the same 5 sports. CFA confirmed the 6-factor, second-order structure for the final 32-item measure. Results from Study 2 supported the construct validity of the scale, providing evidence for the factorial, concurrent, convergent, and discriminant validity. The Moral Disengagement in Sport Scale (MDSS) is proposed as a valid and reliable measure of moral disengagement for use in the sport context.

Use of the Sport Orientation Questionnaire with Wheelchair Athletes: Examination of Evidence for Validity

2002 ◽  
Vol 95 (1) ◽  
pp. 197-207 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. K. Skordilis ◽  
C. Sherrill ◽  
A. Yilla ◽  
D. Koutsouki ◽  
N. A. Stavrou
Keyword(s):  
Factor Analysis ◽  
Goal Orientation ◽  
Factor Model ◽  
Five Factor Model ◽  
Evidence Theory ◽  
Confirmatory Factor Analyses ◽  
Wheelchair Athletes ◽  
Confirmatory Factor ◽  
The Usa ◽  
Sport Orientation

The factor structure of the Sport Orientation Questionnaire with three factors of competitiveness, win orientation, and goal orientation was examined in a sample of 243 wheelchair athletes from the USA. Based on sample-specific validity evidence theory, it was hypothesized that the exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses would yield evidence on validity for wheelchair athletes who were different from able-bodied athletes. Exploratory factor analysis confirmed the hypothesis with a clear fourth and a questionable fifth factor. A confirmatory factor analysis did not adequately explain the new five-factor model. The new emerging fourth and fifth factors separated the competitiveness element of the questionnaire in ‘self-referenced’ and ‘other-referenced’ elements of competitiveness. Results are discussed in terms of demographic characteristics of the sample of wheelchair athletes.

Factor Analysis of Cognitions during Running: Association with Mood Change

1993 ◽  
Vol 15 (4) ◽  
pp. 375-389 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kathryn T. Goode ◽  
David L. Roth
Keyword(s):  
Interpersonal Relationships ◽  
Factor Model ◽  
Five Factor Model ◽  
Strenuous Exercise ◽  
Confirmatory Factor Analyses ◽  
Significant Relationships ◽  
Running Activity ◽  
Confirmatory Factor ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Thought Patterns

Experienced runners completed a Thoughts During Running Scale (TORS) immediately after a typical training run to assess the prevalence of certain thoughts during running. The Profile of Mood States (POMS) was also completed before and after the run. Confirmatory factor analyses revealed that a five-factor model provided better fit than simpler models. Items concerning the demands of the running activity and the monitoring of body responses loaded on one "associative" factor. The four "nonassociative" factors in this model were labeled Daily Events, Interpersonal Relationships, External Surroundings, and Spiritual Reflection. Correlational analyses indicated small but significant relationships between the TDRS dimensions and changes in mood. Increases in vigor were correlated with the tendency to engage in nonassociative thought, and decreases in tension and anxiety were found among those who thought about interpersonal relationships during the run. These results supplement findings on the effects of certain thought patterns during strenuous exercise.

Perfectionism Dimensions and the Five–factor Model of Personality

2012 ◽  
Vol 26 (3) ◽  
pp. 233-244 ◽  
Author(s):  
David M. Dunkley ◽  
Kirk R. Blankstein ◽  
Jody–Lynn Berg
Keyword(s):  
Positive Emotions ◽  
Factor Model ◽  
Five Factor Model ◽  
Higher Order ◽  
Theoretical Frameworks ◽  
Confirmatory Factor Analyses ◽  
Personal Standards ◽  
Neo Personality Inventory ◽  
Evaluative Concerns ◽  
Confirmatory Factor

This study of university students ( n = 357) and community adults ( n = 223) examined personal standards (PS) and evaluative concerns (EC) higher–order dimensions of perfectionism that underlie several measures from three different theoretical frameworks. In both students and community adults, confirmatory factor analyses supported PS perfectionism and EC perfectionism higher–order latent factors. In relation to the revised NEO Personality Inventory, PS perfectionism was primarily related to conscientiousness and achievement striving. In contrast, EC perfectionism was primarily related to neuroticism, and lower positive emotions, trust and competence. EC perfectionism accounted for unique variance in current depressive and anxious symptoms over and above the five–factor domain scores. Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Development and preliminary evaluation of a brief five-factor personality instrument

2021 ◽  
Vol 49 (7) ◽  
pp. 1-8
Author(s):  
Weiliang Lim ◽  
Elaine Chapman
Keyword(s):  
Internal Structure ◽  
Factor Structure ◽  
Factor Model ◽  
Five Factor Model ◽  
Personality Factor ◽  
Preliminary Evaluation ◽  
Response Format ◽  
Factor Analyses ◽  
Confirmatory Factor Analyses ◽  
Confirmatory Factor

Instruments to measure personality traits in the five-factor model of personality are typically lengthy, which can hamper their use in studies with multiple measures. In this study we developed a brief five-factor instrument based on a bipolar statement response format and validated the instrument for use in the Singapore education context. The 20-item Brief Five-Factor Instrument (BFFI) comprises four items to measure each personality factor in the five-factor model. To evaluate the internal structure of the BFFI, students at two polytechnics in Singapore responded to the scale (Polytechnic A, n = 421; Polytechnic B, n = 271). Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses were conducted to evaluate the factor structure of the measure. Results suggest that the BFFI has promise for use in the Singapore education context.

Brief Form of the Interpersonal Competence Questionnaire (ICQ-15)

2015 ◽  
Vol 31 (4) ◽  
pp. 272-279 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adina Coroiu ◽  
Alexandra Meyer ◽  
Carlos A. Gomez-Garibello ◽  
Elmar Brähler ◽  
Aike Hessel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Factor Model ◽  
Five Factor Model ◽  
Population Data ◽  
Interpersonal Competence ◽  
Clinical Settings ◽  
Preliminary Evaluation ◽  
Confirmatory Factor Analyses ◽  
Confirmatory Factor ◽  
The Us ◽  
Assessment Time

Abstract. The Interpersonal Competence Questionnaire (ICQ) developed by Buhrmester and colleagues ( 1988 ) in the US assesses the multidimensional construct of social competence via five distinct, but related subscales. Two versions comprising 40 and 30 items, respectively, are available in German. The purpose of the current study is to develop and validate a brief version of the ICQ among a large adult sample that is representative of the German general population. Data were collected from 2,009 participants. Three confirmatory factor analyses (CFA) were conducted in order to develop and validate the ICQ-15. Cronbach’s alpha coefficients were computed for the ICQ-15. An initial CFA with the ICQ-30 formed the basis for the selection of the items to be included in the ICQ-15. Two subsequent CFA’s with the ICQ-15 revealed an excellent fit of the hypothesized five-factor model to the observed data. Internal consistency coefficients were in the adequate range. This preliminary evaluation shows that the ICQ-15 is a structurally valid measure of interpersonal competence recommended for research contexts with limited assessment time and for psychotherapy progress tracking in clinical settings.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document